Field Measurements and Pullout Tests of Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall

In this paper, field measurements and pullout tests of a new type of reinforced earth retaining wall, which is reinforced by trapezoid concrete blocks connected by steel bar, are described. Field measurements included settlements of the earth fill, tensile forces in the ties and earth pressures on the facing panels during the construction and at completion. Based on the measurements, the following statements can be made: (1) the tensile forces in the ties increased with the height of backfill above the tie and there is a tensile force crest in most ties; (2) at completion, the measured earth pressures along the wall face were between the values of the active earth pressures and the pressures at rest; (3) larger settlements occurred near the face of the wall where a zone of drainage sand and gravel was not compacted properly and smaller settlements occurred in the well-compacted backfill. The results of field pullout tests indicated that the magnitudes of pullout resistances as well as tensile forces induced in the ties were strongly influenced by the relative displacements between the ties and the backfill, and pullout resistances increased with the height of backfill above the ties and the length of ties.

Soil spatial variability impact on the behavior of a reinforced earth wall

This article presents the soil spatial variability effect on the performance of a reinforced earth wall.The serviceability limit state is considered in the analysis.Both cases of isotropic and anisotropic non-normal random fields are implemented for the soil properties.The K arhunen-Loeve expansion method is used for the discretization of the random field.Numerical finite difference models are considered as deterministic models.The Monte Carlo simulation technique is used to obtain the deformation response variability of the reinforced soil retaining wall.The influences of the spatial variability response of the geotechnical system in terms of horizontal facing displacement is presented and discussed.The results obtained show that the spatial variability has an important influence on the facing horizontal displacement as well as on the failure probability.

Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls

Back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls （BBMSEWs） are encountered in bridge approaches, ramp ways, rockfall protection systems, earth dams, levees and noise barriers. However, available design guidelines for BBMSEWs are limited and not applicable to numerical modeling when back-to-back walls interact with each other. The objective of this paper is to investigate, using PLAXIS code, the effects of the reduction in the distance between BBMSEW, the reinforcement length, the quality of backfill material and the connection of reinforcements in the middle, when the back-to-back walls are close. The results indicate that each of the BBMSEWs behaves independently if the width of the embankment between mechanically stabilized earth walls is greater than that of the active zone. This is in good agreement with the result of FHWA design guideline. However, the results show that the FHWA design guideline underestimates the lateral earth pressure when back-to-back walls interact with each other. Moreover, for closer BBMSEWs, FHWA design guideline strongly overestimates the maximum tensile force in the reinforcement. The investigation of the quality of backfill material shows that the minor increase in embankment cohesion can lead to significant reductions in both the lateral earth pressure and the maximum tensile force in geosynthetic. When the distance between the two earth walls is close to zero, the connection of reinforcement between back-to-back walls significantly improves the factor of safety.

Effect of earth reinforcement,soil properties and wall properties on bridge MSE walls

Mechanically stabilized earth(MSE)retaining walls are popular for highway bridge structures.They have precast concrete panels attached to earth reinforcement.The panels are designed to have some lateral movement.However,in some cases,excessive movement and even complete dislocation of the panels have been observed.In this study,3-D numerical modeling involving an existing MSE wall was undertaken to investigate various wall parameters.The effects of pore pressure,soil cohesion,earth reinforcement type and length,breakage/slippage of reinforcement and concrete strength,were examined.Results showed that the wall movement is affected by soil pore pressure and reinforcement integrity and length,and unaffected by concrete strength.Soil cohesion has a minor effect,while the movement increased by 13–20 mm for flexible geogrid reinforced walls compared with the steel grid walls.The steel grid stresses were below yielding,while the geogrid experienced significant stresses without rupture.Geogrid reinforcement may be used taking account of slippage resistance and wall movement.If steel grid is used,non-cohesive soil is recommended to minimize corrosion.Proper soil drainage is important for control of pore pressure.