Visual function and higher order aberration after implantation of aspheric and spherical multifocal intraocular lenses:a meta-analysis

AIMTo assess the visual outcomes of aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) compared with spherical multifocal IOL after cataract surgery.

Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens

·AIM:To compare visual quality after unilateral cataract surgery with implantation of trifocal intraocular lens(IOL)and asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL.·METHODS:The prospective nonrandom,comparative study consisted of 60 eyes of 60 patients suffering unilateral cataract surgery with implantation of two different IOLs:AT LISA tri 839 MP(30 eyes;Carl Zeiss Meditec,Germany)and LS-313 MF30(30 eyes;Oculentis GmbH,Germany).Visual acuity,refractive outcome,contrast sensitivity,defocus curves,quality of vision,and optical phenomena were evaluated at3 mo postoperatively.·RESULTS:There were no statistical differences between groups in uncorrected distance visual acuity(P=0.13)and uncorrected near visual acuity(P=0.54).In contrast,uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was better in trifocal group compared to the refractive multifocal group(P=0.02).No significant statistical between-group difference was detected in cylinder(P=0.43).Compared to trifocal group,spherical refraction and spherical equivalent in refractive multi focal group were more myopic(P<0.01).Under photopic conditions,no significant statistical differences were found between groups in contrast sensitivity at 3 and 6 cycles per degree(cpd).The refractive multifocal group performed better at 12 and 18 cpd than the trifocal group(P=0.01,P=0.034,respectively).The questionnaires of quality of vision and optical phenomena showed no differences between groups.·CONCLUSION:Trifocal IOL is superior to refractive multifocal IOL in intermediate visual acuity.Rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL is more myopic in automated refraction and significantly better for the photopic contrast sensitivity at high frequency.

Accuracy of eight intraocular lens power calculation formulas for segmented multifocal intraocular lens

AIM:To evaluate the accuracy of eight different intraocular lens(IOL)power calculation formulas for a segmented multifocal IOL.METHODS:A total of 53 eyes of 41 adult cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation with the SBL-3 segmented multifocal IOL between January 1,2017 and January 31,2019 were included in this retrospective study.Preoperative biometry measurements were obtained using an IOL Master.Manifest refraction was performed at least 4 wk postoperatively.Accuracy of the eight formulas[Barrett Universal II,Emmetropia Verifying Optical(EVO),Haigis,Hill-RBF 2.0,Hoffer Q,Holladay 1,Kane,and SRK/T]was analyzed.RESULTS:Using current lens constants,all formulas exhibited errors of slight myopic shift in refractive prediction.The Barrett Universal II formula had a significantly lower median absolute error(MedAE)than did Holladay 1(P=0.02),Kane(P=0.001)and Hill-RBF 2.0(P<0.001)formulas.The Haigis formula had a lower MedAE value than did the Hill-RBF 2.0 formula(P=0.005).Differences in MedAE values among SRK/T,EVO and Hoffer Q formulas were not significant.After optimizing lens constants,the MedAE values of all formulas were reduced;significant changes were noted for EVO(P=0.022),Haigis(P=0.048);Hill-RBF 2.0(P=0.014),Holladay 1(P=0.045)and Kane(P=0.022)formulas.All formulas performed equally well after optimization of lens constants(P=0.203).CONCLUSION:All eight formulas tend to result in a myopic shift when using current lens constants.Optimized lens constants improve the accuracy of these formulas among adult Chinese patients.

Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with monofocal intraocular lens in the contralateral eye

AIM:To evaluate clinical outcomes of unilateral implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens(IOL)in patients with contralateral monofocal IOL.METHODS:Twenty-two patients who already had implantation of a monofocal IOL in unilateral eye underwent implantation of a diffractive multifocal IOL in contralateral eye were enrolled.After 1,6,and 12 mo,uncorrected and distant corrected distant visual acuity(UCDVA and DCDVA),uncorrected and distant corrected intermediate-visual acuity(UCIVA and DCIVA),uncorrected and distant corrected near visual acuity(UCNVA and DCNVA),and contrast sensitivity were obtained.Halo/glare symptoms,spectacle dependence,and patient satisfaction were also evaluated.RESULTS:The mean age was 67.86±7.25 y and the average interval between two IOL implantations was 645.82±878.44 d.At 1 mo,binocular UCDVA was lower than 0.20 logMAR in 76%of patients(mean 0.12±0.13 logMAR),which increased to 90%by 6 and 12 mo.The binocular UCDVA was significantly better than the monocular results(P<0.05)at 1,6,and 12 mo.Additionally,UCNVA was lower than 0.40 logMAR in 82%of patients,increasing to 90%by 6 and 12 mo.Mean UCNVA in the multifocal IOL implanted eye was statistically significantly better than that in the monofocal IOL implanted eye(P<0.05)at 1,6,and 12 mo.About 5%of patients at 1 and 6 mo,reported"severe glare or halo".Patient satisfaction rates were 95%and 91%at 6 and 12 mo,respectively.CONCLUSION:Unilateral implantation of multifocal IOL in patients with a contralateral,monofocal IOL implantation results in high patient satisfaction rate,with low severe glare or halo rate during follow-up.It can represent a good option for patients who have previously had a monofocal IOL implantation regardless of two year interval duration between two IOL implantations.

Secondary positioning of rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens in a patient with glaucoma:A case report

BACKGROUND Asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses(IOLs)are now widely used in the modern cataract surgery,providing a good level of visual performance over a range of distances and high postoperative patient satisfaction.We report a case of improved visual quality after shifting the near segment of an asymmetrical multifocal IOL to the superotemporal placement in the dominant eye of a glaucoma patient.CASE SUMMARY A 72-year-old woman with bilateral glaucoma underwent phacoemulsification in the dominant eye(left eye)with implantation of an asymmetrical multifocal IOL.Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA)was 0.0 logMAR(20/20 Snellen)and uncorrected near visual acuity(UNVA)was 0.1 logMAR(20/25 Snellen).Two weeks later,the patient presented to our clinic with decreased vision due to migration of lens epithelial cells to IOL anterior surface and edema of corneal endothelial cells.Anterior capsule polishing and superotemporal placement of near segment[+3.00 diopter(D)addition(add)]of IOL were performed.As a result,UDVA at the first week and first year after reposition was 0.0 logMAR(20/20 Snellen),and compared with 0.3 logMAR(20/40 Snellen)in the first week,the UNVA was improved to 0.0 logMAR(20/20 Snellen)one year after surgery.CONCLUSION The postoperative inflammatory reaction and lens epithelial cells proliferation were obvious in this glaucoma patient.Capsule polishing and rotation of the lens were beneficial to the patient,which not only enhanced the patient's vision,but also improved the patient's satisfaction.Therefore,glaucoma patients need to be cautious of implanting multifocal IOLs.Placement of a near segment of an asymmetrical multifocal IOL in the dominant eye should be performed on an individual basis.

Potential of video games for the promotion of neuroadaptation to multifocal intraocular lenses: a narrative review

Multifocal intraocular lenses(IOLs) are currently usually implanted for the treatment of cataracts because they have been proved to be superior to monofocal IOLs with respect to spectacle independence. In turn, they are associated with a higher prevalence of dysphotopsia symptoms that is one of the most common causes of patient dissatisfaction. Neuroadaptation seems to play a major role in the optimal adaptation to multifocal IOLs. In this context, the development of strategies that facilitate the neuroadaptation process to multifocality might be an effective strategy to reduce patients' dissatisfaction. Video games have been proved to be effective for the improvement of visual acuity and for the promotion of neuroplasticity in elderly subjects and other populations with cortical-related visual impairment. This narrative review highlights the physiological potential of video games as a perceptual strategy to improve visual acuity and promote neuroplasticity in patients using multifocalIOLs, although research is still needed to confirm these benefits in this specific population, with only one comparative study to this date providing evidence of them.

A new treatment option for the resistant spasm of accommodation:clear lens extraction and multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Dear Editor,We write you to present a 20-year-old man with resistant spasm of accommodation without any organic cause treated with clear lens extraction（CLE）with phacoemulsification and multifocal intraocular lens（IOL）implantation.

Objective electrophysiological contrast sensitivity with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses:a prospective clinical study

Background:To compare objective electrophysiological contrast sensitivity function(CSF)in patients implanted with either multifocal intraocular lenses(MIOLs)or monofocal intraocular lenses(IOLs)by pattern reversal visual evoked potentials(prVEP)measurements.Methods:Fourty-five cataract patients were randomly allocated to receive bilaterally:apodized diffractive-refractive Alcon Acrysof MIOL(A),full diffractive AMO Tecnis MIOL(B)or monofocal Alcon Acrysof IOL(C).Primary outcomes:1-year differences in objective binocular CSF measured by prVEP with sinusoid grating stimuli of 6 decreasing contrast levels at 6 spatial frequencies.Secondary outcomes:psychophysical CSF measured with VCTS-6500,photopic uncorrected distance(UDVA),and mesopic and photopic uncorrected near and intermediate visual acuities(UNVA and UIVA respectively).Results:Electrophysiological CSF curve had an inverted U-shaped morphology in all groups,with a biphasic pattern in Group B.Group A showed a lower CSF than group B at 4 and 8 cpd,and a lower value than group C at 8 cpd.Psychophysical CSF in group A exhibited a lower value at 12 cpd than group B.Mean photopic and mesopic UNVA and UIVA were worse in monofocal group compared to the multifocal groups.Mesopic UNVA and UIVA were better in group B.Conclusions:Electrophysiological CSF behaves differently depending on the types of multifocal or monofocal IOLs.This may be related to the visual acuity under certain conditions or to IOL characteristics.This objective method might be a potential new tool to investigate on MIOL differences and on subjective device-related quality of vision.

Visual performance with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses

AIM： To compare the visual functional outcomes with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses（IOLs）.METHODS： Our retrospective comparative study included 51 patients（60 eyes） received implantation of an accommodating IOL（Tetraflex;16 patients,20 eyes）,a refractive multifocal IOL（Re Zoom;18 patients,20 eyes）,or a diffractive multifocal IOL（ZMA00;17 patients,20 eyes）.Subjective refraction,visual acuity,contrast sensitivity（CS）,intraocular aberration,and subjective photic phenomena were detected at 3mo after surgery.RESULTS： The spherical equivalent in the three groups was-0.38±0.54 D,0.14±0.56 D,and 0.35±0.41 D,respectively.No statistically significant differences were found in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity among the groups（P=0.39）.The Re Zoom group had significantly better distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity than the ZMA00 group（P=0.003）.The ZMA00 group had significantly better near visual acuity than the other groups（P〈0.05）.Better contrast sensitivity values were observed in the Tetraflex group under most of the spatial frequencies conditions（P=0.025）.The total aberration was lowest in the ZMA00 group（P=0.000）,and the spherical aberration was highest in the Tetraflex group（P=0.000）.The three groups had similar frequency of ghosting and glare,and the Tetraflex group had a low rate of halos（P=0.01）.CONCLUSION： Both accommodating and multifocal IOLs can successfully restore distance and uncorrected intermediate visual acuities.Tetraflex accommodating IOLs perform better in CS and with less halos of photic phenomena.Re Zoom refractive multifocal IOLs havebetter performance in distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity than ZMA00 diffractive multifocal IOLs,and the latter achieved better near visual acuity and efficiently decreased the optical aberration.

Trocar opening: silicone oil removal with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified technique [trocar opening(TO)] for silicone oil removal(SOR) in combination with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens(IOL) implantation.METHODS: A total of 60 eyes of 60 patients with cataract and silicone oil-filled eyes were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: the patients in the control group underwent 23-gauge pars plana active SOR surgery with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation, while the patients in the TO group underwent TO methods during surgery. Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), surgery time, intraocular pressure, and operative complications were observed 6 mo after surgery.RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, preoperative, intraocular pressure, or time of silicone oil stay. Prior to surgery, the mean BCVA for the control and TO groups was 1.34±0.44 and 1.36±0.42. At 6 mo following surgery, the mean BCVA improved to 0.74±0.36 and 0.77±0.32, respectively(P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups. The mean SOR time was 6.9±2.3 min and 4.8±1.2 min in the control and TO groups(P=0.008). The total operation time was 28.2±8.5 min and 24.6±6.4 min, respectively(P=0.035). Posterior capsule rupture occurred in four eyes of control and none of TO group(P<0.01). Late recurrent retinal detachment occurred in one eye in the control group(2 mo after surgery) and in one eye in the TO group(4 mo after surgery). CONCLUSION: TO is a simple, effective, time-saving, and safe method for SOR combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation.

Combination of Toric and multifocal intraocular lens implantation in bilateral cataract patients with unilateral astigmatism

AIM： To assess the binocular visual function in bilateral cataract patients with unilateral astigmatism after combined implantations of Toric with multifocal intraocular lens （IOL）, and to compare with that of Toric and monofocal IOL implantation.METHODS： All the 30 patients with unilateral astigmatism suffered bilateral cataract were randomly divided into two groups： Toric plus multifocal IOL group and Toric plus monofocal IOL group. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity at distance （5.0 m）, intermediate distance （0.6 m）, and near （0.33 m）, contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis were assessed 6mo after surgery. Patients were also surveyed for visual disturbances and spectacle dependence.RESULTS： Binocular uncorrected visual acuity （LogMAR） of Toric/multifocal IOL eyes at distance, intermediate, near were 0.05±0.05, 0.24±0.10, and 0.14±0.06 respectively. The values of Toric plus monofocal IOL eyes were 0.06±0.07, 0.26±0.08, and 0.37±0.10 respectively. These values did not indicate significant differences between two groups with exception of near visual acuity. In the photopic condition （with or without glare）, the contrast sensitivity of multifocal IOL eyes was significant lower than the monofocal IOL eyes in 18 cpd. In the mesopic condition, the contrast sensitivity of multifocal group was significant lower than monofocal group in 12 cpd, and in mesopic glare condition, this significant difference was found both in 6 cpd and 12 cpd. The stereopsis of Toric/multifocal IOL eyes decreased slightly （100±80 seconds of arc, t=2.222, P=0.136）. Mean near vision for patient satisfaction was statistically significantly higher in Toric/multifocal IOL group patients versus than that in Toric/monofocal IOL group （80% vs 25.5%, P=0.000）. Visual disturbance was not noticed in either group.CONCLUSION： Although the combination of Toric and multifocal IOL implantation results in compromising stereoacuity, it can still provide patients with high levels of spectacle freedom and good overall binocular visual acuity.

Clinical outcomes of a new diffractive multifocal intraocular lens

AIM：To evaluate clinical outcomes after implantation of a new diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lens（IOL） with ＋3.00 addition power.METHODS：This is a retrospective,consecutive case series of cataract patients who underwent bilateral implantation of the Optiflex MO/HF D012（Moss Vision Inc.Ltd,London,UK） multifocal IOL.Patients followed for 6 mo were included in the study.Data on distance,intermediate and near visual acuity,refractive error [manifest spherical equivalent（MSE）],contrast sensitivity,adverse events,subjective symptoms,spectacle independence and patient satisfaction [visual function questionnaire（VFQ）-25 questionnaire] were retrieved from electronic medical records and analyzed.RESULTS：Forty eyes of 20 patients with a mean age of 66.7±8.5 y（range：53-82） were included in the study.Mean uncorrected distance,near and intermediate visual acuity remained stable through postoperative visits and was 0.19±0.19 log MAR,Jaeger 4 and Jaeger 3 respectively at the 6 mo visit.At the end of postoperative 6 mo,MSE was-0.14±0.42 diopters（D） and 98% of the eyes were within 1.00 D of target refraction.Postoperative low contrast（10%） visual acuity remained stable（P=0.54） through follow up visits with a mean of 0.35±0.17 log MAR at the 6 mo visit.There were no reported adverse events.None of the patients reported subjective symptoms of halo or glare.Spectacle independence rate was 90%.Mean VFQ-25 questionnaire score was 93.5±6.12.CONCLUSION：The Optiflex MO/HF-DO12 IOL was safely implanted and successfully restored distance,intermediate and near visual acuity without impairing contrast sensitivity.High levels of spectacle independence were achieved at all distances including intermediate distance.

New Management of Angle-closure Glaucoma by Phacoemulsification with Foldable Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation

Objective:To investigate the management of angle-closure glaucoma by phacoemulsification with foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens(PC-IOL)implantation.Design:Retrospective,noncontrolled interventional case series.Participants:In36eyes with angle-closure glaucoma(ACG),there were18eyes with primary acute angle-closure glaucoma(PACG),14eyes with primary chronic angle-closure glaucoma(PCCG),3eyes with secondary acute angle-closure glaucoma(SACG)and 1eye with secondary chronic angle-closure glaucoma(SCCG).Intervention:Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.Main Outcome Measures:Postoperative visual acuity,IOP,axial anterior chamber depth.Results:After a mean postoperative follow-up time of 8.81±7.45months,intraocular pressure was reduced from a preoperative mean of 23.81±17.84mmHg to a postoperative mean of 12.54±4.73mmHg(P=0.001).Mean anterior hamber depth was1.75±0.48mm preoperatively and2.29±0.38mm postoperatively(P=0.000).Best spectacle-corrected visual acuith in 36eyes ranged from0.01to0.7(20/200to20/30)postoperatively,which was better than preoperative VA ranging from hand movement to 0.4(20/50)(P=0.000).Conclusion:Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber foldable intraocular lens implantation can be a good alternative in treating angle-closure glaucoma,Eye Science 2000;16:22-28.

New Management of Malignant Glaucoma by Phacoemulsification with Posterior Chamber Foldable Intraocular Lens Implantation

Objective:To investigate the feasibility of phacoemulsification with posterior chamber foldable intraocular lens implantation in the management of malignant glaucoma. Patients and Methods:Fourteen patients with malignant glaucoma diagnosed in the Department of Glaucoma were enrolled in the study.12 patients developed malignant glaucoma after filtration surgery.1 developed after peripheral iridectomy.1 patient developed malignant glaucoma without any clear cause.Cataract phacoemulsification was performed.Posterior chamber intraocular foldable lens was implanted in 10 cases of patients.Results:All 14 patients were cured wiht normal intraocular pressure,normal anterior chamber depth and increased visual acuity.Conclusion:Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber foldable intraocular lens implantation is a good alternative in treating malignant glaucoma.

Comparison on Visual Function after Implantation of an Apodized Diffractive Aspheric Multifocal or Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Purpose:To evaluate visual outcomes after implantation of an aspheric multifocal /intraocular lens.(MIOL).or an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL).Methods:This was a prospective nonrandomized study.During 3-months of post-operative follow-up,the following outcomes for SN6AD1 MIOL.(multifocal group).and SN60WF IOL (monofocal group) were compared:uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity,uncorrected (UNVA) and distance-corrected (DCNVA) near visual acuity,Chinese character near visual acuity,uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) under high (100% contrast) and low contrast.(10% contrast),UIVA for different IOL powers,and a quality-of-life questionnaire.Results:UNVA,DCNVA,and UIVA under high contrast in the multifocal group were significantly better than those in the monofocal group (P<0.05).UDVA,CDVA and UIVA under low contrast did not differ between groups at 63 cm and 100 cm (P >0.05).In most cases,Chinese character near visual acuity was significantly better in the multifocal group.(P < 0.05).UNVA and UIVA at 63 cm improved over time during 3 months post-operatively.Better UIVA was found in emmetropic and mild myopic eyes as compared to hyperopic ones.The patients in the multifocal group had a higher degree of satisfaction and performed better on near and intermediate tasks,although with greater complaints of visual disturbance.Conclusion:The SN6AD1 MIOL provides significantly better UNVA,DCNVA and UIVA under high contrast conditions,and better Chinese character near visual acuity.Patients receiving the SN6AD1 MIOL reported a better quality of vision in spite of more serious visual disturbances.Better UIVA was observed in emmetropic and mildly myopic eyes.

The Preliminary Clinical Observation of Array Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

Purpose : To evaluate the clinical effects of implantation of Array multifocal intraocular lenses.Methods : Thirty-one cases (37 eyes) of cataract patients, including 15 males(19 eyes)and 16 females(18 eyes), were involved in this study. All patients underwent standard phacoemulsification with Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation. The complications during operation, postoperative distant visual acuity, near visual acuity,corneal curvature and visual symptoms were observed.Results : the mean value of best postoperative visual acuity was recorded as follows: uncorrected distant visual acuity was 0. 8, the best-corrected distant visual acuity was 0.9, uncorrected near visual acuity was 0. 5, near visual acuity with distant-corrected was 0.6, the best-corrected near visual acuity wss 0.9. The astigmatism of cornea was less than 1.5 D pre-operatively and post-operatively. One patient complained of glare. Conclusion : Array multifocal intraocular lens can provide good distant and near visual acuity. With observation of more cases and follow-up of longer time, we can draw a further conclusion. Eye Science 2001; 17 : 57 - 60.

Predictive factors for photic phenomena after refractive,rotationally asymmetric,multifocal intraocular lens implantation

AIM： To investigate the independent factors associated with photic phenomena in patients implanted with refractive,rotationally asymmetric,multifocal intraocular lenses（MIOLs）.METHODS： Thirty-four eyes of 34 patients who underwent unilateral cataract surgery,followed by implantation of rotationally asymmetric MIOLs were included.Distance and near visual acuity outcomes,intraocular aberrations,preferred reading distances,preoperative and postoperative refractive errors,mesopic and photopic pupil diameters,and the mesopic and photopic kappa angles were assessed.Patients were also administered a satisfaction survey.Photic phenomena were graded by questionnaire.Independent-related factors were identified by correlation and bivariate logistic regression analyses.RESULTS： The distance from the photopic to the mesopic pupil center（pupil center shift） was significantly associated with glare/halo symptoms [odds ratio（OR）=2.065,95% confidence interval（CI）=0.916-4.679,P=0.006] and night vision problems（OR=1.832,95% CI=0.721-2.158,P=0.007）.The preoperative photopic angle kappa was significantly associated with glare/halo symptoms（OR=2.155,95% CI=1.065-4.362,P=0.041）.The photopic angle kappa was also significantly associated with glare/halo symptoms（OR=2.155,95% CI=1.065-4.362,P=0.041） and with night vision problems（OR=1.832,95% CI=0.721-2.158,P=0.007） in patients implanted with rotationally asymmetric MIOLs.CONCLUSION： A large pupil center shift and misalignment between the visual and pupillary axis（angle kappa）may play a role in the occurrence of photic phenomena after implantation of rotationally asymmetric MIOLs.

The impact of posterior corneal astigmatism on the surgical planning of toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Purpose:To investigate the influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on the prediction accuracy of toric multi­focal intraocular lens(IOL)calculation.Methods:The keratometric astigmatism measured by Lenstar LS 900(KCA_(L)),keratometric astigmatism(KCAp)and total corneal astigmatism(TCA)measured by Scheimpflug camera(Pentacam HR)were documented and analyzed accordingly.Three deduction models using different parameters were compared.Model 1:KCA_(L)+keratometric comeal surgically induced astigmatism(KCSIA,0.30 D@50°);Model 2:KCA_(P)+KCSIA);Model 3:TCA 4-total CSIA(TCSIA,0.23 D@50°).The prediction errors of each model as the difference vector between the actual and the intended residual astigmatism were compared.Results:Seventy-six eyes implanted with toric multifocal IOLs were included in this study.The vector differences of the actual KCSIA and TCSIA were statistically significant in the total sample and against-the-rule(ATR)sub­group(both P<0.05).Model 1 deduced the smallest mean values of prediction error,while that of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 2,both in the total sample and the ATR subgroups(all P<0.05).Meanwhile,in the total sample and ATR subgroups,the centroid vector magnitudes of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 1(0.31±0.76 D and 0.39±0.76 D).Conclusions:The calculation of toric multifocal IOL should be individualized especially in the ATR eyes for the impact of PCA on the estimation of the preoperative comeal astigmatism and the CSIA.

Clinical efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification in diabetic cataract patients

BACKGROUND Diabetic patients with cataracts encounter specific difficulties during cataract surgery due to alterations in microcirculation,blood supply,metabolism,and the microenvironment.Traditional phacoemulsification may not fully tackle these issues,especially in instances with substantial preoperative astigmatism.The utilization of femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification,in conjunction with Toric intraocular lens(IOL)implantation,offers a potentially more efficient strategy.This research seeks to evaluate the efficacy and possible complications of this approach in diabetic cataract patients.AIM To investigate the clinical efficacy and complications of femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification combined with Toric IOL implantation in diabetic cataract patients,comparing it with traditional phacoemulsification methods.METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 120 patients with diabetes cataract from May 2019 to May 2021.The patients were divided into two groups:the control group underwent traditional phacoemulsification and Toric IOL implantation,while the treatment group received Len Sx femtosecond laser-assisted treatment.Outcome measures included naked eye vision,astigmatism,high-level ocular phase difference detection,clinical efficacy,and complication.RESULTS There were no significant preoperative differences in astigmatism or naked eyesight between the two groups.However,postoperative improvements were observed in both groups,with the treatment group showing greater enhancements in naked eye vision and astigmatism six months after the procedure.High-level corneal phase difference tests also indicated significant differences in favor of the treatment group.CONCLUSION This study suggests that femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification combined with Toric IOL implantation appears to be more effective in enhancing postoperative vision in diabetic cataract patients compared to traditional methods offering valuable insights for clinical practice.