AIM:To determine if there were any interactions between cardiac devices and small bowel capsules secondary to electromagnetic interference (EMI) in patients who have undergone small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE).METH...AIM:To determine if there were any interactions between cardiac devices and small bowel capsules secondary to electromagnetic interference (EMI) in patients who have undergone small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE).METHODS:Authors conducted a chart review of 20 patients with a cardiac pacemaker (CP) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who underwent continuous electrocardiographic monitoring during their SBCE from 2003-2008.authors searched for unexplained electrocardiogram (ECG) findings,changes in CP andICD set parameters,any abnormality in transmitted capsule data,and adverse clinical events.RESULTS:There were no adverse events or hemodynamically significant arrhythmias reported.CP and ICD set parameters were preserved.The majority of ECG abnormalities were also found in pre-or post-SBCE ECG tracings and the CP behavior during arrhythmias appeared appropriate.Two patients seemed to have episodes of undersensing by the CP.However,similar findings were documented in ECGs taken outside the time frame of the SBCE.One patient was observed to have a low signal encountered from the capsule resulting in lack of localization,but no images were lost.CONCLUSION:Capsule-induced EMI remains a possibility but is unlikely to be clinically important.CPinduced interference of SBCE is also possible,but is infrequent and does not result in loss of images transmitted by the capsule.展开更多
Objectives To explore the optimized program-control mode of a dual-chamber pacemaker combined withβ-blocker to treat congenital long QT syndrome(LQTS). Methods 12 LQTS patients in our hospital that still have symptom...Objectives To explore the optimized program-control mode of a dual-chamber pacemaker combined withβ-blocker to treat congenital long QT syndrome(LQTS). Methods 12 LQTS patients in our hospital that still have symptoms despite use of regular drug therapies or that can not endure the therapies were implanted with DDD cardiac pacemaker.The QT/QTc intervals of those patients were measured at different pacing rates respectively.Their cardiac pacemakers were all programmed to selectively turn on and turn off some related functions at the pacing rate of 80 beats/min.The dosage ofβ-blockers was adjusted according to the patients’ PR intervals and blood pressures.The MACE and the cardiac function of the patients were recorded after operation.Results The measured QT / QTc interval decreased with the pacing rate increasing.The pacing rate of 80 beats/min can make QT/QTc interval basically normal. The MACE of the patients were statistically declined(P = 0.003) and no negative effect on cardiac function was found during the follow-up.Conclusions The optimized program-control mode of a dual-chamber pacemaker combined withβ-blocker to treat congenital LQTS are:to pace at the rate of 80 beats/min and program to turn off lag,sleep,automatic preventing PMT and automatic threshold-capture feature and turn on the PVC,rate adaptation and atrioventricular node priority function.展开更多
Our Letter to the Editor, related to the article "Small bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Outcome analysis using telemetry" by Cuschieri...Our Letter to the Editor, related to the article "Small bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Outcome analysis using telemetry" by Cuschieri et al , comments on some small errors, that slipped into the authors discussions. The given informations concerning the pacemakerand implantable cardioverter defibrillators modes were inaccurate and differ between the text and the table. Moreover, as 8 of 20 patient's pacemakers were programmed to VOO or DOO ("interference mode") and one patient was not monitored by telemetry during capsule endoscopy, 9 of 20 patients (45%) lack the informations of possible interference between capsule endoscopy their implanted device. Another objection refers to the interpretation of an electrocardiogram (figure 1, trace B) presented: in contrast to the author's opinion the marked spike should be interpreted as an artefact and not as "undersensing of a fibrillatory wave". Finally, three comments to cited reviews were not complete respectively not quoted correctly.展开更多
目的:为选择长期有效和适宜的低起搏器输出。方法:23例心动过缓患者植入起搏器Minix 2台,Prevail 2台及 Premier19台,激素电极4023型4条和4003型19条。用9710 E 程控器(Medtronic)以手控测阈值法和遥测技术(RTT)随访慢性起搏阈值,平均...目的:为选择长期有效和适宜的低起搏器输出。方法:23例心动过缓患者植入起搏器Minix 2台,Prevail 2台及 Premier19台,激素电极4023型4条和4003型19条。用9710 E 程控器(Medtronic)以手控测阈值法和遥测技术(RTT)随访慢性起搏阈值,平均电池耗电(μA)和脉冲能量输出(μJ)等参数3~27个月以上。结果:1.6 V 和0.8 V 的慢性起搏脉宽阈值分别为0.11±0.04(0.06~0.18)ms 和0.20±0.08(0.12~0.42)ms,并发现1.6 V 和2倍于其脉宽阈值起搏的电池耗电量(5.45±0.59μA)比0.8 V和3倍于其脉宽阈值起搏的5.96±0.88μA更低(P<0.05)而1.6 V 起搏的脉冲能量输出(1.74±0.53μJ)则比0.8 V 起搏(0.92±0.40μJ)更大(P<0.001)。设置1.6 V 和其脉宽阈值的2倍(脉宽阈值0.06 ms 时置于0.18 ms)的平均安全范围(能量输出/能量阈值)为5.6倍,随访16~40个月证明起搏良好,预期平均寿命为21.2±2.13年,均明显优于设置输出为0.8 V 和3倍于其脉宽阈值的工作寿命(19.5±2.65年)及其安全范围(3倍)。结论:本结果提示起搏器输出1.6 V 比0.8V 的预期起搏器寿命更长(21.2比19.5年),且其平均安全范围更大(5.6比3.0)。展开更多
文摘AIM:To determine if there were any interactions between cardiac devices and small bowel capsules secondary to electromagnetic interference (EMI) in patients who have undergone small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE).METHODS:Authors conducted a chart review of 20 patients with a cardiac pacemaker (CP) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who underwent continuous electrocardiographic monitoring during their SBCE from 2003-2008.authors searched for unexplained electrocardiogram (ECG) findings,changes in CP andICD set parameters,any abnormality in transmitted capsule data,and adverse clinical events.RESULTS:There were no adverse events or hemodynamically significant arrhythmias reported.CP and ICD set parameters were preserved.The majority of ECG abnormalities were also found in pre-or post-SBCE ECG tracings and the CP behavior during arrhythmias appeared appropriate.Two patients seemed to have episodes of undersensing by the CP.However,similar findings were documented in ECGs taken outside the time frame of the SBCE.One patient was observed to have a low signal encountered from the capsule resulting in lack of localization,but no images were lost.CONCLUSION:Capsule-induced EMI remains a possibility but is unlikely to be clinically important.CPinduced interference of SBCE is also possible,but is infrequent and does not result in loss of images transmitted by the capsule.
文摘Objectives To explore the optimized program-control mode of a dual-chamber pacemaker combined withβ-blocker to treat congenital long QT syndrome(LQTS). Methods 12 LQTS patients in our hospital that still have symptoms despite use of regular drug therapies or that can not endure the therapies were implanted with DDD cardiac pacemaker.The QT/QTc intervals of those patients were measured at different pacing rates respectively.Their cardiac pacemakers were all programmed to selectively turn on and turn off some related functions at the pacing rate of 80 beats/min.The dosage ofβ-blockers was adjusted according to the patients’ PR intervals and blood pressures.The MACE and the cardiac function of the patients were recorded after operation.Results The measured QT / QTc interval decreased with the pacing rate increasing.The pacing rate of 80 beats/min can make QT/QTc interval basically normal. The MACE of the patients were statistically declined(P = 0.003) and no negative effect on cardiac function was found during the follow-up.Conclusions The optimized program-control mode of a dual-chamber pacemaker combined withβ-blocker to treat congenital LQTS are:to pace at the rate of 80 beats/min and program to turn off lag,sleep,automatic preventing PMT and automatic threshold-capture feature and turn on the PVC,rate adaptation and atrioventricular node priority function.
文摘Our Letter to the Editor, related to the article "Small bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Outcome analysis using telemetry" by Cuschieri et al , comments on some small errors, that slipped into the authors discussions. The given informations concerning the pacemakerand implantable cardioverter defibrillators modes were inaccurate and differ between the text and the table. Moreover, as 8 of 20 patient's pacemakers were programmed to VOO or DOO ("interference mode") and one patient was not monitored by telemetry during capsule endoscopy, 9 of 20 patients (45%) lack the informations of possible interference between capsule endoscopy their implanted device. Another objection refers to the interpretation of an electrocardiogram (figure 1, trace B) presented: in contrast to the author's opinion the marked spike should be interpreted as an artefact and not as "undersensing of a fibrillatory wave". Finally, three comments to cited reviews were not complete respectively not quoted correctly.
文摘目的:为选择长期有效和适宜的低起搏器输出。方法:23例心动过缓患者植入起搏器Minix 2台,Prevail 2台及 Premier19台,激素电极4023型4条和4003型19条。用9710 E 程控器(Medtronic)以手控测阈值法和遥测技术(RTT)随访慢性起搏阈值,平均电池耗电(μA)和脉冲能量输出(μJ)等参数3~27个月以上。结果:1.6 V 和0.8 V 的慢性起搏脉宽阈值分别为0.11±0.04(0.06~0.18)ms 和0.20±0.08(0.12~0.42)ms,并发现1.6 V 和2倍于其脉宽阈值起搏的电池耗电量(5.45±0.59μA)比0.8 V和3倍于其脉宽阈值起搏的5.96±0.88μA更低(P<0.05)而1.6 V 起搏的脉冲能量输出(1.74±0.53μJ)则比0.8 V 起搏(0.92±0.40μJ)更大(P<0.001)。设置1.6 V 和其脉宽阈值的2倍(脉宽阈值0.06 ms 时置于0.18 ms)的平均安全范围(能量输出/能量阈值)为5.6倍,随访16~40个月证明起搏良好,预期平均寿命为21.2±2.13年,均明显优于设置输出为0.8 V 和3倍于其脉宽阈值的工作寿命(19.5±2.65年)及其安全范围(3倍)。结论:本结果提示起搏器输出1.6 V 比0.8V 的预期起搏器寿命更长(21.2比19.5年),且其平均安全范围更大(5.6比3.0)。