Study on sex differences and potential clinical value of threedimensional computerized tomography pelvimetry in rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic rectal cancer radical surgery is a complex procedure affected by various factors.However,the existing literature lacks standardized parameters for the pelvic region and soft tissues,which hampers the establishment of consistent conclusions.AIM To comprehensively assess 16 pelvic and 7 soft tissue parameters through computerized tomography(CT)-based three-dimensional(3D)reconstruction,providing a strong theoretical basis to address challenges in laparoscopic rectal cancer radical surgery.METHODS We analyzed data from 218 patients who underwent radical laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer,and utilized CT data for 3D pelvic reconstruction.Specific anatomical points were carefully marked and measured using advanced 3D modeling software.To analyze the pelvic and soft tissue parameters,we emp-loyed statistical methods including paired sample t-tests,Wilcoxon rank-sum tests,and correlation analysis.RESULTS The investigation highlighted significant sex disparities in 14 pelvic bone parameters and 3 soft tissue parameters.Males demonstrated larger measurements in pelvic depth and overall curvature,smaller measurements in pelvic width,a larger mesorectal fat area,and a larger anterior-posterior abdominal diameter.By contrast,females exhibited wider pelvises,shallower depth,smaller overall curvature,and an increased amount of subcutaneous fat tissue.However,there were no significant sex differences observed in certain parameters such as sacral curvature height,superior pubococcygeal diameter,rectal area,visceral fat area,waist circumference,and transverse abdominal diameter.CONCLUSION The reconstruction of 3D CT data enabled accurate pelvic measurements,revealing significant sex differences in both pelvic and soft tissue parameters.This study design offer potential in predicting surgical difficulties and creating personalized surgical plans for male rectal cancer patients with a potentially“difficult pelvis”,ultimately improving surgical outcomes.Further research and utilization of these parameters could lead to enhanced surgical methods and patient care in laparoscopic rectal cancer radical surgery.

Narrow pelvic inlet plane area and obesity as risk factors for anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection

BACKGROUND Intersphincteric resection(ISR)has been increasingly used as the ultimate sphincter-preserving procedure in extremely low rectal cancer.The most critical complication of this technique is anastomotic leakage.The incidence rate of anastomotic leakage after ISR has been reported to range from 5.1%to 20%.AIM To investigate risk factors for anastomotic leakage after ISR based on clinicopathological variables and pelvimetry.METHODS This study was conducted at Department of Colorectal Surgery,Japanese Red Cross Medical Center,Tokyo,Japan,with a total of 117 patients.We enrolled 117 patients with extremely low rectal cancer who underwent laparotomic and laparoscopic ISRs at our hospital.We conducted retrospective univariate and multivariate regression analyses on 33 items to elucidate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage after ISR.Pelvic dimensions were measured using threedimensional reconstruction of computed tomography images.The optimal cutoff value of the pelvic inlet plane area that predicts anastomotic leakage was determined using a receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.RESULTS We observed anastomotic leakage in 10(8.5%)of the 117 patients.In the multivariate analysis,we identified high body mass index(odds ratio 1.674;95%confidence interval:1.087-2.58;P=0.019)and smaller pelvic inlet plane area(odds ratio 0.998;95%confidence interval:0.997-0.999;P=0.012)as statistically significant risk factors for anastomotic leakage.According to the receiver operating characteristic curves,the optimal cutoff value of the pelvic inlet plane area was 10074 mm2.Narrow pelvic inlet plane area(≤10074 mm2)predicted anastomotic leakage with a sensitivity of 90%,a specificity of 85.9%,and an accuracy of 86.3%.CONCLUSION Narrow pelvic inlet and obesity were independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage after ISR.Anastomotic leakage after ISR may be predicted from a narrow pelvic inlet plane area(≤10074 mm2).

Intra- and Inter-Observer Reproducibility of Ultrasound Measurements of Pelvic Inlet Diameter in Pregnant Women

Objectives: To determine intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the ultrasound measurement of pelvic inlet in the first trimester of pregnancy. Methods: Transabdominal pelvic ultrasound was performed to measure the pelvic inlet anteroposterior diameter using a 2D probe in twelve Chinese women having a singleton pregnancy. Scans were performed in the first trimester by three sonographers. The pelvic inlet anteroposterior diameter was defined as the distance between the anterior surfaces of the sacral promontory and the superior medial border of the pubic bone most adjacent to the pubic symphysis. Intra-observer repeatability was determined and analysis of variance was performed to assess inter-observer measurements. The bias between any two sonographers’ measurements was assessed by calculating the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference between sonographers paired measurements. Results: Intra-observer reproducibility was 0.71 cm. Analysis of variance indicated that there was no significant difference between sonographers’ measurements (p = 0.46). The bias between two sonographers’ measurements ranged from 0.05 to 0.32 cm. Conclusion: It is technically feasible to measure the pelvic inlet diameter using ultrasound (USG) at the first trimester. High inter-observer reproducibility can be achieved. Further studies are required to establish the potential role of this technique and the measurement of the pelvic inlet diameter in prediction of labor outcome.