Objective:Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs).However,the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction(EGJ-GIST)is surgically challeng...Objective:Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs).However,the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction(EGJ-GIST)is surgically challenging.This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score weighting(PSW)method.Methods:Between April 2006 and April 2018,1,824 surgical patients were diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China.Of these patients,228 were identified as EGJ-GISTs and retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological characteristics,operative information,and long-term outcomes.PSW was used to create the balanced cohorts.Results:PSW was carried out in laparoscopic and open-surgery cohorts according to year of surgery,sex,age,body mass index(BMI),tumor size,mitotic rates and recurrence risk.After PSW,438 patients consisting of 213 laparoscopic(L group)and 225 open surgery(O group)patients were enrolled.After PSW,the following measures in the L group were superior to those in the O group:median operative time[interquartile range(IQR)]:100.0(64.5-141.5)vs.149.0(104.0-197.5)min,P<0.001;median blood loss(IQR):30.0(10.0-50.0)vs.50.0(20.0-100.0)mL,P=0.002;median time to liquid intake(IQR):3.0(2.0-4.0)vs.4.0(3.0-5.0)d,P<0.001;median hospital stay(IQR):6.0(4.0-8.0)vs.7.0(5.0-12.0)d,P<0.001;and postoperative complications(10.3%vs.22.7%,P=0.001).The median follow-up was 55(range,2-153)months in the entire cohort.No significant differences were detected in either relapse-free survival(RFS)[hazard ratio(HR):0.372,95%confidence interval(95%CI):0.072-1.910,P=0.236]or overall survival(OS)(HR:0.400,95%CI:0.119-1.343,P=0.138)between the two groups.Conclusions:Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time,reduced blood loss,shorter time to liquid intake,and shorter length of stay,all without compromising postoperative outcomes and long-term survival.展开更多
Objective: We aim to detect over-time variations in mortality of liver transplant recipients stratified by the period of transplant. Since this is a retrospective investigation, bias reduction caused by possible confo...Objective: We aim to detect over-time variations in mortality of liver transplant recipients stratified by the period of transplant. Since this is a retrospective investigation, bias reduction caused by possible confounding effects can be achieved by using propensity score weighting in a multivariate logistic regression model. Methods: Medical charts of all adult liver transplant recipients (n = 250) who were transplanted in three periods 2005-2009, 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The following recipient factors were analyzed: recipients and donors’ ages, sex, renal impairment, body mass index (BMI), presence of bacterial or viral infections, MELD (Model for end-stage diseases). Multivariate logistic model adjusted by Propensity Scores (PS) was used to identify the effect of the risk factors on mortality, and death within five years, in the targeted time frame. Patient outcomes are recorded as;(patient status = 1 if dead, or patient status = 0 if alive). Results: Meld score, recipient age, and renal impairments were shown to be predictors of mortality in transplanted patients. Multivariate regression model was used to identify the significance of the specified risk factors, followed by pairwise comparisons between periods. Pairwise comparisons between periods using logistic regression weighted by the inverse propensity score, correcting for the possible confounding effect of measured covariates showed that the death rate is significantly reduced in subsequent periods as compared to the initial period. Conclusions: The clinical implications of these findings are the ability to stratify patients at high risk of posttransplant death by planning more intensive and accurate management for them.展开更多
文摘Objective:Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs).However,the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction(EGJ-GIST)is surgically challenging.This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score weighting(PSW)method.Methods:Between April 2006 and April 2018,1,824 surgical patients were diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China.Of these patients,228 were identified as EGJ-GISTs and retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological characteristics,operative information,and long-term outcomes.PSW was used to create the balanced cohorts.Results:PSW was carried out in laparoscopic and open-surgery cohorts according to year of surgery,sex,age,body mass index(BMI),tumor size,mitotic rates and recurrence risk.After PSW,438 patients consisting of 213 laparoscopic(L group)and 225 open surgery(O group)patients were enrolled.After PSW,the following measures in the L group were superior to those in the O group:median operative time[interquartile range(IQR)]:100.0(64.5-141.5)vs.149.0(104.0-197.5)min,P<0.001;median blood loss(IQR):30.0(10.0-50.0)vs.50.0(20.0-100.0)mL,P=0.002;median time to liquid intake(IQR):3.0(2.0-4.0)vs.4.0(3.0-5.0)d,P<0.001;median hospital stay(IQR):6.0(4.0-8.0)vs.7.0(5.0-12.0)d,P<0.001;and postoperative complications(10.3%vs.22.7%,P=0.001).The median follow-up was 55(range,2-153)months in the entire cohort.No significant differences were detected in either relapse-free survival(RFS)[hazard ratio(HR):0.372,95%confidence interval(95%CI):0.072-1.910,P=0.236]or overall survival(OS)(HR:0.400,95%CI:0.119-1.343,P=0.138)between the two groups.Conclusions:Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time,reduced blood loss,shorter time to liquid intake,and shorter length of stay,all without compromising postoperative outcomes and long-term survival.
文摘Objective: We aim to detect over-time variations in mortality of liver transplant recipients stratified by the period of transplant. Since this is a retrospective investigation, bias reduction caused by possible confounding effects can be achieved by using propensity score weighting in a multivariate logistic regression model. Methods: Medical charts of all adult liver transplant recipients (n = 250) who were transplanted in three periods 2005-2009, 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The following recipient factors were analyzed: recipients and donors’ ages, sex, renal impairment, body mass index (BMI), presence of bacterial or viral infections, MELD (Model for end-stage diseases). Multivariate logistic model adjusted by Propensity Scores (PS) was used to identify the effect of the risk factors on mortality, and death within five years, in the targeted time frame. Patient outcomes are recorded as;(patient status = 1 if dead, or patient status = 0 if alive). Results: Meld score, recipient age, and renal impairments were shown to be predictors of mortality in transplanted patients. Multivariate regression model was used to identify the significance of the specified risk factors, followed by pairwise comparisons between periods. Pairwise comparisons between periods using logistic regression weighted by the inverse propensity score, correcting for the possible confounding effect of measured covariates showed that the death rate is significantly reduced in subsequent periods as compared to the initial period. Conclusions: The clinical implications of these findings are the ability to stratify patients at high risk of posttransplant death by planning more intensive and accurate management for them.
