BACKGROUND Subclavian vein stenosis or occlusion may be caused by a transvenous pacemaker,which makes the reimplantation of a new pacemaker lead difficult.Transvenous pacemaker lead implantation-related subclavian vei...BACKGROUND Subclavian vein stenosis or occlusion may be caused by a transvenous pacemaker,which makes the reimplantation of a new pacemaker lead difficult.Transvenous pacemaker lead implantation-related subclavian vein occlusion may present difficulty with regard to cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT)upgrade.CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a 46-year-old man who was admitted with total subclavian vein occlusion caused by a permanent pacemaker that had been implanted 2 years previously.We successfully treated this patient with an upgrade to a CRT pacemaker by utilizing transferable interventional coronary and radiological techniques.The patient recovered uneventfully during the follow-up period.CONCLUSION CRT upgrade is still a viable technique for the treatment of subclavian vein obstruction caused by previous pacemaker implantation.展开更多
基金The Ningbo Natural Science Foundation of China,No.2019A610342the Ningbo Health Branding Subject Fund,No.PPXK2018-01.
文摘BACKGROUND Subclavian vein stenosis or occlusion may be caused by a transvenous pacemaker,which makes the reimplantation of a new pacemaker lead difficult.Transvenous pacemaker lead implantation-related subclavian vein occlusion may present difficulty with regard to cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT)upgrade.CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a 46-year-old man who was admitted with total subclavian vein occlusion caused by a permanent pacemaker that had been implanted 2 years previously.We successfully treated this patient with an upgrade to a CRT pacemaker by utilizing transferable interventional coronary and radiological techniques.The patient recovered uneventfully during the follow-up period.CONCLUSION CRT upgrade is still a viable technique for the treatment of subclavian vein obstruction caused by previous pacemaker implantation.
