New glucose-lowering agents reduce liver enzyme levels and blood pressure(BP).Whether this finding can be extended to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)patients,in whom a bidirectional association of NAFLD measu...New glucose-lowering agents reduce liver enzyme levels and blood pressure(BP).Whether this finding can be extended to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)patients,in whom a bidirectional association of NAFLD measures and BP has been also demonstrated,remains by and large unknown.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of combination perindopril/amlodipine tablets in patients with high-altitude hypertension who were previously unable to control their blood pressure with monotherapy.Methods:A total ...Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of combination perindopril/amlodipine tablets in patients with high-altitude hypertension who were previously unable to control their blood pressure with monotherapy.Methods:A total of 151 patients with high-altitude hypertension whose blood pressure remained inadequately controlled with previous monotherapy were enrolled in this study.All patients received an 8-week treatment with a combination of perindopril/amlodipine tablets,consisting of perindopril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day.Blood pressure measurements,including both diastolic and systolic pressures,were taken at baseline,and after 2,4,6,and 8 weeks of treatment.Results:After 8 weeks of treatment,there was a significant reduction in both average systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to baseline(P<0.0001).Specifically,the average systolic blood pressure decreased by 24.45±13.75 mmHg,and the average diastolic blood pressure decreased by 13.37±8.40 mmHg.The overall heart rate showed no significant changes during the treatment period.Conclusion:A combination of perindopril/amlodipine tablets significantly improved blood pressure control in patients with high-altitude hypertension after 8 weeks of treatment.These results support the efficacy of combination perindopril/amlodipine as a viable treatment option for high-altitude hypertension.展开更多
目的探讨强化降压与标准降压治疗老年高血压合并冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)术后的效果及安全性。方法86例老年高血压合并冠心病PCI患者以随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组,每组43例。对照组给予标准降压治疗[目标收缩压(SBP)<...目的探讨强化降压与标准降压治疗老年高血压合并冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)术后的效果及安全性。方法86例老年高血压合并冠心病PCI患者以随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组,每组43例。对照组给予标准降压治疗[目标收缩压(SBP)<135 mmHg],研究组给予强化降压治疗(目标SBP<120 mmHg),自治疗起始随访12个月观察效果。记录2组患者治疗前后的24 h SBP和舒张压(DBP)变异系数;采用超声心动图评价治疗前后心功能改变;采用欧洲五维健康评价量表(EQ-5D-3L)中的视觉模拟量表评价健康状况,采用患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)评价抑郁情绪,采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)评价焦虑情绪,采用国际版跌倒效能量表(FES-I)评价跌倒风险。结果2组患者治疗前24 h SBP及24 h DBP变异系数、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室质量指数(LVMI)、左心房容积指数(LAVI)、EQ-5D-3L得分、PHQ-9得分、SAS得分、FES-I得分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组治疗后的24 h SBP、24 h DBP变异系数、LAVI、PHQ-9得分、SAS得分及FES-I得分均低于对照组,LVEF、LVMI、EQ-5D-3L得分高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组、对照组治疗期间总不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组心脑血管新发事件总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论强化降压治疗在降低老年高血压合并冠心病患者PCI术后的24 h血压变异系数、改善心功能方面优于标准降压治疗,可提高患者生活质量,且安全性良好。展开更多
目的探讨早期强化控制血压对脑出血患者预后的影响。方法检索Pubmed、Embase和Web of Science数据库2017年9月1之前的文献,纳入比较早期强化控制血压与标准控制血压对脑出血患者预后影响的随机对照研究,进行Meta分析。明确早期强化控制...目的探讨早期强化控制血压对脑出血患者预后的影响。方法检索Pubmed、Embase和Web of Science数据库2017年9月1之前的文献,纳入比较早期强化控制血压与标准控制血压对脑出血患者预后影响的随机对照研究,进行Meta分析。明确早期强化控制血压对脑出血患者预后的影响。结果共6项随机对照研究,4376例患者纳入分析。两组病死率分别为10.8%(235/2177)及10.8%(238/2199),严重残疾发生率分别为38.1%(801/2103)和39.9%(848/2123)。与标准控制血压相比,早期强化控制血压并未降低脑出血患者病死率(RR=1.00,95%CI:0.84~1.18,P=0.98;I^2=0%)及严重残疾发生率(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.88~1.03,P=0.23;I^2=0%)。结论早期强化控制血压不能显著改善脑出血患者预后。展开更多
目的 探讨高血压脑出血急性期积极降压治疗对早期血肿增长的影响.方法 2010年3月至12月人院且发病在6h内的50例高血压脑出血患者,经头颅CT证实为自发性脑出血,且收缩压持续≥150 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)且≤220 mm Hg.按住院号随...目的 探讨高血压脑出血急性期积极降压治疗对早期血肿增长的影响.方法 2010年3月至12月人院且发病在6h内的50例高血压脑出血患者,经头颅CT证实为自发性脑出血,且收缩压持续≥150 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)且≤220 mm Hg.按住院号随机数字分组法分成2组,观察组28例入院即开始降压治疗,要求在1h内使目标收缩压≤140 mm Hg,并维持此目标值;对照组22例收缩压≥180 mm Hg或平均动脉压≥130 mm Hg才开始降压治疗.24 h后复查头部CT,依据ABC/2法计算脑实质内血肿量,进行统计学分析.结果 入院后首次CT检查,观察组的平均血肿体积为(34.1 ±3.1)ml,对照组的平均血肿体积为(33.5 ±3.2)ml,2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组患者24h平均血肿增长率为7.1%,对照组为36.4%,2组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 对高血压脑出血患者,早期将收缩压降到≤140 mm Hg,可减缓24h内血肿的增大.展开更多
文摘New glucose-lowering agents reduce liver enzyme levels and blood pressure(BP).Whether this finding can be extended to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)patients,in whom a bidirectional association of NAFLD measures and BP has been also demonstrated,remains by and large unknown.
文摘Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of combination perindopril/amlodipine tablets in patients with high-altitude hypertension who were previously unable to control their blood pressure with monotherapy.Methods:A total of 151 patients with high-altitude hypertension whose blood pressure remained inadequately controlled with previous monotherapy were enrolled in this study.All patients received an 8-week treatment with a combination of perindopril/amlodipine tablets,consisting of perindopril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day.Blood pressure measurements,including both diastolic and systolic pressures,were taken at baseline,and after 2,4,6,and 8 weeks of treatment.Results:After 8 weeks of treatment,there was a significant reduction in both average systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to baseline(P<0.0001).Specifically,the average systolic blood pressure decreased by 24.45±13.75 mmHg,and the average diastolic blood pressure decreased by 13.37±8.40 mmHg.The overall heart rate showed no significant changes during the treatment period.Conclusion:A combination of perindopril/amlodipine tablets significantly improved blood pressure control in patients with high-altitude hypertension after 8 weeks of treatment.These results support the efficacy of combination perindopril/amlodipine as a viable treatment option for high-altitude hypertension.
文摘目的探讨强化降压与标准降压治疗老年高血压合并冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)术后的效果及安全性。方法86例老年高血压合并冠心病PCI患者以随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组,每组43例。对照组给予标准降压治疗[目标收缩压(SBP)<135 mmHg],研究组给予强化降压治疗(目标SBP<120 mmHg),自治疗起始随访12个月观察效果。记录2组患者治疗前后的24 h SBP和舒张压(DBP)变异系数;采用超声心动图评价治疗前后心功能改变;采用欧洲五维健康评价量表(EQ-5D-3L)中的视觉模拟量表评价健康状况,采用患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)评价抑郁情绪,采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)评价焦虑情绪,采用国际版跌倒效能量表(FES-I)评价跌倒风险。结果2组患者治疗前24 h SBP及24 h DBP变异系数、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室质量指数(LVMI)、左心房容积指数(LAVI)、EQ-5D-3L得分、PHQ-9得分、SAS得分、FES-I得分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组治疗后的24 h SBP、24 h DBP变异系数、LAVI、PHQ-9得分、SAS得分及FES-I得分均低于对照组,LVEF、LVMI、EQ-5D-3L得分高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组、对照组治疗期间总不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组心脑血管新发事件总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论强化降压治疗在降低老年高血压合并冠心病患者PCI术后的24 h血压变异系数、改善心功能方面优于标准降压治疗,可提高患者生活质量,且安全性良好。
文摘目的探讨早期强化控制血压对脑出血患者预后的影响。方法检索Pubmed、Embase和Web of Science数据库2017年9月1之前的文献,纳入比较早期强化控制血压与标准控制血压对脑出血患者预后影响的随机对照研究,进行Meta分析。明确早期强化控制血压对脑出血患者预后的影响。结果共6项随机对照研究,4376例患者纳入分析。两组病死率分别为10.8%(235/2177)及10.8%(238/2199),严重残疾发生率分别为38.1%(801/2103)和39.9%(848/2123)。与标准控制血压相比,早期强化控制血压并未降低脑出血患者病死率(RR=1.00,95%CI:0.84~1.18,P=0.98;I^2=0%)及严重残疾发生率(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.88~1.03,P=0.23;I^2=0%)。结论早期强化控制血压不能显著改善脑出血患者预后。
文摘目的 探讨高血压脑出血急性期积极降压治疗对早期血肿增长的影响.方法 2010年3月至12月人院且发病在6h内的50例高血压脑出血患者,经头颅CT证实为自发性脑出血,且收缩压持续≥150 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)且≤220 mm Hg.按住院号随机数字分组法分成2组,观察组28例入院即开始降压治疗,要求在1h内使目标收缩压≤140 mm Hg,并维持此目标值;对照组22例收缩压≥180 mm Hg或平均动脉压≥130 mm Hg才开始降压治疗.24 h后复查头部CT,依据ABC/2法计算脑实质内血肿量,进行统计学分析.结果 入院后首次CT检查,观察组的平均血肿体积为(34.1 ±3.1)ml,对照组的平均血肿体积为(33.5 ±3.2)ml,2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组患者24h平均血肿增长率为7.1%,对照组为36.4%,2组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 对高血压脑出血患者,早期将收缩压降到≤140 mm Hg,可减缓24h内血肿的增大.