BACKGROUND There are few studies in the literature comparing the clinical outcomes and radiographic results of proximal femoral nail(PFN)and proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)for pertrochanteric femoral fracture...BACKGROUND There are few studies in the literature comparing the clinical outcomes and radiographic results of proximal femoral nail(PFN)and proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)for pertrochanteric femoral fracture(PFF)in elderly patients.AIM To evaluate both clinical and radiographic outcomes after fixation with PFN and PFNA in an elderly patient population.METHODS One hundred fifty-eight patients older than 65 years with PFF who underwent fixation with either PFN or PFNA were included.Seventy-three patients underwent fixation with PFN,whereas 85 were fixed with PFNA.The mean follow-up was 2.4 years(range,1-7 years).Clinical outcome was measured in terms of operation time,postoperative function at each follow-up visit,and mortality within one year.Radiographic evaluation included reduction quality after surgery,Cleveland Index,tip-apex distance(TAD),union rate,time to union,and sliding distance of the screw or blade.Complications including nonunion,screw cutout,infection,osteonecrosis of the femoral head,and implant breakage were also investigated.RESULTS Postoperative function was more satisfactory in patients who underwent PFNA than in those who underwent PFN(P=0.033).Radiologically,the sliding difference was greater in PFN than in PFNA patients(6.1 and 3.2 mm,respectively,P=0.036).The rate of screw cutout was higher in the PFN group;eight for PFN(11.0%)and two for PFNA patients(2.4%,P=0.027).There were no differences between the two groups in terms of operation time,mortality rate at one year after the operation,adequacy of reduction,Cleveland Index,TAD,union rate,time to union,nonunion,infection,osteonecrosis,or implant breakage.CONCLUSION Elderly patients with PFF who underwent PFNA using a helical blade demonstrated better clinical and radiographic outcomes as measured by clinical score and sliding distance compared with patients who underwent PFN.展开更多
目的:基于倾向性评分匹配法探讨血府逐瘀汤对老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者PFNA术后康复的影响。方法:回顾性分析140例行防旋股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)手术治疗的股骨粗隆间骨折患者,使用SPSS 22.0进行倾向性...目的:基于倾向性评分匹配法探讨血府逐瘀汤对老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者PFNA术后康复的影响。方法:回顾性分析140例行防旋股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)手术治疗的股骨粗隆间骨折患者,使用SPSS 22.0进行倾向性匹配评分匹配分为观察组(血府逐瘀汤治疗)和对照组(常规支持治疗)各50例,比较两组术后相关康复治疗指标,并对两组用药安全性进行评价分析。结果:观察组证候积分,术后第5、7天患肢肿胀程度,VAS评分,术后第3、7天血清白细胞及C反应蛋白水平均明显低于对照组(P<0.05),而术后第7天血清血红蛋白、红细胞压积水平和术后1个月Harris评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:PFNA联合血府逐瘀汤内服治疗对老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后康复恢复效果确切,可显著减轻患肢肿胀程度,在更短时间内缓解患者局部疼痛,减少术后隐性失血,提升Harris评分,快速恢复髋关节功能,且不增加患者用药安全性风险。展开更多
Objective Unstable intertrochanteric fractures （ITFs） are mostly treated by proximal femoral nail antirotation （PFNA）,Inter-Tan,Asian Hip,and other new internal fixation devices.But for complex unstable fractures,...Objective Unstable intertrochanteric fractures （ITFs） are mostly treated by proximal femoral nail antirotation （PFNA）,Inter-Tan,Asian Hip,and other new internal fixation devices.But for complex unstable fractures,such as crushed lateral wall of the greater trochanter,the loss of fixation point on lateral wall slightly reduces the fixing effect.This study aimed to compare the biomechanical strengths between reversed less invasive stabilization system （LISS） and PFNA for treatment of unstable ITFs.Methods Forty synthetic femurs were used to simulate unstable ITFs in vitro and were fixed using the reversed LISS or PFNA.These fractures were divided into two groups depending on whether the lateral wall of the greater trochanter is intact or not （AO classification：31-A2.3 and 31-A3.3,respectively）.The load-displacement of femur,stiffness,ultimate load,and cyclic fatigue resistance were detected using an incremental load test and a dynamic fatigue test through an MTS 858 test system.Results For both 31-A2.3 and 31-A3.3,the vertical sinking displacement （VSD） of the femoral head under 500 N load was insignificantly smaller after treatment with reversed LISS than with PFNA,and when the displacement was 5 mm,the femoral head bore insignificantly greater load.The fixation with reversed LISS resulted in greater axial stiffness of the femur but smaller ultimate load.During the same cycle in the dynamic fatigue test,the VSD was insignificantly smaller with the fixation of reversed LISS.Conclusion Reversed LISS and PFNA have similar biomechanical strength for unstable ITFs.This conclusion should be supported by additional large-size research on basic biomechanics and clinical application.This is the first comparative biomechanical study comparing reversed LISS and PFNA for unstable ITFs.展开更多
目的:对比鞘内注射舒芬太尼与芬太尼对高龄股骨粗隆骨折近端股骨钉抗旋(PFNA)内固定术患者的镇痛效果及安全性对比。方法:选取2019年1月—2022年12月于常熟市第五人民医院接受股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术的108例高龄患者作为研究对象,根...目的:对比鞘内注射舒芬太尼与芬太尼对高龄股骨粗隆骨折近端股骨钉抗旋(PFNA)内固定术患者的镇痛效果及安全性对比。方法:选取2019年1月—2022年12月于常熟市第五人民医院接受股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术的108例高龄患者作为研究对象,根据随机数表法将患者分为研究组54例与常规组54例。研究组采用鞘内注射舒芬太尼,常规组采用鞘内注射芬太尼。比较两组手术时间、镇痛时间、术后6 h、12 h视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分及不良反应发生情况。结果:两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组镇痛时间长于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组术后6 h、12 h VAS评分低于常规组,且两组术后12 h VAS评分低于术后6 h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相比芬太尼,舒芬太尼在高龄股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术患者中的镇痛作用显著,能缓解术后疼痛,还可降低不良反应发生率。展开更多
目的:探讨锁定钢板内固定治疗股骨近端外侧壁骨折块后的效果。方法:2021年1月至2022年6月收治31例合并外侧壁骨折的股骨转子间骨折患者,其中15例单纯采用股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)固定,男3例,女12例...目的:探讨锁定钢板内固定治疗股骨近端外侧壁骨折块后的效果。方法:2021年1月至2022年6月收治31例合并外侧壁骨折的股骨转子间骨折患者,其中15例单纯采用股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)固定,男3例,女12例;年龄(75.87±7.46)岁;另16例采用PFNA内固定后再应用预弯好的3.5 mm螺孔锁定钢板内固定外侧壁骨折,男4例,女12例;年龄(76.15±9.47)岁。术后随访观察记录比较两组手术指标、尖顶距(tip-apical distance,TAD)、术后负重站立时间、骨折复位情况。术后6个月根据Harris髋关节评分评价术后髋关节功能。结果:两组患者均获得随访,时间7~17(12±5)个月。两组术后即刻颈干角为111°~132°(119.3±8.3)°。骨折复位效果:PFNA组,优11例,可2例,差1例;PFNA+锁定钢板组,优12例,可3例,差1例。PFNA组1例发生螺旋刀片经股骨头切出。两组手术时间、术中出血量及手术切口长度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组TAD及术后负重站立时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后6个月Harris各项评分和总分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:应用PFNA辅助锁定钢板内固定合并外侧壁骨折的股骨转子间骨折疗效确切,可较好恢复外侧壁完整性,提高PFNA内固定的稳定性,术后并发症少。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND There are few studies in the literature comparing the clinical outcomes and radiographic results of proximal femoral nail(PFN)and proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)for pertrochanteric femoral fracture(PFF)in elderly patients.AIM To evaluate both clinical and radiographic outcomes after fixation with PFN and PFNA in an elderly patient population.METHODS One hundred fifty-eight patients older than 65 years with PFF who underwent fixation with either PFN or PFNA were included.Seventy-three patients underwent fixation with PFN,whereas 85 were fixed with PFNA.The mean follow-up was 2.4 years(range,1-7 years).Clinical outcome was measured in terms of operation time,postoperative function at each follow-up visit,and mortality within one year.Radiographic evaluation included reduction quality after surgery,Cleveland Index,tip-apex distance(TAD),union rate,time to union,and sliding distance of the screw or blade.Complications including nonunion,screw cutout,infection,osteonecrosis of the femoral head,and implant breakage were also investigated.RESULTS Postoperative function was more satisfactory in patients who underwent PFNA than in those who underwent PFN(P=0.033).Radiologically,the sliding difference was greater in PFN than in PFNA patients(6.1 and 3.2 mm,respectively,P=0.036).The rate of screw cutout was higher in the PFN group;eight for PFN(11.0%)and two for PFNA patients(2.4%,P=0.027).There were no differences between the two groups in terms of operation time,mortality rate at one year after the operation,adequacy of reduction,Cleveland Index,TAD,union rate,time to union,nonunion,infection,osteonecrosis,or implant breakage.CONCLUSION Elderly patients with PFF who underwent PFNA using a helical blade demonstrated better clinical and radiographic outcomes as measured by clinical score and sliding distance compared with patients who underwent PFN.
文摘目的:基于倾向性评分匹配法探讨血府逐瘀汤对老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者PFNA术后康复的影响。方法:回顾性分析140例行防旋股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)手术治疗的股骨粗隆间骨折患者,使用SPSS 22.0进行倾向性匹配评分匹配分为观察组(血府逐瘀汤治疗)和对照组(常规支持治疗)各50例,比较两组术后相关康复治疗指标,并对两组用药安全性进行评价分析。结果:观察组证候积分,术后第5、7天患肢肿胀程度,VAS评分,术后第3、7天血清白细胞及C反应蛋白水平均明显低于对照组(P<0.05),而术后第7天血清血红蛋白、红细胞压积水平和术后1个月Harris评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:PFNA联合血府逐瘀汤内服治疗对老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后康复恢复效果确切,可显著减轻患肢肿胀程度,在更短时间内缓解患者局部疼痛,减少术后隐性失血,提升Harris评分,快速恢复髋关节功能,且不增加患者用药安全性风险。
文摘Objective Unstable intertrochanteric fractures （ITFs） are mostly treated by proximal femoral nail antirotation （PFNA）,Inter-Tan,Asian Hip,and other new internal fixation devices.But for complex unstable fractures,such as crushed lateral wall of the greater trochanter,the loss of fixation point on lateral wall slightly reduces the fixing effect.This study aimed to compare the biomechanical strengths between reversed less invasive stabilization system （LISS） and PFNA for treatment of unstable ITFs.Methods Forty synthetic femurs were used to simulate unstable ITFs in vitro and were fixed using the reversed LISS or PFNA.These fractures were divided into two groups depending on whether the lateral wall of the greater trochanter is intact or not （AO classification：31-A2.3 and 31-A3.3,respectively）.The load-displacement of femur,stiffness,ultimate load,and cyclic fatigue resistance were detected using an incremental load test and a dynamic fatigue test through an MTS 858 test system.Results For both 31-A2.3 and 31-A3.3,the vertical sinking displacement （VSD） of the femoral head under 500 N load was insignificantly smaller after treatment with reversed LISS than with PFNA,and when the displacement was 5 mm,the femoral head bore insignificantly greater load.The fixation with reversed LISS resulted in greater axial stiffness of the femur but smaller ultimate load.During the same cycle in the dynamic fatigue test,the VSD was insignificantly smaller with the fixation of reversed LISS.Conclusion Reversed LISS and PFNA have similar biomechanical strength for unstable ITFs.This conclusion should be supported by additional large-size research on basic biomechanics and clinical application.This is the first comparative biomechanical study comparing reversed LISS and PFNA for unstable ITFs.
文摘目的:对比鞘内注射舒芬太尼与芬太尼对高龄股骨粗隆骨折近端股骨钉抗旋(PFNA)内固定术患者的镇痛效果及安全性对比。方法:选取2019年1月—2022年12月于常熟市第五人民医院接受股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术的108例高龄患者作为研究对象,根据随机数表法将患者分为研究组54例与常规组54例。研究组采用鞘内注射舒芬太尼,常规组采用鞘内注射芬太尼。比较两组手术时间、镇痛时间、术后6 h、12 h视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分及不良反应发生情况。结果:两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组镇痛时间长于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组术后6 h、12 h VAS评分低于常规组,且两组术后12 h VAS评分低于术后6 h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相比芬太尼,舒芬太尼在高龄股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术患者中的镇痛作用显著,能缓解术后疼痛,还可降低不良反应发生率。
