BACKGROUND Prostaglandin E1(PGE1),or alprostadil,is a potent vasodilator that improves hepatic blood flow and reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury post-liver transplantation(LT).However,the benefits of PGE1 on renal fu...BACKGROUND Prostaglandin E1(PGE1),or alprostadil,is a potent vasodilator that improves hepatic blood flow and reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury post-liver transplantation(LT).However,the benefits of PGE1 on renal function after LT have not yet been well described.AIM To assess the impact of PGE1 administration on renal function in patients who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplant.METHODS This retrospective study included all patients who underwent liver or liverkidney transplant at our institution from January,2011 to December,2021.Patients were classified based on whether they received PGE1.PGE1 was administered post-LT to those with transaminases>1000 U/L in the immediate postoperative period.Demographics,post-LT treatments and/or complications,renal function,and survival were analyzed.Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed,and a two-tailed P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.RESULTS A total of 145 patients underwent LT,with 44(30%)receiving PGE1.Baseline patient characteristics were comparable,except the PGE1 group had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase(AST)(1961.9 U/L±1862.3 U/L vs 878 U/L±741.4 U/L,P=0.000),alanine aminotransferase(1070.6 U/L±895 U/L vs 547.7 U/L±410 U/L,P=0.000),international normalized ratio on post-LT day 1(2±0.74 vs 1.8±0.4,P=0.03),a longer intensive care unit stay(8.1 days±11.8 days vs 3.8 days±4.6 days,P=0.003),more vasopressor use(55.53 hours±111 hours vs 16.33 hours±26.3 hours,P=0.002),and higher immediate postoperative complications(18.6%vs 4.9%,P=0.04).The PGE1 group also had a significantly higher 90-day readmission rate(29.6%vs 13.1%,P=0.02)and lower 1-year liver graft survival(87.5%vs 98.9%,P=0.005).However,30-day readmission(31.6%vs 27.4%,P=0.64),LT complications(hepatic artery thrombosis,biliary complications,rejection of liver graft,cardiomyopathy),1-year patient survival(96.9%vs 97.8%,P=0.77),overall liver graft survival,and overall patient survival were similar between the two groups(95.4%vs 93.9%,P=0.74 and 88.4%vs 86.9%,P=0.81 respectively).Although the PGE1 group had a significantly lower glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)on post-LT day 7(46.3 mL/minute±26.7 mL/minute vs 62.5 mL/minute±34 mL/minute,P=0.009),the eventual need for renal replacement therapy(13.6%vs 5.9%,P=0.09),the number of dialysis sessions(0.91 vs 0.27,P=0.13),and eGFR at 1-month(37.2 mL/minute±35.9 mL/minute vs 42 mL/minute±36.9 mL/minute,P=0.49),6-months(54.8 mL/minute±21.6 mL/minute vs 62 mL/minute±21.4 mL/minute,P=0.09),and 12-months(63.7 mL/minute±20.7 mL/minute vs 62.8 mL/minute±20.3 mL/minute,P=0.85)post-LT were similar to those in the non-PGE1 group.CONCLUSION In patients who received PGE1 for ischemia-reperfusion injury,despite immediate acute renal injury post-LT,the renal function at 1-month,6-months,and 12-months post-LT was similar compared to those without ischemiareperfusion injury.Prospective clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the benefits of PGE1 use in renal function.展开更多
AIM to determine whether cyclooxygenase-2(COX-2) and prostaglandin E1 receptor(EP1) contribute to disease and whether they help predict prognosis.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients with he...AIM to determine whether cyclooxygenase-2(COX-2) and prostaglandin E1 receptor(EP1) contribute to disease and whether they help predict prognosis.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2011 at our hospital. Expression of COX-2 and EP1 receptor was examined by immunohistochemistry of formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded tissues using polyclonal antibodies. Possible associations between immunohistochemical scores and survival were determined.RESULTS Factors associated with poor overall survival(OS) were alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/m L, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, and high EP1 receptor expression, but not high COX-2 expression. Disease-free survival was not significantly different between patients with low or high levels of COX-2 or EP1. COX-2 immunoreactivity was significantly higher in well-differentiated HCC tissues(Edmondson grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ) than in poorly differentiated tissues(Edmondson grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ)(P = 0.003). EP1 receptor immunoreactivity was significantly higher in poorly differentiated tissue than in well-differentiated tissue(P = 0.001).CONCLUSION COX-2 expression appears to be linked to early HCC events(initiation), while EP1 receptor expression may participate in tumor progression and predict survival.展开更多
Objective To investigate the effects of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on the progression of aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). Methods Twenty-four patients diagnosed as AAN with serum creatinine (Scr) between 1.5 mg/dL an...Objective To investigate the effects of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on the progression of aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). Methods Twenty-four patients diagnosed as AAN with serum creatinine (Scr) between 1.5 mg/dL and 4 mg/dL during September 2001 to August 2003 were randomly divided into 2 groups. All patients had ingested long dan xie gan wan con-taining aristolochic acid (0.219 mg/g) for at least 3 months. Twelve patients were injected with Alprostadil (10 μg/d for 10 days in one month, summing up to 6 months). Except for PGE1, the other therapy was same in both groups. Renal function was assessed using reciprocal serum creatinine levels (1/Scr). Results The level of Scr and serum hemoglobin (Hgb) was similar in both groups prior to therapy. During follow-up, 1/Scr levels in PGE1 group were significantly higher than control group (P < 0.01), and Hgb levels in PGE1 group were sig-nificantly increased compared with control (P < 0.05).Conclusion PGE1 can slow the progression of renal failure and increase Hgb level of AAN patient.展开更多
BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is known to be protective in ischemia-reperfusion of heart, lung,renal, and liver tissue. It still remains to be determined whether PGE1 exhibits similar protection against spina...BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is known to be protective in ischemia-reperfusion of heart, lung,renal, and liver tissue. It still remains to be determined whether PGE1 exhibits similar protection against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model. OBJECTIVE: To observe the large, ventral horn, motor neurons of the spinal cord, as well as limb function, and to investigate whether perfusion of PGE1 exhibits protective effects against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: Controlled observation. The experiment was performed at the Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University between June and October 2007. MATERIALS: Twenty male, New Zealand white rabbits, weighing 2.0 kg and of mixed gender, were used in the present study. The following chemicals and compounds were used: prostaglandin E1 injectable powder,as well as malondialdehyde and ATPase kits. Animal intervention was in accordance with animal ethical standards. METHODS: We separated rabbits into control and experimental groups randomly, with 10 rabbits in each group. Rabbits were used as spinal cord ischemia models by segmentally cross-clamping the infrarenal aorta. The control group was subsequently perfused for five minutes with blood and saline solution, and the experimental group was perfused for 5 minutes with blood and saline solution containing PGE1 (100 ng/kg/min). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The neurological function of the hind limbs was assessed 12, 24, and 48 hours after model establishment. All animals were sacrificed and spinal cords were harvested for histological analyses. The large motor neurons in the ventral horn of L1-7 were observed by inverted microscope. RESULTS: All 20 rabbits were included in the final analysis, without any loss. In the ventral horn of the L5-7 segments, there were more large motor neurons that appeared viable in the experimental group than the control group (P 〈 0.05). The scores of hind limb functions were greater in the experimental group after 12, 24, and 48 hours (P 〈 0.01). CONCLUSION: Perfusion of PGE1 reduced the amount of neuronal damage in the spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury rabbit model. These results correlated with increased numbers large motor neurons in the ventral horn of the spinal cord, as well as improved hind limb function.展开更多
AIM: To detect the effect of intraoperative prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) infusion on survival of esophagectomized patients due to cancer. METHODS: In this preliminary study, a double blinded placebo based clinical trial wa...AIM: To detect the effect of intraoperative prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) infusion on survival of esophagectomized patients due to cancer. METHODS: In this preliminary study, a double blinded placebo based clinical trial was performed. Thirty patients with esophageal cancer scheduled for esophagectomy via the transthoracic approach were randomized by a block randomization method, in two equal groups: PGE1 group - infusion of PGE1 (20 ng/kg per minute) in the operating room and placebo group - saline 0.9% with the same volume and rate. The infusion began before induction of anesthesia and finished just before transfer to the intensive care unit. The patients, anesthetist, intensive care physicians, nurses and surgeons were blinded to both study groups. All the patients were anesthetized with the same method. For postoperative pain control, a thoracic epidural catheter was placed for all patients before induction of anesthesia. We followed up the patients until October 2010. Basic characteristics, duration of anesthesia, total surgery and thoracotomy time, preoperative hemoglobin, length of tumor, grade of histological differentiation, disease stage, number of lymph nodes in the resected mass, number of readmissions to hospital, total duration of readmission and survival rates were compared between the two groups. Some of the data originates from the historical data reported in our previous study. We report them for better realization of the follow up results. RESULTS: The patients’ characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in age (P = 0.48), gender (P = 0.27), body mass index (P = 0.77), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status more than?I?(P = 0.71), and smoking (P = 0.65). The PGE1 and placebo group were comparable in the following variables: duration of anesthesia (277 ± 50 vs 270 ± 67, P = 0.86), duration of thoracotomy (89 ± 35 vs 96 ± 19, P = 0.46), duration of operation (234 ± 37 vs 240 ± 66, P = 0.75), volume of blood loss during operation (520 ± 130 vs 630 ± 330, P = 0.34), and preoperative hemoglobin (14.4 ± 2 vs 14.7 ± 1.9, P = 0.62), respectively. No hemodynamic complications requiring an infusion of dopamine or cessation of the PGE1 infusion were encountered. Cancer variables were compared between the PGE1 and placebo group. Length of tumor (11.9 ± 3 vs 12.3 ± 3, P = 0.83), poor/undifferentiated grade of histological differentiation [3 (20%) vs 3 (20%), P = 0.78], disease stage III [5 (33.3%), 4 (26.7%), P = 0.72] and more than 3 lymph nodes in the resected mass [3 (20%) vs 2 (13.3%), P = 0.79] were similar in both groups. All the patients were discharged from hospital except one patient in the control group who died because of a post operative myocardial infarction. No life threatening postoperative complication occurred in any patient. The results of outcome and survival were the same in PGE1 and placebo group: number of readmissions (2.1 ± 1 vs 1.9 ± 1, P = 0.61), total duration of readmission (27 ± 12 vs 29 ± 12, P = 0.67), survival rate (10.1 ± 3.8 vs 9.6 ± 3.4, P = 0.71), overall survival rate after one year [8 (53.3%) vs 7 (47%), P = 0.72], overall survival rate after two years [3 (20%) vs 3 (20%), P = 0.99], and overall survival rate after three years [0 vs 1 (6.7%), P = 0.99], respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PGE1 did not shorten or lengthen the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. Larger studies are suggested.展开更多
Objective To investigate the effect of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on recovery of early renal graft functions after transplantation. Methods One hundred and seven patients after renal transplantation were allocated in the...Objective To investigate the effect of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on recovery of early renal graft functions after transplantation. Methods One hundred and seven patients after renal transplantation were allocated in the treated group, and treated by conventional treatment with injection of 10 μg prostaglandin E1 additionally twice a day for 14 days. And eighty-eight patients who received conventional treatment alone after renal transplantation at the corresponding period were allocated in the control group. Indexes of the two groups, including incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection reaction, volume of urine, serum certaintie (SCr), endogenous certainties clearance rate (CCr), the blood flow resistance in graft as well as blood viscosity (BV), and platelet aggregation rate (PAR), were determined. Results The urinary volume and endogenous certainties clearance rate of the treated group were significantly higher, but the level of SCr, incidence of renal function recovery retardation, BV, PAR and blood flow resistance in graft were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The difference of incidence of acute rejection reaction between the two groups was insignificant (P>0.05). Conclusion Prostaglandin E1 can improve blood microcirculation and decrease the incidence of renal function recovery retardation. These effects are helpful for recovery of renal function after renal transplantation.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery obstruction is a critical consideration in graft outcomes after living donor liver transplantation.We report a case of diffuse arterial vasospasm that developed immediately after anastomosis ...BACKGROUND Hepatic artery obstruction is a critical consideration in graft outcomes after living donor liver transplantation.We report a case of diffuse arterial vasospasm that developed immediately after anastomosis and was managed with an intra-arterial infusion of lipo-prostaglandin E1(PGE1).CASE SUMMARY A 57-year-old male with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma underwent ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplant.The grafted hepatic artery was first anastomosed to the recipient’s right hepatic artery stump.However,the arterial pulse immediately weakened.Although a new anastomosis was performed using the right gastroepiploic artery,the patient’s arterial pulse rate remained poor.We attempted angiographic intervention immediately after the operation;it showed diffuse arterial vasospasms like‘beads on a string’.We attempted continuous infusion of lipo-PGE1 overnight via an intra-arterial catheter.The next day,arterial flow improved without any spasms or strictures.The patient had no additional arterial complications or related sequelae at the time of writing,1-year post-liver transplantation.CONCLUSION Angiographic evaluation is helpful in cases of repetitive arterial obstruction,and intra-arterial infusion of lipo-PGE1 may be effective in treating diffuse arterial spasms.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Prostaglandin E1(PGE1),or alprostadil,is a potent vasodilator that improves hepatic blood flow and reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury post-liver transplantation(LT).However,the benefits of PGE1 on renal function after LT have not yet been well described.AIM To assess the impact of PGE1 administration on renal function in patients who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplant.METHODS This retrospective study included all patients who underwent liver or liverkidney transplant at our institution from January,2011 to December,2021.Patients were classified based on whether they received PGE1.PGE1 was administered post-LT to those with transaminases>1000 U/L in the immediate postoperative period.Demographics,post-LT treatments and/or complications,renal function,and survival were analyzed.Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed,and a two-tailed P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.RESULTS A total of 145 patients underwent LT,with 44(30%)receiving PGE1.Baseline patient characteristics were comparable,except the PGE1 group had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase(AST)(1961.9 U/L±1862.3 U/L vs 878 U/L±741.4 U/L,P=0.000),alanine aminotransferase(1070.6 U/L±895 U/L vs 547.7 U/L±410 U/L,P=0.000),international normalized ratio on post-LT day 1(2±0.74 vs 1.8±0.4,P=0.03),a longer intensive care unit stay(8.1 days±11.8 days vs 3.8 days±4.6 days,P=0.003),more vasopressor use(55.53 hours±111 hours vs 16.33 hours±26.3 hours,P=0.002),and higher immediate postoperative complications(18.6%vs 4.9%,P=0.04).The PGE1 group also had a significantly higher 90-day readmission rate(29.6%vs 13.1%,P=0.02)and lower 1-year liver graft survival(87.5%vs 98.9%,P=0.005).However,30-day readmission(31.6%vs 27.4%,P=0.64),LT complications(hepatic artery thrombosis,biliary complications,rejection of liver graft,cardiomyopathy),1-year patient survival(96.9%vs 97.8%,P=0.77),overall liver graft survival,and overall patient survival were similar between the two groups(95.4%vs 93.9%,P=0.74 and 88.4%vs 86.9%,P=0.81 respectively).Although the PGE1 group had a significantly lower glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)on post-LT day 7(46.3 mL/minute±26.7 mL/minute vs 62.5 mL/minute±34 mL/minute,P=0.009),the eventual need for renal replacement therapy(13.6%vs 5.9%,P=0.09),the number of dialysis sessions(0.91 vs 0.27,P=0.13),and eGFR at 1-month(37.2 mL/minute±35.9 mL/minute vs 42 mL/minute±36.9 mL/minute,P=0.49),6-months(54.8 mL/minute±21.6 mL/minute vs 62 mL/minute±21.4 mL/minute,P=0.09),and 12-months(63.7 mL/minute±20.7 mL/minute vs 62.8 mL/minute±20.3 mL/minute,P=0.85)post-LT were similar to those in the non-PGE1 group.CONCLUSION In patients who received PGE1 for ischemia-reperfusion injury,despite immediate acute renal injury post-LT,the renal function at 1-month,6-months,and 12-months post-LT was similar compared to those without ischemiareperfusion injury.Prospective clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the benefits of PGE1 use in renal function.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81260331Key Laboratory for High-Incidence Tumor Prevention and Treatment,Ministry of Education,No.GKE2015-ZZ05
文摘AIM to determine whether cyclooxygenase-2(COX-2) and prostaglandin E1 receptor(EP1) contribute to disease and whether they help predict prognosis.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2011 at our hospital. Expression of COX-2 and EP1 receptor was examined by immunohistochemistry of formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded tissues using polyclonal antibodies. Possible associations between immunohistochemical scores and survival were determined.RESULTS Factors associated with poor overall survival(OS) were alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/m L, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, and high EP1 receptor expression, but not high COX-2 expression. Disease-free survival was not significantly different between patients with low or high levels of COX-2 or EP1. COX-2 immunoreactivity was significantly higher in well-differentiated HCC tissues(Edmondson grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ) than in poorly differentiated tissues(Edmondson grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ)(P = 0.003). EP1 receptor immunoreactivity was significantly higher in poorly differentiated tissue than in well-differentiated tissue(P = 0.001).CONCLUSION COX-2 expression appears to be linked to early HCC events(initiation), while EP1 receptor expression may participate in tumor progression and predict survival.
文摘Objective To investigate the effects of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on the progression of aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). Methods Twenty-four patients diagnosed as AAN with serum creatinine (Scr) between 1.5 mg/dL and 4 mg/dL during September 2001 to August 2003 were randomly divided into 2 groups. All patients had ingested long dan xie gan wan con-taining aristolochic acid (0.219 mg/g) for at least 3 months. Twelve patients were injected with Alprostadil (10 μg/d for 10 days in one month, summing up to 6 months). Except for PGE1, the other therapy was same in both groups. Renal function was assessed using reciprocal serum creatinine levels (1/Scr). Results The level of Scr and serum hemoglobin (Hgb) was similar in both groups prior to therapy. During follow-up, 1/Scr levels in PGE1 group were significantly higher than control group (P < 0.01), and Hgb levels in PGE1 group were sig-nificantly increased compared with control (P < 0.05).Conclusion PGE1 can slow the progression of renal failure and increase Hgb level of AAN patient.
基金Tackle Key Problem Plan of Science and Technology in Liaoning Province, No.2004225003-8
文摘BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is known to be protective in ischemia-reperfusion of heart, lung,renal, and liver tissue. It still remains to be determined whether PGE1 exhibits similar protection against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model. OBJECTIVE: To observe the large, ventral horn, motor neurons of the spinal cord, as well as limb function, and to investigate whether perfusion of PGE1 exhibits protective effects against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: Controlled observation. The experiment was performed at the Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University between June and October 2007. MATERIALS: Twenty male, New Zealand white rabbits, weighing 2.0 kg and of mixed gender, were used in the present study. The following chemicals and compounds were used: prostaglandin E1 injectable powder,as well as malondialdehyde and ATPase kits. Animal intervention was in accordance with animal ethical standards. METHODS: We separated rabbits into control and experimental groups randomly, with 10 rabbits in each group. Rabbits were used as spinal cord ischemia models by segmentally cross-clamping the infrarenal aorta. The control group was subsequently perfused for five minutes with blood and saline solution, and the experimental group was perfused for 5 minutes with blood and saline solution containing PGE1 (100 ng/kg/min). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The neurological function of the hind limbs was assessed 12, 24, and 48 hours after model establishment. All animals were sacrificed and spinal cords were harvested for histological analyses. The large motor neurons in the ventral horn of L1-7 were observed by inverted microscope. RESULTS: All 20 rabbits were included in the final analysis, without any loss. In the ventral horn of the L5-7 segments, there were more large motor neurons that appeared viable in the experimental group than the control group (P 〈 0.05). The scores of hind limb functions were greater in the experimental group after 12, 24, and 48 hours (P 〈 0.01). CONCLUSION: Perfusion of PGE1 reduced the amount of neuronal damage in the spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury rabbit model. These results correlated with increased numbers large motor neurons in the ventral horn of the spinal cord, as well as improved hind limb function.
基金Supported by The Cancer Research Center of the Cancer Institute in Iran
文摘AIM: To detect the effect of intraoperative prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) infusion on survival of esophagectomized patients due to cancer. METHODS: In this preliminary study, a double blinded placebo based clinical trial was performed. Thirty patients with esophageal cancer scheduled for esophagectomy via the transthoracic approach were randomized by a block randomization method, in two equal groups: PGE1 group - infusion of PGE1 (20 ng/kg per minute) in the operating room and placebo group - saline 0.9% with the same volume and rate. The infusion began before induction of anesthesia and finished just before transfer to the intensive care unit. The patients, anesthetist, intensive care physicians, nurses and surgeons were blinded to both study groups. All the patients were anesthetized with the same method. For postoperative pain control, a thoracic epidural catheter was placed for all patients before induction of anesthesia. We followed up the patients until October 2010. Basic characteristics, duration of anesthesia, total surgery and thoracotomy time, preoperative hemoglobin, length of tumor, grade of histological differentiation, disease stage, number of lymph nodes in the resected mass, number of readmissions to hospital, total duration of readmission and survival rates were compared between the two groups. Some of the data originates from the historical data reported in our previous study. We report them for better realization of the follow up results. RESULTS: The patients’ characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in age (P = 0.48), gender (P = 0.27), body mass index (P = 0.77), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status more than?I?(P = 0.71), and smoking (P = 0.65). The PGE1 and placebo group were comparable in the following variables: duration of anesthesia (277 ± 50 vs 270 ± 67, P = 0.86), duration of thoracotomy (89 ± 35 vs 96 ± 19, P = 0.46), duration of operation (234 ± 37 vs 240 ± 66, P = 0.75), volume of blood loss during operation (520 ± 130 vs 630 ± 330, P = 0.34), and preoperative hemoglobin (14.4 ± 2 vs 14.7 ± 1.9, P = 0.62), respectively. No hemodynamic complications requiring an infusion of dopamine or cessation of the PGE1 infusion were encountered. Cancer variables were compared between the PGE1 and placebo group. Length of tumor (11.9 ± 3 vs 12.3 ± 3, P = 0.83), poor/undifferentiated grade of histological differentiation [3 (20%) vs 3 (20%), P = 0.78], disease stage III [5 (33.3%), 4 (26.7%), P = 0.72] and more than 3 lymph nodes in the resected mass [3 (20%) vs 2 (13.3%), P = 0.79] were similar in both groups. All the patients were discharged from hospital except one patient in the control group who died because of a post operative myocardial infarction. No life threatening postoperative complication occurred in any patient. The results of outcome and survival were the same in PGE1 and placebo group: number of readmissions (2.1 ± 1 vs 1.9 ± 1, P = 0.61), total duration of readmission (27 ± 12 vs 29 ± 12, P = 0.67), survival rate (10.1 ± 3.8 vs 9.6 ± 3.4, P = 0.71), overall survival rate after one year [8 (53.3%) vs 7 (47%), P = 0.72], overall survival rate after two years [3 (20%) vs 3 (20%), P = 0.99], and overall survival rate after three years [0 vs 1 (6.7%), P = 0.99], respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PGE1 did not shorten or lengthen the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. Larger studies are suggested.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30471640)
文摘Objective To investigate the effect of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on recovery of early renal graft functions after transplantation. Methods One hundred and seven patients after renal transplantation were allocated in the treated group, and treated by conventional treatment with injection of 10 μg prostaglandin E1 additionally twice a day for 14 days. And eighty-eight patients who received conventional treatment alone after renal transplantation at the corresponding period were allocated in the control group. Indexes of the two groups, including incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection reaction, volume of urine, serum certaintie (SCr), endogenous certainties clearance rate (CCr), the blood flow resistance in graft as well as blood viscosity (BV), and platelet aggregation rate (PAR), were determined. Results The urinary volume and endogenous certainties clearance rate of the treated group were significantly higher, but the level of SCr, incidence of renal function recovery retardation, BV, PAR and blood flow resistance in graft were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The difference of incidence of acute rejection reaction between the two groups was insignificant (P>0.05). Conclusion Prostaglandin E1 can improve blood microcirculation and decrease the incidence of renal function recovery retardation. These effects are helpful for recovery of renal function after renal transplantation.
文摘BACKGROUND Hepatic artery obstruction is a critical consideration in graft outcomes after living donor liver transplantation.We report a case of diffuse arterial vasospasm that developed immediately after anastomosis and was managed with an intra-arterial infusion of lipo-prostaglandin E1(PGE1).CASE SUMMARY A 57-year-old male with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma underwent ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplant.The grafted hepatic artery was first anastomosed to the recipient’s right hepatic artery stump.However,the arterial pulse immediately weakened.Although a new anastomosis was performed using the right gastroepiploic artery,the patient’s arterial pulse rate remained poor.We attempted angiographic intervention immediately after the operation;it showed diffuse arterial vasospasms like‘beads on a string’.We attempted continuous infusion of lipo-PGE1 overnight via an intra-arterial catheter.The next day,arterial flow improved without any spasms or strictures.The patient had no additional arterial complications or related sequelae at the time of writing,1-year post-liver transplantation.CONCLUSION Angiographic evaluation is helpful in cases of repetitive arterial obstruction,and intra-arterial infusion of lipo-PGE1 may be effective in treating diffuse arterial spasms.