Pedagogically, There Is No Room for a Native Speaker.

The current review study challenges the pedagogical role of native English-speaking teacher along with his/her role as a teaching model. The language （English） that about 500 years ago was just spoken by five to seven million speakers living in the British Isles, currently is globally taught, learned, and used by at least one and a half billion speakers living in different countries of the world （Crystal, 2003）. Therefore, one may find native speakers of varieties of Englishes, namely, American, Australian, Canadian, Indian, or British English... rather than the native speaker of pure English. Definitely, the Englishes used by these speakers globally are partially different from one another in terms of lexicon, pronunciation, and even grammar. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to convince the English teachers that there should not be any sensitivity to teaching just one type of English or taking any speakers of these varieties of Englishes as a teaching model. Preferably, in this study, it has been tried to acknowledge teaching interanational （formal） English which might be understandable to English speakers of the world. All in all, the findings of this review study indicated that English teachers all around the world should adopt the language （English） and adapt it based on the cultural norms of the learners and try to help them gain the mastery of language to use it locally and internationally when needed.

Native-speakerism in China:An Investigation of Foreign Language Education Policy and Learners’Attitudes

With the development of globalization,the use of English is no longer restricted to native speaker(NS)but also widely spread to non-native speaker(NNS).The importance of English learning is also acknowledged by Expanding and Outer Circle,and English as a foreign language(EFL)education plays a significant role in China’s education.Admitting the fact that non-native English teachers(NNESTs)take up a large proportion of English teachers,English language teaching(ELT)is still greatly influenced by native-speakerism.This research aims to investigate language ideologies reflected in Chinese foreign language education policy(FLEP)at higher education level,and Chinese English learners’attitudes towards native-speakerism and English teachers.A mixed method of policy analysis and survey is adopted in this research.After conducting analysing two FLEPs in higher education level,it is found that linguistic instrumentalism is the prominent language ideology,although native-speakerism and standard English ideology is implicitly demonstrated.Questionnaire is used to investigate 58 Chinese English learners’attitudes,revealing that most participants do not demonstrate bias towards either NESTs or NNESTs.Instead,the strengths and weaknesses of both NEST and NNEST are identified,though participants adhere to native-speakerism in terms of English variety.Overall,English learner’s attitudes are consistent with language ideologies in FLEPs.This research may provide implications for future studies on addressing native-speakerism in Chinese FLEPs,as well as relationship of students’attitudes and language policies.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CLASSROOM DISCOURSE STRUCTURES IN THE COLLEGE ENGLISH CLASSES IN CHINA

The present study, using Discourse Analysis method, makes a comparative study of the interactive features of two groups of college English teaching classes, one instructed by native speakers of English, the other by Chinese teachers of English. It has been found that TST (Teacher-Student-Teacher) structure occurs more frequently in the classes taught by Chinese teachers of English. It is suggested that Chinese teachers put their classes under stricter control than native English teachers do.