Background The choice between coronary artery bypass surgery （CABG） and percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for revascularisation in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease, who accoun...Background The choice between coronary artery bypass surgery （CABG） and percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for revascularisation in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease, who account for 25% of revascularisation procedures, is much debated. We aimed to assess whether all-cause mortality differed be- tween patients with diabetes who had CABG or PCI by doing a systematic review and meta-analysis of ran- domised controlled trials （RCTs） comparing CABG with PCI in the modem stent era.展开更多
文摘Background The choice between coronary artery bypass surgery （CABG） and percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for revascularisation in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease, who account for 25% of revascularisation procedures, is much debated. We aimed to assess whether all-cause mortality differed be- tween patients with diabetes who had CABG or PCI by doing a systematic review and meta-analysis of ran- domised controlled trials （RCTs） comparing CABG with PCI in the modem stent era.
