The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence rate of prostate cancer among men with erectile dysfunction （ED） treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors （PDE-5i） over a 7-year period vs. men with...The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence rate of prostate cancer among men with erectile dysfunction （ED） treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors （PDE-5i） over a 7-year period vs. men with ED of the same age and with similar risk factors who were not treated with PDE-5i. In a retrospective review of electronic medical records and billing databases between the years 2000 and 2006, men with ED between the ages of 50 and 69 years and no history of prostate cancer prior to 2000 were identified. These individuals were divided into two groups： 2362 men who had treatment with PDE-5i, and 2612 men who did not have treatment. Demographic data in each group were compared. During the study period, 97 （4.1%） men with ED treated with PDE-5i were diagnosed with prostate cancer compared with 258 （9.9%） men with ED in the non-treated group （P〈00001）. A higher percentage of African Americans were treated with PDE-5i vs. those who were not （10.5% vs. 7.1%; P〈O.O001）. The PDE-5i group had lower documented diagnosis of elevated prostate-specific antigen （10.0% vs. 13.1%; P=-0.0008） and higher percentage of benign prostatic hyperplasia （38.4% vs. 35.1%; P=0.0149）. Men with ED treated with PDE-5i tended to have less chance （adjusted odds ratio： 0.4; 95% confidence intervals： 0.3-0.5; P〈0.0001） of having prostate cancer. Our data suggest that men with ED treated with PDE-5i tended to have less of a chance of beine diaenosed with orostate cancer. Further research is warranted.展开更多
Introduction: There is substantial evidence suggesting the additive effect on erectile function (ED) of testosterone and phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitors. But the combination of long-acting testosterone undecanoat...Introduction: There is substantial evidence suggesting the additive effect on erectile function (ED) of testosterone and phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitors. But the combination of long-acting testosterone undecanoate (TU), in combination with the PDE5-I vardenafil men with with late-onset hypogonadal patients (LOH) with (ED) has not yet been studied. Aims: To evaluate the effects of TU i.m., and if desired, the PDE5i vardenafil (PDE-5I) in LOH patients with ED measured with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Methods: A prospective study was performed following four administrations of TU in week 0, 6, 18, 30. If no improvement of ED assessed with IIEF-5 or the Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) in week 12, the PDE5 inhibitor vardenafil was added. The final evaluation was in week 46. Main Outcome Measures: Aging Male Symptom (AMS) score, IIEF-5 score, and International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) at each visit were summarized as mean with standard deviation;while GAQ was summarized using frequency and percentage. Scores at each visit were also categorized into different levels of symptom severity. Results: AMS score decreased significantly at week 12, 30 and 46. IIEF-5 score increased but a significant change was found only at week 30 and 46. The GAQ assessment indicated erection and sexual intercourse already improved at the first assessment continuing thereafter. IPSS score decreased from baseline at week 46. Levels of total, free and bioavailable testosterone had increased significantly from baseline at all visits. Hematocrit, hemoglobin and prostate specific antigen increased significantly from baseline. Adverse events were rare with pain at injection site found in one patient. The two events were non-serious in type, mild in their intensity and recovered. Conclusions: Therapy with TU and, and if desired, combined with the PDE5 inhibitor vardenafil improved sexual activity in LOH patients with ED.展开更多
文摘The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence rate of prostate cancer among men with erectile dysfunction （ED） treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors （PDE-5i） over a 7-year period vs. men with ED of the same age and with similar risk factors who were not treated with PDE-5i. In a retrospective review of electronic medical records and billing databases between the years 2000 and 2006, men with ED between the ages of 50 and 69 years and no history of prostate cancer prior to 2000 were identified. These individuals were divided into two groups： 2362 men who had treatment with PDE-5i, and 2612 men who did not have treatment. Demographic data in each group were compared. During the study period, 97 （4.1%） men with ED treated with PDE-5i were diagnosed with prostate cancer compared with 258 （9.9%） men with ED in the non-treated group （P〈00001）. A higher percentage of African Americans were treated with PDE-5i vs. those who were not （10.5% vs. 7.1%; P〈O.O001）. The PDE-5i group had lower documented diagnosis of elevated prostate-specific antigen （10.0% vs. 13.1%; P=-0.0008） and higher percentage of benign prostatic hyperplasia （38.4% vs. 35.1%; P=0.0149）. Men with ED treated with PDE-5i tended to have less chance （adjusted odds ratio： 0.4; 95% confidence intervals： 0.3-0.5; P〈0.0001） of having prostate cancer. Our data suggest that men with ED treated with PDE-5i tended to have less of a chance of beine diaenosed with orostate cancer. Further research is warranted.
文摘Introduction: There is substantial evidence suggesting the additive effect on erectile function (ED) of testosterone and phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitors. But the combination of long-acting testosterone undecanoate (TU), in combination with the PDE5-I vardenafil men with with late-onset hypogonadal patients (LOH) with (ED) has not yet been studied. Aims: To evaluate the effects of TU i.m., and if desired, the PDE5i vardenafil (PDE-5I) in LOH patients with ED measured with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Methods: A prospective study was performed following four administrations of TU in week 0, 6, 18, 30. If no improvement of ED assessed with IIEF-5 or the Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) in week 12, the PDE5 inhibitor vardenafil was added. The final evaluation was in week 46. Main Outcome Measures: Aging Male Symptom (AMS) score, IIEF-5 score, and International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) at each visit were summarized as mean with standard deviation;while GAQ was summarized using frequency and percentage. Scores at each visit were also categorized into different levels of symptom severity. Results: AMS score decreased significantly at week 12, 30 and 46. IIEF-5 score increased but a significant change was found only at week 30 and 46. The GAQ assessment indicated erection and sexual intercourse already improved at the first assessment continuing thereafter. IPSS score decreased from baseline at week 46. Levels of total, free and bioavailable testosterone had increased significantly from baseline at all visits. Hematocrit, hemoglobin and prostate specific antigen increased significantly from baseline. Adverse events were rare with pain at injection site found in one patient. The two events were non-serious in type, mild in their intensity and recovered. Conclusions: Therapy with TU and, and if desired, combined with the PDE5 inhibitor vardenafil improved sexual activity in LOH patients with ED.
