This study analyses the role played by organizational ambidexterity and open innovation in innovation outputs,considering business units with different levels of technological intensity(medium-high and high tech,and m...This study analyses the role played by organizational ambidexterity and open innovation in innovation outputs,considering business units with different levels of technological intensity(medium-high and high tech,and medium-low and low tech)for countries with different inno-vation profiles.The countries considered in this paper are i)Estonia and Slovenia as innovation followers;i)Slovakia,Hungary,Spain,Czech Republic,Italy,Portugal,Norway,and Croatia as moderate innovators;and ii)Bulgaria,Lithuania and Romania as modest innovators.In the empirical approach,the research hypotheses arise from the literature review and are tested using secondary data collected from the Community Innovation Survey(CIS)201o.The conceptual model is tested using the logistic regression method,which indicates suitable accuracy and reliability for empirical testing purposes.The evidence reveals that for innovation followers,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of eco-innovation,marketing innovation,and product innovation.For moderate innovators,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of product innovation,process innovation,and eco-innovation.Concerning modest in-novators,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of product innovation,process innovation,and eco-innovation.With regard to open innovation,for innovation followers,this has a negative influence on product innovation in medium-high and high-tech companies.For moderate innovators,open innovation has a greater influence in process,organizational,and eco-innovation.In the case of modest innovators,open innovation is more significant for innovation outputs in product,organizational,and marketing innovation.Size is not always positively related to innovation outputs.展开更多
In order to provide channels of human resource management in promoting organizational learning,structural equation models were used for identifying the differences in the coupling dimensions between human resource arc...In order to provide channels of human resource management in promoting organizational learning,structural equation models were used for identifying the differences in the coupling dimensions between human resource archetypes and organizational learning modes based on sample data of 219 manufacturing firms with more than 100 employees.It is found that the coupling of the cooperative human resource archetype and exploitative learning is reflected in the mechanistic structure dimension;the coupling of the cooperative human resource archetype and exploratory learning is reflected in the two dimensions of the mechanistic structure and specialist cognition;the coupling of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype and exploitative learning is reflected in the two dimensions of generalist cognition and cognitive trust;the coupling of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype and exploratory learning is reflected in the dimension of generalist cognition.When manufacturing firms pursue exploitative learning,it is suggested that they pay attention to the structure dimension management of the collaborative human resource archetype and the cognition and affect dimensions management of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype.When manufacturing firms pursue exploratory learning,it is suggested pay attention to the structure and cognition dimensions management of the collaborative human resource archetype and the cognition dimension management of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype.展开更多
High tech organizations confront dual demands of exploration and exploitation,particularly in today’s competitive environment marked by a trend of volatility,uncertainty,complexity,and ambiguity.Although there is gen...High tech organizations confront dual demands of exploration and exploitation,particularly in today’s competitive environment marked by a trend of volatility,uncertainty,complexity,and ambiguity.Although there is general consensus about the relationship between ambidexterity and firm performance,few studies have probed into the mechanism of how it is applied in the strategic management process.Considering the premise of environmental change,this research considers a multilevel perspective on the nature of organizational ambidexterity and its functioning in the whole strategic management process.Through a comparative case study of the two most famous high tech companies in China,a model is provided to reflect the functioning of organizational ambidexterity where a cognitive pattern of top management teamsplays a critical role in the ability that the organizations demonstrate.This research also contributes to the literature of entrepreneurship by extending innovation from a demand-side perspective,where the core of product/market exploration/exploitation activities could be expanded into customer value creation.Undertaking a careful analysis of the mechanism of organizational ambidexterity,this research sheds new light on the literature of strategic management that operates in a more turbulent environment.展开更多
The influence of organizational ambidexterity on innovation and the growth of enterprises has gradually become an important research topic in the field of strategic management and organization theory. This paper build...The influence of organizational ambidexterity on innovation and the growth of enterprises has gradually become an important research topic in the field of strategic management and organization theory. This paper builds up a theoretical framework of the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance with regards to corporate entrepreneurship orientation. We select 175 companies from high and new technology industries in China＇s three large cities, Beijing, Tianjin and Dalian, as samples to carry out an empirical test. We find that the balance and complement of organizational ambidexterity are positively correlated with the innovation performance of enterprises; a corporate entrepreneurial orientation has a significantly moderating effect on the relationship between the balance dimension of organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance, yet it has no significant positive moderating effect on the relationship between the combined dimension oforganizational ambidexterity and innovation performance.展开更多
以Web of Science数据库中历年有关组织双元文献为研究对象,借助Citespace Ⅲ软件,利用共引分析理论和寻径网络算法绘制组织双元研究领域知识图谱,探究组织双元研究变化趋势和研究热点。研究发现:(1)组织双元研究逐渐受到学者关注和重视...以Web of Science数据库中历年有关组织双元文献为研究对象,借助Citespace Ⅲ软件,利用共引分析理论和寻径网络算法绘制组织双元研究领域知识图谱,探究组织双元研究变化趋势和研究热点。研究发现:(1)组织双元研究逐渐受到学者关注和重视;(2)组织双元研究发展遵循多视角和多层次的演进路径;(3)组织双元研究已经形成外部前因、双元情景、管理者、环境、战略柔性、效率困境、双元假设等七大领域以及创新悖论管理、渐进式创新和双元领导等三大组织双元前沿问题。展开更多
基金supported by The Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology(Grants and NECE-UIDB/04630/2020)which provided financial support for this study.NECE and this work are supported by FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia,I.P.by project reference UIDB/04630/2020 and D0I identifier 10.54499/UIDP/04630/2020.
文摘This study analyses the role played by organizational ambidexterity and open innovation in innovation outputs,considering business units with different levels of technological intensity(medium-high and high tech,and medium-low and low tech)for countries with different inno-vation profiles.The countries considered in this paper are i)Estonia and Slovenia as innovation followers;i)Slovakia,Hungary,Spain,Czech Republic,Italy,Portugal,Norway,and Croatia as moderate innovators;and ii)Bulgaria,Lithuania and Romania as modest innovators.In the empirical approach,the research hypotheses arise from the literature review and are tested using secondary data collected from the Community Innovation Survey(CIS)201o.The conceptual model is tested using the logistic regression method,which indicates suitable accuracy and reliability for empirical testing purposes.The evidence reveals that for innovation followers,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of eco-innovation,marketing innovation,and product innovation.For moderate innovators,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of product innovation,process innovation,and eco-innovation.Concerning modest in-novators,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of product innovation,process innovation,and eco-innovation.With regard to open innovation,for innovation followers,this has a negative influence on product innovation in medium-high and high-tech companies.For moderate innovators,open innovation has a greater influence in process,organizational,and eco-innovation.In the case of modest innovators,open innovation is more significant for innovation outputs in product,organizational,and marketing innovation.Size is not always positively related to innovation outputs.
基金The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.71764015).
文摘In order to provide channels of human resource management in promoting organizational learning,structural equation models were used for identifying the differences in the coupling dimensions between human resource archetypes and organizational learning modes based on sample data of 219 manufacturing firms with more than 100 employees.It is found that the coupling of the cooperative human resource archetype and exploitative learning is reflected in the mechanistic structure dimension;the coupling of the cooperative human resource archetype and exploratory learning is reflected in the two dimensions of the mechanistic structure and specialist cognition;the coupling of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype and exploitative learning is reflected in the two dimensions of generalist cognition and cognitive trust;the coupling of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype and exploratory learning is reflected in the dimension of generalist cognition.When manufacturing firms pursue exploitative learning,it is suggested that they pay attention to the structure dimension management of the collaborative human resource archetype and the cognition and affect dimensions management of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype.When manufacturing firms pursue exploratory learning,it is suggested pay attention to the structure and cognition dimensions management of the collaborative human resource archetype and the cognition dimension management of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype.
文摘High tech organizations confront dual demands of exploration and exploitation,particularly in today’s competitive environment marked by a trend of volatility,uncertainty,complexity,and ambiguity.Although there is general consensus about the relationship between ambidexterity and firm performance,few studies have probed into the mechanism of how it is applied in the strategic management process.Considering the premise of environmental change,this research considers a multilevel perspective on the nature of organizational ambidexterity and its functioning in the whole strategic management process.Through a comparative case study of the two most famous high tech companies in China,a model is provided to reflect the functioning of organizational ambidexterity where a cognitive pattern of top management teamsplays a critical role in the ability that the organizations demonstrate.This research also contributes to the literature of entrepreneurship by extending innovation from a demand-side perspective,where the core of product/market exploration/exploitation activities could be expanded into customer value creation.Undertaking a careful analysis of the mechanism of organizational ambidexterity,this research sheds new light on the literature of strategic management that operates in a more turbulent environment.
基金Acknowledgements This research is supported by the National Social Science Fund Major Project, ＂The New Organization Theory And Organizational Governance Research＂ （11 ＆ ZD153） National Natural Science Foundation Project ＂ The Effects of Corporate Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Learning on the Continuous Growth of Mature Firms from an Organizational Inertia Perspective.＂ （71372067）+2 种基金 China Scholarship Council Project Humanities and Social Sciences general project of the Education Ministry ＂The Research of Organizational Inertia based on Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Learning＂ （11YJC630001） Guangzhou Municipal Colleges and Universities social science project ＂The Formation and Implementation Mechanism Study of Independent Innovation Ability from the Perspective of Organization Inertia＂ （08B061）.
文摘The influence of organizational ambidexterity on innovation and the growth of enterprises has gradually become an important research topic in the field of strategic management and organization theory. This paper builds up a theoretical framework of the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance with regards to corporate entrepreneurship orientation. We select 175 companies from high and new technology industries in China＇s three large cities, Beijing, Tianjin and Dalian, as samples to carry out an empirical test. We find that the balance and complement of organizational ambidexterity are positively correlated with the innovation performance of enterprises; a corporate entrepreneurial orientation has a significantly moderating effect on the relationship between the balance dimension of organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance, yet it has no significant positive moderating effect on the relationship between the combined dimension oforganizational ambidexterity and innovation performance.
文摘以Web of Science数据库中历年有关组织双元文献为研究对象,借助Citespace Ⅲ软件,利用共引分析理论和寻径网络算法绘制组织双元研究领域知识图谱,探究组织双元研究变化趋势和研究热点。研究发现:(1)组织双元研究逐渐受到学者关注和重视;(2)组织双元研究发展遵循多视角和多层次的演进路径;(3)组织双元研究已经形成外部前因、双元情景、管理者、环境、战略柔性、效率困境、双元假设等七大领域以及创新悖论管理、渐进式创新和双元领导等三大组织双元前沿问题。
