Background:In recent years,there has been increased research interest in both smartphone addiction and social media addiction as well as the development of psychometric instruments to assess these constructs.However,t...Background:In recent years,there has been increased research interest in both smartphone addiction and social media addiction as well as the development of psychometric instruments to assess these constructs.However,there is a lack of psychometric evaluation for instruments assessing smartphone addiction and social media addiction in Thailand.The present study evaluated the psychometric properties and gender measurement invariance of the Thai version of the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale(SABAS)and Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale(BSMAS).Method:A total of 801 Thai university students participated in an online survey from January 2022 to July 2022 which included demographic information,SABAS,BSMAS,and the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form(IGDS9-SF).Results:Confirmatory Factor Analyses(CFAs)found that both the SABAS and BSMAS had a one-factor structure.Findings demonstrated adequate psychometric properties of both instruments and also supported measurement invariance across genders.Moreover,scores on the SABAS and BSMAS were correlated with scores on the IGDS9-SF.Conclusion:The results indicated that the SABAS and BSMAS are useful psychometric instruments for assessing the risk of smartphone addiction and social media addiction among Thai young adults.展开更多
目的修订甲状腺癌歧视感量表(Thyroid Cancer Self-perceived Discrimination Scale,TCSPDS)以适用于头颈癌患者,检验其信效度及适用性,并分析歧视感与生活质量的相关性。方法采用经典测量理论对TCSPDS条目进行修订和补充,形成头颈癌歧...目的修订甲状腺癌歧视感量表(Thyroid Cancer Self-perceived Discrimination Scale,TCSPDS)以适用于头颈癌患者,检验其信效度及适用性,并分析歧视感与生活质量的相关性。方法采用经典测量理论对TCSPDS条目进行修订和补充,形成头颈癌歧视感量表(Head and Neck Cancer Self-perceived Discrimination Scale,HNCSPDS)。选取头颈癌患者进行问卷调查,检验HNCSPDS的信效度及适用性,并分析歧视感的影响因素及其与生活质量的相关性。结果共回收311份有效问卷。HNCSPDS共13个条目,包括污名化(6个条目)、自我否定(5个条目)及社交回避(2个条目)3个分量表。量表具有良好的效度(χ^(2)/df=2.660,RMSEA=0.073,GFI=0.927,CFI=0.972,NFI=0.957,IFI=0.972,TLI=0.963)、信度(Cronbach'sα系数为0.955,折半信度为0.967,重测信度为0.845)和适用性[问卷平均完成时间(14.14±2.18)min和91.5%的有效应答率]。性别和经济负担是患者歧视感的独立影响因素,患者歧视感与生活质量呈负相关。结论头颈癌患者普遍存在较强的歧视感,HNCSPDS在评价头颈癌患者歧视感中信效度良好,可作为未来开展健康宣教、医疗咨询和心理支持的有效评价工具,进一步提高患者身心健康和生活质量。展开更多
Objective:This study aimed to translate the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy scale(ANSE),assess its appropriateness for use in Korean nursing students,and evaluate the Korean Version of the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy sc...Objective:This study aimed to translate the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy scale(ANSE),assess its appropriateness for use in Korean nursing students,and evaluate the Korean Version of the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy scale’s(K-ANSE)validity and reliability.Methods:The data of 444 nursing college students at 10 universities across the country were collected from November 1,2020 to June 8,2021.The K-ANSE was analyzed utilizing SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 25.0 programs.The K-ANSE’s content validity,construct validity,convergent/discriminant validity,criterion-related validity,and reliability were evaluated.Results:Internal emotion management,auto-regulatory behavior,external emotion management,and sociality were established.The Cronbach’sαfor the overall scale was 0.87,and that of the 4 subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.89.Conclusions:The Korean version of the ANSE seems to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure Korean bachelor-level nursing students.展开更多
基金This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology,Taiwan(MOST 110-2410-H-006-115)the Higher Education Sprout Project,Ministry of Education to the Headquarters of University Advancement at National Cheng Kung University(NCKU)the 2021 Southeast and South Asia and Taiwan Universities Joint Research Scheme(NCKU 31),and the E-Da Hospital(EDAHC111004).
文摘Background:In recent years,there has been increased research interest in both smartphone addiction and social media addiction as well as the development of psychometric instruments to assess these constructs.However,there is a lack of psychometric evaluation for instruments assessing smartphone addiction and social media addiction in Thailand.The present study evaluated the psychometric properties and gender measurement invariance of the Thai version of the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale(SABAS)and Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale(BSMAS).Method:A total of 801 Thai university students participated in an online survey from January 2022 to July 2022 which included demographic information,SABAS,BSMAS,and the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form(IGDS9-SF).Results:Confirmatory Factor Analyses(CFAs)found that both the SABAS and BSMAS had a one-factor structure.Findings demonstrated adequate psychometric properties of both instruments and also supported measurement invariance across genders.Moreover,scores on the SABAS and BSMAS were correlated with scores on the IGDS9-SF.Conclusion:The results indicated that the SABAS and BSMAS are useful psychometric instruments for assessing the risk of smartphone addiction and social media addiction among Thai young adults.
文摘目的修订甲状腺癌歧视感量表(Thyroid Cancer Self-perceived Discrimination Scale,TCSPDS)以适用于头颈癌患者,检验其信效度及适用性,并分析歧视感与生活质量的相关性。方法采用经典测量理论对TCSPDS条目进行修订和补充,形成头颈癌歧视感量表(Head and Neck Cancer Self-perceived Discrimination Scale,HNCSPDS)。选取头颈癌患者进行问卷调查,检验HNCSPDS的信效度及适用性,并分析歧视感的影响因素及其与生活质量的相关性。结果共回收311份有效问卷。HNCSPDS共13个条目,包括污名化(6个条目)、自我否定(5个条目)及社交回避(2个条目)3个分量表。量表具有良好的效度(χ^(2)/df=2.660,RMSEA=0.073,GFI=0.927,CFI=0.972,NFI=0.957,IFI=0.972,TLI=0.963)、信度(Cronbach'sα系数为0.955,折半信度为0.967,重测信度为0.845)和适用性[问卷平均完成时间(14.14±2.18)min和91.5%的有效应答率]。性别和经济负担是患者歧视感的独立影响因素,患者歧视感与生活质量呈负相关。结论头颈癌患者普遍存在较强的歧视感,HNCSPDS在评价头颈癌患者歧视感中信效度良好,可作为未来开展健康宣教、医疗咨询和心理支持的有效评价工具,进一步提高患者身心健康和生活质量。
文摘Objective:This study aimed to translate the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy scale(ANSE),assess its appropriateness for use in Korean nursing students,and evaluate the Korean Version of the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy scale’s(K-ANSE)validity and reliability.Methods:The data of 444 nursing college students at 10 universities across the country were collected from November 1,2020 to June 8,2021.The K-ANSE was analyzed utilizing SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 25.0 programs.The K-ANSE’s content validity,construct validity,convergent/discriminant validity,criterion-related validity,and reliability were evaluated.Results:Internal emotion management,auto-regulatory behavior,external emotion management,and sociality were established.The Cronbach’sαfor the overall scale was 0.87,and that of the 4 subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.89.Conclusions:The Korean version of the ANSE seems to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure Korean bachelor-level nursing students.