The orthometric height (OH) system plays a key role in geodesy, and it has broad applications in various fields and activities. Based on general relativity theory (GRT), on an arbitrary equi-geo- potential surface, th...The orthometric height (OH) system plays a key role in geodesy, and it has broad applications in various fields and activities. Based on general relativity theory (GRT), on an arbitrary equi-geo- potential surface, there does not exist the gravity frequency shift of an electromagnetic wave signal. However, between arbitrary two different equi-geopotential surfaces, there exists the gra- vity frequency shift of the signal. The relationship between the geopotential difference and the gravity frequency shift between arbitrary two points P and Q is referred to as the gravity frequency shift equation. Based on this equation, one can determine the geopotential difference as well as the OH difference between two separated points P and Q either by using electromagnetic wave signals propagated between P and Q, or by using the Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite signals received simultaneously by receivers at P and Q. Suppose an emitter at P emits a signal with frequency f towards a receiver at Q, and the received frequency of the signal at Q is , or suppose an emitter on board a flying GPS satellite emits signals with frequency f towards two receivers at P and Q on ground, and the received frequencies of the signals at P and Q are and , respectively, then, the geopoten-tial dif- ference between these two points can be determined based on the geopotential frequen- cy shift equation, using either the gravity frequency shift ? f or ? , and the corresponding OH difference is further determined based on the Bruns’ formula. Besides, using this approach a unified world height datum system might be realized, because P and Q could be chosen quite arbitrarily, e.g., they are located on two separated continents or islands.展开更多
Many applications in geodesy, hydrography and engineering require geoid-related heights. Spirit leveling which is the traditional means of obtaining geoid- or mean sea level-related heights is slow, time-consuming and...Many applications in geodesy, hydrography and engineering require geoid-related heights. Spirit leveling which is the traditional means of obtaining geoid- or mean sea level-related heights is slow, time-consuming and costly. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) offer faster and relatively cheaper way of obtaining geoid-related heights when geoidal undulation is applied to ellipsoidal heights. However, difficulties involved in determining acceptable geoid height have seriously hampered the application of GNSS for leveling in Rivers State, thus necessitating the need to develop an acceptable geoid model which will serve as a means of conversion of GNSS-delivered ellipsoidal heights to their orthometric heights equivalent. In pursuance of this objective, a detailed gravimetric geoid has been evaluated for Rivers State, Nigeria. The computation of the geoid was carried out by the traditional remove-restore procedure. The Earth Geopotential Model 2008 (EGM08) was applied as the reference field for both the remove and restore parts of the procedures;spherical Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) was employed for the evaluation of the Molodenskii’s integral formula for the height anomaly, (ζ) to yield the quasi-geoid;while the Residual Terrain Modelling (RTM) was done by prism integration. The classical gravimetric geoid over Rivers State was obtained from the rigorously evaluated quasi-geoid by adding the quasi-geoid to geoid (N?- ζ) correction it. The minimum and maximum geoid height values are 18.599 m and 20.114 m respectively with standard deviation of 0.345 m across the study area. Comparison of the gravimetric geoidal heights with the GPS/Leveling-derived geoidal heights of 13 stations across Rivers State, Nigeria showed that the absolute agreement with respect to the GPS/leveling datum is generally better than 7 cm root mean squares (r.m.s) error. Results also showed that combining both GPS heights and the computed Rivers State geoid model can give orthometric heights accurate to 3 cm post-fit using a 4-parameter empirical model. The geoid model can thus serve as a good alternative to traditional leveling when used with GPS leveling, particularly for third order leveling in the study area.展开更多
Distance between the main land and island is so long that it is very difficult to precisely connect the height datum across the sea with the traditional method like the trigonometric leveling, or it is very expensive ...Distance between the main land and island is so long that it is very difficult to precisely connect the height datum across the sea with the traditional method like the trigonometric leveling, or it is very expensive and takes long time to implement the height transfer with the geopotential technique. We combine the data of GPS surveying, astro-geodesy and EGM2008 to precisely connect the orthometric height across the sea with the improved astronomical leveling method in the paper. The Qiongzhou Strait is selected as the test area for the height connection over the sea. We precisely determine the geodetic latitudes, longitudes, heights and deflections of the vertical for four points on both sides across the strait. Modeled deflections of the vertical along the height connecting routes over the sea are determined with EGM2008 model based on the geodetic positions and heights of the sea segmentation points from DNSC08MSS model. Differences of the measured and modeled deflections of the vertical are calculated at four points on both sides and linearly change along the route. So the deflections of the vertical along the route over the sea can be improved by the linear interpolation model. The results are also in accord with those of trigonometirc levelings. The practical case shows that we can precisely connect the orthometric height across the Qiongzhou Strait to satisfy the requirement of order 3 leveling network of China. The method is very efficient to precisely connect the height datum across the sea along the route up to 80 km.展开更多
Shallow layer method(SLM)based on the definition of the geoid can determine the gravity field inside the shallow layer.In this study,the orthometric height of Mount Everest(HME)is calculated based on SLM,in which the ...Shallow layer method(SLM)based on the definition of the geoid can determine the gravity field inside the shallow layer.In this study,the orthometric height of Mount Everest(HME)is calculated based on SLM,in which the key is to construct the shallow layer model.The top and bottom boundaries of the shallow layer model are the natural surface of the Earth and the surface at a certain depth below the reference geoid,respectively.The model-combined strategies to determine the geoid undulation(N)based on SLM are applied to calculate the HME by two approaches:(1)direct calculation by combining N and geodetic height(h);(2)calculation by the segment summation approach(SSA)using the gravity field inside the shallow layer.On December 8,2020,the Chinese and Nepalese governments announced an authoritative value of 8848.86 m,which is referred to a geoid determined by the International Height Reference System(IHRS)(i.e.,the geopotential is 62636853.4 m^(2) s^(-2)).Here,our results(combined strategies(1)EGM2008 and CRUST1.0,(2)EGM2008 and CRUST2.0,(3)EIGEN-6 C4 and CRUST1.0,and(4)EIGEN-6 C4 and CRUST2.0)are referred to the geoid defined by WGS84(i.e.,the geopotential is 62636851.7 m^(2) s^(-2)).The differences between our results and the authoritative value(8848.86 m)are 0.448 m,-0.009 m,-0.295 m,and -0.741 m by the first approach,and 0.539 m,0.083 m,-0.214 m,and -0.647 m by the second approach.When the reference surface WGS84 geoid is converted to the IHRS geoid,the differences are 0.620 m,0.163 m,-0.123 m,and -0.569 m by the first approach,and0.711 m,0.225 m,-0.042 m,and -0.475 m by the second approach.展开更多
The determination of accurate orthometric or normal heights remains one of the main challenges for the geodetic community in Ethiopia.These heights are required for geodetic and geodynamic scientific research as well ...The determination of accurate orthometric or normal heights remains one of the main challenges for the geodetic community in Ethiopia.These heights are required for geodetic and geodynamic scientific research as well as for extensive engineering applications.The main objective of this study is to estimate the geoid-to-quasi geoid separation(GQS)in Ethiopia(ETH-GQS).Such separation would be required for the conversion between geoid and quasigeoid models,which is mandatory for the determination of accurate geodetic heights in mountain regions.The airborne free-air gravity anomalies and the topo-graphic information retrieved from the SRTM3(Shuttle Radar Topography Mission of a spatial resolution 3 arc-second)digital elevation model were used to compute the ETH-GQS model according to the Sjoberg's strict formula for the geoid-to-quasigeoid separation.The ETH-GQS was then validated using GNSS-levelling data as well as geoid heights determined from different Global Geopotential Models(GGMs),namely the EGM2008,EIGEN-6C4 and GECO.The results reveal that the standard deviation of differences between the geoid heights obtained from the EIGEN-6C4 model and the geometric geoid heights obtained from GNSS-levelling data were improved by~75%(i.e.from~24 to~6 cm)when considering GQS values obtained from the ETH-GQS.展开更多
Digital Elevation Models(DEMs)contain topographic relief data that are vital for many geoscience applications.This study relies on the vertical accuracy of publicly available latest high-resolution(30 m)global DEMs ov...Digital Elevation Models(DEMs)contain topographic relief data that are vital for many geoscience applications.This study relies on the vertical accuracy of publicly available latest high-resolution(30 m)global DEMs over Cameroon.These models are(1)the ALOS World 3D-30 m(AW3D30),(2)the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 1 Arc-Second CBand Global DEM(SRTM 1)and(3)the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Global DEM Version 2(ASTER GDEM 2).After matching their coordinate systems and datums,the horizontal positional accuracy evaluation was carried out and it shows that geolocation errors significantly influence the vertical accuracy of global DEMs.After this,the three models are compared among them,in order to access random and systematic effects in the elevation data each of them contains.Further,heights from 555 GPS/leveling points distributed all over Cameroon are compared to each DEM,for their vertical accuracy determination.Traditional and robust statistical measures,normality test,outlier detection and removal were used to describe the vertical quality of the DEMs.The test of the normality rejected the hypothesis of normal distribution for all tested global DEMs.Overall vertical accuracies obtained for the three models after georeferencing and gross error removal in terms of Root Mean Square(RMS)and Normalized Median Absolute Deviation(NMAD)are:AW3D30(13.06 m and 7.75 m),SRTM 1(13.25 m and 7.41 m)and ASTER GDEM 2(18.87 m and 13.30 m).Other accuracy measures(MED,68.3% quantile,95% quantile)supply some evidence of the good quality of AW3D30 over Cameroon.Further,the effect of land cover and slope on DEM vertical accuracy was also analyzed.All models have proved to be worse in the areas dominated by forests and shrubs areas.SRTM 1 and AW3D30 are more resilient to the effects of the scattering objects respectively in forests and cultivated areas.The dependency of DEMs accuracy on the terrain roughness is evident.In all slope intervals,AW3D30 is performing better than SRTM 1 and ASTER GDEM 2 over Cameroon.AW3D30 is more representative of the external topography over Cameroon in comparison with two others datasets and SRTM 1 can be a serious alternative to AW3D30 for a range of DEM applications in Cameroon.展开更多
IT is known that the Mt. Qomolangma is the highest peak in the world. It was recorded in the'Map of Complete Territory of the Qin Dynasty' (published in 1717). As the highest peak,the Mt. Qomolangma not only p...IT is known that the Mt. Qomolangma is the highest peak in the world. It was recorded in the'Map of Complete Territory of the Qin Dynasty' (published in 1717). As the highest peak,the Mt. Qomolangma not only provokes the interest of climbers but also arouses much atten-tion of geodesists. A significant cause is that the Mt. Qomolangma is located in the collisionbelt between the Indian Plate and the Eurasian Plate. According to the relative展开更多
文摘The orthometric height (OH) system plays a key role in geodesy, and it has broad applications in various fields and activities. Based on general relativity theory (GRT), on an arbitrary equi-geo- potential surface, there does not exist the gravity frequency shift of an electromagnetic wave signal. However, between arbitrary two different equi-geopotential surfaces, there exists the gra- vity frequency shift of the signal. The relationship between the geopotential difference and the gravity frequency shift between arbitrary two points P and Q is referred to as the gravity frequency shift equation. Based on this equation, one can determine the geopotential difference as well as the OH difference between two separated points P and Q either by using electromagnetic wave signals propagated between P and Q, or by using the Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite signals received simultaneously by receivers at P and Q. Suppose an emitter at P emits a signal with frequency f towards a receiver at Q, and the received frequency of the signal at Q is , or suppose an emitter on board a flying GPS satellite emits signals with frequency f towards two receivers at P and Q on ground, and the received frequencies of the signals at P and Q are and , respectively, then, the geopoten-tial dif- ference between these two points can be determined based on the geopotential frequen- cy shift equation, using either the gravity frequency shift ? f or ? , and the corresponding OH difference is further determined based on the Bruns’ formula. Besides, using this approach a unified world height datum system might be realized, because P and Q could be chosen quite arbitrarily, e.g., they are located on two separated continents or islands.
文摘Many applications in geodesy, hydrography and engineering require geoid-related heights. Spirit leveling which is the traditional means of obtaining geoid- or mean sea level-related heights is slow, time-consuming and costly. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) offer faster and relatively cheaper way of obtaining geoid-related heights when geoidal undulation is applied to ellipsoidal heights. However, difficulties involved in determining acceptable geoid height have seriously hampered the application of GNSS for leveling in Rivers State, thus necessitating the need to develop an acceptable geoid model which will serve as a means of conversion of GNSS-delivered ellipsoidal heights to their orthometric heights equivalent. In pursuance of this objective, a detailed gravimetric geoid has been evaluated for Rivers State, Nigeria. The computation of the geoid was carried out by the traditional remove-restore procedure. The Earth Geopotential Model 2008 (EGM08) was applied as the reference field for both the remove and restore parts of the procedures;spherical Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) was employed for the evaluation of the Molodenskii’s integral formula for the height anomaly, (ζ) to yield the quasi-geoid;while the Residual Terrain Modelling (RTM) was done by prism integration. The classical gravimetric geoid over Rivers State was obtained from the rigorously evaluated quasi-geoid by adding the quasi-geoid to geoid (N?- ζ) correction it. The minimum and maximum geoid height values are 18.599 m and 20.114 m respectively with standard deviation of 0.345 m across the study area. Comparison of the gravimetric geoidal heights with the GPS/Leveling-derived geoidal heights of 13 stations across Rivers State, Nigeria showed that the absolute agreement with respect to the GPS/leveling datum is generally better than 7 cm root mean squares (r.m.s) error. Results also showed that combining both GPS heights and the computed Rivers State geoid model can give orthometric heights accurate to 3 cm post-fit using a 4-parameter empirical model. The geoid model can thus serve as a good alternative to traditional leveling when used with GPS leveling, particularly for third order leveling in the study area.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40974004)the National High-Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program,Grant No. 2009AA121405)+1 种基金the Key Laboratory of Surveying and Mapping Technology on Island and Reef of NASMG,China (Grant No. 2011A01)the Key Laboratory of Advanced Engineering Surveying of NASMG,China (Grant No. TJES1101)
文摘Distance between the main land and island is so long that it is very difficult to precisely connect the height datum across the sea with the traditional method like the trigonometric leveling, or it is very expensive and takes long time to implement the height transfer with the geopotential technique. We combine the data of GPS surveying, astro-geodesy and EGM2008 to precisely connect the orthometric height across the sea with the improved astronomical leveling method in the paper. The Qiongzhou Strait is selected as the test area for the height connection over the sea. We precisely determine the geodetic latitudes, longitudes, heights and deflections of the vertical for four points on both sides across the strait. Modeled deflections of the vertical along the height connecting routes over the sea are determined with EGM2008 model based on the geodetic positions and heights of the sea segmentation points from DNSC08MSS model. Differences of the measured and modeled deflections of the vertical are calculated at four points on both sides and linearly change along the route. So the deflections of the vertical along the route over the sea can be improved by the linear interpolation model. The results are also in accord with those of trigonometirc levelings. The practical case shows that we can precisely connect the orthometric height across the Qiongzhou Strait to satisfy the requirement of order 3 leveling network of China. The method is very efficient to precisely connect the height datum across the sea along the route up to 80 km.
基金supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundations of China under Grants Nos.41631072,42030105,41721003,41804012,and 41874023。
文摘Shallow layer method(SLM)based on the definition of the geoid can determine the gravity field inside the shallow layer.In this study,the orthometric height of Mount Everest(HME)is calculated based on SLM,in which the key is to construct the shallow layer model.The top and bottom boundaries of the shallow layer model are the natural surface of the Earth and the surface at a certain depth below the reference geoid,respectively.The model-combined strategies to determine the geoid undulation(N)based on SLM are applied to calculate the HME by two approaches:(1)direct calculation by combining N and geodetic height(h);(2)calculation by the segment summation approach(SSA)using the gravity field inside the shallow layer.On December 8,2020,the Chinese and Nepalese governments announced an authoritative value of 8848.86 m,which is referred to a geoid determined by the International Height Reference System(IHRS)(i.e.,the geopotential is 62636853.4 m^(2) s^(-2)).Here,our results(combined strategies(1)EGM2008 and CRUST1.0,(2)EGM2008 and CRUST2.0,(3)EIGEN-6 C4 and CRUST1.0,and(4)EIGEN-6 C4 and CRUST2.0)are referred to the geoid defined by WGS84(i.e.,the geopotential is 62636851.7 m^(2) s^(-2)).The differences between our results and the authoritative value(8848.86 m)are 0.448 m,-0.009 m,-0.295 m,and -0.741 m by the first approach,and 0.539 m,0.083 m,-0.214 m,and -0.647 m by the second approach.When the reference surface WGS84 geoid is converted to the IHRS geoid,the differences are 0.620 m,0.163 m,-0.123 m,and -0.569 m by the first approach,and0.711 m,0.225 m,-0.042 m,and -0.475 m by the second approach.
基金conducted in the framework of the statutory project “Problems of Geodesy and Geodynamics” of the Institute of Geodesy and Cartography (IGiK), Warsaw, financially supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Educationsupported by the Hong Kong GRF RGC project 15218819: “The modernization of height datum in the Hong Kong territories”
文摘The determination of accurate orthometric or normal heights remains one of the main challenges for the geodetic community in Ethiopia.These heights are required for geodetic and geodynamic scientific research as well as for extensive engineering applications.The main objective of this study is to estimate the geoid-to-quasi geoid separation(GQS)in Ethiopia(ETH-GQS).Such separation would be required for the conversion between geoid and quasigeoid models,which is mandatory for the determination of accurate geodetic heights in mountain regions.The airborne free-air gravity anomalies and the topo-graphic information retrieved from the SRTM3(Shuttle Radar Topography Mission of a spatial resolution 3 arc-second)digital elevation model were used to compute the ETH-GQS model according to the Sjoberg's strict formula for the geoid-to-quasigeoid separation.The ETH-GQS was then validated using GNSS-levelling data as well as geoid heights determined from different Global Geopotential Models(GGMs),namely the EGM2008,EIGEN-6C4 and GECO.The results reveal that the standard deviation of differences between the geoid heights obtained from the EIGEN-6C4 model and the geometric geoid heights obtained from GNSS-levelling data were improved by~75%(i.e.from~24 to~6 cm)when considering GQS values obtained from the ETH-GQS.
文摘Digital Elevation Models(DEMs)contain topographic relief data that are vital for many geoscience applications.This study relies on the vertical accuracy of publicly available latest high-resolution(30 m)global DEMs over Cameroon.These models are(1)the ALOS World 3D-30 m(AW3D30),(2)the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 1 Arc-Second CBand Global DEM(SRTM 1)and(3)the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Global DEM Version 2(ASTER GDEM 2).After matching their coordinate systems and datums,the horizontal positional accuracy evaluation was carried out and it shows that geolocation errors significantly influence the vertical accuracy of global DEMs.After this,the three models are compared among them,in order to access random and systematic effects in the elevation data each of them contains.Further,heights from 555 GPS/leveling points distributed all over Cameroon are compared to each DEM,for their vertical accuracy determination.Traditional and robust statistical measures,normality test,outlier detection and removal were used to describe the vertical quality of the DEMs.The test of the normality rejected the hypothesis of normal distribution for all tested global DEMs.Overall vertical accuracies obtained for the three models after georeferencing and gross error removal in terms of Root Mean Square(RMS)and Normalized Median Absolute Deviation(NMAD)are:AW3D30(13.06 m and 7.75 m),SRTM 1(13.25 m and 7.41 m)and ASTER GDEM 2(18.87 m and 13.30 m).Other accuracy measures(MED,68.3% quantile,95% quantile)supply some evidence of the good quality of AW3D30 over Cameroon.Further,the effect of land cover and slope on DEM vertical accuracy was also analyzed.All models have proved to be worse in the areas dominated by forests and shrubs areas.SRTM 1 and AW3D30 are more resilient to the effects of the scattering objects respectively in forests and cultivated areas.The dependency of DEMs accuracy on the terrain roughness is evident.In all slope intervals,AW3D30 is performing better than SRTM 1 and ASTER GDEM 2 over Cameroon.AW3D30 is more representative of the external topography over Cameroon in comparison with two others datasets and SRTM 1 can be a serious alternative to AW3D30 for a range of DEM applications in Cameroon.
文摘IT is known that the Mt. Qomolangma is the highest peak in the world. It was recorded in the'Map of Complete Territory of the Qin Dynasty' (published in 1717). As the highest peak,the Mt. Qomolangma not only provokes the interest of climbers but also arouses much atten-tion of geodesists. A significant cause is that the Mt. Qomolangma is located in the collisionbelt between the Indian Plate and the Eurasian Plate. According to the relative