The main points of the revision in the near future of the Chinese Maritime Code are discussed,which include extension of the scope of application of the Code to the transport and vessels in inland navigable waters adj...The main points of the revision in the near future of the Chinese Maritime Code are discussed,which include extension of the scope of application of the Code to the transport and vessels in inland navigable waters adjacent to the sea,modernization of the law on the contracts of carriage of goods by sea,establishment of legal regime governing compensation for marine pollution from ships,improvement of provisions regarding shipmasters and crew in order to provide them with more protections,and the increase of the global limits of liability and the limit of liability of carrier for death of or personal injuries to passengers especially in the domestic trade.展开更多
The necessities for the revision of the Chinese Maritime Code are analyzed,based upon the significant development in the maritime trade and related areas in China since the adoption of the Maritime Code in 1992,includ...The necessities for the revision of the Chinese Maritime Code are analyzed,based upon the significant development in the maritime trade and related areas in China since the adoption of the Maritime Code in 1992,including the big changes of the contents of the basic principles which were followed in the making of the Maritime Code,the lack of legal regime governing compensation for marine pollution from ships and of harmony with the related basic laws as well as the ambiguities,uncertainties and gaps existing in die Maritime Code.The main contents of revision are discussed,i.e.modernization of the law on carriage of goods by sea,establishment of legal regime governing compensation for marine pollution from ships,increase of global limits of liability and limit of liability of carrier for death of or personal injury to passengers especially in the domestic trade,extension of application to transport and vessels in inland navigable waters adjacent to the sea,removal of ambiguities and uncertainties and filling in the gaps to enhance its enforceability,and harmonization with the basic laws.The future of the revision of the Maritime Code is also anticipated.展开更多
This article purports to shed light on some thoughts on China’s legislative reform in respect of rules pertaining to regulate the multimodal transportation involving a sea leg. While the section of multimodal transpo...This article purports to shed light on some thoughts on China’s legislative reform in respect of rules pertaining to regulate the multimodal transportation involving a sea leg. While the section of multimodal transportation in the Chinese Maritime Code has not been much challenged in the legal practice, the recent Rotterdam Rules that deals with contracts of carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea certainly probes the area with new solutions. These new solutions have enlightened the debates among the scholars and practitioners over the routes for the reform of the wet multimodal transport provisions in the Code. In this article, the author attempts to assess the Rotterdam Rules solutions in connection with the characteristics of Chinese import and export trades that involve multimodal transportation as well as the relevant domestic legislation and international treaties to which China has entered into as member state that regulate transport of goods by modes other than sea. Based on the analysis, it finds out that some of the former solutions may give rise to unexpected results that hinder their adoption in the future Code : it could narrow the existing scope of application of the Chinese Maritime Code and would let the multimodal transport operators escape the mandatory regime of the Code.And if provision like the Art.26 of the Rotterdam Rules is adopted in the Code, a great market difference might be created as between the fragmented transportation under various contracts and the multimodal transportation under a single contract. However,certain rules are positive so that can be adopted in the future Code: the hypothetical contract approach adopted in the Art. 26 of the Rotterdam, Rules and the gap-filling approach adopted in the Arts. 26 and 82 of the Rules may provide better certainties in respect of issues such as time for suit, liability for delay, transport documents.Moreover, Chinese legislators may consider to extend the multimodal liability regime to the independent contractors or subcontractors of the MTOs that are involved in maritime carriage and related operations.展开更多
文摘The main points of the revision in the near future of the Chinese Maritime Code are discussed,which include extension of the scope of application of the Code to the transport and vessels in inland navigable waters adjacent to the sea,modernization of the law on the contracts of carriage of goods by sea,establishment of legal regime governing compensation for marine pollution from ships,improvement of provisions regarding shipmasters and crew in order to provide them with more protections,and the increase of the global limits of liability and the limit of liability of carrier for death of or personal injuries to passengers especially in the domestic trade.
文摘The necessities for the revision of the Chinese Maritime Code are analyzed,based upon the significant development in the maritime trade and related areas in China since the adoption of the Maritime Code in 1992,including the big changes of the contents of the basic principles which were followed in the making of the Maritime Code,the lack of legal regime governing compensation for marine pollution from ships and of harmony with the related basic laws as well as the ambiguities,uncertainties and gaps existing in die Maritime Code.The main contents of revision are discussed,i.e.modernization of the law on carriage of goods by sea,establishment of legal regime governing compensation for marine pollution from ships,increase of global limits of liability and limit of liability of carrier for death of or personal injury to passengers especially in the domestic trade,extension of application to transport and vessels in inland navigable waters adjacent to the sea,removal of ambiguities and uncertainties and filling in the gaps to enhance its enforceability,and harmonization with the basic laws.The future of the revision of the Maritime Code is also anticipated.
文摘This article purports to shed light on some thoughts on China’s legislative reform in respect of rules pertaining to regulate the multimodal transportation involving a sea leg. While the section of multimodal transportation in the Chinese Maritime Code has not been much challenged in the legal practice, the recent Rotterdam Rules that deals with contracts of carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea certainly probes the area with new solutions. These new solutions have enlightened the debates among the scholars and practitioners over the routes for the reform of the wet multimodal transport provisions in the Code. In this article, the author attempts to assess the Rotterdam Rules solutions in connection with the characteristics of Chinese import and export trades that involve multimodal transportation as well as the relevant domestic legislation and international treaties to which China has entered into as member state that regulate transport of goods by modes other than sea. Based on the analysis, it finds out that some of the former solutions may give rise to unexpected results that hinder their adoption in the future Code : it could narrow the existing scope of application of the Chinese Maritime Code and would let the multimodal transport operators escape the mandatory regime of the Code.And if provision like the Art.26 of the Rotterdam Rules is adopted in the Code, a great market difference might be created as between the fragmented transportation under various contracts and the multimodal transportation under a single contract. However,certain rules are positive so that can be adopted in the future Code: the hypothetical contract approach adopted in the Art. 26 of the Rotterdam, Rules and the gap-filling approach adopted in the Arts. 26 and 82 of the Rules may provide better certainties in respect of issues such as time for suit, liability for delay, transport documents.Moreover, Chinese legislators may consider to extend the multimodal liability regime to the independent contractors or subcontractors of the MTOs that are involved in maritime carriage and related operations.
