This double-blind, controlled, randomized, three-way cross-over study evaluates the effect of 40 g (D1 group) and 20 g (D2 group) of acacia gum (AG) versus no treatment (NT group) on post-prandial glucose (PPG) levels...This double-blind, controlled, randomized, three-way cross-over study evaluates the effect of 40 g (D1 group) and 20 g (D2 group) of acacia gum (AG) versus no treatment (NT group) on post-prandial glucose (PPG) levels in normal-weight and overweight subjects. Additionally, post-prandial insulin (PPI) levels as well as the safety and tolerability of gum acacia were assessed. 35 healthy subjects aged 25 - 60 years, body mass index 18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> - 29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, received one treatment of 20 g, 40 g, or 0 g of AG each. Glucose and insulin values were determined at -15 min and prior to the intake (time “0”) as well as 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 120, and 180 min after the “0 min” blood draw. The mean PPG levels were lower (34% in D1 group, p = 0.003;35% in D2 group, p = 0.005) than in the NT group. PPI concentration was statistically significantly lower at all time points except baseline in both treatment groups compared to NT groups. Global benefit and tolerability were rated as “very good” or “good” by 100% of subjects in the treatment groups. This study provides robust evidence of the significant benefits of AG consumption on PPG and PPI levels in healthy subjects. Moreover, very good tolerability was demonstrated.展开更多
For type 1 and advanced type 2 diabetic patients, insulin replacement therapy with simulating on-demand prandial and basal insulin secretion is the best option for optimal glycemic control. However, there is no insuli...For type 1 and advanced type 2 diabetic patients, insulin replacement therapy with simulating on-demand prandial and basal insulin secretion is the best option for optimal glycemic control. However, there is no insulin delivery system yet could mimic both controlled basal insulin release and rapid prandial insulin release in response to real-time blood glucose changes. Here we reported an artificial insulin delivery system, mimicking physiological basal and prandial insulin secretion, to achieve real-time glycemic control and reduce risk of hypoglycemia. A phenylboronic acid(PBA)/galactosyl-based glucose-responsive insulin delivery system was prepared with insulin-loaded micelles embedded in hydrogel matrix. At the hyperglycemic state, both the hydrogel and micelles could swell and achieve rapid glucose-responsive release of insulin, mimicking prandial insulin secretion.When the glucose level returned to the normal state, only the micelles partially responded to glucose and still released insulin gradually. The hydrogel with increased crosslinking density could slow down the diffusion speed of insulin inside, resulting in controlled release of insulin and simulating physiological basal insulin secretion. This hydrogel-micelle composite insulin delivery system could quickly reduce the blood glucose level in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes, and maintain normal blood glucose level without hypoglycemia for about 24 h. This kind of glucose-responsive hydrogel-micelle composite may be a promising candidate for delivery of insulin in the treatment of diabetes.展开更多
目的 分析德谷门冬双胰岛素、基础-餐时胰岛素短期强化治疗对新诊断2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖控制的影响。方法 选取60例新诊断T2DM患者为研究对象,依据随机数字法分为对照组(30例,德谷门冬双胰岛素治疗)、研究组(30例,基础-餐时胰岛素...目的 分析德谷门冬双胰岛素、基础-餐时胰岛素短期强化治疗对新诊断2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖控制的影响。方法 选取60例新诊断T2DM患者为研究对象,依据随机数字法分为对照组(30例,德谷门冬双胰岛素治疗)、研究组(30例,基础-餐时胰岛素短期强化治疗)。对比两组患者的血糖指标[糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)和餐后2 h血糖(2 h PBG)],血糖控制情况(血糖达标时间、血糖波动水平)和低血糖发生率,治疗效果。结果 两组治疗前HbA1c、FPG和2 h PBG水平对比无显著差异(P>0.05);治疗后,研究组HbA1c(6.08±0.76)%、FPG(5.71±0.59)mmol/L和2 h PBG(7.53±0.96)mmol/L比对照组的(8.19±1.14)%、(6.86±0.84)mmol/L、(9.38±1.33)mmol/L低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者血糖达标时间为(6.95±1.61)d、血糖波动为(2.25±0.35)mmol/L、夜间低血糖发生率为0;对照组患者血糖达标时间为(8.26±1.56)d、血糖波动为(3.12±0.68)mmol/L、夜间低血糖发生率为20.00%;研究组患者的血糖达标时间、血糖波动水平和低血糖发生率均显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的治疗总有效率(100.00%)显著高于对照组(80.00%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对于新诊断T2DM患者来说,基础-餐时胰岛素短期强化治疗相对于德谷门冬双胰岛素疗效较好,值得推广。展开更多
目的:评价国内自我管理对糖尿病患者血糖影响的效果。方法:计算机检索维普数据库、万方数据库、中国知网数据库,检索时间为各数据库建库至2015年7月,同时辅助其他检索方式,纳入自我管理对糖尿病患者干预的随机对照试验(RCT),根据Coc...目的:评价国内自我管理对糖尿病患者血糖影响的效果。方法:计算机检索维普数据库、万方数据库、中国知网数据库,检索时间为各数据库建库至2015年7月,同时辅助其他检索方式,纳入自我管理对糖尿病患者干预的随机对照试验(RCT),根据Cochrane Handbook 5.0质量评价标准评价,采用Rev Man 5.0软件进行统计分析。结果:纳入17篇合格文献,包含2489例病例。分析结果显示:与糖尿病传统干预方式组相比,自我管理教育试验组患者空腹血糖在干预后3个月、6个月、12个月与相应对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义;干预后18个月与相应对照组比较差异无统计学意义。自我管理教育试验组患者餐后2小时血糖在干预后3个月与相应对照组比较,差异无统计学意义;6个月、12个月、18个月与相应对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义。结论:自我管理教育(干预6~12个月)对糖尿病患者空腹血糖和餐后2小时血糖的干预效果较好,值得临床推广。发表性偏倚的识别结果表明,该次Meta分析的结果稳定、可靠。展开更多
AIM:To study the prevalence of functional dyspepsia(FD)(Rome Ⅲ criteria) across eating disorders(ED),obese patients,constitutional thinner and healthy volunteers.METHODS:Twenty patients affected by anorexia nervosa,6...AIM:To study the prevalence of functional dyspepsia(FD)(Rome Ⅲ criteria) across eating disorders(ED),obese patients,constitutional thinner and healthy volunteers.METHODS:Twenty patients affected by anorexia nervosa,6 affected by bulimia nervosa,10 affected by ED not otherwise specified according to diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders,4th edition,nine constitutional thinner subjects and,thirtytwo obese patients were recruited from an outpatients clinic devoted to eating behavior disorders.Twentytwo healthy volunteers matched for age and gender were enrolled as healthy controls.All participants underwent a careful clinical examination.Demographic and anthropometric characteristics were obtained from a structured questionnaires.The presence of FD and,its subgroups,epigastric pain syndrome and postprandial distress syndrome(PDS) were diagnosed according to Rome Ⅲ criteria.The intensity-frequency score of broader dyspeptic symptoms such as early satiety,epigastric fullness,epigastric pain,epigastric burning,epigastric pressure,belching,nausea and vomiting were studied by a standardized questionnaire(0-6).Analysis of variance and post-hoc Sheffè tests were used for comparisons.RESULTS:90% of patients affected by anorexia nervosa,83.3% of patients affected by bulimia nervosa,90% of patients affected by ED not otherwise specified,55.6% of constitutionally thin subjects and 18.2% healthy volunteers met the Postprandial Distress Syndrome Criteria(χ 2,P < 0.001).Only one bulimic patient met the epigastric pain syndrome diagnosis.Postprandial fullness intensity-frequency score was significantly higher in anorexia nervosa,bulimia nervosa and ED not otherwise specified groups compared to the score calculated in the constitutional thinner group(4.15 ± 2.08 vs 1.44 ± 2.35,P = 0.003;5.00 ± 2.45vs 1.44 ± 2.35,P = 0.003;4.10 ± 2.23vs 1.44 ± 2.35,P = 0.002,respectively),the obese group(4.15 ± 2.08vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001;5.00 ± 2.45vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001;4.10 ± 2.23 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001,respectively) and healthy volunteers(4.15 ± 2.08 vs 0.36 ± 0.79,P < 0.001;5.00 ± 2.45 vs 0.36 ± 0.79,P < 0.001;4.10 ± 2.23 vs 0.36 ± 0.79,P < 0.001,respectively).Early satiety intensity-frequency score was prominent in anorectic patients compared to bulimic patients(3.85 ± 2.23 vs 1.17 ± 1.83,P = 0.015),obese patients(3.85 ± 2.23 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001) and healthy volunteers(3.85 ± 2.23 vs 0.05 ± 0.21,P < 0.001).Nausea and epigastric pressure were increased in bulimic and ED not otherwise specified patients.Specifically,nausea intensity-frequencyscore was significantly higher in bulimia nervosa and ED not otherwise specified patients compared to anorectic patients(3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.89 ± 1.66,P = 0.04;2.70 ± 2.91 vs 0.89 ± 1.66,P = 0.05,respectively),constitutional thinner subjects(3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P = 0.004;2.70 ± 2.91 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P = 0.005,respectively),obese patients(3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001;3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001 respectively) and,healthy volunteers(3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.17 ± 0.71,P = 0.002;3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.17 ± 0.71,P = 0.001,respectively).Epigastric pressure intensityfrequency score was significantly higher in bulimic and ED not otherwise specified patients compared to constitutional thin subjects(4.67 ± 2.42 vs 1.22 ± 1.72,P = 0.03;4.20 ± 2.21 vs 1.22 ± 1.72,P = 0.03,respectively),obese patients(4.67 ± 2.42 vs 0.75 ± 1.32,P = 0.001;4.20 ± 2.21vs 0.75 ± 1.32,P < 0.001,respectively) and,healthy volunteers(4.67 ± 2.42 vs 0.67 ± 1.46,P = 0.001;4.20 ± 2.21vs 0.67 ± 1.46,P = 0.001,respectively).Vomiting was referred in 100% of bulimia nervosa patients,in 20% of ED not otherwise specified patients,in 15% of anorexia nervosa patients,in 22% of constitutional thinner subjects,and,in 5.6% healthy volunteers(χ 2,P < 0.001).CONCLUSION:PDS is common in eating disorders.Is it mandatory in outpatient gastroenterological clinics to investigate eating disorders in patients with PDS?展开更多
<div style="text-align:justify;"> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a growing health problem, characterized by insulin resistance progressing to beta cell d...<div style="text-align:justify;"> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a growing health problem, characterized by insulin resistance progressing to beta cell dysfunction and insulin deficiency, most of these patients will need intensification of treatment and initiation of insulin to delay or prevent diabetic complications. Glycemic control is the most important aspect of management, and in reducing morbidity and mortality of the diseases. Control of plasma glucose in patients with diabetes can be assessed by HbA1c, FPG, PPG, but still HbA1c% remains the gold standard for assessment of glycemic control and follow up of diabetic patients. The aim of this study is to assess HbA1c% in patients on oral anti-diabetic drugs, with poor glycemic control before and after adding basal insulin, with titration of the dose of insulin depending on fasting blood sugar. 82 patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (43.9% male, 56.1% female), with HbA1c more than 9%, on two types of oral diabetic medication or more, were started on basal insulin (glargine, lantus) and followed for three to six months. Overall 82 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were included in the study. The mean age of the study population was 58.4 years, the mean duration of the disease range was 13.4 years. All patients with HbA1c more than 9%, without organ failure, were included in the study. The mean HbA1c overall had decreased from mean of 11.15% before starting basal insulin to the mean of 8.43% within 3 to 6 month, after initiating basal insulin, this difference was significant at p < 0.001. There was no adverse effect on this medication in any of the study group. The addition of basal insulin to oral anti-diabetic medication in uncontrolled insulin-na<span style="color:#4F4F4F;font-family:"font-size:14px;white-space:normal;background-color:#F7F7F7;">ï</span>ve type 2 diabetic patients resulted in significant improvement of glycemic control, with improved HbA1c level, without adverse effects.</span> </div>展开更多
Pregnancy causes a multitude of metabolic changes within a woman’s body in order to provide the proper nutrients to the developing fetus. In women with diabetes type 1, type 2, and GDM (gestational diabetes mellitus...Pregnancy causes a multitude of metabolic changes within a woman’s body in order to provide the proper nutrients to the developing fetus. In women with diabetes type 1, type 2, and GDM (gestational diabetes mellitus) these metabolic perturbations must be treated distinctly and aggressively to optimize fetal development and health. Pre-gestational diabetes (either type 1 or type 2) has the potential to subject the developing fetus to abnormal maternal glucose levels resulting in problems with organogenesis producing congenital abnormalities or spontaneous abortion. Furthermore, gestational diabetes mellitus presents after organogenesis in the second part of pregnancy, therefore the major risk for the fetus is macrosomia. Although the goal for dietary therapy for each of these disorders is the same which is euglycaemia, the means to achieve it are very different and somewhat controversial. In the case of gestational diabetes, the main stay of therapy is medical nutritional therapy whereas in insulin requiring diabetes, dietary therapy is compensated with pre-meal insulin injections. The metabolic changes in normal pregnancy will be presented followed by the general guidelines for pregnancy. Fetal complications associated with inadequate nutrition or metabolic perturbation will be briefly explored, followed by issues and treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus, with emphasis on specific dietary therapies for GDM.展开更多
文摘This double-blind, controlled, randomized, three-way cross-over study evaluates the effect of 40 g (D1 group) and 20 g (D2 group) of acacia gum (AG) versus no treatment (NT group) on post-prandial glucose (PPG) levels in normal-weight and overweight subjects. Additionally, post-prandial insulin (PPI) levels as well as the safety and tolerability of gum acacia were assessed. 35 healthy subjects aged 25 - 60 years, body mass index 18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> - 29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, received one treatment of 20 g, 40 g, or 0 g of AG each. Glucose and insulin values were determined at -15 min and prior to the intake (time “0”) as well as 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 120, and 180 min after the “0 min” blood draw. The mean PPG levels were lower (34% in D1 group, p = 0.003;35% in D2 group, p = 0.005) than in the NT group. PPI concentration was statistically significantly lower at all time points except baseline in both treatment groups compared to NT groups. Global benefit and tolerability were rated as “very good” or “good” by 100% of subjects in the treatment groups. This study provides robust evidence of the significant benefits of AG consumption on PPG and PPI levels in healthy subjects. Moreover, very good tolerability was demonstrated.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51603105,51773099,51390483,91527306,21620102005)the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University(IRT1257)
文摘For type 1 and advanced type 2 diabetic patients, insulin replacement therapy with simulating on-demand prandial and basal insulin secretion is the best option for optimal glycemic control. However, there is no insulin delivery system yet could mimic both controlled basal insulin release and rapid prandial insulin release in response to real-time blood glucose changes. Here we reported an artificial insulin delivery system, mimicking physiological basal and prandial insulin secretion, to achieve real-time glycemic control and reduce risk of hypoglycemia. A phenylboronic acid(PBA)/galactosyl-based glucose-responsive insulin delivery system was prepared with insulin-loaded micelles embedded in hydrogel matrix. At the hyperglycemic state, both the hydrogel and micelles could swell and achieve rapid glucose-responsive release of insulin, mimicking prandial insulin secretion.When the glucose level returned to the normal state, only the micelles partially responded to glucose and still released insulin gradually. The hydrogel with increased crosslinking density could slow down the diffusion speed of insulin inside, resulting in controlled release of insulin and simulating physiological basal insulin secretion. This hydrogel-micelle composite insulin delivery system could quickly reduce the blood glucose level in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes, and maintain normal blood glucose level without hypoglycemia for about 24 h. This kind of glucose-responsive hydrogel-micelle composite may be a promising candidate for delivery of insulin in the treatment of diabetes.
文摘目的 分析德谷门冬双胰岛素、基础-餐时胰岛素短期强化治疗对新诊断2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖控制的影响。方法 选取60例新诊断T2DM患者为研究对象,依据随机数字法分为对照组(30例,德谷门冬双胰岛素治疗)、研究组(30例,基础-餐时胰岛素短期强化治疗)。对比两组患者的血糖指标[糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)和餐后2 h血糖(2 h PBG)],血糖控制情况(血糖达标时间、血糖波动水平)和低血糖发生率,治疗效果。结果 两组治疗前HbA1c、FPG和2 h PBG水平对比无显著差异(P>0.05);治疗后,研究组HbA1c(6.08±0.76)%、FPG(5.71±0.59)mmol/L和2 h PBG(7.53±0.96)mmol/L比对照组的(8.19±1.14)%、(6.86±0.84)mmol/L、(9.38±1.33)mmol/L低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者血糖达标时间为(6.95±1.61)d、血糖波动为(2.25±0.35)mmol/L、夜间低血糖发生率为0;对照组患者血糖达标时间为(8.26±1.56)d、血糖波动为(3.12±0.68)mmol/L、夜间低血糖发生率为20.00%;研究组患者的血糖达标时间、血糖波动水平和低血糖发生率均显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的治疗总有效率(100.00%)显著高于对照组(80.00%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对于新诊断T2DM患者来说,基础-餐时胰岛素短期强化治疗相对于德谷门冬双胰岛素疗效较好,值得推广。
文摘目的:评价国内自我管理对糖尿病患者血糖影响的效果。方法:计算机检索维普数据库、万方数据库、中国知网数据库,检索时间为各数据库建库至2015年7月,同时辅助其他检索方式,纳入自我管理对糖尿病患者干预的随机对照试验(RCT),根据Cochrane Handbook 5.0质量评价标准评价,采用Rev Man 5.0软件进行统计分析。结果:纳入17篇合格文献,包含2489例病例。分析结果显示:与糖尿病传统干预方式组相比,自我管理教育试验组患者空腹血糖在干预后3个月、6个月、12个月与相应对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义;干预后18个月与相应对照组比较差异无统计学意义。自我管理教育试验组患者餐后2小时血糖在干预后3个月与相应对照组比较,差异无统计学意义;6个月、12个月、18个月与相应对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义。结论:自我管理教育(干预6~12个月)对糖尿病患者空腹血糖和餐后2小时血糖的干预效果较好,值得临床推广。发表性偏倚的识别结果表明,该次Meta分析的结果稳定、可靠。
文摘AIM:To study the prevalence of functional dyspepsia(FD)(Rome Ⅲ criteria) across eating disorders(ED),obese patients,constitutional thinner and healthy volunteers.METHODS:Twenty patients affected by anorexia nervosa,6 affected by bulimia nervosa,10 affected by ED not otherwise specified according to diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders,4th edition,nine constitutional thinner subjects and,thirtytwo obese patients were recruited from an outpatients clinic devoted to eating behavior disorders.Twentytwo healthy volunteers matched for age and gender were enrolled as healthy controls.All participants underwent a careful clinical examination.Demographic and anthropometric characteristics were obtained from a structured questionnaires.The presence of FD and,its subgroups,epigastric pain syndrome and postprandial distress syndrome(PDS) were diagnosed according to Rome Ⅲ criteria.The intensity-frequency score of broader dyspeptic symptoms such as early satiety,epigastric fullness,epigastric pain,epigastric burning,epigastric pressure,belching,nausea and vomiting were studied by a standardized questionnaire(0-6).Analysis of variance and post-hoc Sheffè tests were used for comparisons.RESULTS:90% of patients affected by anorexia nervosa,83.3% of patients affected by bulimia nervosa,90% of patients affected by ED not otherwise specified,55.6% of constitutionally thin subjects and 18.2% healthy volunteers met the Postprandial Distress Syndrome Criteria(χ 2,P < 0.001).Only one bulimic patient met the epigastric pain syndrome diagnosis.Postprandial fullness intensity-frequency score was significantly higher in anorexia nervosa,bulimia nervosa and ED not otherwise specified groups compared to the score calculated in the constitutional thinner group(4.15 ± 2.08 vs 1.44 ± 2.35,P = 0.003;5.00 ± 2.45vs 1.44 ± 2.35,P = 0.003;4.10 ± 2.23vs 1.44 ± 2.35,P = 0.002,respectively),the obese group(4.15 ± 2.08vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001;5.00 ± 2.45vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001;4.10 ± 2.23 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001,respectively) and healthy volunteers(4.15 ± 2.08 vs 0.36 ± 0.79,P < 0.001;5.00 ± 2.45 vs 0.36 ± 0.79,P < 0.001;4.10 ± 2.23 vs 0.36 ± 0.79,P < 0.001,respectively).Early satiety intensity-frequency score was prominent in anorectic patients compared to bulimic patients(3.85 ± 2.23 vs 1.17 ± 1.83,P = 0.015),obese patients(3.85 ± 2.23 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001) and healthy volunteers(3.85 ± 2.23 vs 0.05 ± 0.21,P < 0.001).Nausea and epigastric pressure were increased in bulimic and ED not otherwise specified patients.Specifically,nausea intensity-frequencyscore was significantly higher in bulimia nervosa and ED not otherwise specified patients compared to anorectic patients(3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.89 ± 1.66,P = 0.04;2.70 ± 2.91 vs 0.89 ± 1.66,P = 0.05,respectively),constitutional thinner subjects(3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P = 0.004;2.70 ± 2.91 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P = 0.005,respectively),obese patients(3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001;3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.00 ± 0.00,P < 0.001 respectively) and,healthy volunteers(3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.17 ± 0.71,P = 0.002;3.17 ± 2.56 vs 0.17 ± 0.71,P = 0.001,respectively).Epigastric pressure intensityfrequency score was significantly higher in bulimic and ED not otherwise specified patients compared to constitutional thin subjects(4.67 ± 2.42 vs 1.22 ± 1.72,P = 0.03;4.20 ± 2.21 vs 1.22 ± 1.72,P = 0.03,respectively),obese patients(4.67 ± 2.42 vs 0.75 ± 1.32,P = 0.001;4.20 ± 2.21vs 0.75 ± 1.32,P < 0.001,respectively) and,healthy volunteers(4.67 ± 2.42 vs 0.67 ± 1.46,P = 0.001;4.20 ± 2.21vs 0.67 ± 1.46,P = 0.001,respectively).Vomiting was referred in 100% of bulimia nervosa patients,in 20% of ED not otherwise specified patients,in 15% of anorexia nervosa patients,in 22% of constitutional thinner subjects,and,in 5.6% healthy volunteers(χ 2,P < 0.001).CONCLUSION:PDS is common in eating disorders.Is it mandatory in outpatient gastroenterological clinics to investigate eating disorders in patients with PDS?
文摘<div style="text-align:justify;"> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a growing health problem, characterized by insulin resistance progressing to beta cell dysfunction and insulin deficiency, most of these patients will need intensification of treatment and initiation of insulin to delay or prevent diabetic complications. Glycemic control is the most important aspect of management, and in reducing morbidity and mortality of the diseases. Control of plasma glucose in patients with diabetes can be assessed by HbA1c, FPG, PPG, but still HbA1c% remains the gold standard for assessment of glycemic control and follow up of diabetic patients. The aim of this study is to assess HbA1c% in patients on oral anti-diabetic drugs, with poor glycemic control before and after adding basal insulin, with titration of the dose of insulin depending on fasting blood sugar. 82 patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (43.9% male, 56.1% female), with HbA1c more than 9%, on two types of oral diabetic medication or more, were started on basal insulin (glargine, lantus) and followed for three to six months. Overall 82 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were included in the study. The mean age of the study population was 58.4 years, the mean duration of the disease range was 13.4 years. All patients with HbA1c more than 9%, without organ failure, were included in the study. The mean HbA1c overall had decreased from mean of 11.15% before starting basal insulin to the mean of 8.43% within 3 to 6 month, after initiating basal insulin, this difference was significant at p < 0.001. There was no adverse effect on this medication in any of the study group. The addition of basal insulin to oral anti-diabetic medication in uncontrolled insulin-na<span style="color:#4F4F4F;font-family:"font-size:14px;white-space:normal;background-color:#F7F7F7;">ï</span>ve type 2 diabetic patients resulted in significant improvement of glycemic control, with improved HbA1c level, without adverse effects.</span> </div>
文摘Pregnancy causes a multitude of metabolic changes within a woman’s body in order to provide the proper nutrients to the developing fetus. In women with diabetes type 1, type 2, and GDM (gestational diabetes mellitus) these metabolic perturbations must be treated distinctly and aggressively to optimize fetal development and health. Pre-gestational diabetes (either type 1 or type 2) has the potential to subject the developing fetus to abnormal maternal glucose levels resulting in problems with organogenesis producing congenital abnormalities or spontaneous abortion. Furthermore, gestational diabetes mellitus presents after organogenesis in the second part of pregnancy, therefore the major risk for the fetus is macrosomia. Although the goal for dietary therapy for each of these disorders is the same which is euglycaemia, the means to achieve it are very different and somewhat controversial. In the case of gestational diabetes, the main stay of therapy is medical nutritional therapy whereas in insulin requiring diabetes, dietary therapy is compensated with pre-meal insulin injections. The metabolic changes in normal pregnancy will be presented followed by the general guidelines for pregnancy. Fetal complications associated with inadequate nutrition or metabolic perturbation will be briefly explored, followed by issues and treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus, with emphasis on specific dietary therapies for GDM.