Efficacy and predictive factors of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1(PD-1)for unresectable hepato-cellular carcinoma(HCC)have rarely been evaluated and it is unknown which factors are related to efficacy.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and independent predictive factors of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable HCC.METHODS This study retrospectively enrolled patients with unresectable HCC who received TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 treatment between March 2019 and April 2022.Overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS)were determined.The objective response rate(ORR)and disease control rate(DCR)were evaluated in accordance with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.Additionally,the prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome were assessed.RESULTS One hundred and two patients were enrolled with a median follow-up duration of 12.63 months.The median OS was 26.43 months(95%CI:17.00-35.87),and the median PFS was 10.07 months(95%CI:8.50-11.65).The ORR and DCR were 61.76%and 81.37%,respectively.The patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification(BCLC)B stage,early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR)response(decrease),or early alpha-fetoprotein(AFP)response(decrease>20%)had superior OS and PFS than their counterparts.CONCLUSION This study showed that TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 treatment was well tolerated with encouraging efficacy in patients with unresectable HCC.The patients with BCLC B-stage disease with early NLR response(decrease)and early AFP response(decrease>20%)may achieve better clinical outcomes with this triple therapy.

Cytokine release syndrome triggered by programmed death 1 blockade(sintilimab)therapy in a psoriasis patient:A case report

BACKGROUND In recent years,immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)have demonstrated remarkable efficacy across diverse malignancies.Notably,in patients with advanced gastric cancer,the use of programmed death 1(PD-1)blockade has significantly prolonged overall survival,marking a pivotal advancement comparable to the impact of Herceptin over the past two decades.While the therapeutic benefits of ICIs are evident,the increasing use of immunotherapy has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events.CASE SUMMARY This article presents the case of a patient with advanced gastric cancer and chronic plaque psoriasis.Following sintilimab therapy,the patient developed severe rashes accompanied by cytokine release syndrome(CRS).Fortunately,effective management was achieved through the administration of glucocorticoid,tocilizumab,and acitretin,which resulted in favorable outcomes.CONCLUSION Glucocorticoid and tocilizumab therapy was effective in managing CRS after PD-1 blockade therapy for gastric cancer in a patient with chronic plaque psoriasis.

Assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases of gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND Anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1)immuno-therapy has demonstrated promising results on gastric cancer(GC).However,PD-L1 can express differently between metastatic sites and primary tumors(PT).AIM To compare PD-L1 status in PT and matched lymph node metastases(LNM)of GC patients and to determine the correlation between the PD-L1 status and clinicopathological characteristics.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 284 GC patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy.PD-L1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry(clone SP142)using the com-bined positive score.All PD-L1+PT staged as pN+were also tested for PD-L1 expression in their LNM.PD-L1(-)GC with pN+served as the comparison group.RESULTS Among 284 GC patients included,45 had PD-L1+PT and 24 of them had pN+.For comparison,44 PD-L1(-)cases with pN+were included(sample loss of 4 cases).Of the PD-L1+PT,54.2%(13/24 cases)were also PD-L1+in the LNM.Regarding PD-L1(-)PT,9.1%(4/44)had PD-L1+in the LNM.The agreement between PT and LNM had a kappa value of 0.483.Larger tumor size and moderate/severe peritumoral inflammatory response were associated with PD-L1 positivity in both sites.There was no statistical difference in overall survival for PT and LNM according to the PD-L1 status(P=0.166 and P=0.837,respectively).CONCLUSION Intra-patient heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression was observed between the PT and matched LNM.This disagreement in PD-L1 status may emphasize the importance of considering different tumor sites for analyses to select patients for immunotherapy.

Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma:Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib in combination with programmed death-1 inhibition is a possible approach

In this editorial,we review the article“Efficacy and predictive factors of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma”.We specifically focused on whether transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib in combination with a programmed death 1 inhibitor could be used in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Since both transarterial chemoembolization as well as lenvatinib in combination with programmed death 1 inhibitors play an important role in the treatment of advanced liver cancer,but the combination of all three therapeutic approaches needs more research.

Roles of the tumor microenvironment in the resistance to programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors in patients with gastric cancer

Despite the continuous developments and advancements in the treatment of gastric cancer(GC),which is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in China,the overall survival is still poor for most patients with advanced GC.In recent years,with the progress in tumor immunology research,attention has shifted toward immunotherapy as a therapeutic approach for GC.Programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)inhibitors,as novel immunosuppressive medications,have been widely utilized in the treatment of GC.However,many patients are still resistant to PD-1 inhibitors and experience recurrence in the advanced stages of PD-1 immunotherapy.To reduce the occurrence of drug resistance and recurrence in GC patients receiving PD-1 immunotherapy,to maximize the clinical activity of immunosuppressive drugs,and to elicit a lasting immune response,it is essential to research the tumor microenvironment mechanisms leading to PD-1 inhibitor resistance in GC patients.This article reviews the progress in studying the factors influencing the resistance to PD-1 inhibitors in the GC tumor microenvironment,aiming to provide insights and a basis for reducing resistance to PD-1 inhibitors for GC patients in the future.

Efficacy of chemotherapy containing bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer according to programmed cell death ligand 1

BACKGROUND Bevacizumab,an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)monoclonal antibody,inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor growth.Serum VEGF-C,lactate dehydrogenase,and inflammatory markers have been reported as predictive markers related to bevacizumab treatment.Programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1)could act upon VEGF receptor 2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis.AIM To investigate the efficacy of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(CRC)according to the expression of PD-L1.METHODS This analysis included CRC patients who received bevacizumab plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line therapy between June 24,2014 and February 28,2022,at Samsung Medical Center(Seoul,South Korea).Analysis of patient data included evaluation of PD-L1 expression by the combined positive score(CPS).We analyzed the efficacy of bevacizumab according to PD-L1 expression status in patients with CRC.RESULTS A total of 124 patients was included in this analysis.Almost all patients were treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX as the first-line chemotherapy.While 77%of patients received FOLFOX,23%received FOLFIRI as backbone first-line chemotherapy.The numbers of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more,5 or more,or 10 or more were 105(85%),64(52%),and 32(26%),respectively.The results showed no significant difference in progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)with bevacizumab treatment between patients with PDL1 CPS less than 1 and those with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more(PD-L1<1%vs PD-L1≥1%;PFS:P=0.93,OS:P=0.33),between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 5 and of 5 or more(PD-L1<5%vs PD-L1≥5%;PFS:P=0.409,OS:P=0.746),and between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 10 and of 10 or more(PD-L1<10%vs PD-L1≥10%;PFS:P=0.529,OS:P=0.568).CONCLUSION Chemotherapy containing bevacizumab can be considered as first-line therapy in metastatic CRC irrespective of PD-L1 expression.

Drug-eluting beads chemoembolization combined with programmed cell death 1 inhibitor and lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND The combination of transarterial chemoembolization(TACE),lenvatinib,and programmed cell death 1(PD-1)inhibitor has been widely used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)and has achieved promising results.However,there are few studies comparing whether drug-eluting beads TACE(DTACE)can bring more survival benefits to patients with large HCC compared to conventional TACE(C-TACE)in this triplet therapy.AIM To compare the efficacy and adverse events(AEs)of triple therapy comprising DTACE,PD-1 inhibitors,and lenvatinib(D-TACE-P-L)and C-TACE,PD-1 inhibitors,and lenvatinib(C-TACE-P-L)in patients with large HCC(maximum diameter≥5 cm),and analyze the prognostic factors.METHODS Following a comprehensive review of our hospital’s medical records,this retrospective study included 104 patients:50 received D-TACE-P-L,and 54 received CTACE-P-L.We employed Kaplan-Meier estimation to assess the median progression-free survival(PFS)between the two groups,utilized Cox multivariate regression analysis to identify prognostic factors,and applied theχ2 test to evaluate AEs.RESULTS The objective response rate(ORR)and median PFS were significantly higher in the D-TACE-P-L group compared to the C-TACE-P-L group(ORR:66.0%vs 44.4%,P=0.027;median PFS:6.8 months vs 5.0 months,P=0.041).Cox regression analysis identified treatment option,portal vein tumor thrombus,and hepatic vein invasion as protective factors for PFS.AEs were comparable between the two CONCLUSION D-TACE-P-L may have significantly better PFS and ORR for large HCC,while exhibiting similar AEs to C-TACE-PL.

Effectiveness and tolerability of programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor+chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy for upper gastrointestinal tract cancers

BACKGROUND The combination of programmed cell death protein-1(PD-1)inhibitor and che-motherapy is approved as a standard first-or second-line treatment in patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer.However,it is unclear whether this combination is superior to chemotherapy alone.AIM To assess the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of combining PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer,gastroesophageal junction(GEJ)cancer,or oesophageal carcinoma.METHODS We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for studies that compared the efficacy and tolerance of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer.We employed either random or fixed models to analyze the outcomes of each clinical trial,en-compassing data on overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),objective response rate,and adverse events(AEs).RESULTS Nine phase 3 clinical trials(7016 advanced oesophageal and gastric cancer patients)met the inclusion criteria.Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the pooled PD-1 inhibitor+chemotherapy group had a significantly longer OS than the chemotherapy-alone group[hazard ratio(HR)=0.76,95%confidence interval(CI):0.71-0.81];the pooled PFS result was consistent with that of OS(HR=0.67,95%CI:0.61-0.74).The count of patients achieving an objective response in the PD-1 inhibitor+chemotherapy group surpassed that of the chemotherapy-alone group[odds ratio(OR)=1.86,95%CI:1.59-2.18].AE incidence was also higher in the combination-therapy group than in the chemotherapy-alone group,regardless of whether≥grade 3 only(OR=1.30,95%CI:1.07-1.57)or all AE grades(OR=1.88,95%CI:1.39-2.54)were examined.We performed a subgroup analysis based on the programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1)combined positive score(CPS)and noted extended OS and PFS durations within the CPS≥1,CPS≥5,and CPS≥10 subgroups of the PD-1 inhibitor+chemotherapy group.CONCLUSION In contrast to chemotherapy alone,the combination of PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy appears to present a more favorable option for initial or subsequent treatment in patients with gastric cancer,GEJ tumor,or oesophageal cancer.This holds true particularly for individuals with PD-L1 CPS scores of≥5 and≥10.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma,a malignancy that arises in the cells of the pancreas,is a devastating disease with unclear etiology and often poor prognosis.Locally advanced pancreatic cancer,a stage where the tumor has grown significantly but has not yet spread to distant organs,presents unique challenges in treatment.This article aims to discuss the current strategies,challenges,and future directions in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma(LAPC).AIM To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of programmed cell death 1(PD-1)inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LAPC.METHODS Eligible patients had LAPC,an Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status of 0 or 1,adequate organ and marrow functions,and no prior anticancer therapy.In the observation group,participants received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg once every 3 wk,and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy(concurrent conventional fractionated radiotherapy with doses planning target volume 50.4 Gy and gross tumor volume 60 Gy in 28 fractions and oral S-140 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-d cycle and intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle for eight cycles until disease progression,death,or unacceptable toxicity).In the control group,participants only received concurrent chemoradiotherapy.From April 2020 to November 2021,64 participants were finally enrolled with 34 in the observation group and 30 in the control group.RESULTS Thirty-four patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy,while 32(94.1%)received sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 2 patients discontinuing sintilimab in the observation group.Thirty patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy in the control group.Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines,the analysis of the observation group revealed that a partial response was observed in 11 patients(32.4%),stable disease was evident in 19 patients(55.9%),and 4 patients(11.8%)experienced progressive disease;a partial response was observed in 6(20.0%)patients,stable disease in 18(60%),and progressive disease in 6(20%)in the control group.The major toxic effects were leukopenia and nausea.The incidence of severe adverse events(AEs)(grade 3 or 4)was 26.5%(9/34)in the observation group and 23.3%(7/30)in the control group.There were no treatment-related deaths.The observation group demonstrated a significantly longer median overall survival(22.1 mo compared to 15.8 mo)(P<0.05)and progression-free survival(12.2 mo vs 10.1 mo)(P<0.05)in comparison to the control group.The occurrence of severe AEs did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy was effective and safe for LAPC patients,and warrants further investigation.

Clinical outcomes of lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization with or without programmed death receptor-1 inhibitors in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND Programmed death receptor-1(PD-1)inhibitors have been approved as secondline treatment regimen in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),but it is still worth studying whether patients can benefit from PD-1 inhibitors as first-line drugs combined with targeted drugs and locoregional therapy.AIM To estimate the clinical outcome of transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)and lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for patients with unresectable HCC(uHCC).METHODS We carried out retrospective research of 65 patients with uHCC who were treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from September 2017 to February 2022.45 patients received the PD-1 inhibitors,lenvatinib,TACE(PD-1-Lenv-T)therapy,and 20 received the lenvatinib,TACE(Lenv-T)therapy.In terms of the dose of lenvatinib,8 mg was given orally for patients weighing less than 60 kg and 12 mg for those weighing more than 60 kg.Of the patients in the PD-1 inhibitor combination group,15 received Toripalimab,14 received Toripalimab,14 received Camrelizumab,4 received Pembrolizumab,9 received Sintilimab,and 2 received Nivolumab,1 with Tislelizumab.According to the investigators’assessment,TACE was performed every 4-6 wk when the patient had good hepatic function(Child-Pugh class A or B)until disease progression occurred.We evaluated the efficacy by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(mRECIST criteria).We accessd the safety by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events,v 5.0.The key adverse events(AEs)after the initiation of combination therapy were observed.RESULTS Patients with uHCC who received PD-1-Lenv-T therapy(n=45)had a clearly longer overall survival than those who underwent Lenv-T therapy(n=20,26.8 vs 14.0 mo;P=0.027).The median progression-free survival time between the two treatment regimens was also measured{11.7 mo[95%confidence interval(CI):7.7-15.7]in the PD-1-Lenv-T group vs 8.5 mo(95%CI:3.0-13.9)in the Lenv-T group(P=0.028)}.The objective response rates of the PD-1-Lenv-T group and Lenv-T group were 44.4%and 20%(P=0.059)according to the mRECIST criteria,meanwhile the disease control rates were 93.3%and 64.0%(P=0.003),respectively.The type and frequency of AEs showed little distinction between patients received the two treatment regimens.CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the early combination of PD-1 inhibitors has manageable toxicity and hopeful efficacy in patients with uHCC.

PD-1抑制剂联合安罗替尼治疗二线化疗失败的老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的效果

目的 探究程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抑制剂联合安罗替尼治疗二线化疗失败的老年晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效。方法 选取2019年1月—2021年4月泰州市第二人民医院收治的106例二线化疗失败的老年晚期NSCLC患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为单药组和联合组,各53例。单药组采用安罗替尼治疗,联合组采用PD-1抑制剂联合安罗替尼治疗。比较两组的疾病控制率、毒副反应发生情况、生存率、肿瘤标志物[细胞角蛋白19片段抗原21-1(CYFRA21-1)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)]、血管新生指标[血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)-A、VEGF受体2(VEGFR2)]、血清驱动蛋白超家族蛋白(KIF)C1、N-钙黏蛋白、生活质量核心量表(QLQ-C30)评分。结果 联合组疾病控制率高于单药组(P<0.05);治疗2个周期后,联合组血清CYFRA21-1、CA125、CEA、VEGF-A、VEGFR2、KIFC1及N-钙黏蛋白水平均低于单药组(P<0.05),QLQ-C30评分低于单药组(P<0.05);两组各毒副反应总发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,联合组累积生存率高于单药组(P<0.05)。结论 PD-1抑制剂联合安罗替尼治疗二线化疗失败的老年晚期NSCLC效果显著,可有效调节血清KIFC1、N-钙黏蛋白表达,抑制VEGF-A、VEGFR2水平,降低肿瘤标志物水平,提高生活质量,延长生存时间,安全性高。

PD-1单抗后线辅助治疗晚期结直肠癌患者对胃肠功能、肿瘤标志物的影响

目的分析程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)单抗后线辅助治疗晚期结直肠癌患者对胃肠功能、肿瘤标志物的影响。方法前瞻性选取2020年1月至2023年1月海口市人民医院收治的105例晚期结直肠癌患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将患者分为对照组(n=50)、研究组(n=55)。对照组采用阿帕替尼治疗,研究组在对照组的基础上联合PD-1单抗后线治疗,3周为1个疗程,共治疗4个疗程。比较两组的临床疗效、胃肠功能改善时间,治疗前、治疗12周后的肿瘤标志物[癌胚抗原、糖类抗原(CA)72-4、CA199]、免疫功能(CD4^(+)、CD8^(+)、CD4^(+)/CD8^(+))指标以及不良反应发生情况。结果治疗12周后,研究组的客观缓解率(ORR)、病情控制率(DCR)分别为78.33%、90.91%,均高于对照组(58.00%、70.00%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的首次排便时间、首次排气时间、肠鸣音消退时间分别为(51.50±5.02)、(35.52±4.25)、(44.28±4.80)d,均短于对照组[(69.37±6.40)、(50.63±5.10)、(53.50±6.15)d],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗12周后,研究组癌胚抗原、CA72-4、CA199水平分别为(12.57±1.64)ng/mL、(17.60±3.45)U/mL、(58.29±8.70)kU/L,均低于对照组[(17.24±2.50)ng/mL、(27.59±4.67)U/mL、(82.65±12.29)kU/L],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗12周后,研究组CD4^(+)、CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)水平分别为(21.42±3.54)%、0.73±0.30,均低于对照组[(28.39±4.38)%、1.12±0.41],CD8^(+)水平为(30.36±4.52)%,高于对照组[(25.71±3.30)%],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组的不良反应发生率为9.09%,稍低于对照组(16.00%),但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论通过PD-1单抗后线辅助治疗可有效改善晚期结直肠癌患者的临床疗效,效果明显,改善胃肠功能,降低肿瘤标志物指标水平,调节机体免疫功能,可为临床干预此病提供参考。

血清细胞因子表达水平与非小细胞肺癌PD-1抑制剂疗效研究进展

程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)/程序性死亡分子配体-1信号通路抑制剂激活机体免系统后产生的细胞因子在抗肿瘤细胞过程中发挥关键作用。本文回顾近年来接受PD-1抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者血清细胞因子表达水平与临床获益的相关性研究,揭示非小细胞肺癌患者PD-1治疗前后白介素-6、白介素-8、肿瘤坏死因子、干扰素、白介素-17A等细胞因子水平变化,为寻找经济、便捷的PD-1抑制剂疗效生物标志物提供思路和线索。

口蹄疫病毒感染后猪PD-1及其配体转录水平变化和免疫抑制机制分析

研究猪感染口蹄疫病毒(Foot-and-mouth disease virus,FMDV)后程序性死亡受体-1(Programmed death-1,PD-1)及其配体(PD-L1、PD-L2),细胞因子[IL-2(Interleukin-2)、IL-10(Interleukin-10)、IFN-γ(Interferon-γ)]mRNA转录水平和外周血单个核细胞(Peripheral blood mononuclear cells,PBMCs)增殖能力,探讨PD-1/PD-Ls通路在FMDV引起免疫抑制过程中的作用机制。结果表明,猪感染FMDV后3、7、14、17 d,PD-1的mRNA转录水平显著或极显著升高,感染后7 d达到峰值,之后逐渐降低;感染FMDV后3 d和7 d,PD-L1的mRNA转录水平极显著升高;感染FMDV后3 d,PD-L2的mRNA转录水平显著升高。感染FMDV后3、7 d,IL-2的mRNA转录水平显著下降;感染FMDV后1、3 d,IFN-γ的mRNA转录水平极显著下降,IL-2和IFN-γ的mRNA转录水平与PD-1及其配体mRNA转录水平变化趋势相反;感染FMDV后3、7、14 d,IL-10的mRNA转录水平显著或极显著升高,与PD-1及其配体mRNA转录水平变化趋势相同。感染FMDV后,全血中FMDV的病毒载量随着感染后时间的推进逐渐升高,感染后7 d达到峰值,与PD-1及其配体mRNA转录水平变化趋势总体上相同。感染后7 d,PBMCs的增殖能力明显降低。综上,FMDV感染猪后,总体上上调了PD-1及其配体的mRNA转录水平,是FMDV感染引起机体免疫抑制的重要致病机制。

PD-1在原发性肝细胞癌组织中的表达及意义

目的旨在探讨程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)在原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)组织中的表达及意义。方法回顾性分析2020年5月—2022年5月于联勤保障部队第980(白求恩国际和平)医院接受诊治的HCC患者70例,所有患者均经过影像学及病理学证实为HCC。术中取肝癌原发病灶处癌组织制作为肝癌标本,取肝癌原发病灶5 cm以外的肝组织作为癌旁正常肝组织标本,对所有标本进行切片处理,通过免疫组化、Western blotting等方法,检测标本组织中PD-1的表达情况;分析癌组织、癌旁组织以及不同分化程度的HCC PD-1的表达情况;分析不同病理特征(年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、HBV阳性与否、是否转移、是否合并腹水)对PD-1表达情况的影响。结果癌组织的PD-1表达水平明显高于癌旁组织,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);中分化型HCC PD-1表达水平明显高于高分化及低分化型HCC,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);高分化型与低分化型相比,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);PD-1阳性表达与HCC患者年龄、性别、HBV是否阳性无关,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);PD-1阳性表达与肿瘤大小、肿瘤是否转移以及有无腹水有关,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);肿瘤直径>6 cm、肿瘤发生转移以及合并腹水的HCC患者PD-1阳性表达率较高。另外,通过qPCR及Western blotting测定发现PD-1在Ⅲ~Ⅳ期肝癌表达高于Ⅰ~Ⅱ期肝癌。结论PD-1在癌组织中以及中分化型HCC表达水平较高;且肿瘤分期越高,直径越大,合并转移及腹水时,PD-1表达水平高。因此PD-1有望成为判断HCC分期以及预后的指标之一,为HCC的诊断及治疗提供新策略。

血清中PD-L1含量与胃癌病人预后的关系

目的:分析胃癌病人血清中程序性死亡配体1(programmed death-ligand 1,PD-L1)含量及其与肿瘤分期和预后的关系。方法:收集我院2018年8月至2019年12月60例胃癌病人血清,15例健康成人血清作为对照,通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清PD-L1的含量,比较胃癌病人与健康成人血清PD-L1含量的差异,分析胃癌病人血清PD-L1的含量与病期及预后的关系。免疫组织化学检测肿瘤组织内PD-L1的表达情况,并分析其与血清中PD-L1含量的相关性。结果:胃癌组血清中PD-L1的含量明显高于对照组。Ⅲ、Ⅳ期胃癌病人血清PD-L1含量明显高于Ⅰ、Ⅱ期胃癌病人。胃癌病人合并腹膜转移者血清PD-L1含量明显升高,提示预后不良。生存分析显示,血清PD-L1含量高的胃癌病人生存期明显短于低者。检测肿瘤组织标本中PD-L1的表达水平,发现其与血清中PD-L1含量无明显相关性。结论:胃癌病人血清中PD-L1含量高于健康成人。随病期进展逐渐升高。胃癌伴腹膜转移的病人血清中PD-L1升高明显。血清中PD-L1含量与肿瘤组织中的PD-L1表达不相关。

ITP患者PD-1/PD-L1表达特点及其在Treg与Breg细胞之间的相互作用机制分析

目的探讨原发免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)患者细胞程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)/细胞程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达特点及其在调节性T细胞(Treg)、调节性B细胞(Breg)间的相互作用。方法选取2018年12月—2022年1月在我院治疗的ITP患者106例作为观察组,其中轻度患者32例,中度患者44例,重度患者30例。同时选取同期健康志愿者100例作为对照组。检测两组Treg细胞百分比、Breg细胞百分比、Treg细胞表面PD-1阳性率、Breg细胞表面PD-L1阳性率等,同时分析观察组不同病情程度患者各指标差异。结果观察组Breg细胞百分比、Treg细胞百分比、TGF-β、IL-10和IL-4水平均明显低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组Treg细胞表面PD-1阳性率、Breg细胞表面PD-L1阳性率、可溶性程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1(sPD-1)和IL-17水平均明显高于对照组(均P<0.05);两组可溶性程序性细胞死亡蛋白配体-1(sPD-L1)水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组重度患者Breg细胞百分比、Treg细胞百分比均明显低于轻度和中度患者(均P<0.05),而Treg细胞表面PD-1阳性率、Breg细胞表面PD-L1阳性率均明显高于轻度和中度患者(均P<0.05)。Treg细胞表面PD-1阳性率与Breg细胞表面PD-L1阳性率呈正相关(r=0.446,P<0.05)。观察组治疗后Breg细胞百分比、Treg细胞百分比、TGF-β、IL-10和IL-4水平有所升高(P<0.05),而Treg细胞表面PD-1阳性率、Breg细胞表面PD-L1阳性率、sPD-1和IL-17水平有所降低(P<0.05),治疗前后sPD-L1水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论ITP患者Treg细胞表面PD-1和Breg细胞表面PD-L1阳性率明显升高,与患者病情严重程度呈正相关,同时Treg细胞表面PD-1和Breg细胞表面PD-L1表达之间存在相关性。

炎调方通过PD-1/PD-L1通路抑制脓毒症大鼠T淋巴细胞衰竭的实验研究

目的研究炎调方对脓毒症大鼠T淋巴细胞及T淋巴细胞表面表面程序性死亡蛋白(PD-1)、程序性死亡蛋白配体(PD-L1)表达的影响。方法SD大鼠(雄性)分为正常组、假手术组、模型组和炎调方组。盲肠结扎穿孔(CLP)制备脓毒症大鼠模型,于造模后12、24、48、72 h采集外周血处死大鼠(每个时间点各5只大鼠),采用流式细胞分析法测定CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)、CD8^(+)比例;双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)测定CD4^(+)及CD8^(+)表面PD-1、PD-L1表达水平。结果白介素-6(IL-6)在脓毒症模型组12 h分泌达到高峰后逐渐下降,降钙素原(PCT)在模型组24 h达到高峰后逐渐下降;炎调方组在12 h降低IL-6的水平(P<0.05),24 h时明显降低IL-6、PCT的水平(P<0.01)。模型组CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)、CD8^(+)比例早期分泌开始减少,48 h分泌达最低点(P<0.01);炎调方组在48 h时可升高CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)、CD8^(+)比例,提高CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)的比值而具体调节T细胞活化和增殖的功能。模型组CD4^(+)、CD8^(+)表面PD-1、PD-L1表达水平早期24 h即表达增多(P<0.01),72 h表达最多;炎调方组24 h时即可抑制PD-1、PD-L1的表达水平而具体改善T细胞衰竭的作用。CD4^(+)的比例与CD4^(+)表面PD-1、PD-L1的表达呈负相关(P<0.01);CD8^(+)比例与CD8^(+)表面PD-1、PD-L1的表达呈负相关(P<0.01)。结论脓毒症早期48 h内即出现了T细胞活化和增殖的功能衰竭引起的T细胞免疫抑制。炎调方能在脓毒症早期改善T细胞活化和增殖的功能,其机制可能与抑制PD-1/P-L1通路有关。

急性髓系白血病患儿柔红霉素耐药与PD-L1蛋白表达相关

目的研究急性髓系白血病(AML)患儿柔红霉素(DNR)耐药与程序性死亡受体配体-1(PD-L1)蛋白表达的相关性。方法选取2016年1月至2022年12月郑州大学附属儿童医院收治的110例AML患儿骨髓样本作为研究组,以50名骨髓正常供体骨髓样本作为对照组。培养人AML细胞系HL60、THP-1、U-937、Molm-13,Western blot检测PD-L1蛋白表达量。构建LV-PD-L1-shRNA、LV-PD-L1-WT-OE慢病毒载体,分析PD-L1对Molm-13细胞DNR耐药的影响及机制。结果研究组PD-L1蛋白表达量高于对照组,AML细胞系中PD-L1蛋白表达量高于健康骨髓单个核细胞(BMMC)(P<0.05),PD-L1表达与AML患儿白细胞计数、骨髓原始细胞比率、预后危险分层、两个标准化学治疗方案后疾病缓解情况有关(P<0.05)。PD-L1高表达组总生存率低于PD-L1低表达组(P<0.05)。与LV-PD-L1-WT-OE组比较,LV-PD-L1-shRNA组PD-L1 mRNA表达量降低、细胞增殖活性降低、凋亡率升高(P<0.05),LV-PD-L1-shRNA可提高Molm-13细胞对DNR的敏感性。TCGA数据库分析显示,6-磷酸葡萄糖脱氢酶(G6PD)可能为PD-L1潜在的目标基因。结论PD-L1在儿童AML中高表达,与患儿化疗耐药有关,其可能通过调控G6PD引起DNR耐药。

血管内皮生长因子、PD-1联合胃泌素三项检测在早期胃癌中的应用及预后价值

目的探讨血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)联合胃泌素三项检测在早期胃癌中的应用及预后价值。方法选取2020年3月至2022年8月沧州市中心医院收治的早期胃癌患者120例为研究对象,纳入早期胃癌组;另取同期胃部良性疾病与体检证实健康者各50例,分别纳入胃部良性疾病组和对照组。检测早期胃癌组、胃部良性疾病组治疗前及对照组体检当天的外周血PD-1含量,同时检测VEGF、血清胃功能三项[胃泌素17(G-17)、胃蛋白酶原-Ⅰ(PG-Ⅰ)、胃蛋白酶原-Ⅱ(PG-Ⅱ)]含量,评估各指标联合对早期胃癌的诊断价值。早期胃癌患者均行内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)治疗,术后随访12个月,以复发为随访终点事件,复发患者纳入复发组,未复发患者纳入未复发组,比较2组资料,重点分析VEGF、PD-1、胃泌素三项与预后的关系。结果3组VEGF、PD-1、G-17比较,早期胃癌组>胃良性疾病组>对照组,3组PG-Ⅰ水平比较,早期胃癌组<胃良性疾病组<对照组(P<0.05),3组PG-Ⅱ比较,对照组低于其他2组,但其他2组组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。血清VEGF、PD-1、G-17、PG-Ⅰ单独诊断胃癌的AUC均>0.70,均有一定诊断价值,PG-Ⅱ诊断胃癌的AUC<0.7,诊断价值较差,联合诊断的AUC为0.968,诊断价值最高。早期胃癌患者ESD术后随访12个月,复发15例,复发率为12.50%。复发组入院时血清VEGF、PD-1、G-17、PG-Ⅰ水平高于未复发组,PG-Ⅱ水平低于未复发组,术后各时点VEGF、PD-1、G-17、PG-Ⅰ水平均较术前逐渐降低,PG-Ⅱ逐渐升高(P<0.05);经Logistic回归分析,结果显示,入院时血清VEGF、PD-1、G-17、PG-Ⅰ、PG-Ⅱ异常表达均与早期胃癌患者术后复发有关,其中VEGF、PD-1、G-17、PG-Ⅱ为危险因素,PG-Ⅰ为保护因素(P<0.05)。结论血清VEGF、PD-1及胃泌素三项均在早期胃癌患者中呈异常表达,可用于早期胃癌的诊断,其异常表达也可能是术后复发的影响因素。