Cell transplantation has come to the forefront of regenerative medicine alongside the discovery and application of stem cells in both research and clinical settings.There are several types of stem cells currently bein...Cell transplantation has come to the forefront of regenerative medicine alongside the discovery and application of stem cells in both research and clinical settings.There are several types of stem cells currently being used for pre-clinical regenerative therapies,each with unique characteristics,benefits and limitations.This brief review will focus on recent basic science advancements made with embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.Both embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells provide platforms for new neurons to replace dead and/or dying cells following injury.Due to their capacity for reprogramming and differentiation into any neuronal type,research in preclinical rodent models has shown that embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells can integrate,survive and form connections in the nervous system similar to de novo cells.Going forward however,there are some limitations to consider with the use of either stem cell type.Ethically,embryonic stem cells are not an ideal source of cells,genetically,induced pluripotent stem cells are not ideal in terms of personalized treatment for those with certain genetic diseases the latter of which may guide regenerative medicine away from personalized stem cell based therapies and into optimized stem cell banks.Nonetheless,the potential of these stem cells in central nervous system regenerative therapy is only beginning to be appreciated.For example,through genetic modification,stem cells serve as ideal platforms to reintroduce missing or downregulated molecules into the nervous system to further induce regenerative growth.In this review,we highlight the limitations of stem cell based therapies whilst discussing some of the means of overcoming these limitations.展开更多
Millions of people worldwide are affected by traumatic spinal cord injury,which usually results in permanent sensorimotor disability.Damage to the spinal cord leads to a series of detrimental events including ischaemi...Millions of people worldwide are affected by traumatic spinal cord injury,which usually results in permanent sensorimotor disability.Damage to the spinal cord leads to a series of detrimental events including ischaemia,haemorrhage and neuroinflammation,which over time result in further neural tissue loss.Eventually,at chronic stages of traumatic spinal cord injury,the formation of a glial scar,cystic cavitation and the presence of numerous inhibitory molecules act as physical and chemical barriers to axonal regrowth.This is further hindered by a lack of intrinsic regrowth ability of adult neurons in the central nervous system.The intracellular signalling molecule,cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate(cAMP),is known to play many important roles in the central nervous system,and elevating its levels as shown to improve axonal regeneration outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury in animal models.However,therapies directly targeting cAMP have not found their way into the clinic,as cAMP is ubiquitously present in all cell types and its manipulation may have additional deleterious effects.A downstream effector of cAMP,exchange protein directly activated by cAMP 2(Epac2),is mainly expressed in the adult central nervous system,and its activation has been shown to mediate the positive effects of cAMP on axonal guidance and regeneration.Recently,using ex vivo modelling of traumatic spinal cord injury,Epac2 activation was found to profoundly modulate the post-lesion environment,such as decreasing the activation of astrocytes and microglia.Pilot data with Epac2 activation also suggested functional improvement assessed by in vivo models of traumatic spinal cord injury.Therefore,targeting Epac2 in traumatic spinal cord injury could represent a novel strategy in traumatic spinal cord injury repair,and future work is needed to fully establish its therapeutic potential.展开更多
基金This work was supported by the Wessex Medical Research Trust and the Biotechnology and Biological Research Council(both to MRA).
文摘Cell transplantation has come to the forefront of regenerative medicine alongside the discovery and application of stem cells in both research and clinical settings.There are several types of stem cells currently being used for pre-clinical regenerative therapies,each with unique characteristics,benefits and limitations.This brief review will focus on recent basic science advancements made with embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.Both embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells provide platforms for new neurons to replace dead and/or dying cells following injury.Due to their capacity for reprogramming and differentiation into any neuronal type,research in preclinical rodent models has shown that embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells can integrate,survive and form connections in the nervous system similar to de novo cells.Going forward however,there are some limitations to consider with the use of either stem cell type.Ethically,embryonic stem cells are not an ideal source of cells,genetically,induced pluripotent stem cells are not ideal in terms of personalized treatment for those with certain genetic diseases the latter of which may guide regenerative medicine away from personalized stem cell based therapies and into optimized stem cell banks.Nonetheless,the potential of these stem cells in central nervous system regenerative therapy is only beginning to be appreciated.For example,through genetic modification,stem cells serve as ideal platforms to reintroduce missing or downregulated molecules into the nervous system to further induce regenerative growth.In this review,we highlight the limitations of stem cell based therapies whilst discussing some of the means of overcoming these limitations.
基金supported by Scottish Rugby Union funding to WH and DSthe NRB PhD scholarship from the International Spinal Rsesarch Trust to AGBa Hot-Start Scholarship from the University of aberdeen to DD。
文摘Millions of people worldwide are affected by traumatic spinal cord injury,which usually results in permanent sensorimotor disability.Damage to the spinal cord leads to a series of detrimental events including ischaemia,haemorrhage and neuroinflammation,which over time result in further neural tissue loss.Eventually,at chronic stages of traumatic spinal cord injury,the formation of a glial scar,cystic cavitation and the presence of numerous inhibitory molecules act as physical and chemical barriers to axonal regrowth.This is further hindered by a lack of intrinsic regrowth ability of adult neurons in the central nervous system.The intracellular signalling molecule,cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate(cAMP),is known to play many important roles in the central nervous system,and elevating its levels as shown to improve axonal regeneration outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury in animal models.However,therapies directly targeting cAMP have not found their way into the clinic,as cAMP is ubiquitously present in all cell types and its manipulation may have additional deleterious effects.A downstream effector of cAMP,exchange protein directly activated by cAMP 2(Epac2),is mainly expressed in the adult central nervous system,and its activation has been shown to mediate the positive effects of cAMP on axonal guidance and regeneration.Recently,using ex vivo modelling of traumatic spinal cord injury,Epac2 activation was found to profoundly modulate the post-lesion environment,such as decreasing the activation of astrocytes and microglia.Pilot data with Epac2 activation also suggested functional improvement assessed by in vivo models of traumatic spinal cord injury.Therefore,targeting Epac2 in traumatic spinal cord injury could represent a novel strategy in traumatic spinal cord injury repair,and future work is needed to fully establish its therapeutic potential.