[目的/意义]梳理同行评议发展脉络,分析当前同行评议面临的问题,进而提出科学合理的应对之策。[方法/过程]首先从同行评议起源、传统同行评议模式、开放同行评议、同行评议文本挖掘四方面梳理同行评议发展脉络,并以Web of Science核心...[目的/意义]梳理同行评议发展脉络,分析当前同行评议面临的问题,进而提出科学合理的应对之策。[方法/过程]首先从同行评议起源、传统同行评议模式、开放同行评议、同行评议文本挖掘四方面梳理同行评议发展脉络,并以Web of Science核心库中收录的同行评议模式文献数据为例,分析学者对同行评议模式的研究变化趋势;随后,对Elsevier旗下2426种期刊使用的同行评议模式进行统计,分析同行评议模式的实际应用情况。其次,根据国家统计局发布的中国创新指数、中国知网2000—2019年间收录的图书馆、情报与文献学领域的题录数据,从科研文献数量增长、研究主题演化以及潜在评审专家数量变化角度分析当前同行评议工作面临的问题。最后,根据分析结果,提出从构建学术质量评估系统、精准构建学者画像、量化学者在同行评议中的贡献三个方面应对在大数据环境下同行评议面临的困境。[结果/结论]在科研文献数量不断增长、研究主题不断拓展、评审专家数量增长放缓的情形下,同行评议面临的挑战与日俱增。通过发展脉络梳理、研究趋势与应用现状总结、挑战与策略分析,能够加深对同行评议的认识;提出的方案能够在一定程度上缓解日趋严峻的同行评议工作,具有一定的应用价值。[局限]由于数据获取难度大,文章使用的数据不够全面,所提出的对策尚未开发出验证系统。展开更多
This study proposes the establishment of a knowledge-system ontology in the nursing field. It uses advanced data mining techniques,digital publishing technologies, and new media concepts to comprehensively integrate a...This study proposes the establishment of a knowledge-system ontology in the nursing field. It uses advanced data mining techniques,digital publishing technologies, and new media concepts to comprehensively integrate and deepen nursing knowledge and to aggregate sources of knowledge in specialized technical fields. This study applies all forms of media and transmission channels, such as personal computers and mobile devices, to establish a knowledge-transmission system that provides knowledge services such as knowledge search, update retrieval, evaluation, questions and answers(Q&As), online viewing, information subscription, expert services, push notifications, review forums, and online learning. In doing so, this study creates an authoritative and foundational knowledge service engine for the nursing field, which provides convenient, flexible, and comprehensive knowledge services to members of the nursing industry in a digital format.展开更多
文摘[目的/意义]梳理同行评议发展脉络,分析当前同行评议面临的问题,进而提出科学合理的应对之策。[方法/过程]首先从同行评议起源、传统同行评议模式、开放同行评议、同行评议文本挖掘四方面梳理同行评议发展脉络,并以Web of Science核心库中收录的同行评议模式文献数据为例,分析学者对同行评议模式的研究变化趋势;随后,对Elsevier旗下2426种期刊使用的同行评议模式进行统计,分析同行评议模式的实际应用情况。其次,根据国家统计局发布的中国创新指数、中国知网2000—2019年间收录的图书馆、情报与文献学领域的题录数据,从科研文献数量增长、研究主题演化以及潜在评审专家数量变化角度分析当前同行评议工作面临的问题。最后,根据分析结果,提出从构建学术质量评估系统、精准构建学者画像、量化学者在同行评议中的贡献三个方面应对在大数据环境下同行评议面临的困境。[结果/结论]在科研文献数量不断增长、研究主题不断拓展、评审专家数量增长放缓的情形下,同行评议面临的挑战与日俱增。通过发展脉络梳理、研究趋势与应用现状总结、挑战与策略分析,能够加深对同行评议的认识;提出的方案能够在一定程度上缓解日趋严峻的同行评议工作,具有一定的应用价值。[局限]由于数据获取难度大,文章使用的数据不够全面,所提出的对策尚未开发出验证系统。
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.71573162)Shanxi Province Soft Science Research Program(No.2018041029-3)
文摘This study proposes the establishment of a knowledge-system ontology in the nursing field. It uses advanced data mining techniques,digital publishing technologies, and new media concepts to comprehensively integrate and deepen nursing knowledge and to aggregate sources of knowledge in specialized technical fields. This study applies all forms of media and transmission channels, such as personal computers and mobile devices, to establish a knowledge-transmission system that provides knowledge services such as knowledge search, update retrieval, evaluation, questions and answers(Q&As), online viewing, information subscription, expert services, push notifications, review forums, and online learning. In doing so, this study creates an authoritative and foundational knowledge service engine for the nursing field, which provides convenient, flexible, and comprehensive knowledge services to members of the nursing industry in a digital format.