In order to distinguish rectal rnucosal prolapse (RMP) from full thickness rectal intassusception(FTRI ). 66 patients with internal rectal prolapse and 36 normal controls were studied with defecopelvicography. Anorect...In order to distinguish rectal rnucosal prolapse (RMP) from full thickness rectal intassusception(FTRI ). 66 patients with internal rectal prolapse and 36 normal controls were studied with defecopelvicography. Anorectal angle,level of pelvic floor and other indices were measured. It was found that 41patients with RMP had no changes of the peritoneal cul-de-sac of pelvic floor and 25 patients with FTRI hadabnormal descent of the peritoneal cul-de-sac of pelvic floor. which formed the internal herniated sac of therectal wall. It is believed that defeco-pelvicography is a reliable method to distinguish RMP from FTRI,anddemonstrate coexistent internal herniated sac of the rectal wall. Our findings are helpful to plan proper management of internal rectal prolapse.展开更多
文摘In order to distinguish rectal rnucosal prolapse (RMP) from full thickness rectal intassusception(FTRI ). 66 patients with internal rectal prolapse and 36 normal controls were studied with defecopelvicography. Anorectal angle,level of pelvic floor and other indices were measured. It was found that 41patients with RMP had no changes of the peritoneal cul-de-sac of pelvic floor and 25 patients with FTRI hadabnormal descent of the peritoneal cul-de-sac of pelvic floor. which formed the internal herniated sac of therectal wall. It is believed that defeco-pelvicography is a reliable method to distinguish RMP from FTRI,anddemonstrate coexistent internal herniated sac of the rectal wall. Our findings are helpful to plan proper management of internal rectal prolapse.
