Ethnic Issues of China's Neighboring Countries and Their Impact on National Security

In the international community,the internal ethnic issues of one country can easily spread out of its borders through the impact of internal and external factors to affect the national security of other countries,known as the spillover effect.Presently,the ethnic issues of China's neighboring countries that have real consequences on the country's national security break down mainly into four types:the internal ethnic conflict,the transnational ethnic issue,the issues related with immigrants and the collaboration of the Three Forces.The risk of spillover can be summed up according to the intensity of its effect in five categories:infiltration,springboard,spillover,immigration and harassment.As diverse ethnic issues of the neighboring countries have different effects on China's national security,the Chinese government must grasp the core element of each issue to formulate specific policies.

A Delegation of Friendly People from Neighboring Countries Visited China

At the invitation of the Chinese Association for International Understanding(CAFIU),a17-member delegation of friendly people from the political circle,NGOs,think tanks and media of Bangladesh,Nepal,Indonesia,the Philippines and Brunei visited China during July 19 and28.The members of the delegation were either old friends or new acquaintances of China,and therefore all boasted a lot of close links

NGO Leaders from Four Neighboring Countries Visit China

正At the invitation of CAFIU, a 24-member delegation consisting of NGO leaders from four neighboring countries visited China from May 13 to 26. The four NGOs are Bangladesh-China People's Friendship Association (BCPFA), Delhi Study Group (DSG)of India, Nepal Council

NGO Delegation of Neighboring Countries Visited China

At the invitation of the Chinese Association for International Understanding(CAFIU),a 15-member delegation composed of delegates from NGOs,think tanks and media from Bangladesh,Indonesia,Pakistan and Sri Lanka visited China from July 20 to 31.During their stay in China,the delegation members listened to briefings about China’s basic national conditions and the concept of

The Treaty of San Francisco From the Perspective of International Peace Movements in Early Twentieth-Century America

The leaders of the Meiji Restoration believed in their master, Yoshida Shoin （吉田松陰）, who claimed that in order for the islands of Japan not to be a colony of the powerful Western states, Japan had to conquer nearby countries. This led to Japan’s invasion of the Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan, Korea, and Manchuria, which ultimately led to the Manchurian Incident of 1931, the Sino-Japanese War, and the Pacific War. Surprisingly, the subject and the timing of each and every one of these acts of war were in the same order of Yoshida Shoin’s proposal on preoccupancy. The Sino-Japanese war of 1894 was romanticized as clearing the barbaric culture by civilization, and the Russo-Japanese war of 1904 was romanticized as the realization of Eastern Peace. However, Japanese policies of aggressions were first deemed illegal by international law during the 1931 Manchurian Incident by the investigations of the League of Nations. The Japanese Empire received the recommendation by the League of Nations to restore to original state, but declined and exited from the League of Nations. Following their exit, they started the Sino-Japanese War and the Pacific War and eventually lost in 1945. The goal of the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951 was to punish Japan’s aggressions. However, as the Cold War between the East and the West started to arise in 1948, the punishment was eased, and their punishment for the aggressions on the Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan, and Korea was nearly unasked for. This paper examines the issues of the San Francisco Peace Treaty in the views of the international law of the League of Nations, established by Manley O. Hudson of Harvard University and others in U.S. academia and judiciary.

Japan's Conception of the East Asian Order during the Edo Period and Its

Following the Meiji Restoration,Japan rapidly embarked on a path of external aggression and expansion.While during the Edo period in Japan,this historical trajectory appeared to be a result of rapid capitalist development,the conception of overturning the regional order in East Asia had already begun to surface.In terms of ideology,Edo-era intellectuals,drawing inspiration from Chinese Confucianism and Japanese classical literature,sought to bridge the cultural gap between China and Japan,thereby shaping Japan's cultural superiority.Politically,Edo Japan attempted to establish a political framework superior to neighboring countries through diplomatic protocols,and even formulated expansionist plans in the face of internal social crises and threats posed by Russian encroachment southward.Modern Japanese incursions such as the annexation of Ryukyu,the annexation of Korea,and the occupation of Taiwan are all associated with Edoera notions of“Japanese cultural superiority”and“subjugation of neighboring countries”The ambition of Edo Japanese thinkers to overturn the East Asian regional order not only influenced the historical trajectory of modern Japan but also predestined a modern East Asia of unrest and turmoil.