Contrast visual acuity after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design

AIM: To evaluate contrast visual acuity(CVA) after implantation of an aspheric apodized diffractive intraocular lens(IOL) or a spherical apodized diffractive IOL in cataract surgery. ·METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study with a 12-month follow-up compared the results of cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD3 IOL(30 eyes) and a spherical AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3 IOL(30 eyes). CVA with best distance correction was measured at 4 contrast levels(100%,25%,10% and 5%) under 3 levels of chart luminance [250,85 and 25 candelas per square meter(cd/m2)] using a multi-functional visual acuity tester(MFVA-100). ·RESULTS: At 12 months after surgery,there were no statistically significant differences in 100% CVA and 25% CVA under 250cd/m2(P100% =0.875 and P25% =0.057) and 85cd/m2(P100% =0.198 and P25% =0.193) between the aspheric group and the spherical group. However,the 10% CVA and 5% CVA were significant better in aspheric group than spherical group under 250cd/m2(P10% =0.042 and P5% = 0.007) and 85cd/m2(P10% =0.002 and P5%=0.039). Under the luminance level of 25cd/m 2,no significant differences was found in the 100% CVA between the 2 group(P100% = 0.245),while aspheric group had better visual acuity in the remaining 3 contracts(P25% =0.023,P10% =0.026 and P5% = 0.002,respectively). ·CONCULSION: The aspheric AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD3 IOL provided patients with better low-contrast visual acuity than the spherical AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3 IOL.

Effect of intraocular lens implantation on visual field in glaucoma and comorbid cataracts

AIM: To investigate the effects of intraocular lens(IOL) implantation on visual field(VF) in patients with glaucoma and comorbid cataracts(G&C) with different disease severities.METHODS: Totally 56 eyes of 50 patients with primary G&C were included. All patients were divided into three groups based on the severity of the VF defect: the mild, moderate, and severe stage. Phacoemulsification was performed for cataract removal combined with IOL implantation. Visual acuity(VA) and VF tests were performed for all enrolled patients, up to 3 mo after surgery. Changes in VF threshold and global VF index in various groups were also recorded before and after surgery. The mean light sensitivity(MS) values and the changes following surgery(DMS) were compared between the three groups. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study(AGIS) scoring was analyzed on all VF results for analysis of changes in VF before and after surgery.RESULTS: Following surgery, the MS values of the three groups of G&C increased significantly, while the AGIS scores decreased statistically in all groups. The DMS values for the three zones in moderate and severe stage but not mild stage were statistically different between zones. The DMS value was significantly higher in zone I than those in zone II and III(zone I>zone II>zone III;P<0.05). The DMS was significantly higher in zone I than that in zone III in moderate stage patients(zone I>zone II>zone III;P<0.01), while the DMS values in the severe stage patients was significantly higher in zone I than those in zone II and III(zone I>zone II>zone III;P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The mean VF sensitivity of glaucoma patients increased significantly after cataract removal and IOL implantation. Variations in the severity and distribution of characteristics of VF defects result in differences in postoperative VF improvements after cataract surgery. The magnitude of increase in VF sensitivity is associated with VF defect characteristic in glaucoma.

Visual function and higher order aberration after implantation of aspheric and spherical multifocal intraocular lenses:a meta-analysis

AIMTo assess the visual outcomes of aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) compared with spherical multifocal IOL after cataract surgery.

Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison

·AIM: To evaluate the visual function after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal Tecnis ZMA00, aspheric monofocal ZA9003 versus spherical monofocal Akreos Adapt intraocular lenses (IOLs). ·METHODS: Tecnis ZMA00, Tecnis ZA9003 or Akreos Adapt IOLs were bilaterally implanted in 180 eyes from 90 patients. The following parameters were assessed 3 months postoperatively: monocular and binocular uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA) for distance, intermediate and near, spherical aberration (SA), contrast and glare sensitivity, near point refractive power, uncorrected and best corrected near stereoscopic acuity (NSA). Patient satisfaction was assessed by a questionnaire. ·RESULTS:Threemonthspostoperatively,themonocular and binocular UCVA and DCVA at near of Tecnis ZMA00 were significantly better than other two groups. The mean SA for 5.0mm optical zone in Tecnis ZMA00 and Tecnis ZA9003 was significantly lower than that in Akreos Adapt. Mean contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity were better for Tecnis ZA9003 group than for other two groups. Patients with Tecnis ZMA00 had higher monocular and binocular near point refractive power and uncorrected NSA than monofocal groups. The patients in Tecnis ZMA00 had higher mean values for halo compared with other two groups. ·CONCLUSION: Tecnis ZMA00 provided better near VA and uncorrected NSA and higher near point refractive power than monofocal IOLs and patients were spectacle independent. The IOLs with Tecnis aspheric design improved contrast and glare sensitivity. Patients with Tecnis ZMA00 reported more disturbances on visual phenomena of halo. ·

Visual performance of four types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and a review of articles

AIM: To compare the clinical outcomes of a variety of multifocal intraocular lenses(MIOLs) in patients diagnosed with presbyopia or cataracts. METHODS: This clinical trial study included 141 patients(282 eyes) with different MIOLs implantation. The Symfony(60 eyes), the Re STOR(100 eyes), the AT LISAtri(60 eyes), and the Pan Optix(62 eyes) intraocular lenses were evaluated in this prospective interventional study. The near, intermediate, and distant visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, and defocus curve were measured as valid criteria. To statistically analyze the results, we used the Statistical Package for Social Science software, the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank t, the one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey’s post-hoc test in our analysis. Moreover, we conducted a detailed literature search on the Pub Med database in English about MIOLs, in total 59 studies were included in this review article.RESULTS: The four approaches did not show any significant difference in the best-corrected distance visual acuity(P>0.05). The defocus curves at the contrast of 100% showed that trifocal IOLs had better intermediate performance than the bifocal IOL(P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between AT LISAtri and Pan Optix lenses for visual acuity at all distances. The eyes with Pan Optix, Symfony, and AT LISAtri IOL showed better contrast sensitivity than those Re STOR at spatial frequencies of 1, 3, and 6 cpd in photopic and mesopic conditions(P<0.001). CONCLUSION: All four groups of the multifocal lenses were satisfying in terms of distance and near vision. Also, the group of trifocal lenses led to satisfactory outcomes in intermediate vision, without degradation in quality of vision.

Comparison of visual quality after implantation of Al-UV and SN60WF aspheric intraocular lens

AIM:To compare the visual performance of pseudophakic eyes implanted with Al-UV and SN60WF aspheric intraocular lens(IOL),and to investigate the correlations between visual quality parameters and pupil size.METHODS:This prospective comparative study included 105 eyes of 90 patients with age-related cataract who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification.The subjects were divided into two groups according to the implanted IOL type.Three months postoperatively,visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured,wave-front aberrations were assessed using a KR-IW aberrometer(Topcon),and objective optical quality parameters were performed using an optical quality analysis system-OQAS Il(Visiometrics).Independent sample Mest and Spearman correlation analysis were used for data analysis.RESULTS:There were no significant differences found in visual acuity,contrast sensitivity and visual quality parameters between the two groups(P>0.05).The measured intraocular spherical aberration(SA)in Al-UV IOL eyes of-0.19±0.05 pm was close to the designed SA value of-0.20 pm.The modulation transfer function cutoff,Strehl ratio and OQAS values were negatively correlated with pupil size in both groups(P<0.01).CONCLUSION:The subjective and objective visual quality in pseudophakic eyes with A1-UV and SN60WF IOLs are comparable.For aspheric IOL eyes,visual quality decreases with increasing pupil size.

Encouraging Visual Outcome of a New Accommodative Intraocular Lens: A Retrospective Long-Term Study with a Mean Follow-Up of 5.3 Years

Purpose: To assess the visual outcome after implantation of the new Hydrophylic IOL type 41 B/G accommodating intraocular lens (AIOL). Methods: The presented lens was implanted during cataract surgery. All patients were offered follow-ups, allowing two postoperative measurements to be performed at 3 months and between 2020 and 2021. The mean time between lens implantation and last follow-up was 5.3 years (min. 1 year, max. 10 years). Excluded were patients with age-related macular degeneration or amblyopia. Patients with a foreign lens implanted into the second eye were included in a separate control group. Corrected distance (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 5 m, and corrected near (CNVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm were assessed. Furthermore, the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), the dependence on spectacles and the occurrence of optical phenomena were evaluated. Results: The final study cohort consists of 65 patients with 119 implanted AIOLs. Significantly better visual results were obtained in both postoperative follow-ups compared with the preoperative results. The mean values of the last follow-up for the UNVA, CNVA, UDVA, and CDVA were 0.107 ± 0.10;0.039 ± 0.08;0.097 ± 0.11;and 0.040 ± 0.09 logMAR, respectively. Visual outcomes remained on a high level for up to 10 years and showed significantly better results compared to the control group. Postoperative SE was significantly improved. Nearly 70% of patients were no longer dependent on glasses. Furthermore, the occurrence of disturbing optical phenomena was denied by all patients. Conclusion: The results of this AIOL are particularly promising, especially since gratifying visual results could still be measured 10 years after implantation.

Effect of lens constants optimization on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes

AIM: To evaluate the effect of different lens constant optimization methods on the accuracy of intraocular lens(IOL) power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes.METHODS: This study comprised 108 eyes of 94 consecutive patients with axial length(AL) over 26 mm undergoing phacoemulsification and implantation of a Rayner(Hove, UK) 920H IOL. Formulas were evaluated using the following lens constants: manufacturer’s lens constant, User Group for Laser Interference Biometry(ULIB) constant, and optimized constant for long eyes. Results were compared with Barrett Universal II formula, original Wang-Koch AL adjustment method, and modified Wang-Koch AL adjustment method. The outcomes assessed were mean absolute error(MAE) and percentage of eyes with IOL prediction errors within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.0 diopter(D). The nonparametric method, Friedman test, was used to compare MAE performance among constants.RESULTS: Optimized constants could significantly reduce the MAE of SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas compared with manufacturer’s lens constant, whereas the percentage of eyes with IOL prediction errors within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.0 D had no statistically significant differences. Optimized lens constant for long eyes alone showed non-significant refractive advantages over the ULIB constant. Barrett Universal II formula and formulas with AL adjustment showed significantly higher accuracy in highly myopic eyes(P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Lens constant optimization for the subset of long eyes reduces the refractive error only to a limited extent for highly myopic eyes.

Surgical treatment and visual outcomes of cataract with persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous

AIM：To evaluate the surgical treatment and visual outcomes of eyes with cataract and persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous（PHPV）.METHODS：This retrospective study included patients with cataract and PHPV treated with various strategies.Anterior PHPV was treated using phacoemulsification with underwater electric coagulation on posterior capsule neovascularization,posterior capsulotomy,anterior vitrectomy,and intraocular lens（IOL）implantation. Posterior PHPV was treated with lensectomy,posterior vitrectomy,retinal photocoagulation,and IOL implantation or silicone oil tamponade. Visual acuity（VA）,pattern visual evoked potential（P-VEP）,anatomic recovery,postoperative complications,and amblyopia outcome were examined.Subjects were followed-up for 3-48 mo after surgery.RESULTS：Of the 30 patients（33 eyes）with congenital cataract and PHPV included（average age,39.30±35.47mo）,9 eyes had anterior PHPV and 24 had posterior PHPV. Thirty-two eyes were surgically treated. Eyes with anterior PHPV received an IOL during one-stage（6 eyes）and twostage（3 eyes）implantation. Postoperative complications included retinal detachment（1 eye）and recurrent anterior chamber hemorrhage（1 eye）. In eyes with posterior PHPV,6 and 11 eyes received IOLs in one-and two-stage procedures,respectively. Silicone oil was retained in 2 eyes,and IOLs were not implanted in 4 eyes. VA significantly improved in 25 eyes following operations and 3-48 mo of amblyopia treatment. P-VEP P_（100） was improved following surgery in both PHPV types.CONCLUSION：Our surgical strategies are appropriate and effective for anterior and posterior PHPV. Early surgical intervention and amblyopia therapy result in positive treatment outcomes.

Macular hole following phakic intraocular lens implantation:A case report

BACKGROUND Phakic intraocular lens(pIOL)implantation has been commonly prescribed and is considered as a safe and effective option for correcting high myopia.However,it is associated with multiple complications.CASE SUMMARY This report describes a case of full-thickness macular hole(MH)in a patient with a history of bilateral pIOL implantation for the correction of myopia of–12.00 diopters in both eyes 7 mo ago.The MH closed after pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane removal and the best-corrected visual acuity improved to 20/40 in the left eye.CONCLUSION In rare cases,MH can occur following pIOL.In this present case report,we analyzed the formation process of MH following the surgery and emphasized that it is important to inform highly myopic patients about the risk of MH occurrence while being aware of the symptoms of this complication.

Secondary positioning of rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens in a patient with glaucoma:A case report

BACKGROUND Asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses(IOLs)are now widely used in the modern cataract surgery,providing a good level of visual performance over a range of distances and high postoperative patient satisfaction.We report a case of improved visual quality after shifting the near segment of an asymmetrical multifocal IOL to the superotemporal placement in the dominant eye of a glaucoma patient.CASE SUMMARY A 72-year-old woman with bilateral glaucoma underwent phacoemulsification in the dominant eye(left eye)with implantation of an asymmetrical multifocal IOL.Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA)was 0.0 logMAR(20/20 Snellen)and uncorrected near visual acuity(UNVA)was 0.1 logMAR(20/25 Snellen).Two weeks later,the patient presented to our clinic with decreased vision due to migration of lens epithelial cells to IOL anterior surface and edema of corneal endothelial cells.Anterior capsule polishing and superotemporal placement of near segment[+3.00 diopter(D)addition(add)]of IOL were performed.As a result,UDVA at the first week and first year after reposition was 0.0 logMAR(20/20 Snellen),and compared with 0.3 logMAR(20/40 Snellen)in the first week,the UNVA was improved to 0.0 logMAR(20/20 Snellen)one year after surgery.CONCLUSION The postoperative inflammatory reaction and lens epithelial cells proliferation were obvious in this glaucoma patient.Capsule polishing and rotation of the lens were beneficial to the patient,which not only enhanced the patient's vision,but also improved the patient's satisfaction.Therefore,glaucoma patients need to be cautious of implanting multifocal IOLs.Placement of a near segment of an asymmetrical multifocal IOL in the dominant eye should be performed on an individual basis.

区域折射型人工晶状体对散光的包容性

目的:探讨年龄相关性白内障患者行白内障超声乳化摘除联合区域折射型人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后残余散光对视觉质量的影响,评估区域折射型IOL对散光的包容性。方法:回顾性队列研究。收集2020-07/2022-03于我院眼科行白内障超声乳化摘除联合区域折射型IOL(Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15)植入术的年龄相关性白内障患者62例73眼的临床资料,根据术后6 mo残余散光度数进行分组,0.75 D<残余散光度数≤1.50 D的患者35例40眼作为试验组,残余散光度数≤0.75 D的患者27例33眼作为对照组。比较两组患者术后6 mo视力、离焦曲线、客观视觉质量[波前像差、斯泰尔比值(SR)、调制传递函数(MTF)]、主观视觉质量(视功能问卷评分)、满意度及脱镜率情况。结果:两组患者术前散光度数及术后6 mo残余散光度数均有差异(P<0.01)。术后6 mo,两组患者裸眼远、中、近视力、客观视觉质量、主观视觉质量、满意度及脱镜率均无差异(P>0.05),离焦曲线显示,两组患者在附加球镜度数+2.00--4.00 D离焦范围内各点视力均无差异(P>0.05)。结论:Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15 IOL能够包容1.50 D以内的规则散光。

原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障术后视觉质量变化及影响因素

近年来,白内障超声乳化吸除加人工晶状体植入联合房角分离手术逐渐成为治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的主要有效手段,然而随着医疗技术不断进步,术后眼压的控制不再是唯一的追求,患者对术后的视觉质量期望越来越高。为了使患者术后拥有更好的屈光状态和更高的视觉质量,需减少因原发性闭角型青光眼所带来的负面影响,个性化选择不同人工晶状体或计算公式等。视觉质量评价指标包括视力、对比敏感度、高阶像差、主观感受等。因此,本文就原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障患者行白内障超声乳化吸除加人工晶状体植入联合房角分离手术术后屈光漂移、高阶像差、对比敏感度变化及其影响因素以及人工晶状体的选择做出综述。

房角分离手术联合超声乳化人工晶状体植入术对白内障合并闭角型青光眼患者的临床疗效分析

目的:探讨房角分离手术联合超声乳化人工晶状体植入术对白内障合并闭角型青光眼患者的临床疗效。方法:选取2022年1月至2023年1月间于北京康复医院就诊的198例白内障合并闭角型青光眼患者,根据治疗方法的不同将其分为对照组和观察组,每组99例。对照组行白内障超声乳化人工晶状体植入术联合小梁切除术;观察组行超声乳化人工晶状体植入术联合房角分离术。比较两组手术前后的临床相关指标与角膜内皮完整性、手术后3个月临床疗效,以及并发症发生情况。结果:观察组术后3个月临床疗效总有效率为95.96%,较对照组更佳,差异有统计学意义(x^(2)=4.352,P<0.05)。两组治疗后3个月视力水平均有所提高,但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);前房深度和前房角度均有所增大,且观察组更大;眼压均有所降低,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=7.654,P<0.05)。两组治疗后3个月角膜内皮细胞密度均有所减小,而观察组明显大于对照组;角膜内皮细胞平均面积与角膜中心厚度均有所增大,而观察组明显小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=25.233、16.608、6.698,P<0.05)。手术治疗后观察组并发症总检率为8.08%,低于对照组的19.19%,差异有统计学意义(x^(2)=5.189,P<0.05)。结论:白内障合并闭角型青光眼患者实施房角分离手术联合超声乳化人工晶体植入术疗效确切,可有效提高患者视力水平,同时也改善了前房深度、前房角度和眼压,更利于维持患者角膜内皮细胞的完整性,且安全性较好。

超声乳化术联合SBL-3区域折射型非球面IOL治疗年龄相关白内障的效果及对视觉质量的影响

目的 探究超声乳化术联合SBL-3区域折射型非球面人工晶状体(IOL)治疗年龄相关白内障的效果及对视觉质量的影响。方法 选取2022年1—12月收治的年龄相关白内障110例,采用随机数字表法分为单焦点组55例和SBL-3组55例,单焦点组予超声乳化术联合ADAPT AO非球面单焦点IOL植入,SBL-3组给予超声乳化术联合SBL-3区域折射型非球面IOL植入。比较2组术后3个月对比敏感度[明光、暗光、明光炫光、暗光炫光],术前和术后3个月视觉质量[客观散射指数(OSI)、斯特列尔比(SR)、调制传递函数截止频率(MTF cut off)]、视力[最佳矫正近视力(BCNVA)、最佳矫正远视力(BCDVA)、远视矫正下的近视力(DCNVA)]及生活质量[视功能与生存质量问卷(VF-QOL)]。结果 术后3个月,SBL-3组对比敏感度高于单焦点组(P<0.05);术后3个月,2组OSI、BCNVA、BCDVA、DCNVA水平均较术前降低,SBL-3组低于单焦点组(P<0.05);术后3个月,2组SR、MTF cut off水平及VF-QOL评分均较术前升高,SBL-3组高于单焦点组(P<0.05)。结论 超声乳化术联合SBL-3区域折射型非球面IOL能够提高年龄相关白内障患者对比敏感度及视觉质量,改善视力水平及生活质量。

FLACS-IOL手术对白内障患者术后MIOL的偏移率及视觉质量的影响

目的:探讨飞秒激光辅助超声乳化手术联合人工晶状体植入(FLACS-IOL)对白内障患者术后多焦点人工晶状体(MIOL)偏移率及视觉质量的影响。方法:前瞻性研究。选取我院2021-01/2022-12收治的白内障MIOL植入患者95例108眼,根据患者意愿选择手术方式并分组为FLACS组(51例56眼),Phaco组(44例52眼)。对比两组手术时间、前囊切开直径、有效超声时间(EPT)、超声乳化能量释放量(CDE)、裸眼远视力(UCDVA)、最佳矫正远视力(BCDVA)、术后3 mo的IOL偏心距离、偏移率及3 mm瞳孔下全眼总高阶像差(HOA)、三叶草差(Trefoil)及彗差(Coma)。结果:FLACS组手术时间明显短于Phaco组,EPT、CDE均明显低于Phaco组(均P<0.05);两组前囊切开直径无差异(P>0.05)。FLACS组UCDVA在术后1 wk,3 mo优于Phaco组(均P<0.05);两组术后1 wk,3 mo的UCDVA和术后3 mo的BCDVA比较均有差异(P<0.05)。术后3 mo,FLACS组IOL偏心距离小于Phaco组,偏移率明显低于Phaco组(均P<0.05)。在3 mm瞳孔直径下,两组术后3 mo的全眼HOA、三叶草差及彗差均较术前减少(P<0.05),FLACS组术后3 mo的全眼HOA、三叶草差与Phaco组比较均有差异(P<0.05),FLACS组术后3 mo的彗差与Phaco组比较无差异(P>0.05)。结论:FLACS-IOL手术可有效降低白内障患者术后IOL偏移率,获得更好的视觉质量。

Opacity Lensmeter和Pentacam测量的晶状体密度与视力的相关性研究

目的探讨Opacity Lensmeter(OLM)和Pentacam测量的晶状体密度值以及视力与其之间的相关性。方法收集年龄相关核性白内障患者81例(81眼),检查最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity,BCVA)(logMAR)后,分别用OLM和Pentacam测量晶状体密度,分析OLM和Pentacam测量的晶状体密度值及BCVA与其之间的相关性。结果 OLM和Pentacam测量的晶状体密度值与BCVA(logMAR)均呈正相关关系,且Pentacam测量的晶状体密度值与BCVA(logMAR)相关性更高(Z=2.068,P<0.05)。结论晶状体密度可以反映晶状体混浊程度及视力损害程度。Pentacam比OLM测量的晶状体密度值与BCVA损害程度的相关性更高。

多焦点人工晶体植入术在年龄相关性白内障中的临床应用

目的探讨多焦点人工晶体(MIOL)植入术对年龄相关性白内障(ARC)患者的有效性和安全性。方法通过临床前瞻性分组比较研究,选择2020年8月至2021年8月在河源市人民医院就诊且符合ARC诊断患者100例,参考随机数表法分为试验组和对照组,试验组患者行白内障超声乳化摘除联合多焦点人工晶体植入术,对照组行白内障超声乳化摘除联合单晶体植入术,比较两组患者术后1周、1个月、3个月的裸眼远视力(UDVA)、裸眼中视力(UIVA)、裸眼近视力(UNVA)、最佳矫正近视力、最佳矫正远视力及术后3个月视觉质量情况。结果与术后1周比较,两组术后3个月UNVA、UIVA、UDVA、最佳矫正远视力、最佳矫正近视力改善明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组比较,术后1周、1个月、3个月试验组UNVA、UIVA、最佳矫正远视力、最佳矫正近视力改善更优,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与对照组比较,术后3个月试验组近视力维度、中视力维度、脱镜率维度更优,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论多焦点人工晶体植入术不仅可使ARC患者获得良好的远中近视力,且提高了脱镜率,术后主观视觉质量良好。

小切口囊外摘除术与超声乳化术分别联合人工晶状体植入术治疗白内障患者的效果比较

目的:比较小切口囊外摘除术与超声乳化术分别联合人工晶状体植入术治疗白内障患者的效果。方法:选取2020年1月至2022年12月该院收治的70例白内障患者进行前瞻性研究,按照随机数字表法分为研究组与对照组各35例。对照组采取超声乳化术联合人工晶状体植入术治疗,研究组采取小切口囊外摘除术联合人工晶状体植入术治疗,比较两组手术前后视力水平、角膜内皮细胞密度、六角形细胞占比和并发症发生率。结果:术后1 d、3 d、7 d、1个月,研究组视力水平高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3个月,两组角膜内皮细胞密度、六角形细胞占比均低于术前,但研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组并发症发生率为8.57%,低于对照组的28.57%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:小切口囊外摘除术联合人工晶状体植入术治疗白内障患者可提高其术后视力水平和角膜内皮细胞密度、六角形细胞占比,降低其并发症发生率,效果优于超声乳化术联合人工晶状体植入术治疗。

超声乳化吸除联合房角分离术治疗白内障合并急性原发性闭角型青光眼患者的效果

目的:观察超声乳化吸除联合房角分离术治疗白内障合并急性原发性闭角型青光眼患者的效果。方法:选取2021年9月至2023年9月黔东南五州眼科医院收治的100例白内障合并急性原发性闭角型青光眼患者进行前瞻性研究,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组各50例。观察组采用超声乳化吸除联合房角分离术治疗,对照组采用超声乳化吸除联合小梁切除术治疗,两组术后均随访3个月。比较两组临床疗效,手术前后眼压水平、矫正视力水平、眼科指标(中央前房深度、小梁虹膜角、小梁睫状体距离)水平、术后不同时间(术后1周和术后1、3个月)角膜内皮细胞丢失率,以及并发症发生率。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为96.00%(48/50),高于对照组的78.00%(39/50),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后,观察组眼压水平低于对照组,矫正视力水平高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后,观察组中央前房深度、小梁虹膜角、小梁睫状体距离均大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1周和术后1、3个月,观察组角膜内皮细胞丢失率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率为6.00%(3/50),低于对照组的22.00%(11/50),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:超声乳化吸除联合房角分离术治疗白内障合并急性原发性闭角型青光眼患者可提高治疗总有效率、矫正视力水平和眼科指标水平,降低眼压水平、角膜内皮细胞丢失率和并发症发生率,效果优于超声乳化吸除联合小梁切除术治疗。