期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Meta-analysis of gemcitabine at 30 min standard-dose infusion versus prolonged low-dose infusion for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
1
作者 赵德华 楚明明 +1 位作者 陈静 王继生 《Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences》 CAS CSCD 2017年第10期763-770,共8页
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) at 30 min standard-dose infusion (30 min-SDI) compared with prolonged low-dose infusion (P-LDI) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NS... To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) at 30 min standard-dose infusion (30 min-SDI) compared with prolonged low-dose infusion (P-LDI) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Electronic databases including Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, and VIP were searched using keywords "GEM", "P-LDI", and "NSCLC". Review Manager 5.3 was used to perform the recta-analysis. Primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and 1-year survival rate (1-year SR). Secondary endpoints were grade 3/4 hematotoxicity and nausea/vomiting. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 637 patients were included. The results showed that P-LDI was superior in ORR (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.08-2.10, P = 0.02), but had an equal 1-year SR (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI: 0.90-1.79, P = 0.18) as compared with 30 min-SDl. For grade 3/4 adverse events, there was no significant difference in anemia (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 0.61-5.57, P = 0.28) and nausea/vomiting (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.63-2.12, P = 0.64) between the two treatments. However, patients with P-LDI experienced less leukopenia (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.97, P = 0.04) and thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.80, P = 0.01). P-LDI was superior in terms of ORR, experienced less grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and leukopenia compared with 30 min-SDI, and could be a viable treatment option for advanced NSCLC. 展开更多
关键词 GEMCITABINE prolonged low-dose infusion Non-small-cell lung cancer META-ANALYSIS Randomized controlled trials
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部