Aim: To validate a Vietnamese short version (OHIP- 14VN) for use in epidemiological studies. Methods: The original English-language version was translated into Vietnamese, back translated and after some revisions test...Aim: To validate a Vietnamese short version (OHIP- 14VN) for use in epidemiological studies. Methods: The original English-language version was translated into Vietnamese, back translated and after some revisions tested for psychometric properties. Subjects (n = 724) were asked to self-administer a questionnaire but could ask for assistance. Convergent validity was tested by investigating associations between OHIP domain and total scores, and dichotomized self-reported satisfaction with 1) the dentition in general, 2) chewing function, and 3) esthetics. Groups validity was evaluated by comparing OHIP scores of subjects having ≤6 molars vs. >6 molars and tooth decay vs. no decay. Test-retest reliability was investigated in a convenience sample (n = 54) and expressed in Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha and average interitem correlation coefficients. Results: Validity: all associations were in the hypothesized directions. Differences in mean OHIP total were statistically sig-nificant for all discriminative variables. OHIP scores completed with assistance were significantly lower than those from self-administered questionnaires and therefore analyzed separately. For both administration formats differences in mean scores were still significant for “satisfaction” but for having ≤6 molars or decay the differences lost significance for most domain and total scores. Reliability: ICCs ranged from 0.54 - 0.74. Internal consistency: Cronbach’s alphas for OHIP total scores were 0.93 (self-administered) and 0.91 (with assistance). Average interitem correlation coefficients ranged from 0.26 - 0.67 (self-administered) and 0.28 - 0.69 (with assistance). Conclusions: This Vietnamese version of the OHIP-14 demonstrated good construct validity and acceptable reliability for OHIP total scores however OHIP-14VN domain scores should be interpreted with caution.展开更多
目的探讨牙周内窥镜(periodontal endoscope,PE)辅助龈下刮治和根面平整术(scaling and root plan⁃ning,SRP)的临床疗效及对牙周炎患者心理和生活质量的影响,为临床应用牙周内窥镜提供参考。方法本研究已通过单位伦理委员会审查批准,并...目的探讨牙周内窥镜(periodontal endoscope,PE)辅助龈下刮治和根面平整术(scaling and root plan⁃ning,SRP)的临床疗效及对牙周炎患者心理和生活质量的影响,为临床应用牙周内窥镜提供参考。方法本研究已通过单位伦理委员会审查批准,并获得患者知情同意。收集2018年4月—2022年12月于南京大学医学院附属口腔医院牙周病科就诊的,传统SRP治疗6周后复查仍有残留牙周袋探诊深度(probing depth,PD)≥5 mm的牙周炎患者,进一步行PE辅助SRP(PE+SRP)。在传统SRP治疗后6周,PE+SRP治疗3个月后分别测量牙周临床指标包括菌斑指数(plaque index,PLI)、PD、临床附着丧失(clinical attachment loss,CAL)及探诊出血(bleeding on probing,BOP);同时分别收集传统SRP和PE辅助SRP治疗即刻视觉模拟评分量表(visual analogue scale,VAS);在传统SRP治疗和PE辅助SRP治疗3个月后分别收集牙周组织自我认知表、口腔健康影响程度量表⁃14(oral health impact profile⁃14,OHIP⁃14)以及牙科畏惧调查量表(dental fear scale,DFS)。结果共纳入牙周炎患者23例,患牙486颗,832个位点纳入临床研究。PE+SRP治疗后3个月,各项牙周临床指标:PLI(t=9.254,P<0.001)、PD(t=50.724,P<0.001)、CAL(t=22.407,P<0.001)以及BOP(t=9.217,P<0.001)均显著改善;与传统SRP(VAS:2.48±1.70)相比,PE+SRP(VAS:2.57±1.80)给患者带来的疼痛感无显著差异(t=0.192,P=0.850);两组牙周组织自我认知表得分无显著性差异(t=1.485,P=0.152);同时传统SRP完成后OHIP⁃14的得分为(12.13±7.63)分,PE+SRP完成后OHIP⁃14得分为(10.26±5.25)分,两者无显著差异(t=-1.589,P=0.126);传统SRP完成后DFS量表得分为(40.70±12.63)分,PE+SRP完成后DFS量表得分为(41.57±12.61)分,两者无显著差异(t=0.404,P=0.690)。结论PE辅助SRP治疗牙周炎患者残留牙周袋后各项牙周临床指标均显著改善,且与传统SRP相比,PE辅助SRP对牙周炎患者的生活质量和心理状况没有负面影响,可以临床广泛推广。展开更多
目的:观察儿童正畸患者治疗前后其父母生活质量的变化;分析Family Impact Scale(FIS)问卷对正畸治疗的应答性。方法:从正畸临床病人中随机挑选122例儿童患者,其父母分别在正畸前后填写汉语化的FIS问卷,治疗前后的模型采用ICON指数(Index...目的:观察儿童正畸患者治疗前后其父母生活质量的变化;分析Family Impact Scale(FIS)问卷对正畸治疗的应答性。方法:从正畸临床病人中随机挑选122例儿童患者,其父母分别在正畸前后填写汉语化的FIS问卷,治疗前后的模型采用ICON指数(Index of Complexity,Outcome and Need)进行评价。结果:治疗结束后家长的FIS值比治疗前显著降低,治疗前后FIS差值与家长的自我评价一致,但与ICON治疗前后差值没有显著关系。结论:正畸治疗后患者家长的生活质量显著提高,FIS问卷能够用于对患者家长生活质量的评估。展开更多
目的:探讨使用义齿稳固剂对老年全口义齿佩戴者口腔健康相关生活质量(Oral Health-Related Quality of Life,OHRQoL)的影响。方法:选取2016年1月-2017年6月收治的老年牙列缺失患者60例,将其随机分成对照组和试验组,各30例。采用口腔健...目的:探讨使用义齿稳固剂对老年全口义齿佩戴者口腔健康相关生活质量(Oral Health-Related Quality of Life,OHRQoL)的影响。方法:选取2016年1月-2017年6月收治的老年牙列缺失患者60例,将其随机分成对照组和试验组,各30例。采用口腔健康影响程度量表中文版(Oral Health Impact Profile,OHIP-14)来评价生活质量。全口义齿初戴时由患者本人填写OHIP-14量表。对照组给予常规治疗和护理,试验组在对照组基础上使用义齿稳固剂,修复3个月后再次填写OHIP-14量表。采用SPSS22.0软件包对相关数据进行统计学分析。结果:全口义齿初戴时试验组的OHIP-14量表总分为(17.13±3.937),对照组OHIP-14量表总分为(15.43±4.032),两组无统计学差异;修复3个月后试验组的OH IP-14量表总分为(8.20±2.511)分,显著低于对照组(13.30±3.789)分,差异主要体现在口腔功能上的限制、生理性疼痛、生理障碍、心理障碍四个方面。结论:使用义齿稳固剂可提高老年全口义齿佩戴者口腔健康相关的生活质量。展开更多
文摘Aim: To validate a Vietnamese short version (OHIP- 14VN) for use in epidemiological studies. Methods: The original English-language version was translated into Vietnamese, back translated and after some revisions tested for psychometric properties. Subjects (n = 724) were asked to self-administer a questionnaire but could ask for assistance. Convergent validity was tested by investigating associations between OHIP domain and total scores, and dichotomized self-reported satisfaction with 1) the dentition in general, 2) chewing function, and 3) esthetics. Groups validity was evaluated by comparing OHIP scores of subjects having ≤6 molars vs. >6 molars and tooth decay vs. no decay. Test-retest reliability was investigated in a convenience sample (n = 54) and expressed in Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha and average interitem correlation coefficients. Results: Validity: all associations were in the hypothesized directions. Differences in mean OHIP total were statistically sig-nificant for all discriminative variables. OHIP scores completed with assistance were significantly lower than those from self-administered questionnaires and therefore analyzed separately. For both administration formats differences in mean scores were still significant for “satisfaction” but for having ≤6 molars or decay the differences lost significance for most domain and total scores. Reliability: ICCs ranged from 0.54 - 0.74. Internal consistency: Cronbach’s alphas for OHIP total scores were 0.93 (self-administered) and 0.91 (with assistance). Average interitem correlation coefficients ranged from 0.26 - 0.67 (self-administered) and 0.28 - 0.69 (with assistance). Conclusions: This Vietnamese version of the OHIP-14 demonstrated good construct validity and acceptable reliability for OHIP total scores however OHIP-14VN domain scores should be interpreted with caution.
文摘目的探讨牙周内窥镜(periodontal endoscope,PE)辅助龈下刮治和根面平整术(scaling and root plan⁃ning,SRP)的临床疗效及对牙周炎患者心理和生活质量的影响,为临床应用牙周内窥镜提供参考。方法本研究已通过单位伦理委员会审查批准,并获得患者知情同意。收集2018年4月—2022年12月于南京大学医学院附属口腔医院牙周病科就诊的,传统SRP治疗6周后复查仍有残留牙周袋探诊深度(probing depth,PD)≥5 mm的牙周炎患者,进一步行PE辅助SRP(PE+SRP)。在传统SRP治疗后6周,PE+SRP治疗3个月后分别测量牙周临床指标包括菌斑指数(plaque index,PLI)、PD、临床附着丧失(clinical attachment loss,CAL)及探诊出血(bleeding on probing,BOP);同时分别收集传统SRP和PE辅助SRP治疗即刻视觉模拟评分量表(visual analogue scale,VAS);在传统SRP治疗和PE辅助SRP治疗3个月后分别收集牙周组织自我认知表、口腔健康影响程度量表⁃14(oral health impact profile⁃14,OHIP⁃14)以及牙科畏惧调查量表(dental fear scale,DFS)。结果共纳入牙周炎患者23例,患牙486颗,832个位点纳入临床研究。PE+SRP治疗后3个月,各项牙周临床指标:PLI(t=9.254,P<0.001)、PD(t=50.724,P<0.001)、CAL(t=22.407,P<0.001)以及BOP(t=9.217,P<0.001)均显著改善;与传统SRP(VAS:2.48±1.70)相比,PE+SRP(VAS:2.57±1.80)给患者带来的疼痛感无显著差异(t=0.192,P=0.850);两组牙周组织自我认知表得分无显著性差异(t=1.485,P=0.152);同时传统SRP完成后OHIP⁃14的得分为(12.13±7.63)分,PE+SRP完成后OHIP⁃14得分为(10.26±5.25)分,两者无显著差异(t=-1.589,P=0.126);传统SRP完成后DFS量表得分为(40.70±12.63)分,PE+SRP完成后DFS量表得分为(41.57±12.61)分,两者无显著差异(t=0.404,P=0.690)。结论PE辅助SRP治疗牙周炎患者残留牙周袋后各项牙周临床指标均显著改善,且与传统SRP相比,PE辅助SRP对牙周炎患者的生活质量和心理状况没有负面影响,可以临床广泛推广。
文摘目的:观察儿童正畸患者治疗前后其父母生活质量的变化;分析Family Impact Scale(FIS)问卷对正畸治疗的应答性。方法:从正畸临床病人中随机挑选122例儿童患者,其父母分别在正畸前后填写汉语化的FIS问卷,治疗前后的模型采用ICON指数(Index of Complexity,Outcome and Need)进行评价。结果:治疗结束后家长的FIS值比治疗前显著降低,治疗前后FIS差值与家长的自我评价一致,但与ICON治疗前后差值没有显著关系。结论:正畸治疗后患者家长的生活质量显著提高,FIS问卷能够用于对患者家长生活质量的评估。
文摘目的:探讨使用义齿稳固剂对老年全口义齿佩戴者口腔健康相关生活质量(Oral Health-Related Quality of Life,OHRQoL)的影响。方法:选取2016年1月-2017年6月收治的老年牙列缺失患者60例,将其随机分成对照组和试验组,各30例。采用口腔健康影响程度量表中文版(Oral Health Impact Profile,OHIP-14)来评价生活质量。全口义齿初戴时由患者本人填写OHIP-14量表。对照组给予常规治疗和护理,试验组在对照组基础上使用义齿稳固剂,修复3个月后再次填写OHIP-14量表。采用SPSS22.0软件包对相关数据进行统计学分析。结果:全口义齿初戴时试验组的OHIP-14量表总分为(17.13±3.937),对照组OHIP-14量表总分为(15.43±4.032),两组无统计学差异;修复3个月后试验组的OH IP-14量表总分为(8.20±2.511)分,显著低于对照组(13.30±3.789)分,差异主要体现在口腔功能上的限制、生理性疼痛、生理障碍、心理障碍四个方面。结论:使用义齿稳固剂可提高老年全口义齿佩戴者口腔健康相关的生活质量。
