Quantum adiabatic algorithms using unitary interpolation

We present two efficient quantum adiabatic algorithms for Bernstein–Vazirani problem and Simon’s problem.We show that the time complexities of the algorithms for Bernstein–Vazirani problem and Simon’s problem are O(1)and O(n),respectively,which are the same complexities as the corresponding algorithms in quantum circuit model.In these two algorithms,the adiabatic Hamiltonians are realized by unitary interpolation instead of standard linear interpolation.Comparing with the adiabatic algorithms using linear interpolation,the energy gaps of our algorithms keep constant.Therefore,the complexities are much easier to analyze using this method.

Exact Equivalence between Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm and Quantum Circuit Algorithm

We present a rigorous proof that quantum circuit algorithm can be transformed into quantum adiabatic algorithm with the exact same time complexity. This means that from a quantum circuit algorithm of L gates we can construct a quantum adiabatic algorithm with time complexity of O（L）. Additionally, our construction shows that one may exponentially speed up some quantum adiabatic algorithms by properly choosing an evolution path.

Transitionless driving on local adiabatic quantum search algorithm

We apply the transitionless driving on the local adiabatic quantum search algorithm to speed up the adiabatic process. By studying quantum dynamics of the adiabatic search algorithm with the equivalent two-level system, we derive the transi- tionless driving Hamiltonian for the local adiabatic quantum search algorithm. We found that when adding a transitionless quantum driving term Ht~ （t） on the local adiabatic quantum search algorithm, the success rate is 1 exactly with arbitrary evolution time by solving the time-dependent Schr6dinger equation in eigen-picture. Moreover, we show the reason for the drastic decrease of the evolution time is that the driving Hamiltonian increases the lowest eigenvalues to a maximum of

Implementation of quantum search scheme by adiabatic passage in a cavity-laser-atom system

This paper proposes a scheme for implementing the adiabatic quantum search algorithm of different marked items in an unsorted list of N items with atoms in a cavity driven by lasers. N identical three-level atoms are trapped in a single-mode cavity. Each atom is driven by a set of three pulsed laser fields. In each atom, the same level represents a database entry. Two of the atoms are marked differently. The marked atom has an energy gap between its two ground states. The two different marked states can be sought out respectively starting from an initial entangled state by controlling the ratio of three pulse amplitudes. Moreover, the mechanism, based on adiabatic passage, constitutes a decoherence-free method in the sense that spontaneous emission and cavity damping are avoided since the dynamics follows the dark state. Furthermore, this paper extends the algorithm with m（m〉2） atoms marked in an ideal situation. Any different marked state can be sought out.

Accelerating an adiabatic process by nonlinear sweeping

We investigate the acceleration of an adiabatic process with the same survival probability of the ground state by sweeping a parameter nonlinearly, fast in the wide gap region and slowly in the narrow gap region, in contrast to the usual linear sweeping. We find the expected acceleration both in the Landau-Zener tunneling model and in the adiabatic quantum computing model for factorizing the number N - 21.

On a Nonlinear Model in Adiabatic Evolutions

In this paper, we study a kind of nonlinear model of adiabatic evolution in quantum search problem. As will be seen here, for this problem, there always exists a possibility that this nonlinear model can successfully solve the problem, while the linear model can not. Also in the same setting, when the overlap between the initial state and the final stare is sufficiently large, a simple linear adiabatic evolution can achieve O(1) time efficiency, but infinite time complexity for the nonlinear model of adiabatic evolution is needed. This tells us, it is not always a wise choice to use nonlinear interpolations in adiabatic algorithms. Sometimes, simple linear adiabatic evolutions may be sufficient for using.