The collapse of a cavitation bubble is an interesting topic and it has many applications in the engineering fields.Due to its compressible nature,the modelling of a cavitation bubble is not easy by the Lagrangian meth...The collapse of a cavitation bubble is an interesting topic and it has many applications in the engineering fields.Due to its compressible nature,the modelling of a cavitation bubble is not easy by the Lagrangian method,like the smoothed particle hydrodynamics(SPH),as there is large variation of particle volume.Currently,there are two kinds of method that have been proposed to deal with this problem:the particle regeneration technique(PRT)and the volume adaptive scheme(VAS).They have all been validated via several numerical tests of compressible flow in the past studies.As is based on totally different concept,the ultimate simulation results and properties may differ.Here,we intend to compare these two methods based on the Riemann-based SPH solver with monotone upwind-centered scheme for conservation laws(MUSCL)reconstruction via several numerical tests.The characteristics of these two methods are discussed and the applicable scope for them are also commented for further usage.展开更多
基金Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.51909041,51909042)This work was supported by the funded by the Finance Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province (Grant No. ZDKJ2021020).
文摘The collapse of a cavitation bubble is an interesting topic and it has many applications in the engineering fields.Due to its compressible nature,the modelling of a cavitation bubble is not easy by the Lagrangian method,like the smoothed particle hydrodynamics(SPH),as there is large variation of particle volume.Currently,there are two kinds of method that have been proposed to deal with this problem:the particle regeneration technique(PRT)and the volume adaptive scheme(VAS).They have all been validated via several numerical tests of compressible flow in the past studies.As is based on totally different concept,the ultimate simulation results and properties may differ.Here,we intend to compare these two methods based on the Riemann-based SPH solver with monotone upwind-centered scheme for conservation laws(MUSCL)reconstruction via several numerical tests.The characteristics of these two methods are discussed and the applicable scope for them are also commented for further usage.
