Effect of psychological nursing intervention on anxiety level and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND Peptic ulcer is a common gastrointestinal disease,and psychological intervention has an important influence on its occurrence and development.AIM To investigate the effect of psychological nursing intervention on the anxiety level and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal peptic ulcers.METHODS Two groups of patients with peptic ulcer were selected from January to December 2012,with 60 cases in each group,and psychological nursing intervention and routine treatment were respectively performed.Psychological nursing interven-tions include cognitive behavioral therapy,psychological support and relaxation training.Self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)and quality of life questionnaire were used to evaluate the anxiety level and quality of life of patients before,during and after treatment.RESULTS The SAS scores of the experimental group significantly decreased over the course of treatment,from 52.3 before treatment to 30.5 after treatment,while SAS scores of the control group did not change significantly.Meanwhile,the experimental group's quality of life score(SF-36)significantly improved over the course of treatment,from 65.2 to 85.2,while the control group remained stable.Further analysis showed that sex and age had no significant influence on the effect of psychotherapy.Both men and women,young and old,showed similar trends in anxiety relief and improved quality of life after treatment.CONCLUSION Psychological nursing-based intervention program has a positive effect on the anxiety level and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal peptic ulcer.

Clinical effects of psychological intervention and drug therapy against peptic ulcer

Objective:To evaluate the clinical effects of psychological interventions and drug therapy against peptic ulcer.Methods:96 patients with peptic ulcer were divided into control group with Tagamet 800 mg per evening p.o.and trial group with psychological intervention on the basis of drug treatment.Results:There were significant differences between the two groups(P【0.05), the trial group showed that the anxiety and depression cases declined obviously and effective rate of ulcer therapy was much higlier than control group.Conclusions:In sum,psychological intervention combined with drug therapy provides an effective method for ulcer treatment.

Does Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for peptic ulcer prevent gastric cancer?

AIM:To investigate the effects of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori)eradication therapy for treatment of peptic ulcer on the incidence of gastric cancer. METHODS:A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted between November 2000 and December 2007 in Yamagata Prefecture,Japan.The study included patients with H pylori-positive peptic ulcer who decided themselves whether to receive H pylori eradication(eradication group)or conventional antacid therapy(non-eradication group).Incidence of gastric cancer in the two groups was determined based on the results of annual endoscopy and questionnaire surveys,as well as Yamagata Prefectural Cancer Registry data,and was compared between the two groups and by results of H pylori therapy.RESULTS:A total of 4133 patients aged between 13 and 91 years(mean 52.9 years)were registered,and 56 cases of gastric cancer were identified over a mean follow-up of 5.6 years.The sex-and age-adjusted incidence ratio of gastric cancer in the eradication group, as compared with the non-eradication group,was 0.58 (95%CI:0.28-1.19)and ratios by follow-up period(<1 year,1-3 years,>3 years)were 1.16(0.27-5.00),0.50 (0.17-1.49),and 0.34(0.09-1.28),respectively.Longer follow-up tended to be associated with better prevention of gastric cancer,although not to a significant extent.No significant difference in incidence of gastric cancer was observed between patients with successful eradication therapy(32/2451 patients,1.31%)and those with treatment failure(11/639 patients,1.72%).Among patients with duodenal ulcer,which is known to be more prevalent in younger individuals,the incidence of gastric cancer was significantly less in those with successful eradication therapy(2/845 patients,0.24%)than in those with treatment failure(3/216 patients,1.39%). CONCLUSION:H pylori eradication therapy for peptic ulcer patients with a mean age of 52.9 years at registration did not significantly decrease the incidence of gastric cancer.

Effects of killing Helicobacter pylori quadruple therapy on peptic ulcer: A randomized double-blind clinical trial

AIM: To study the therapeutic efficacy of a Chinese and Western integrated regimen, killing Helicobacter pylori quadruple therapy on H pylori-associated peptic ulcers(PU).METHODS: With prospective and double-blind controlled method, seventy-five active PU patients with H pylori infection were randomized to receive one of the following three regimens: (1) new triple therapy (group A:lansoprazole 30 mg qd, plus clarithromycin 250 mg bid,plus amoxycillin 500 mg tid, each for 10 d); (2) killing Hp quadruple therapy(group B: the three above drugs plus killing H pylori capsule 6 capsules bid for 4 wk) and (3)placebo(group C: gastropine 3 tablets bid for 4 wk).H pylori eradication and ulcer healing quality were evaluated under an endoscope 4 wk after treatment. The patients were followed up for 5 years.RESULTS: Both the healing rate of PU and H pylori eradication rate in group B were significantly higher than those in group C (100% and 96.4% vs 20% and 0%,respectively, P＜0.005), but there was no significant difference compared to those in group A (88% and92%, P＞0.05). The healing quality of ulcer in group B was superior to that in groups C and A (P＜0.05). The recurrence rate of PU in group B (4%) was lower than that in group A (10%) and group C (100%, P＜0.01).CONCLUSION: Killing Helicobacter pylori quadruple therapy can not only promote the eradication of H pylori and healing quality of ulcer but also reduce recurrence rate of ulcer.

Upper-gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to peptic ulcer disease:Incidence and outcomes

AIM: To evaluate the incidence, surgery, mortality, and readmission of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) secondary to peptic ulcer disease (PUD).

Risk factors and therapeutic response in Chinese patients with peptic ulcer disease

AIM:To assess the risk factors and the eff icacy of medications of patients with gastric and duodenal ulcers among Chinese patients in Taiwan.METHODS:Patients with peptic ulcers,diagnosed by upper endoscopy,were retrospectively collected between January 2008 and December 2008.The differences were compared.RESULTS:Among all 448 cases,254(56.6%) and 194(43.4%) patients had gastric ulcers and duodenal ulcers respectively.Patients with gastric ulcers were younger than those with duodenal ulcers.Although more men existed,there was a female predominance in middle-aged cases.Patients with duodenal ulcers had a higher rate of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection(62.4% vs 43.3%,P = 0.001),and those with gastric ulcers owned a significantly higher amount of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug(NSAID) use(7.5% vs 1.5%,6.7% vs 2.1%,P = 0.001).Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking had no different impact between these two groups.Proton-pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists(H2RA) were effective,but significantly less so in cases with duodenal ulcers receiving H2RAs,or in those with H.pylori infection and a history of NSAID use.CONCLUSION:Patients with gastric ulcers had lower H.pylori infection but more aspirin or NSAID use.Antisecretory therapy was ineffective in gastric ulcers underwent H2RA treatment,and cases combined H.pylori infection and NSAID use.

Endoscopic hemoclip treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer

AIM To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopichemoclip in the treatment of bleeding pepticulcer.METHODS Totally,40 patients with F1a andFib hemorrhagic activity of peptic ulcers wereenrolled in this uncontrolled prospective studyfor endoscopic hemoclip treatment.We used anewly developed rotatable clip-device for theapplication of hemoclip(MD850)to stopbleeding.Endoscopy was repeated if there wasany sign or suspicion of rebleeding,and re-clipping was performed if necessary andfeasible.RESULTS Initial hemostatic rate by clippingwas 95%,and rebleeding rate was only 8%.Ultimate hemostatic rates were 87%,96%,and93% in the Fla and Flb subgroups,and totalcases,respectively.In patients with shock onadmission,hemoclipping achieved ultimatehemostasis of 71% and 83% in F1a and F1bsubgroups,respectively.Hemostasis reached100% in patients without shock regardless ofhemorrhagic activity being F1a or F1b.Theaverage number of clips used per case was 3.0(range 2-5).Spurting bleeders required moreclips on average than did oozing bleeders(3.4versus 2.8).We observed no obviouscomplications,no tissue injury,or impairmentof ulcer healing related to hemoclipping.CONCLUSION Endoscopic hemoclip placementis an effective and safe method.With theimprovement of the clip and application device,the procedure has become easier and much moreefficient.Endoscopic hemoclipping deservesfurther study in the treatment of bleeding pepticulcers.

Optimal initiation of Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding

AIM:To evaluate when Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)eradication therapy(ET)should be started in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding(PUB).METHODS:Clinical data concerning adults hospitalizedwith PUB were retrospectively collected and analyzed.Age,sex,type and stage of peptic ulcer,whether endoscopic therapy was performed or not,methods of H.pylori detection,duration of hospitalization,and specialty of the attending physician were investigated.Factors influencing the confirmation of H.pylori infection prior to discharge were determined using multiple logistic regression analysis.The H.pylori eradication rates of patients who received ET during hospitalization and those who commenced ET as outpatients were compared.RESULTS:A total of 232 patients with PUB were evaluated for H.pylori infection by histology and/or rapid urease testing.Of these patients,53.7%(127/232)had confirmed results of H.pylori infection prior to discharge.In multivariate analysis,duration of hospitalization and ulcer stage were factors independently influencing whether H.pylori infection was confirmed before or after discharge.Among the patients discharged before confirmation of H.pylori infection,13.3%(14/105)were lost to follow-up.Among the patients found to be H.pylori-positive after discharge,41.4%(12/29)did not receive ET.There was no significant difference in the H.pylori eradication rate between patients who received ET during hospitalization a n d t h o s e w h o c o m m e n c e d E T a s o u t p a t i e n t s[intention-to-treat:68.8%(53/77)vs 60%(12/20),P=0.594;per-protocol:82.8%(53/64)vs 80%(12/15),P=0.723].CONCLUSION:Because many patients with PUB who were discharged before H.pylori infection status was confirmed lost an opportunity to receive ET,we should confirm H.pylori infection and start ET prior to discharge.

One fifth of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer-related bleeding are potentially preventable

AIM: To calculate the proportion of potentially preventable hospitalizations due to peptic ulcer disease (PUD), erosive gastritis (EG) or duodenitis (ED).

Epinephrine injection therapy versus a combination of epinepnrine injection and endoscopic hemoclip in the treatment of bleeding ulcers

AIM: To assess the efficacy of hemoclip application in combination with epinephrine injection in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers and to compare the clinical outcomes between patients treated with such a combination therapy and those treated with epinephrine injection alone.METHODS: A total of 293 patients (211 males, 82females) underwent endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers. Of these, 202 patients (152 males, 50females) received epinephrine injection therapy while 91patients (59 males, 32 females) received combination therapy. The choice of endoscopic therapy was made by the endoscopist. Hemostatic rates, rebleeding rates, need for emergency surgery and 30-d mortality were the outcome measures studied.RESULTS: Patients who received combination therapy were significantly older (mean age 66±16 years, range24-90 years) and more suffered from chronic renal failure compared to those who received epinephrine injection therapy alone (mean age 61±17 years, range 21-89 years).Failure to achieve permanent hemostasis was 4% in the group who received epinephrine injection alone and 11%in the group who received combination therapy. When the differences in age and renal function between the two treatment groups were taken into account by multivariate analysis, the rates of initial hemostasis,rebleeding rates, need for surgery and 30-d mortality for both treatment options were not significantly different.CONCLUSION: Combination therapy of epinephrine injection with endoscopic hemoclip application is an effective method of achieving hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcer diseases. However, superiority of combination therapy over epinephrine injection alone, could not be demonstrated.

Usefulness of anti-ulcer drugs for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcers induced by low doses of aspirin

AIM： To investigate the usefulness of anti-ulcer drugs for the prevention and treatment of low-dose aspirin-induced peptic ulcer.METHODS： Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed in 68 patients receiving daily low-dose aspirin （81 or 100 rag/day）. The endoscopic findings were classified according to the Lanza score, and the scores were compared between groups categorized according to the concomitant use of anti-ulcer drugs and the types of drugs used. In another study, 31 hemorrhagic peptic ulcer patients who had been receiving low-dose aspirin were enrolled. The patients were randomly classified into the proton pump inhibitor （PPI）-treated group and the H2 receptor antagonist （H2RA）-treated group. The administration of low-dose aspirin was continued concomitantly, and endoscopic examinations were performed 8 wk later.RESULTS： The Lanza scores （mean ± SD） of the gastro-mucosal lesions were 1.0 ± 1.9 and 1.9 ± 2.3 in 8 and 16 patients receiving prevention therapy with a PPI and an H2RA, respectively. Both scores were significantly smaller than the scores in 34 patients who were not receiving prevention therapy （4.7 ± 1.0） and in 10 patients receiving cytoprotective anti-ulcer drugs （4.3± 1.6）. In the prospective study, 18 and 13 patients received a PPI and an H2RA, respectively. Endoscopic examinations revealed that the tissue in the region of the gastro-mucosal lesions had reverted to normal in all patients in the PPI-treated group and in 12 patients （92%） in the H2RA-treated group; no significant differences were observed between the groups.CONCLUSION： H2RA therapy was effective for both the prevention and treatment of low-dose aspirin-induced peptic ulcer, similar to the effects of PPIs, while cytoprotective anti-ulcer drugs were ineffective in preventing ulceration.

Characteristics of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with chronic kidney disease

AIM:To evaluate the clinical characteristics of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage(NGIH)in patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD).METHODS:From 2003 to 2010,a total of 72 CKD patients(male n=52,72.2%;female n=20,27.8%)who had undergone endoscopic treatments for NGIH were retrospectively identified.Clinical findings,endoscopic features,prognosis,rebleeding risk factors,and mortality-related factors were evaluated.The characteristics of the patients and rebleeding-related data were recorded for the following variables:gender,age,alcohol use and smoking history,past hemorrhage history,endoscopic findings(the cause,location,and size of the hemorrhage and the hemorrhagic state),therapeutic options for endoscopy,endoscopist experience,clinical outcomes,and mortality.RESULTS:The average size of the hemorrhagic site was 13.7±10.2 mm,and the most common hemorrhagic site in the stomach was the antrum(n=21,43.8%).The most frequent method of hemostasis was combination therapy(n=32,44.4%).The incidence of rebleeding was 37.5%(n=27),and 16.7%(n=12)of patients expired due to hemorrhage.In a multivariate analysis of the risk factors for rebleeding,alcoholism(OR=11.19,P=0.02),the experience of endoscopists(OR=0.56,P=0.03),and combination endoscopic therapy(OR=0.06,P=0.01)compared with monotherapy were significantly related to rebleeding after endoscopic therapy.In a risk analysis of mortality after endoscopic therapy,only rebleeding was related to mortality(OR=7.1,P=0.02).CONCLUSION:Intensive combined endoscopic treatments by experienced endoscopists are necessary for the treatment of NGIH in patients with CKD,especially when a patient is an alcoholic.

Helicobacter pylori infection in bleeding peptic ulcer patients after non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug consumption

AIM： TO establish the prevalence of He/icobacterpy/on （H. pylori） infection in patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer after consumption of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs （NSAIDs）.METHODS： A very early upper endoscopy was performed to find the source of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and to take biopsy specimens for analysis of H. pylori infection by the rapid urease （CLO） test, his- tological examination, and bacterial culture. TgG anti- CagA were also sought. The gold standard for identifying H. pylori infection was positive culture of biopsy specimens or contemporary positivity of the CLO test and the presence of H. pylori on tissue sections.RESULTS： Eighty patients, 61 males （76.3%）, mean age 61.2 ~ 15.9 years, were consecutively enrolled. Forty-seven （58.8%） patients occasionally consumed NSAIDs, while 33 （41.3%） were on chronic treatment with low-dose aspirin （LD ASA）. Forty-four （55.0%） patients were considered infected by H. pylori. The infection rate was not different between patients who occasionally or chronically consumed NSAIDs. The culture of biopsy specimens had a sensitivity of 86.4% and a specificity of 100%; corresponding figures for histological analysis were 65.9% and 77.8%, for the CLO test were 68.2% and 75%, for the combined use of histology and the CLO test were 56.8% and 100%, and for IgG anti-CagA were 90% and 98%. The high- est accuracy （92.5%） was obtained with the culture of biopsy specimens.CONCLUSION： Patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer after NSAID/LD ASA consumption frequently have H. pylori infection. Biopsy specimen culture after an early upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy seems the most efficient test to detect this infection.

Endoclips vs large or small-volume epinephrine in peptic ulcer recurrent bleeding

AIM:To compare the recurrent bleeding after endoscopic injection of different epinephrine volumes with hemoclips in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer.METHODS:Between January 2005 and December 2009,150 patients with gastric or duodenal bleeding ulcer with major stigmata of hemorrhage and nonbleeding visible vessel in an ulcer bed(Forrest Ⅱa) were included in the study.Patients were randomized to receive a small-volume epinephrine group(15 to 25 mL injection group;Group 1,n = 50),a large-volume epinephrine group(30 to 40 mL injection group;Group 2,n = 50) and a hemoclip group(Group 3,n = 50).The rate of recurrent bleeding,as the primary outcome,was compared between the groups of patients included in the study.Secondary outcomes compared between the groups were primary hemostasis rate,permanent hemostasis,need for emergency surgery,30 d mortality,bleeding-related deaths,length of hospital stay and transfusion requirements.RESULTS:Initial hemostasis was obtained in all patients.The rate of early recurrent bleeding was 30%(15/50) in the small-volume epinephrine group(Group 1) and 16%(8/50) in the large-volume epinephrine group(Group 2)(P = 0.09).The rate of recurrent bleeding was 4%(2/50) in the hemoclip group(Group 3);the difference was statistically significant with regard to patients treated with either small-volume or large-volume epinephrine solution(P = 0.0005 and P = 0.045,respectively).Duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter among patients treated with hemoclips than among patients treated with epinephrine whereas there were no differences in transfusion requirement or even 30 d mortality between the groups.CONCLUSION:Endoclip is superior to both small and large volume injection of epinephrine in the prevention of recurrent bleeding in patients with peptic ulcer.

Distinctive aspects of peptic ulcer disease,Dieulafoy'slesion,and Mallory-Weiss syndrome in patients withadvanced alcoholic liver disease or cirrhosis

AIM:To systematically review the data on distinctive aspects of peptic ulcer disease(PUD),Dieulafoy’s lesion(DL),and Mallory-Weiss syndrome(MWS)in patients with advanced alcoholic liver disease(a ALD),including alcoholic hepatitis or alcoholic cirrhosis.METHODS:Computerized literature search performed via Pub Med using the following medical subject heading terms and keywords:"alcoholic liver disease","alcoholic hepatitis","alcoholic cirrhosis","cirrhosis","liver disease","upper gastrointestinal bleeding","nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding","PUD",‘‘DL’’,‘‘Mallory-Weiss tear",and"MWS’’.RESULTS:While the majority of acute gastrointestinal(GI)bleeding with a ALD is related to portal hypertension,about 30%-40%of acute GI bleeding in patients with a ALD is unrelated to portal hypertension.Such bleeding constitutes an important complication of a ALD because of its frequency,severity,and associated mortality.Patients with cirrhosis have a markedly increased risk of PUD,which further increases with the progression of cirrhosis.Patients with cirrhosis or a ALD and peptic ulcer bleeding(PUB)have worse clinical outcomes than other patients with PUB,including uncontrolled bleeding,rebleeding,and mortality.Alcohol consumption,nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use,and portal hypertension may have a pathogenic role in the development of PUD in patients with a ALD.Limited data suggest that Helicobacter pylori does not play a significant role in the pathogenesis of PUD in most cirrhotic patients.The frequency of bleeding from DL appears to be increased in patients with a ALD.DL may be associated with an especially high mortality in these patients.MWS is strongly associated with heavy alcohol consumption from binge drinking or chronic alcoholism,and is associated with a ALD.Patients with a ALD have more severe MWS bleeding and are more likely to rebleed when compared to non-cirrhotics.Preendoscopic management of acute GI bleeding in patients with a ALD unrelated to portal hypertension is similar to the management of a ALD patients with GI bleeding from portal hypertension,because clinical distinction before endoscopy is difficult.Most patients require intensive care unit admission and attention to avoid over-transfusion,to correct electrolyte abnormalities and coagulopathies,and to administer antibiotic prophylaxis.Alcoholics should receive thiamine and be closely monitored for symptoms of alcohol withdrawal.Prompt endoscopy,after initial resuscitation,is essential to diagnose and appropriately treat these patients.Generally,the same endoscopic hemostatic techniques are used in patients bleeding from PUD,DL,or MWS in patients with a ALD as in the general population.CONCLUSION:Nonvariceal upper GI bleeding in patients with a ALD has clinically important differences from that in the general population without a ALD,including:more frequent and more severe bleeding from PUD,DL,or MWS.

Role of proton pump inhibitors in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding

Peptic ulcer bleeding is a serious medical problem with significant morbidity and mortality.Endoscopic therapy significantly reduces further bleeding,surgery and mortality in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and is now recommended as the first hemostatic modality for these patients.The efficacy of large-dose proton pump inhibitor(PPI) therapy in reducing re-bleeding after endoscopic therapy has been supported by evidence derived from randomized controlled trials.It may be premature to recommend small-dose intravenous injection PPI after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with bleeding ulcers.An updated systematic review shows that PPI therapy before endoscopy significantly reduces the proportion with major stigmata and requirement for endoscopic therapy at index endoscopy.Some studies show that there is no significant difference between oral and intravenous PPIs in raising intragastric pH.However,clinical data is lacking in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding to date.

How evidence-based are current guidelines for managing patients with peptic ulcer bleeding?

Current guidelines for managing ulcer bleeding state that patients with major stigmata should be managed by dual endoscopic therapy(injection with epinephrine plus a thermal or mechanical modality) followed by a high dose intravenous infusion of proton pump inhibitors(PPIs).This paper aims to review and critically evaluate evidence supporting the purported superiority of a continuous infusion over less intensive regimens of PPIs administration and the need for adding a second hemostatic endoscopic procedure to epinephrine injection.Systematic searches of PubMed,EMBASE and the Cochrane library were performed.There is strong evidence for an incremental benefit of PPIs over H2receptor antagonists or placebo for the outcome of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding following endoscopic hemostasis.However,the benefit of PPIs is unrelated to either the dosage(intensive vs standard regimen) or the route of administration(intravenous vs oral).There is significant heterogeneity among the 15 studies that compared epinephrine with epinephrine plus a second modality,which might preclude the validity of reported summary estimates.Studies without second look endoscopy plus re-treatment of re-bleeding lesions showed a signif icant benef it of adding a second endoscopic modality for hemostasis,while studies with second-look and re-treatment showed equal efficacy between endoscopic mono and dual therapy.Inconclusive experimental evidence supports the current recommendation of the use of dual endoscopic hemostatic means and infusion of high-dose PPIs as standard therapy for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.Presently,the combination of epinephrine monotherapy with standard doses of PPIs constitutes an appropriate treatment for the majority of patients.

OBSERVATION ON CURATIVE EFFECTS OF 245 CASES WITH PEPTIC ULCER TREATED BY CATGUT IMPLANTATION AT THE ACUPOINT

It is reported that 245 cases of peptic ulcer were treated with catgut implantationat Pishu（BL 20）-through-Weishu（BL 21）,Shangwan（CV 13）-through-Xiawan（CV 10）and Zusanli（ST 36）points.Catgut was embedded subcutaneously and left for 15 days as a course.As a resuit,121 cases（49.39％）were cured and 124（50.61％）improved.The total effective was 100％.

Optimal treatment of peptic－ulcer：per?

Ｏｐｔｉｍａｌｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔｏｆｐｅｐｔｉｃｕｌｃｅｒ：ｐｅｒｓｐｅｃｔｉｖｅｓｂｅｙｏｎｄｔｈｅｙｅａｒ２０００ＸＩＡＯＳｈｕＤｏｎｇａｎｄＬＩＵＷｅｎＺｈｏｎｇＳｕｂｊｅｃｔｈｅａｄｉｎｇｓｐｅｐｔｉｃｕｌｃｅｒ／ｔｈｅｒａｐｙｈｅｌｉ...

黄连素+四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性消化性溃疡的临床效果分析

目的探究黄连素(别称:盐酸小檗碱)与四联疗法联合用药方案治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)阳性消化性溃疡的临床效果,为临床医师选择合理用药方案提供参考。方法204例Hp阳性消化性溃疡患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组102例。对照组患者接受常规四联疗法治疗,观察组采用黄连素与四联疗法联合治疗。比较两组患者症状改善时间、Hp清除率及复发率、临床治疗效果、不良反应发生率。结果观察组患者反酸、嗳气、腹痛消失时间与溃疡愈合时间分别为(2.95±0.51)、(3.85±0.44)、(5.65±0.88)、(8.74±0.85)d,较对照组的(4.35±0.85)、(6.85±0.61)、(7.51±1.38)、(12.45±1.28)d短(P<0.05)。观察组患者Hp清除率及复发率分别为96.1%、3.9%,对照组患者分别为80.4%、17.6%,两组比较,观察组患者Hp清除率高,复发率低(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗总有效率为98.0%,对照组为90.2%,两组比较,观察组较高(P<0.05)。观察组患者不良反应发生率为2.0%(2/102),与对照组的3.9%(4/102)比较无差异(P>0.05)。结论对Hp阳性消化性溃疡患者实施四联疗法治疗时联合黄连素可以快速改善临床症状,提升治疗效果,同时还能提高Hp清除率,降低复发率,值得推广。