Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)and recombinant human granulocyte colonystimulating factor(rhG-CS...Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)and recombinant human granulocyte colonystimulating factor(rhG-CSF)for the prevention of neutropenia in elderly breast cancer patients during adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods A total of 45 oncology inpatients with breast cancer,who received adjuvant chemotherapy and were older than 65 years from May 2017 to October 2018 in the General Hospital of the Northern Theater of the Chinese people’s Liberation Army,were included.Epirubivin Cyclophoshamide-Docetaxel(EC-T)sequential adjuvant chemotherapy was chosen.Forty-five patients were randomly divided into two groups;25 patients in the treatment group were treated with PEG-rhG-CSF and 20 patients in the control group were not treated with PEG-rhG-CSF,but only rhG-CSF.The experimental group was treated with the PEG-rhG-CSF at the end of chemotherapy for 24–48 h,with a 6 mg subcutaneous injection once per chemotherapy cycle.In the control group,rhG-CSF was administered after 48 h of chemotherapy,with a 100μg subcutaneous injection,1/d,d 1–7.The dosage could be increased step by step with the exacerbation of neutropenia.The primary aims of this study was to discover the incidence of leukopenia,neutropenia,neutrophilic fever,and adverse reactions in the two groups.Results The incidence of neutropenia,neutrophilic fever and adverse reactions decreased in the treatment group compared to the control group,but no significant difference existed between two groups(P>0.05).Patients in treatment group had a lower,but not statistically significant,incidence of adverse reactions(P>0.05).Conclusion Applying PEG-rhG-CSF could be effective in preventing neutropenia in elderly patients with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to treat breast cancer.It may effectively control the occurrence of neutropenia after chemotherapy and reduce the chance of infection.The incidence of side effects,such as fever and bone pain,was low.The adverse drug reactions were well tolerated by patients,which could ensure the smooth progress of chemotherapy.展开更多
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)for preventive or delayed treatment in neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradio...Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)for preventive or delayed treatment in neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and hospitalization rate in patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma during definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Methods:A total of 70 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma in Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020,who received PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy,were enrolled in this retrospective analysis.There were 32 patients in the preventive group,and 38 patients in the delayed group.The incidence of neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and neutropeniarelated hospitalization rate were compared between PEG-rhG-CSF preventive group and delayed group.Results:The incidence of severe neutropenia(Grades 3–4)in all patients was 31.4%.Comparison between preventive group and delayed group showed that the incidence of severe neutropenia was 6.3%and 39.4%(χ^(2)=10.428,P=0.001),respectively.In preventive group,the incidence of severe neutropenia was 3.7%and 20.0%,respectively,for primary prevention and secondary prevention of PEG-rhG-CSF(χ^(2)=12.321,P=0.001).The completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 93.8%in the preventive group and 63.2%in the delayed group(χ^(2)=9.220,P=0.002).The incidence of treatment interruption was 25.7%in the whole group,12.5%in the preventive group and 36.8%in the delayed group(χ^(2)=5.389,P=0.020).Seven patients(7/70,10.0%)were hospitalized and treated with intravenous antibiotics for neutropenia,including 1 in the preventive group and 6 in the delayed group(P=0.078).Conclusions:Prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma can effectively reduce the incidence of neutropenia,ensure the safety of treatment,and improve the completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.展开更多
目的:探讨无外周血CD34监测下聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)在血液肿瘤自体外周血干细胞动员中的采集时机及采集效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年8月至2022年1月福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的46例行自体外周血干细胞动...目的:探讨无外周血CD34监测下聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)在血液肿瘤自体外周血干细胞动员中的采集时机及采集效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年8月至2022年1月福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的46例行自体外周血干细胞动员的血液恶性肿瘤患者。采用大剂量化疗联合PEG-rhG-CSF或重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员方案,其中应用PEG-rhG-CSF动员的27例(PEG-rhG-CSF组),应用G-CSF动员的19例(G-CSF组),比较两组患者动员采集效果。结果:46例患者共采集86例次,PEG-rhG-CSF组与G-CSF组获得采集物的单个核细胞中位数分别为6.54(3.85-12.61)×10^(8)/kg和6.15(1.13-11.58)×10^(8)/kg(P>0.05),采集物CD34^(+)细胞数分别为11.44(1.33-65.02)×10^(6)/kg和4.95(0.30-24.02)×10^(6)/kg(P<0.05),采集时机分别为14(10-20)和14(4-22)d(P>0.05)。PEG-rhG-CSF组在外周血白细胞(WBC)≥10×10^(9)/L时单次所采集的产物CD34^(+)细胞数明显高于外周血WBC<10×10^(9)/L时采集的数量[19.04(2.85-65.02)×10^(6)/kg vs 6.22(0.81-34.86)×10^(6)/kg,(P<0.05)]。结论:采用PEG-rhG-CSF动员外周血干细胞单次采集足量CD34^(+)细胞成功率高,中位动员时间为14 d;在无外周血CD34监测情况下,外周血WBC≥10×10^(9)/L可以考虑作为单次采集足量干细胞的采集阈值。展开更多
文摘Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)and recombinant human granulocyte colonystimulating factor(rhG-CSF)for the prevention of neutropenia in elderly breast cancer patients during adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods A total of 45 oncology inpatients with breast cancer,who received adjuvant chemotherapy and were older than 65 years from May 2017 to October 2018 in the General Hospital of the Northern Theater of the Chinese people’s Liberation Army,were included.Epirubivin Cyclophoshamide-Docetaxel(EC-T)sequential adjuvant chemotherapy was chosen.Forty-five patients were randomly divided into two groups;25 patients in the treatment group were treated with PEG-rhG-CSF and 20 patients in the control group were not treated with PEG-rhG-CSF,but only rhG-CSF.The experimental group was treated with the PEG-rhG-CSF at the end of chemotherapy for 24–48 h,with a 6 mg subcutaneous injection once per chemotherapy cycle.In the control group,rhG-CSF was administered after 48 h of chemotherapy,with a 100μg subcutaneous injection,1/d,d 1–7.The dosage could be increased step by step with the exacerbation of neutropenia.The primary aims of this study was to discover the incidence of leukopenia,neutropenia,neutrophilic fever,and adverse reactions in the two groups.Results The incidence of neutropenia,neutrophilic fever and adverse reactions decreased in the treatment group compared to the control group,but no significant difference existed between two groups(P>0.05).Patients in treatment group had a lower,but not statistically significant,incidence of adverse reactions(P>0.05).Conclusion Applying PEG-rhG-CSF could be effective in preventing neutropenia in elderly patients with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to treat breast cancer.It may effectively control the occurrence of neutropenia after chemotherapy and reduce the chance of infection.The incidence of side effects,such as fever and bone pain,was low.The adverse drug reactions were well tolerated by patients,which could ensure the smooth progress of chemotherapy.
文摘Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)for preventive or delayed treatment in neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and hospitalization rate in patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma during definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Methods:A total of 70 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma in Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020,who received PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy,were enrolled in this retrospective analysis.There were 32 patients in the preventive group,and 38 patients in the delayed group.The incidence of neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and neutropeniarelated hospitalization rate were compared between PEG-rhG-CSF preventive group and delayed group.Results:The incidence of severe neutropenia(Grades 3–4)in all patients was 31.4%.Comparison between preventive group and delayed group showed that the incidence of severe neutropenia was 6.3%and 39.4%(χ^(2)=10.428,P=0.001),respectively.In preventive group,the incidence of severe neutropenia was 3.7%and 20.0%,respectively,for primary prevention and secondary prevention of PEG-rhG-CSF(χ^(2)=12.321,P=0.001).The completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 93.8%in the preventive group and 63.2%in the delayed group(χ^(2)=9.220,P=0.002).The incidence of treatment interruption was 25.7%in the whole group,12.5%in the preventive group and 36.8%in the delayed group(χ^(2)=5.389,P=0.020).Seven patients(7/70,10.0%)were hospitalized and treated with intravenous antibiotics for neutropenia,including 1 in the preventive group and 6 in the delayed group(P=0.078).Conclusions:Prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma can effectively reduce the incidence of neutropenia,ensure the safety of treatment,and improve the completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
文摘目的:探讨无外周血CD34监测下聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)在血液肿瘤自体外周血干细胞动员中的采集时机及采集效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年8月至2022年1月福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的46例行自体外周血干细胞动员的血液恶性肿瘤患者。采用大剂量化疗联合PEG-rhG-CSF或重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员方案,其中应用PEG-rhG-CSF动员的27例(PEG-rhG-CSF组),应用G-CSF动员的19例(G-CSF组),比较两组患者动员采集效果。结果:46例患者共采集86例次,PEG-rhG-CSF组与G-CSF组获得采集物的单个核细胞中位数分别为6.54(3.85-12.61)×10^(8)/kg和6.15(1.13-11.58)×10^(8)/kg(P>0.05),采集物CD34^(+)细胞数分别为11.44(1.33-65.02)×10^(6)/kg和4.95(0.30-24.02)×10^(6)/kg(P<0.05),采集时机分别为14(10-20)和14(4-22)d(P>0.05)。PEG-rhG-CSF组在外周血白细胞(WBC)≥10×10^(9)/L时单次所采集的产物CD34^(+)细胞数明显高于外周血WBC<10×10^(9)/L时采集的数量[19.04(2.85-65.02)×10^(6)/kg vs 6.22(0.81-34.86)×10^(6)/kg,(P<0.05)]。结论:采用PEG-rhG-CSF动员外周血干细胞单次采集足量CD34^(+)细胞成功率高,中位动员时间为14 d;在无外周血CD34监测情况下,外周血WBC≥10×10^(9)/L可以考虑作为单次采集足量干细胞的采集阈值。
