Picaresque novel as a genre is usually traced back to the anonymous Lazarillo de Tormes, but mystery surrounds the origin of this paradoxical narrative that appeared in 1554. In particular, the techniques of irony and...Picaresque novel as a genre is usually traced back to the anonymous Lazarillo de Tormes, but mystery surrounds the origin of this paradoxical narrative that appeared in 1554. In particular, the techniques of irony and paradox employed in Lazarillo as vehicles for moral and social satire are influenced by an extremely widespread classical tradition, the rhetorical paradox, recently revived and made popular by Erasmus in his Praise of Folly. Lazarillo＇s ties with a humanist revival of literary genres suited to social satire and self-inquiry extends to other forms of Menippean satire of which the rhetorical paradox and mock oration are only specialized forms. The Golden Ass by Apuleius, a 2nd Century A.D. prose Menippean satire, alluded to in Cervantes＇ Don Quixote, and Lazarillo both employ a frame-story motif, ＂the servant of many masters,＂ as a vehicle for social and moral commentary. A fundamental conflict between how people appear and what in fact they are runs through the narrative, first exemplified by Lazaro＇s clever exposure of others, then extended to Lazaro himself. Paradox extends from Lazaro himself and his actions to the very form and style of the narrative itself. In Paradoxia Epidemica： The Renaissance Tradition of Paradox, Rosalie Colie traces the influence of rhetorical paradox through the literatures of the 16th and 17th century. Rhetorical paradox is a formal defense of an unexpected, unworthy, or indefensible subject, as in Erasmus＇ mock encomium of folly. Rhetorical paradox criticizes and calls into question traditionally received opinion by appearing to assert one position while in fact asserting another by implication. By placing his praise in the mouth of the subject itself of that praise, the praise of folly in the mouth of Folly in Erasmus, or the praise of Lazaro the self-made man in the mouth of Lazaro, the satirist ironically undercuts the reliability of the speaker and removes all objective standards by which the discourse can be measured, Lazaro＇s self-justification is as duplicitous and unreliable as Folly＇s self-praise of folly or the ancient paradox of the Liar： ＂Epimenides the Cretan said, ＇All Cretans are liars.＇＂ The ultimate function of irony and paradox in rhetorical paradox is to stimulate in the reader a process of self-examination and reflection. Lazarillo appears to have been written by a trained humanist, and, further, a humanist familiar with Menippean satire, whether the dialogues of Lucian, the prose satire of Apuleius, or rhetorical paradox as a vehicle of moral and social satire.展开更多
The Book of Songs is a book of propriety passing on rites and teaching people by the form of poetry with unique logic and rhetoric.“Guan Ju”is the most typical poem deducing the propriety of humans from the laws of ...The Book of Songs is a book of propriety passing on rites and teaching people by the form of poetry with unique logic and rhetoric.“Guan Ju”is the most typical poem deducing the propriety of humans from the laws of nature,which is acceptable,convinced and obeyed by the people naturally,friendly and eloquently.Therefore,the logic and rhetoric in The Book of Songs can be reconciled and self-consistent in the poetic thinking of the unity of heaven and humans.展开更多
The current corporate finance is based on the theory framework of new classical economics. Therefore, the main contents such as free cash flow, NPV method and capital structure decision-making are still based on the b...The current corporate finance is based on the theory framework of new classical economics. Therefore, the main contents such as free cash flow, NPV method and capital structure decision-making are still based on the balanced price of product and capital markets, they still can＇t reflect the essential character of corporation. The logic paradox, causes the current corporate finance study under a more and more embarrassing circumstance in the front of enterprise financial management practice, with the feature of value management.展开更多
As a byproduct of solving the surprise-exam paradox, Saul Kripke formulates a ＂dogmatism paradox＂ which seems to show that knowledge entails dogmatism. In this paper, the author analyzes the nature of the dogmatism ...As a byproduct of solving the surprise-exam paradox, Saul Kripke formulates a ＂dogmatism paradox＂ which seems to show that knowledge entails dogmatism. In this paper, the author analyzes the nature of the dogmatism paradox from a logical dynamical perspective. The author suggests that the dogmatism paradox is better understood as a paradox of knowledge attribution rather than of knowledge. Therefore, the dogmatism paradox could be solved without sacrificing the principle of epistemic closure. Based on a famous version of relevant alternatives theory, the author formalizes a logic of knowledge attribution in the style of logical dynamics, namely, public retraction logic, and analyzes how knowledge attributions are retracted with the expansion of relevant altematives.展开更多
Mankind needs Communication and languages are means of it. The art of expressing oneself well has come to be regarded as the abilityto get on’es idea clearly. English rhetoric is the art of effective communication. S...Mankind needs Communication and languages are means of it. The art of expressing oneself well has come to be regarded as the abilityto get on’es idea clearly. English rhetoric is the art of effective communication. So to know something about it will profit us a lot in our reading, writing and even speaking. We may express ourselves either literrally or figuratively. Literal language speaks directly, in matter-of-fact statements. Fiqurative language speaks indirectly. Writing which makes extensiveuse of words展开更多
Gregory Bateson is famous for his description of the ＂double bind＂ that occurs when human （and animal） communication interaction becomes dysfunctional/-/is principal example is the ＂nip versus bite＂ opposition t...Gregory Bateson is famous for his description of the ＂double bind＂ that occurs when human （and animal） communication interaction becomes dysfunctional/-/is principal example is the ＂nip versus bite＂ opposition that he observed when a human and a dog （or two monkies） ＂play＂ （nip） and then play turns to ＂work＂ （bite）.The model is a semiotic failure by not accounting for negation, i.e., ＂labor＂ （not-nip） and ＂leisure＂ （not-bite）. Thus, if there is a double bind, there must be a foundational apposition condition of single-bind （functional communication） in the system, i.e., the possibility of an actual choice, which logically entails a not-choice [potential ＂new＂ choice]. The play/work versus leisure/labor distinction by combination goes back at least to Plato, and in modernity to Ernst Cassirer and Karl Buhler, but has its most strategic communicological development in Maurice Merleau-Ponty＇s tropic logic thesis on Chiasm. The thesis is better known through its application by Roman Jakobson and Claude L6vi-Strauss as a tropic logic of metaphor （attribute--substance quality） and metonymy （part--whole quantity）. My analysis illustrates the tropic logic by contrasting a fundamental metaphysical thesis that Being/Having （Play--Work） and Becoming/Doing （Leisure--Labor） must be phenomenological （tropic） as a basis for Semiotics （logic）. Thus in Communicology, Play is a ＂pretend reality＂ of actual agency, and, Playing is a ＂pretended action in Play＂ of symbolic agency.展开更多
文摘Picaresque novel as a genre is usually traced back to the anonymous Lazarillo de Tormes, but mystery surrounds the origin of this paradoxical narrative that appeared in 1554. In particular, the techniques of irony and paradox employed in Lazarillo as vehicles for moral and social satire are influenced by an extremely widespread classical tradition, the rhetorical paradox, recently revived and made popular by Erasmus in his Praise of Folly. Lazarillo＇s ties with a humanist revival of literary genres suited to social satire and self-inquiry extends to other forms of Menippean satire of which the rhetorical paradox and mock oration are only specialized forms. The Golden Ass by Apuleius, a 2nd Century A.D. prose Menippean satire, alluded to in Cervantes＇ Don Quixote, and Lazarillo both employ a frame-story motif, ＂the servant of many masters,＂ as a vehicle for social and moral commentary. A fundamental conflict between how people appear and what in fact they are runs through the narrative, first exemplified by Lazaro＇s clever exposure of others, then extended to Lazaro himself. Paradox extends from Lazaro himself and his actions to the very form and style of the narrative itself. In Paradoxia Epidemica： The Renaissance Tradition of Paradox, Rosalie Colie traces the influence of rhetorical paradox through the literatures of the 16th and 17th century. Rhetorical paradox is a formal defense of an unexpected, unworthy, or indefensible subject, as in Erasmus＇ mock encomium of folly. Rhetorical paradox criticizes and calls into question traditionally received opinion by appearing to assert one position while in fact asserting another by implication. By placing his praise in the mouth of the subject itself of that praise, the praise of folly in the mouth of Folly in Erasmus, or the praise of Lazaro the self-made man in the mouth of Lazaro, the satirist ironically undercuts the reliability of the speaker and removes all objective standards by which the discourse can be measured, Lazaro＇s self-justification is as duplicitous and unreliable as Folly＇s self-praise of folly or the ancient paradox of the Liar： ＂Epimenides the Cretan said, ＇All Cretans are liars.＇＂ The ultimate function of irony and paradox in rhetorical paradox is to stimulate in the reader a process of self-examination and reflection. Lazarillo appears to have been written by a trained humanist, and, further, a humanist familiar with Menippean satire, whether the dialogues of Lucian, the prose satire of Apuleius, or rhetorical paradox as a vehicle of moral and social satire.
文摘The Book of Songs is a book of propriety passing on rites and teaching people by the form of poetry with unique logic and rhetoric.“Guan Ju”is the most typical poem deducing the propriety of humans from the laws of nature,which is acceptable,convinced and obeyed by the people naturally,friendly and eloquently.Therefore,the logic and rhetoric in The Book of Songs can be reconciled and self-consistent in the poetic thinking of the unity of heaven and humans.
文摘The current corporate finance is based on the theory framework of new classical economics. Therefore, the main contents such as free cash flow, NPV method and capital structure decision-making are still based on the balanced price of product and capital markets, they still can＇t reflect the essential character of corporation. The logic paradox, causes the current corporate finance study under a more and more embarrassing circumstance in the front of enterprise financial management practice, with the feature of value management.
文摘As a byproduct of solving the surprise-exam paradox, Saul Kripke formulates a ＂dogmatism paradox＂ which seems to show that knowledge entails dogmatism. In this paper, the author analyzes the nature of the dogmatism paradox from a logical dynamical perspective. The author suggests that the dogmatism paradox is better understood as a paradox of knowledge attribution rather than of knowledge. Therefore, the dogmatism paradox could be solved without sacrificing the principle of epistemic closure. Based on a famous version of relevant alternatives theory, the author formalizes a logic of knowledge attribution in the style of logical dynamics, namely, public retraction logic, and analyzes how knowledge attributions are retracted with the expansion of relevant altematives.
文摘Mankind needs Communication and languages are means of it. The art of expressing oneself well has come to be regarded as the abilityto get on’es idea clearly. English rhetoric is the art of effective communication. So to know something about it will profit us a lot in our reading, writing and even speaking. We may express ourselves either literrally or figuratively. Literal language speaks directly, in matter-of-fact statements. Fiqurative language speaks indirectly. Writing which makes extensiveuse of words
文摘Gregory Bateson is famous for his description of the ＂double bind＂ that occurs when human （and animal） communication interaction becomes dysfunctional/-/is principal example is the ＂nip versus bite＂ opposition that he observed when a human and a dog （or two monkies） ＂play＂ （nip） and then play turns to ＂work＂ （bite）.The model is a semiotic failure by not accounting for negation, i.e., ＂labor＂ （not-nip） and ＂leisure＂ （not-bite）. Thus, if there is a double bind, there must be a foundational apposition condition of single-bind （functional communication） in the system, i.e., the possibility of an actual choice, which logically entails a not-choice [potential ＂new＂ choice]. The play/work versus leisure/labor distinction by combination goes back at least to Plato, and in modernity to Ernst Cassirer and Karl Buhler, but has its most strategic communicological development in Maurice Merleau-Ponty＇s tropic logic thesis on Chiasm. The thesis is better known through its application by Roman Jakobson and Claude L6vi-Strauss as a tropic logic of metaphor （attribute--substance quality） and metonymy （part--whole quantity）. My analysis illustrates the tropic logic by contrasting a fundamental metaphysical thesis that Being/Having （Play--Work） and Becoming/Doing （Leisure--Labor） must be phenomenological （tropic） as a basis for Semiotics （logic）. Thus in Communicology, Play is a ＂pretend reality＂ of actual agency, and, Playing is a ＂pretended action in Play＂ of symbolic agency.
