Hyponatremic encephalopathy due to polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy:A case report

BACKGROUND Adequate bowel preparation is critical for colonoscopy screening.At present,the most widely used intestinal cleaner recommended at home and abroad is Polyethylene glycol(PEG).Intestinal cleansers can cause electrolyte disturbances and hyponatremia.However,hyponatremic encephalopathy due to hyponatremia induced by PEG solution,although rare,can lead to serious irreversible sequelae and even death.CASE SUMMARY In this report,we discuss a case of neurological dysfunction due to hyponatremia,also known as hyponatremic encephalopathy,observed in a 63-year-old woman who underwent PEG-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy.She was eventually transferred to our intensive care unit for treatment due to her Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9/15(Eye opening 2;Verbal response 1;Motor response 6)and abnormal laboratory tests.CONCLUSION Physicians should be thoroughly familiarized with the patient’s history before prescribing PEG for bowel preparation,and timely identification of patients with hyponatremic encephalopathy is essential as delayed treatment is associated with poor neurological outcomes.An intravenous infusion of 3%sodium chloride is recommended at the onset of early symptoms.The goal of treatment is to adequately treat cerebral edema while avoiding serum sodium correction beyond 15 to 20 m Eq/L within 48 h of treatment to prevent osmotic demyelination syndrome.

Anaphylactic shock induced by polyethylene glycol after bowel preparation for the colorectal cancer surgery:A case report

BACKGROUND Polyethylene glycol(PEG)is widely used as an additive because of its hydrophilic and chemically inert properties.However,there are been increasing reports of PEG allergies,including anaphylaxis,although they are still rare.This case report aims to raise awareness,that the commonly used bowel cleansing agent containing PEG can cause serious allergic reactions.CASE SUMMARY Prior to surgery for sigmoid colon cancer,a 63-year-old man was prescribed a bowel cleansing agent containing PEG.Within 30 min of ingestion,he developed symptoms of anaphylactic shock and did not respond to initial intramuscular epinephrine injection.Under diagnosis of anaphylaxis to PEG,he was stabilized with fluid hydration and continuous norepinephrine infusion.CONCLUSION While allergic reactions to PEG are rare,they can be life-threatening.Therefore,it is crucial for clinicians to be aware of this possibility and to diagnose and resuscitate patients immediately.

Efficacy of mosapride citrate with polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy preparation

AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive mosapride citrate for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METHODS:We conducted a randomized,double-blind, placebo-controlled study with mosapride in addition to polyethylene glycol(PEG)-electrolyte solution.Of 250 patients undergoing colonoscopy,124 were randomized to receive 2 L PEG plus 15 mg of mosapride citrate (mosapride group),and 126 received 2 L PEG plus placebo(placebo group).Patients completed a questionnaire reporting the acceptability and tolerability of the bowel preparation process.The efficacy of bowel preparation was assessed by colonoscopists using a 5-point scale based on Aronchick's criteria.The primary end point was optimal bowel preparation rates(scores of excellent/good/fair vs poor/inadequate). RESULTS:A total of 249 patients were included in the analysis.In the mosapride group,optimal bowel preparation rates were significantly higher in the left colon compared with the placebo group(78.2%vs 65.6%,P<0.05),but not in the right colon(76.5%vs 66.4%,P=0.08).After excluding patients with severe constipation,there was a significant difference in bowel preparation in both the left and right colon(82.4%vs 66.7%,80.8%vs 67.5%,P<0.05,P<0.01).The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. Among the subgroup who had previous colonoscopy experience,a significantly higher number of patients in the mosapride group felt that the current preparation was easier compared with patients in the placebo group(34/72 patients vs 24/74 patients,P<0.05). CONCLUSION:Mosapride citrate may be an effective and safe adjunct to PEG-electrolyte solution that leads to improved quality of bowel preparation,especially in patients without severe constipation.

Surface Modification of Polyethylene (PE) Films Using Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure

Modification of the surface properties of polyethylene （PE） films is studied using air dielectric barrier discharge at atmospheric pressure. The treated samples are examined by Water contact angle measurements, Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflection spectroscopy （FTIR-ATR）, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy （XPS） and scanning electron microscopy （SEM）. With the increase in treating time, the water contact angle changes from 93.2° before treatment to a minimum of 53.3° after a treatment for 50 s. Both ATR and XPS results show some oxidized species are introduced into the sample surface by the plasma treatment and the tendency of the water contact angle with the treating time is the same as that of oxygen concentration on the treated sample surface. SEM result shows the surface roughness of PE samples increases with the treatment time increasing.

Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation

AIM: To compare the effectiveness, patient acceptability, and physical tolerability of two oral lavage solutions prior to colonoscopy in a Taiwan Residents population. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients were randomized to receive either standard 4 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) or 90 mL of sodium phosphate (NaP) in a split regimen of two 45 mL doses separated by 12 h, prior to colonoscopic evaluation. The primary endpoint was the percent of subjects who had completed the preparation. Secondary endpoints included colonic cleansing evaluated with an overall assessment and segmental evaluation, the tolerance and acceptability assessed by a selfadministered structured questionnaire, and a safety profile such as any unexpected adverse events, electrolyte tests, physical exams, vital signs, and body weights. RESULTS: A significantly higher completion rate was found in the NaP group compared to the PEG group(84.2% vs 27.5%, P＜0.001). The amount of fluid suctioned was significantly less in patients taking NaP vs PEG (50.13±54.8 cc vs 121.13±115.4 cc, P＜0.001),even after controlling for completion of the oral solution(P = 0.031). The two groups showed a comparable overall assessment of bowel preparation with a rate of 'good' or 'excellent' in 78.9% of patients in the NaPgroup and 82.5% in PEG group (P = 0.778). Patients taking NaP tended to have significantly better colonic segmental cleansing relative to stool amount observedin the descending (94.7% vs 70%, P = 0.007) andtransverse (94.6% vs 74.4%, P = 0.025) colon. Slightly more patients graded the taste of NaP as 'good' or 'very good' compared to the PEG patients (32.5% vs 12.5%;P = 0.059). Patients' willingness to take the same preparation in the future was 68.4% in the NaP compared to 75% in the PEG group (P = 0.617). There was a significant increase in serum sodium and a significant decrease in phosphate and chloride levels in NaP group on the day following the colonoscopy without any clinical sequelae. Prolonged (＞24 h) hemodynamic changes were also observed in 20-35% subjects of either group.CONCLUSION: Both bowel cleansing agents proved to be similar in safety and effectiveness, while NaP appeared to be more cost-effective. After identifying and excluding patients with potential risk factors, sodium phosphate should become an alternative preparation for patients undergoing elective colonoscopy in the Taiwan Residents population.

Atomic layer deposition: Catalytic preparation and modification technique for the next generation

Atomic layer deposition(ALD)attracts great attention nowadays due to its ability for designing and modifying catalytic systems at the molecular level.There are several reported review papers published recently discussing this technique in catalysis.However,the mechanism on how the deposited materials improve the catalyst stability and tune the reaction selectivity is still unclear.Herein,catalytic systems created via ALD on stepwise preparation and/or modification under self-limiting reaction conditions are summarized.The effects of deposited materials in terms of electronic/geometry modification over the catalytic nanoparticles(NPs)are discussed.These effects explain the mechanism of the catalytic stability improvement and the selectivity modification.The unique properties of ALD for designing new catalytic systems are further investigated for building up photocatalytic reaction nanobowls,tandem catalyst and bi-active-component metallic catalytic systems.

The Aging Study on Polyethylene Terephthalate with Surface Modification by Water Vapor Plasma

The aging effects of the contact angle and surface energy on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) have been investigated with surface modification by water vapor plasma. The experimental results show that the contact angle of water and PET decreases obviously and surface energy increases. However, with the increase of the aging time, the contact angle and surface energy change back gradually to original state.

Ascorbic acid and low-volume polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy:A meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the benefits of low-volume polyethylene glycol(PEG) with ascorbic acid compared to fulldose PEG for colonoscopy preparation. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Pub Med, and recent abstracts from major conferences were searched(January 2012). Only randomized-controlled trials on adult subjects comparing lowvolume PEG(2 L) with ascorbic acid vs full-dose PEG(3 or 4 L) were included. Meta-analysis for the efficacy of low-volume PEG with ascorbic acid and full-dose PEG were analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of number of satisfactory bowel preparations as well as adverse patient events(abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting). Separate analyses were performed for each main outcome by using OR with fixed and random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed by calculating the I2 measure of inconsistency. Rev Man 5.1 was utilized for statistical analysis.RESULTS: The initial search identified 242 articles and trials. Nine studies(n = 2911) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for this meta-analysis with mean age range from 53.0 to 59.6 years. All studies were randomized controlled trials on adult patients comparing large-volume PEG solutions(3 or 4 L) with low-volume PEG solutions and ascorbic acid. No statistically significant difference was noted between lowvolume PEG with ascorbic acid and full-dose PEG for number of satisfactory bowel preparations(OR 1.07, 95%CI: 0.86-1.33, P = 0.56). No statistically significant difference was noted between low-volume PEG with ascorbic acid and full-dose PEG for abdominal pain(OR 1.09, 95%CI: 0.81-1.48, P = 0.56), nausea(OR 0.70, 95%CI: 0.49-1.00, P = 0.05), or vomiting(OR 0.99, 95%CI: 0.78-1.26, P = 0.95). No publication bias was noted.CONCLUSION: Low-volume PEG with the addition of ascorbic acid demonstrates no statistically significant difference to full-dose PEG for satisfactory bowel preparation and side-effects.

Same-day single-dose vs large-volume split-dose regimens of polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Split-dose regimens(SpDs)of 4 L of polyethylene glycol(PEG)have been established as the“gold standard”for bowel preparation;however,its use is limited by the large volumes of fluids required and sleep disturbance associated with night doses.Meanwhile,the same-day single-dose regimens(SSDs)of PEG has been recommended as an alternative;however,its superiority compared to other regimens is a matter of debate.AIM To compare the efficacy and tolerability between SSDs and large-volume SpDs PEG for bowel preparation.METHODS We searched MEDLINE/PubMed,the Cochrane Library,RCA,EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded for randomized trials comparing(2 L/4 L)SSDs to large-volume(4 L/3 L)SpDs PEG-based regimens,regardless of adjuvant laxative use.The pooled analysis of relative risk ratio and mean difference was calculated for bowel cleanliness,sleep disturbance,willingness to repeat the procedure using the same preparation and adverse effects.A random effects model or fixed-effects model was chosen based on heterogeneity analysis among studies.RESULTS A total of 18 studies were included.There was no statistically significant difference of adequate bowel preparation(relative risk=0.97;95%CI:0.92-1.02)(14 trials),right colon Boston Bowel Preparation Scale(mean difference=0.00;95%CI:-0.04,0.03)(9 trials)and right colon Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale(mean difference=0.04;95%CI:-0.27,0.34)(5 trials)between(2 L/4 L)SSDs and large-volume(4 L/3 L)SpDs,regardless of adjuvant laxative use.The pooled analysis favored the use of SSDs with less sleep disturbance(relative risk=0.52;95%CI:0.40,0.68)and lower incidence of abdominal pain(relative risk=0.75;95%CI:0.62,0.90).During subgroup analysis,patients that received low-volume(2 L)SSDs showed more willingness to repeat the procedure using the same preparation than SpDs(P<0.05).No significant difference in adverse effects,including nausea,vomiting and bloating,was found between the two arms(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Regardless of adjuvant laxative use,the(2 L/4 L)SSD PEG-based arm was considered equal or better than the large-volume(≥3 L)SpDs PEG regimen in terms of bowel cleanliness and tolerability.Patients that received low-volume(2 L)SSDs showed more willingness to repeat the procedure using the same preparation due to the low-volume fluid requirement and less sleep disturbance.

Bisacodyl plus split 2-L polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone improves quality of bowel preparation before screening colonoscopy

AIM:To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy,tolerability and acceptability of split 2-L polyethylene glycol(PEG)-citrate-simethicone(PEG-CS)plus bisacodyl(BIS)vs 4-L PEG for fecal occult blood test-positive screening colonoscopy.METHODS:This was a randomised,observer-blind comparative study.Two hundred and sixty-four subjects underwent screening colonoscopy(mean age 62.5±7.4years,male 61.7%).The primary objective of the study was to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of the two preparations.Interventions:BIS plus PEG-CS:3 tablets of 5-mg BIS at 16:00,PEG-CS 1-L at 19:00 and 1-L at7:00,4-L PEG:3-L at 17:00,and 1-L at 7:00.Colonoscopy was carried out after 11:00,at least 3 h after the completion of bowel preparation.Bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Harefield Cleansing Scale.RESULTS:Bowel preparation was successful for 92.8%of subjects in the PEG-CS group and for 92.1%of subjects in the 4-L PEG(RR=1.01;95%CI:0.94-1.08).BIS+PEG-CS was better tolerated than 4-L PEG.A greater rate of patients in the BIS+PEG-CS group had no difficulty and/or were willing to repeat the same preparation compared to split-dose 4-L PEG group.Subjects in the BIS+PEG-CS group rated the prep as good or satisfactory in 90.6%as compared to 77%in the 4-L PEG(P=0.003).Subjects receiving BIS+PEGCS stated they fully adhered to instructions drinking all the 2-L solution in 97.1%compared with 87.3%in the4-L PEG(P=0.003).CONCLUSION:BIS plus split 2-L PEG-CS was as effective as but better tolerated and accepted than split4-L PEG for screening colonoscopy.This new procedure may increase the positive attitude and participation to colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy.

Lubiprostone used with polyethylene glycol in diabetic patients enhances colonoscopy preparation quality

AIM: To assess the additive effect of lubiprostone on the quality of colon preparation in diabetics given single-dosed polyethylene glycol electrolyte(PEG)for colonoscopy.METHODS:This was an investigator-initiated,singlecenter,single-blinded prospective trial comparing the efficacy of L+PEG to PEG alone on colon preparation quality in diabetics undergoing screening colonoscopy.The study was approved by our institution’s IRB.The PEG was given as a single-dose to address patientcompliance concerns voiced by our IRB with splitdosing.All patients received only clear liquids the day prior to colonoscopy.Experimental group(Grp L)received PEG+1 dose L 2 h prior to and 2 h after PEG completion.Control group(Grp C)received only PEG the evening prior to the colonoscopy.Patients were randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups.The endoscopist was blinded to which colon prep was given and all colonoscopies were complete.Upon colonoscopy completion,the endoscopist rated the colon prep-quality by a validated 5-point Likert scale(1-excellent to 5-inadequate).RESULTS:Sixty patients were enrolled in the study;30 Grp L and 30 Grp C.Overall,patients were excluded due to study non-completion in 12(41%)Grp L and 5(17%) Grp C,P=0.04.Average colon preparation score Grp L =2.47 and Grp C=3.00,P=0.09.Although this was not statistically significant,there was a trend towards improved colon prep in Grp L.Statistical significance may have been achieved if completion rates had been similar between both study groups.CONCLUSION:Use of 2-L capsules with PEG resulted in a trend towards improved colon prep over PEG alone in diabetic patients when given as a single-dose regimen.

Efficacy of 1.2L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations

BACKGROUND A low-volume polyethylene glycol(PEG) solution that combines ascorbic acid with PEG-based electrolyte solution(PEG-ASC) is gaining mainstream acceptance for bowel preparation due to reduced volume and improved taste.Although several reports showed that bowel preparation with PEG-ASC volume lower than 2.0 L with laxative agents could be an alternative to traditional preparation regimen, the cleansing protocols have not been fully investigated.AIM To evaluate the cleansing efficacy of 1.2 L PEG-ASC solution comparing with 2.0 L PEG electrolyte(PEG-ELS) for bowel preparations.METHODS A randomized, single-blinded, open-label, single-center, non-inferiority study was conducted. In total, 312 Japanese adult patients(aged > 18 years) who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to bowel lavage with either 1.2 L of PEG-ASC solution with at least 0.6 L of an additional clear fluid(1.2 L PEG-ASC group) or 2.0 L of PEG-ELS(PEG-ELS group). Then, 48 mg of sennoside was administered at bedtime on the day before colonoscopy, and the designated drug solution was administered at the hospital on the day of colonoscopy. Bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale(BBPS). The volume of fluid intake and required time for bowel preparation were evaluated. Furthermore, compliance, patient tolerance,and overall acceptability were evaluated using a patient questionnaire, which was assessed using a visual analog scale.RESULTS In total, 291 patients(1.2 L PEG-ASC group, 148; PEG-ELS group, 143) completed the study. There was no significant difference in successful cleansing, defined as a BBPS score ≥ 2 in each segment, between the two groups(1.2 L PEG-ASC group, 91.9%; PEG-ELS group, 90.2%; 95%CI:-0.03-0.09). The required time for bowel preparation was significantly shorter(164.95 min ± 68.95 min vs 202.16 min± 68.69 min, P < 0.001) and the total fluid intake volume was significantly lower(2.23 L ± 0.55 L vs 2.47 L ± 0.56 L, P < 0.001) in the 1.2 L PEG-ASC group than in the PEG-ELS group. Palatability, acceptability of the volume of solution, and overall acceptability evaluated using a patient questionnaire, which was assessed by the visual analog scale, were significantly better in the 1.2 L PEG-ASC group than in the PEG-ELS group(7.70 cm ± 2.57 cm vs 5.80 cm ± 3.24 cm, P < 0.001). No severe adverse event was observed in each group.CONCLUSION The 1.2 L PEG-ASC solution was non-inferior to the 2.0 L PEG-ELS solution in terms of cleansing efficacy and had better acceptability among Japanese patients.

Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy

BACKGROUND No consensus has been reached in patients suspected of having inadequate bowel preparation regarding optimal salvage methods, which negatively affects the efficacy and quality of colonoscopy. The most ideal and reasonable rescue option involves early suspicion and identification of patients with inadequate preparation before sedation, additional oral ingestion of a suitable preparation formulation, and same-day colonoscopy.AIM To compare 0.5-L and 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid(PEG +Asc) as additional bowel cleansing methods after a 2-L split-dose PEG + Asc regimen in patients with expected inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy.METHODS Individuals with expected inadequate bowel preparation based on last stool form, such as turbid liquid, particulate liquid, or liquid with small amounts of feces, were randomized to either a 0.5-L PEG + Asc group or a 1-L PEG + Asc group. The primary endpoint was bowel preparation as assessed using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale(ABPS) and Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS) scores. The secondary endpoints were cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate(PDR), adenoma detection rate(ADR), individual compliance with additional PEG + Asc, and patient satisfaction.RESULTS Initially, 98 patients were included, but 8 were later excluded due to withdrawal of consent to participate in the study. Adequate bowel preparation(as assessed by ABPS) was observed in 80.9%(38/47) of subjects in the 0.5-L group and in88.4%(38/43) of subjects in the 1-L group(P = 0.617). Mean total BBPS was 6.7 points in the 0.5-L group and 7.0 points in the 1-L group(P = 0.458). ADRs and PDRs were similar in the two groups, and cecal intubation and withdrawal times were not significantly different. However, mean patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the 0.5-L group(P = 0.041).CONCLUSION The bowel cleaning efficacy of additional 0.5-L PEG + Asc was not inferior to that of 1-L PEG + Asc. Additional 0.5-L PEG + Asc is worthwhile when inadequate bowel preparation is expected before colonoscopy.

Research Progress of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

Colorectal cancer ranks third in the global cancer data in 2020. Colorectal scope is the most effective method to diagnose colorectal diseases such as benign and malignant colorectal tumors. The poor quality of intestinal preparation causes an increased rate of missed diagnosis of colorectal tumors, reduces the rate of cecal intubation for colorectal examination, increases the discomfort, and reduces the compliance of re-examination. Therefore, we should try our best to improve the quality of intestinal preparation. This study reviewed the latest advances related to the preoperative preparation for colonoscopy. Recent research shows that smartphone apps can provide more detailed education and guidance on bowel preparation;Pre-packaged foods are more suitable as a way to eat before colonoscopy. The use of smaller doses, better taste of cathartic agents, and some auxiliary measures, combined with the patient’s situation to provide personalized intestinal preparation measures to improve the quality of intestinal preparation. Starting from the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation, continuous improvement of patients’ tolerance to bowel preparation, continuous improvement of bowel preparation plan based on individual factors’ needs, and better communication with examined subjects by using existing scientific information technology, may be the hot spot of colonoscopy bowel preparation research in the next few years.

Effect of sham feeding on gastrointestinal hormone and the quality of bowel preparation in patients with Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes solution

Objective:To investigate whether sham feeding before colonoscopy can effect gastrointestinal hormone and compliance of colonoscopy patients when taking polyethylene glycol solution,so as to provide reference for effective intervention programs.Methods:A total of 110 patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized into a control group and an sham feeding group,with 55 patients in each group.Patients in control group only received polyethylene glycol(PEG)solution before colonoscopy.Patients in gum group chewed gum after taking PEG solution.Serum motilin,gastrin and cholecystokinin were tested with ELISA assay.Intestinal tract cleanliness was assessed by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale and patients'discomfort and intake compliance by a self-designed questionnaire.Results:The serum motilin of sham feeding for 4 h were lower than that of control group,the incidence of abdominal distention and nausea in sham feeding group was lower than that in control group,and the intake compliance and the speed of peristalsis was better,but there was no statistical significance found in the total score of intestinal tract cleanliness,difficulty and time of endoscopic operation.There was no statistical significance between the two groups regarding cecal intubation rate and colonoscopic findings.Conclusions:patients with gum chewing increase serum motilin and accelerating speed of peristalsis,it can not enhances colonoscopy bowel preparation quality,but improved abdominal discomfort,and intake adherence of patients in colonoscopy preparation.

Research Progress of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

Colorectal cancer ranks third in the global cancer data in 2020.Colorectal scope is the most effective method to diagnose colorectal diseases such as benign and malignant colorectal tumors.The poor quality of intestinal preparation causes an increased rate of missed diagnosis of colorectal tumors,reduces the rate of cecal intubation for colorectal examination,increases the discomfort,and reduces the compliance of re-examination.Therefore,we should try our best to improve the quality of intestinal preparation.This study reviewed the latest advances related to the preoperative preparation for colonoscopy.Recent research shows that smartphone apps can provide more detailed education and guidance on bowel preparation;Pre-packaged foods are more suitable as a way to eat before colonoscopy.The use of smaller doses,better taste of cathartic agents,and some auxiliary measures,combined with the patient’s situation to provide personalized intestinal preparation measures to improve the quality of intestinal preparation.Starting from the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation,continuous improvement of patients’tolerance to bowel preparation,continuous improvement of bowel preparation plan based on individual factors’needs,and better communication with examined subjects by using existing scientific information technology,may be the hot spot of colonoscopy bowel preparation research in the next few years.

Preparation of Bio-polyols by Liquefaction of Hardwood Residue and Their Application in the Modification of Polyurethane Foams

Hardwood residue（HR）,a byproduct of paper industry,was liquefied by using polyethylene glycol 400（PEG400） and ethylene carbonate（EC） as the liquefaction solvents,and concentrated sulfuric acid as the catalyst to produce bio-polyols（HRLP）,which were used to synthesize polyurethane（PU） foams.The effects of conditions on the properties of HRLP and modified PU foams were investigated and the mechanism of biomass liquefaction was discussed.The optimum conditions of liquefaction were obtained as follows： reaction temperature of 160 °C,reaction time of 60 min,ratio of PEG400/EC of 8：2（w/w）,and ratio of liquid/solid of 5：1（w/w）.The characterization of HRLP modified PU foams suggested that HRLP could partially replace the petroleum polyols to synthesize PU foams.With the increase of the replacement percentage of HRLP,the apparent density and compressive strength of the foams increased firstly,and then decreased.Meanwhile,the thermal stability was improved slightly.

Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients:Evidence from the literature

Adequate bowel cleansing is critical for a high-quality colonoscopy because it affects diagnostic accuracy and adenoma detection.Nevertheless,almost a quarter of procedures are still carried out with suboptimal preparation,resulting in longer procedure times,higher risk of complications,and higher likelihood of missing lesions.Current guidelines recommend high-volume or low-volume polyethylene glycol(PEG)/non-PEG-based split-dose regimens.In patients who have had insufficient bowel cleansing,the colonoscopy should be repeated the same day or the next day with additional bowel cleansing as a salvage option.A strategy that includes a prolonged low-fiber diet,a split preparation regimen,and a colonoscopy within 5 h of the end of preparation may increase cleansing success rates in the elderly.Furthermore,even though no specific product is specifically recommended in the other cases for difficult-to-prepare patients,clinical evidence suggests that 1-L PEG plus ascorbic acid preparation are associated with higher cleansing success in hospitalized and inflammatory bowel disease patients.Patients with severe renal insufficiency(creatinine clearance<30 mL/min)should be prepared with isotonic high volume PEG solutions.Few data on cirrhotic patients are currently available,and no trials have been conducted in this population.An accurate characterization of procedural and patient variables may lead to a more personalized approach to bowel preparation,especially in patients undergoing resection of left colon lesions,where intestinal preparation has a poor outcome.The purpose of this review was to summarize the evidence on the risk factors influencing the quality of bowel cleansing in difficult-to-prepare patients,as well as strategies to improve colonoscopy preparation in these patients.

Emerging space for non-polyethene-glycol bowel preparations in inflammatory bowel disease-related colonoscopy:Veering toward better adherence and palatability

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases(IBDs)require repeated endoscopic evaluations over time by colonoscopy to weigh disease activity but also for different and additional indications(e.g.,evaluation of postoperative recurrence,colorectal cancer surveillance).Colonoscopy,however,requires adequate bowel preparation to be of quality.The latter is achieved as long as the patient takes a certain amount of product to have a number of bowel movements suitable to clean the colon and allow optimal visualization of the mucosa during endoscopy.However,significant guidelines recommend preparations for patients with IBD not excelling in palatability.This recommendation originates from the fact that most of the studies conducted on bowel preparations in patients with IBD have been done with isosmolar preparations based on polyethylene glycol(PEG),for which,therefore,more safety data exist.As a result,the low-volume non-PEG preparations(e.g.,magnesium citrate plus picosulphate,oral sulphate solutions)have been set aside for the whole range of warnings to be heeded because of their hyperosmolarity.New studies,however,are emerging,leaning in overall for a paradigm shift in this matter.Indeed,such non-PEG preparations seem to show a particularly encouraging and engaging safety profile when considering their broad potential for tolerability and patient preference.Indeed,such evidence is insufficient to indicate such preparations in all patients with IBD but may pave the way for those with remission or well-controlled disease.This article summarizes the central studies conducted in IBD settings using non-PEG preparations by discussing their results.

Preparation of Compound Ultrafine CeO2 by Wet-Solid-Phase Mechanochemical Modification

To satisfy practical requirements from industrial applications, an alternate route for synthesis compound ultrafine CeO2 powders by wet-solid-phase mechanochemical modification using industrial grade hydrated cerium carbonate as raw material was proposed.The effect of modifier reaction percentage, reaction time, calcining temperature and modifier amount on particle size, density, suspensibility, and hardness of compound CeO2 powder was investigated.The phase evolutions of preparation process were characterized by XRD.SEM micrograph of the final product shows that compound CeO2 powders obtained are well-dispersed, spherically-shaped, uniformly-sized and submicron-sized particles.The method is readily available in raw material, low in cost, simple in process, and has great potential for industrialization.The compound CeO2 powders of different physical properties can be synthesized by controlling the above-mentioned influence factors in preparation process.