Background: Cardiothoracic surgery is a common cause of acute respiratory failure and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the outcomes of open heart surgery patients treated using...Background: Cardiothoracic surgery is a common cause of acute respiratory failure and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the outcomes of open heart surgery patients treated using oxygen delivery devices with patients who receive NIV as a first-line therapy for hypoxemic respiratory failure. Materials and Methods: 40 patients who developed acute hypoxemic respiratory failure after open heart surgery and admitted to cardiothoracic ICU 20 patients received NIV and 20 patient received oxygen by venture mask. For all patients the following measurements were performed before and after CPAP AND Venture use: CBC, blood urea, serum creatinine body temperature, chest X-ray, Arterial blood gases (arterial pH, sodium bicarbonate, pcO2, SpO2 and PaO2-to-FiO2 ratio). Results: Mean PO2 and SO2 have increased after using of both venture and Cpap, increase in both PCO2 and HCO3 levels after using Venturi mask, CPAP mask was superior to venturi mask in avoiding the need of intubation, decreasing The ICU stay median length and also median length of hospitalization, all were lower in CPAP group than venture group. Also the mortality rate was lower in CPAP group than the venturi group. Conclusion: Using CPAP mask in severe AHRF following open heart surgery can avoid intubation, decreases the levels of tachypnea and arterial hypoxemia, decreases ICU stay, the length of hospitalization and also decreases the mortality rate compared with patients receiving high-concentration oxygen therapy with venture mask.展开更多
目的探讨喉罩通气技术用于妇科手术微创麻醉的可行性。方法美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)分级为Ⅰ~Ⅱ级妇科全身麻醉手术患者80例,随机分为两组(Ⅰ组:气管导管全身麻醉组;Ⅱ组:喉罩全身麻醉组),每组40例...目的探讨喉罩通气技术用于妇科手术微创麻醉的可行性。方法美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)分级为Ⅰ~Ⅱ级妇科全身麻醉手术患者80例,随机分为两组(Ⅰ组:气管导管全身麻醉组;Ⅱ组:喉罩全身麻醉组),每组40例,均采用静脉吸入复合全身麻醉,麻醉诱导、维持及复苏所用药物种类相同,但Ⅰ组采用气管导管通气技术,Ⅱ组采用喉罩通气技术。记录并比较两组在不同时点的心率、血压数值,患者插管/置罩反应情况,麻醉复苏期患者耐受气管导管/喉罩情况及发生恶心、呕吐、呛咳、体动、咽喉痛等不良反应情况,统计并比较两组麻醉药物使用量,手术医师的满意度及患者的舒适度评分。结果与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅱ组在麻醉诱导气管插管后及麻醉复苏期拔管前的心率、心率,平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)保持稳定(P<0.001),患者诱导期插管/置罩反应发生率、复苏期的不耐受率和不良反应发生率显著降低(P<0.001),患者的麻醉药物使用量明显降低(P<0.001),患者和手术医师的满意度明显增高(P<0.001)。结论喉罩通气是一种微创操作,具有置入快捷、刺激性小、血流动力学平稳、麻醉药物使用量少、并发症少、手术医生满意度高、患者舒适度高易于接受等优点,以其提供通气保障的静脉吸入全身麻醉方式是安全、有效的微创麻醉技术之一,值得在临床推广应用。展开更多
文摘Background: Cardiothoracic surgery is a common cause of acute respiratory failure and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the outcomes of open heart surgery patients treated using oxygen delivery devices with patients who receive NIV as a first-line therapy for hypoxemic respiratory failure. Materials and Methods: 40 patients who developed acute hypoxemic respiratory failure after open heart surgery and admitted to cardiothoracic ICU 20 patients received NIV and 20 patient received oxygen by venture mask. For all patients the following measurements were performed before and after CPAP AND Venture use: CBC, blood urea, serum creatinine body temperature, chest X-ray, Arterial blood gases (arterial pH, sodium bicarbonate, pcO2, SpO2 and PaO2-to-FiO2 ratio). Results: Mean PO2 and SO2 have increased after using of both venture and Cpap, increase in both PCO2 and HCO3 levels after using Venturi mask, CPAP mask was superior to venturi mask in avoiding the need of intubation, decreasing The ICU stay median length and also median length of hospitalization, all were lower in CPAP group than venture group. Also the mortality rate was lower in CPAP group than the venturi group. Conclusion: Using CPAP mask in severe AHRF following open heart surgery can avoid intubation, decreases the levels of tachypnea and arterial hypoxemia, decreases ICU stay, the length of hospitalization and also decreases the mortality rate compared with patients receiving high-concentration oxygen therapy with venture mask.
文摘目的探讨喉罩通气技术用于妇科手术微创麻醉的可行性。方法美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)分级为Ⅰ~Ⅱ级妇科全身麻醉手术患者80例,随机分为两组(Ⅰ组:气管导管全身麻醉组;Ⅱ组:喉罩全身麻醉组),每组40例,均采用静脉吸入复合全身麻醉,麻醉诱导、维持及复苏所用药物种类相同,但Ⅰ组采用气管导管通气技术,Ⅱ组采用喉罩通气技术。记录并比较两组在不同时点的心率、血压数值,患者插管/置罩反应情况,麻醉复苏期患者耐受气管导管/喉罩情况及发生恶心、呕吐、呛咳、体动、咽喉痛等不良反应情况,统计并比较两组麻醉药物使用量,手术医师的满意度及患者的舒适度评分。结果与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅱ组在麻醉诱导气管插管后及麻醉复苏期拔管前的心率、心率,平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)保持稳定(P<0.001),患者诱导期插管/置罩反应发生率、复苏期的不耐受率和不良反应发生率显著降低(P<0.001),患者的麻醉药物使用量明显降低(P<0.001),患者和手术医师的满意度明显增高(P<0.001)。结论喉罩通气是一种微创操作,具有置入快捷、刺激性小、血流动力学平稳、麻醉药物使用量少、并发症少、手术医生满意度高、患者舒适度高易于接受等优点,以其提供通气保障的静脉吸入全身麻醉方式是安全、有效的微创麻醉技术之一,值得在临床推广应用。
