and conclusion of the Third Session of the 12th National People＇s Congress （NPC） of China at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, Which is- sues did Chinese legislators discuss during this year＇s session？ Wha...and conclusion of the Third Session of the 12th National People＇s Congress （NPC） of China at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, Which is- sues did Chinese legislators discuss during this year＇s session？ What lessons can be drawn for the benefit of African countries.展开更多
The main purpose of this article is to present the initial phase of the project in the field of argumentation theory and political philosophy. Project concerns studies of different types of rationality in the context ...The main purpose of this article is to present the initial phase of the project in the field of argumentation theory and political philosophy. Project concerns studies of different types of rationality in the context of the argumentation. Background consideration is the problem of incommensurability and incompatibility types of rationality in political and ideological disputes. The first step is the establishment of a category of argumentative potential as a criterion for the typology of argument, which will build a map of argumentation, which will provide a starting point for a discussion. Apart from demonstrating the disproportion of discourses, the conclusion of the argument is to prove the local character of rationality.展开更多
文摘and conclusion of the Third Session of the 12th National People＇s Congress （NPC） of China at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, Which is- sues did Chinese legislators discuss during this year＇s session？ What lessons can be drawn for the benefit of African countries.
文摘The main purpose of this article is to present the initial phase of the project in the field of argumentation theory and political philosophy. Project concerns studies of different types of rationality in the context of the argumentation. Background consideration is the problem of incommensurability and incompatibility types of rationality in political and ideological disputes. The first step is the establishment of a category of argumentative potential as a criterion for the typology of argument, which will build a map of argumentation, which will provide a starting point for a discussion. Apart from demonstrating the disproportion of discourses, the conclusion of the argument is to prove the local character of rationality.
