期刊文献+
共找到14篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Modeling the Effect of Planting Dates and Nitrogen Application Rates on Potatoes Water Productivity in Jordan Valley
1
作者 Ayman Suleiman 《American Journal of Plant Sciences》 2022年第1期137-146,共10页
Agricultural sector in Jordan is facing serious challenges in meeting the<span style="font-family:;" "=""> growing needs of food security because of its low water availability. Maintaini... Agricultural sector in Jordan is facing serious challenges in meeting the<span style="font-family:;" "=""> growing needs of food security because of its low water availability. Maintaining <span>and enhancing agricultural water productivity under such prevailing</span> environmental constraints are hard to achieve. Potatoes water productively in Jordan Valley was modeled using Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) under six nitrogen applications (0, 60, 80, 100, 120 and 140 kg/ha) and twelve planting dates every two weeks from October 1 to March 15 scenarios. The potatoes yield increased from 0% to 100% nitrogen treatment and then no considerable increase occurred. The potatoes</span><span style="font-family:;" "="">’</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> crop yield increased from October 1<sup>st</sup> to January 15 and then decreased after which until the last day of planting date. The seasonal cumulative crop evapotranspiration for potatoes about doubled from 0% to 60% nitrogen treatment and then kept increasing gradually until the last treatment. The growing season cumulative crop evapotranspiration for potatoes increased gradually from October 1 to March 1. The water productivity increased from 0% nitrogen treatment to 100% and then decreased. The potatoes</span><span style="font-family:;" "="">’</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> water productivity increased from October 1 until November 15 and then decreased to the end. From these results, we recommend that 100% of nitrogen requirements should be applied. The best window for potatoes</span><span style="font-family:;" "="">’</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> planting date is the last two weeks in November.</span> 展开更多
关键词 Deficit Irrigation POTATOES DSSAT Nitrogen Application planting dates Water Productivity
下载PDF
Year-to-Year and Maturity Variation in Rainfed Soybean Yield by Planting Dates 被引量:1
2
作者 YANGJin-zhong MarkAlley JonRoygard 《Agricultural Sciences in China》 CAS CSCD 2004年第3期186-191,共6页
The interactions on rainfed soybean yield among planting date, maturity, and year-to-yearclimate change were studied using CROPGRO-soybean model. Simulations were based on 19 plantingdates, maturity groupsⅢ, ⅣandⅤ,... The interactions on rainfed soybean yield among planting date, maturity, and year-to-yearclimate change were studied using CROPGRO-soybean model. Simulations were based on 19 plantingdates, maturity groupsⅢ, ⅣandⅤ, 30 years recorded weather data from Corbin, Suffolk,West Point in Virginia, USA. Yield was similar on early plantings and went down with lateplantings. Both grand and year-to-year variation of soybean yield declined linearly withplanting date. Year-to-year climate variation was dominant yield variation source inrainfed soybean production. Interaction occurred between planting date and maturity.Optimal planting dates for different sites lied within 130th-170th day of a year.Irrigation is recommended for profitable crops, especially in Corbin and West Point. 展开更多
关键词 Simulation Soybean yield planting date Climatic risk MATURITY
下载PDF
Effects of planting dates and shading on carbohydrate content,yield,and fiber quality in cotton with respect to fruiting positions 被引量:2
3
作者 ZHAO Wen-qing WU You +5 位作者 Zahoor Rizwan WANG You-hua MA Yi-na CHEN Bing-lin MENG Ya-li ZHOU Zhi-guo 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第5期1106-1119,共14页
Two cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars, Kemian 1(cool temperature-tolerant) and Sumian 15(cool temperaturesensitive) were used to study the effects of cool temperature on carbohydrates, yield, and fiber qua... Two cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars, Kemian 1(cool temperature-tolerant) and Sumian 15(cool temperaturesensitive) were used to study the effects of cool temperature on carbohydrates, yield, and fiber quality in cotton bolls located at different fruiting positions(FP). Cool temperatures were created using late planting and low light. The experiment was conducted in 2010 and 2011 using two planting dates(OPD, the optimized planting date, 25 April; LPD, the late planting date, 10 June) and two shading levels of crop relative light rate(CRLR, 100 and 60%). Compared with fruiting position 1(FP1), cotton yield and yield components(fiber quality, leaf sucrose and starch content, and fiber cellulose) were all decreased on FP3 under all treatments. Compared with OPD-CRLR 100%, other treatments(OPD-CRLR 60%, LPD-CRLR 100%, and LPD-CRLR 60%) had significantly decreased lint yield at both FPs of both cultivars, but especially at FP3 and in Sumian 15; this decrease was mainly caused by a large decline in boll number. All fiber quality indices decreased under late planting and shading except fiber length at FP1 with OPD-CRLR 60%, and a greater reduction was observed at FP3 and in Sumian 15. Sucrose content of the subtending leaf and fiber increased under LPD compared to OPD, whereas it decreased under CRLR 60% compared to CRLR 100%, which led to decreased fiber cellulose content. Therefore, shading primarily decreased the "source" sucrose content in the subtending leaf whereas late planting diminished translocation of sucrose towards cotton fiber. Notably, as planting date was delayed and light was decreased, more carbohydrates were distributed to leaf and bolls at FP1 than those at FP3, resulting in higher yield and better fiber quality at FP1, and a higher proportion of bolls and carbohydrates allocated at FP3 of Kemian 1 compared to that of Sumian 15. In conclusion, cotton yield and fiber quality were reduced less at FP1 compared to those at FP3 under low temperature and low light conditions. Thus, reduced cotton yield and fiber quality loss can be minimized by selecting low temperature tolerant cultivars under both low temperature and light conditions. 展开更多
关键词 cotton planting date and shading fruiting position yield fiber quality
下载PDF
Growth and Yield of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) Genotypes under Different Planting Dates in the Semi-Arid Southern High Plains 被引量:1
4
作者 Sudhir Singla Kulbhushan Grover +3 位作者 Sangamesh V. Angadi Sultan H. Begna Brian Schutte Dawn Van Leeuwen 《American Journal of Plant Sciences》 2016年第8期1246-1258,共13页
Guar is a drought and salt tolerant summer annual legume, which could be a potential alternative crop in the semi-arid Southern High Plains. Increased use of guar gum in oil industries has increased the demand of guar... Guar is a drought and salt tolerant summer annual legume, which could be a potential alternative crop in the semi-arid Southern High Plains. Increased use of guar gum in oil industries has increased the demand of guar globally. Planting date effects on stand establishment, physiological parameters, and yield formation of guar genotypes were investigated at the New Mexico State University’s Agricultural Science Center at Clovis, NM for two seasons (2014 and 2015). Four guar genotypes (HES 1123, Kinman, Lewis, and Matador) were tested under three planting dates (June 18, July 7, and July 22 in 2014;and June 18, July 6, and July 20 in 2015). Higher temperature and rainfall were recorded under mid-June planting than early-July and late-July plantings. Guar planted under mid-June had better stand establishment as shown by the higher number of plants m<sup>-2</sup>, better physiology as revealed by higher photosynthetic rate (P<sub>n</sub>), transpiration rate (T<sub>r</sub>), leaf area index (LAI), and SPAD values than early-July and late-July plantings. Guar planted under mid-June resulted in taller plants, and therefore, produced higher plant biomass than both of the July plantings. Yield attributing characteristics including clusters plant<sup>-1</sup>, pods plant<sup>-1</sup>, seeds plant<sup>-1</sup>, seed spod<sup>-1</sup>, 1000 seed weight, and harvest index (HI) were highest under mid-June planting followed by the early-July and late-July plantings, respectively. The mid-June planting increased seed yield by 26% and 55% over early-July and late-July (1399 vs. 1111 and 903 kg&middot;ha<sup>-1</sup>) plantings, respectively in 2014;while the same increase in 2015 was 51% and 243% (1308 vs. 868 and 381 kg&middot;ha<sup>-1</sup>), respectively. These results indicate that delaying planting beyond mid-June is detrimental to guar productivity. However, genotypes did not show any significant variation in their performance. Overall, warmer growing conditions and more precipitation under mid-June planting caused better growth and yield formation of guar genotypes. 展开更多
关键词 GUAR planting Date Genotype Yield Southern High Plains
下载PDF
Influence of Planting Date on the Incidence and Severity of Leaf Spot Disease in Telfairia occidentalis Hook f.
5
作者 Agyingi Lucy Ambang Kebei Andrew Kpu Mbong Grace Annih 《Agricultural Sciences》 2023年第9期1169-1178,共10页
Telfairia occidentalis Hook f. is attacked by a destructive fungal pathogen Epicoccum sorghinum which causes leaf spot disease in the field. In Came-roon, this critically important seed and leaf vegetable is predomina... Telfairia occidentalis Hook f. is attacked by a destructive fungal pathogen Epicoccum sorghinum which causes leaf spot disease in the field. In Came-roon, this critically important seed and leaf vegetable is predominantly culti-vated under natural environmental conditions. An experiment was conducted in 2019 and 2020 during the long and short rainy seasons in Santchou to de-termine the influence of planting dates between seasons on the incidence and severity of leaf spot disease. The design used was a 2 by 4 factorial random-ized complete block design with three replications and four sowing dates. Data for disease incidence and severity documented fortnightly, were submitted to analysis of variance using SPSS version 23, and the means were separated by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at a 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis revealed that the long rainy season registered a significantly (p p < 0.05) disease incidences and severities to other planting dates investi-gated. We established that the first three planting dates in the long rainy season could be a management practice to reduce disease prevalence. 展开更多
关键词 Leaf Spot planting Date SEASON Telfairia occidentalis
下载PDF
Suitable Date of Seeding, Planting Density and Water Use Efficiency for Propagation of Stock Seed Potato in Mountainous Region of Southwest Sichuan 被引量:2
6
作者 沈学善 罗李飞 +1 位作者 李春荣 黄钢 《Agricultural Science & Technology》 CAS 2012年第9期1904-1907,共4页
[Objective] The experiment was conducted to study suitable date of seed- ing and density of spring potato at the stock breeding base in Ebian County at an elevation of 1 200 to 1 500 m. [Methods] Virus-free Potato "C... [Objective] The experiment was conducted to study suitable date of seed- ing and density of spring potato at the stock breeding base in Ebian County at an elevation of 1 200 to 1 500 m. [Methods] Virus-free Potato "Chuanyu 13" was used as material to study the effects of date of seeding and density on growing period, germination rate, yield and water use efficiency of spring potato in the field. [Result] With the postponement of date of seeding, the days from sowing to germination shortened, while the germination rate, the number of tubers per plant, the number of middle and small tubers in a group, yield and water use efficiency all increased. Planting density had no effects on the days from sowing to germination and the ger- mination rate, while the number of tubers per ptant, the number of middle and small tubers in a group, yield and water use efficiency increased significantly along with the increasing planting density. [Conclusion] At an elevation of 1 200 m to 1 250 m in Ebian County, the suitable date of seeding for potato was from February 9 to March 1, and the suitable planting density was 12×10^4 plants per hm^2, however, in the optimum planting density has not been found so that it needs further research, 展开更多
关键词 Date ofseedingi planting density Stock seed YIELD Water use efficiency
下载PDF
Effects of Planting Date on Winter Canola Growth and Yield in the Southwestern U.S. 被引量:2
7
作者 Sultan H. Begna Sangamesh V. Angadi 《American Journal of Plant Sciences》 2016年第1期201-217,共17页
Canola (Brassica napus L.) has potential to become alternative cash crop (healthy oil for human and meals for animal uses) with tremendous rotational benefits in the Southwestern U.S., a region dominated by cereal-fal... Canola (Brassica napus L.) has potential to become alternative cash crop (healthy oil for human and meals for animal uses) with tremendous rotational benefits in the Southwestern U.S., a region dominated by cereal-fallow cropping systems. However, information on optimum planting date for its successful production is limited. Field experiments were conducted in 2011-12 and 2012-13 seasons under irrigation condition to study the response of canola growth and yield to planting dates at Clovis, NM. Three planting dates (mid-September, late-September and early-October) and four canola varieties (early flowering: DKW41-10 and DKW46-15;medium flowering: Riley and Wichita) are studied. Fall plant stand density is significantly higher for early-October than mid- and late-September plantings. However, a ratio of fall to spring plant stand density indicates a greater reduction in spring plant stand density with early-October (25%) and mid-September (19%) than late-September (7%). Vegetative (by 13 days) and flowering (by 7 days) duration phases are significantly shortened with delay in planting. The decline in aboveground dry matter (DM) due to delayed planting resulted in significant seed yield reduction in both 2011-12 (26%) and in 2012-13 (8%) when early-October and mid-September plantings were compared. There was a positive relationship between final DM and canola seed yield, accounting for 84 and 34% variation for 2011-12 and 2012-13 seasons, respectively with the 2011-12 environmental conditions being conducive for genetically controlled variation in DM production to be more apparent and strong in explaining the variation in seed yield among varieties. Medium-flowering varieties produced higher DM (9741 vs. 8371 Kg&#8226ha<sup>-1</sup>) and seed yield (2785 vs. 2035 Kg&#8226ha<sup>-1</sup>) than early-flowering varieties. In addition to seed yield, DM can be used as an indirect selection criterion for seed yield in variety selection and appropriate planting dates including a guarantee for high crop residues (~75% of the total aboveground biomass) production to make canola a potential alternative cash and rotational break crop in the Southwestern U.S. 展开更多
关键词 Alternative Potential Crop planting dates Yield Diversity Southwestern U.S.
下载PDF
Influence of Planting Date on the Growth and Yield of Different Maturity Group of Soybeans in the Southeastern Coastal Plains of USA
8
作者 P. Wiatrak G. Chen 《Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(B)》 2011年第2期251-265,共15页
Planting date is a critical component of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production, under dry land conditions in the Southeastern Coastal Plain. The objectives of this study were to 1. Evaluate the effect of plant... Planting date is a critical component of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production, under dry land conditions in the Southeastern Coastal Plain. The objectives of this study were to 1. Evaluate the effect of planting date on plant leaf area index (LAI) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at 60 and 90 days after planting (DAP), plant height and grain yield, and 2. Determine the optimum planting period by integrating the responses from vegetation growth to yield for soybean maturity group (MG) IV-VIII under dry land conditions in the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Planting dates were scheduled about 14-days intervals from late April to mid-July (2008) or late July (2009). Greatest grain yield for MG IV was obtained from planting in around mid-May in both years. The yield was greater for MG V planted in May and greater for MG VI-VIII planted in late April and May, but started to decline for planting in early June. Plant LAI and NDVI at 60 DAP were affected by both planting date and precipitation, but were poorly correlated with grain yield. However, plant LAI and NDVI were well correlated with yield and were greater for May planting dates at 90 DAP. These indiccs declined for soybean planted after May. Mature plant height decreased more rapidly with delayed planting. These results indicate that plant growth and yield decreased after May planting. Optimum planting period for all MGs was early to mid-May. 展开更多
关键词 SOYBEAN planting date leaf area index normalized difference vegetation index grain yield plant growth.
下载PDF
Effects of Planting Date on Development and Field of Forage Maize
9
作者 LI Jing-shi HAN Jin-ling +1 位作者 ZHANG Min LI Yan-sheng 《Animal Husbandry and Feed Science》 CAS 2012年第1期41-44,共4页
[ Objective] To investigate the effects of planting date on development and yield of forage maize and to determine the appropriate plant- ing date for forage maize. [ Method] Using forage maize 50 as experimental mate... [ Objective] To investigate the effects of planting date on development and yield of forage maize and to determine the appropriate plant- ing date for forage maize. [ Method] Using forage maize 50 as experimental material, the development of forage maize was observed, and the yield of forage in the later grain filling period and mature stage was measured, after the maize were planted at different dates, r Remltl With the delaying planting date, phenological period was delayed, and the duration of the same growing stage was shortened among different treatments. The shor- test duration days of anthesis maturity period appeared in the treatment of planting in June 15, and the duration days of anthesis maturity period was increased in the treatment of planting in June 30. With the delaying planting date, the height of maize plant in the five leaf stage was increased. The highest plant in the jointing stage appeared in the treatment of planting in June 15. However, the highest plant appeared in the treatment of planting in May 30 after the jointing stage. The number of green leaves per plant was reduced with the delaying planting date in the tasseling stage, and it was increased with the delaying planting date from later grain filling period to mature stage. With the delaying planting date, the fresh matter yield, forage yield and grain yield were reduced. [ Conclusion] The study provides theoretical and practical reference for high-yield cultivation of forage maize. 展开更多
关键词 planting date Forage maize Growth and development FIELD
下载PDF
Impact of temperature on yield and related traits in cotton genotypes 被引量:2
10
作者 Kalim Ullah Niamatullah Khan +4 位作者 Zahid Usman Rehmat Ullah Fazal Yazdan Saleem Syed Asif Imran Shah Muhammad Salman 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第3期678-683,共6页
Cotton growth and development is influenced by various uncontrollable environmental conditions. Temperature variations in the field can be created by planting at different dates. The objective of the present study was... Cotton growth and development is influenced by various uncontrollable environmental conditions. Temperature variations in the field can be created by planting at different dates. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of planting dates and thermal temperatures(growing degree days) on yield of 4 cotton genotypes, viz., CIM-598, CIM-599, CIM-602 and Ali Akbar-703. Plants were subjected to 6 planting dates during 2013 and 2014 in a trial conducted in randomized complete block design with four replications. For boll number, boll weight and seed cotton yield, cotton genotypes exhibited significant differences, CIM-599 produced the highest seed cotton yield of 2 062 kg ha^(–1) on account of maximum boll number and boll weight. The highest seed cotton yield was recorded in planting dates from 15 th April to 1st May whereas early and delayed planting reduced the yield due to less accumulation of heat units. Regression analysis revealed that increase of one unit(15 days) from early to optimum date(15th March to 15 th April) increased yield by 93.58 kg ha^–1. Delay in planting also decreased the seed cotton yield with the same ratio. Thus it is concluded that cotton must be sown from 15 th April to 1st May to have good productivity in this kind of environment. 展开更多
关键词 Gossypium hirsutum planting dates growing degree days genotypes
下载PDF
Association mapping of quantitative trait loci for yield-related agronomic traits in rice(Oryza sativa L.)
11
作者 XU Fei-fei JIN Liang +3 位作者 HUANG Yan TONG Chuan CHEN Ya-ling BAO Jin-song 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第10期2192-2202,共11页
High yield in rice mainly depends on large grain weight, ideal plant architecture and proper flowering time adapting to various geographic regions. To help achieve higher yield, phenotype variations of heading date(H... High yield in rice mainly depends on large grain weight, ideal plant architecture and proper flowering time adapting to various geographic regions. To help achieve higher yield, phenotype variations of heading date(HD), plant architecture and grain shape in a panel of 416 rice accessions were investigated in this study. A total of 143 markers including 100 simple sequence repeat(SSR) markers and 43 gene-tagged markers were employed in association mapping to detect quantitative trait loci(QTL) responsible for these variations. Among the 7 subpopulations, POP5 in japonica group showed the largest values of HD and grain width(GW), but the smallest values of grain length(GL) and grain length to width ratio(GLW). Among the six indica groups, POP7 had the largest values of HD, GL, GLW, and 1 000-grain weight(TGW). A total of 27 QTLs were detected underlying these phenotypic variations in single year, while 12 of them could be detected in 2006 and 2007. GS3 marker was closely associated with GL, GW and GLW, and widely distributed in different groups. The starch synthesis related gene markers, SSI, SSIIa, SBE1, AGPL4, and ISA1, were linked to plant height(PH), panicle length(PL), flag leaf length(FLL), GW, and GLW. The SSR markers, RM267, RM340 and RM346, were linked to at least two traits. Therefore, these new markers will probably be used to improve rice grain yield or plant architecture when performing marker-assisted selection of proper alleles. 展开更多
关键词 yield plant architecture heading date association mapping marker-assisted selection
下载PDF
Impact off cotton planting date and nitrogen fertilization on Bemisiaargentifolii populations 被引量:7
12
作者 JIAN-LONGBI DONG-MEILIN +1 位作者 KEH-SHENLII NICKC.TOSCANO 《Insect Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第1期31-36,共6页
The silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring) is a widely distributed pest of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and the population levels may be affected by rates of nitrogen fertilization and planti... The silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring) is a widely distributed pest of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and the population levels may be affected by rates of nitrogen fertilization and planting date. Field experiments were conducted to investigate the impact of cotton planting date and nitrogen fertilization on silverleaf whitefly population dynamics. Cotton was planted on 26 April and 8 June, for the early and late plantings, respectively. Nitrogen treatments consisted of soil applications of 0, 112, 168 and 224 kg of nitrogen per hectare. The population levels of adult whiteflies were much higher on early-planted cotton than on late planting. Also, increased numbers of adult whiteflies on both early and late plantings occurred with increasing amounts of applied nitrogen.Applied nitrogen increased seed cotton yields of early plantings but had no effect on the yields of late plantings. 展开更多
关键词 silverleaf whitefly nitrogen fertility gossypium hirsutum planting date
原文传递
Influence of brown stink bug feeding, planting date and sampling time on common smut infection of maize
13
作者 Xinzhi Ni Michael D. Toews +5 位作者 G. David Buntin James E. Carpenter Alisa Huffaker Eric A. Schmelz Ted E. Cottrell Zaid Abdo 《Insect Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第5期564-571,共8页
Phytopathogen infections are frequently influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors in a crop field. The effect of brown stink bug, Euschistus servus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), feeding and planting date and sampl... Phytopathogen infections are frequently influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors in a crop field. The effect of brown stink bug, Euschistus servus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), feeding and planting date and sampling time on common smut (Ustilago maydis) infection percentage of maize plants was examined in 2005 and 2006, and 2010 and 2011, respectively. Brown stink bug adult feeding on maize hybrid "DKC6971" at flowering in 2005 and 2006 did not influence smut infection percentage when examined using 3 treatments (i.e., 0 adult, 5 adults, and 5 adults mixed with the smut spores). The smut infection percentages were 〈 3% (n =12) in the 3 treatments. The smut infection percentage among the 4 weekly samplings was the same, so was natural aflatoxin contamination at harvest among the treatments. The 2nd experiment showed that planting date did not affect the smut infection percentage in either 2010 or 2011. But, the smut infection percentage from the postflowering sampling was greater than preflowering sampling in both years. The smut infection percentage varied among the germplasm lines in 2010, but not in 2011. This study demonstrated that brown stink bug feeding at flowering had no effect on smut infection in maize, and the best time for smut evaluation would be after flowering. The temperature and precipitation might have also influenced the percentage of smut-infected maize plants during the 4 years when the experiments were conducted. The similarity between kernel-colonizing U. maydis and Aspergillus flavus infections and genotype × environment interaction were also discussed. 展开更多
关键词 common smut Euschistus servus planting date Ustilago maydis
原文传递
Adaptation to a Warming-Drying Trend Through Cropping System Adjustment over Three Decades:A Case Study in the Northern Agro-Pastural Ecotone of China 被引量:7
14
作者 张婧婷 安萍莉 +5 位作者 潘志华 郝宝针 王立为 董智强 潘学标 薛青武 《Journal of Meteorological Research》 SCIE CSCD 2015年第3期496-514,共19页
Long-term field monitoring data and historical crop data are useful to assess the impacts of climate change and to manage cropping systems. The objectives of this study are to understand the cropping system response t... Long-term field monitoring data and historical crop data are useful to assess the impacts of climate change and to manage cropping systems. The objectives of this study are to understand the cropping system response to a warming-drying trend in the northern agro-pastural ecotone (NAE) of China and to document how farmers can adapt to the warming-drying trend by changing cropping system structure and adjusting planting date. The results indicate that a significant warming-drying trend existed in the NAE from 1980 to 2009, and this trend significantly decreased crop (spring wheat, naked oat, and potato) yields. Furthermore, the yield decreased by 16.2%-28.4% with a 1℃ increase in maximum temperature and decreased by 6.6%-11.8% with a 10% decrease in precipitation. Considering food security, water use efficiency, and water ecological adaptability in the semi-arid NAE, cropping system structure adjustment (e.g., a shift from wheat to potato as the predominant crop) and planting date adaptation (e.g., a delay in crop planting date) can offset the impact of the warming-drying trend in the NAE. Based on the successful offsetting of the impact of the warming-drying trend in the NAE, we conclude that farmers can reduce the negative effects of climate change and minimize the risk of crop failure by adapting their cropping system structure at the farming level. 展开更多
关键词 warming-drying trend cropping system structure adjustment planting date change water use efficiency water ecological adaptability northern agro-pastural ecotone of China
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部