Distribution of the Si-deficiency rice soil in Hubei Province

There are about 1 million ha of Si-deficiency paddy soils in Hubei Province. Practically, it is essential to study the Si nutrient status in those Si-deficiency rice soil and its regional distribution before the application of Si-fertilizer. According to the analysis of 50 rice soil samples which collected from 20 counties/cities in Hubei Province, the available Si content in rice soils derived from different parent materials varied greatly. The Si content from high to low was in sequence of limestone, redpurplish sandy shale with carbonate, alluvium and lacustrine deposits, quaternary period red clay, granitic gneiss, and sandy shale. In addition, the Si content in rice soil was remarkably related with its pH. It seems that the pH 6.5 might be a demarcation line that divided the supplying Si ability of rice soils into the low and high categories (Table 1). Integrating the results with a critical soil Si-deficiency as 100 mg/kg, the evaluation index of soil Si supplying capability of a rice soil

Subcellular Cd accumulation characteristic in root cell wall of rice cultivars with different sensitivities to Cd stress in soil

The variations of grain cadmiun（Cd） concentrations, translocation factors（TFs） of Cd from roots to shoots/grains of six rice cultivars, characterized with different Cd-sensitivities in polluted soil were studied, the selected rice cultivars were Xiangzao 17（R1）, Jiayu 211（R2）, Xiangzao 42（R3）, Zhuliangyou 312（R4）, Zhuliangyou 611（R5）, and Jinyou 463（R6）, respectively. The Cd subcellular distribution and Cd binding characteristics on subcellular fractions of rice root cell wall（CW） were further investigated. The results showed that the rice grain Cd contents varied significantly, with a maximum variation of 47.0% among the cultivars, the largest grain Cd content was observed with cultivar R1（Cd-sensitivity cultivar） and the smallest with R5（Cd-tolerance cultivar）. The translocation factors of Cd from roots to shoots（TF_（shoot）） and roots to grains（TF_（grain）） varied greatly among the cultivars. In general, the TFgrain of the cultivars followed the order of R1〉R2〉R3〉R4〉 R6-R5. The Cd concentration（mg kg^（–1） FW） in the fraction of root CW, the fraction of cell wall removing pectin（CW-P） and the fraction of cell wall removing pectin and hemicellulose（CW-P-HC） of the cultivars generally followed the order of CW-P〉CW〉CWP-HC; the ratios of Cd concentration（mg kg–1 FW） in the fraction of CW-P to that of CW were mostly more than 1.10, while the ratios of Cd concentration in the fraction of CW-P-HC to that of CW were mostly less than 0.60, indicating that Cd was mainly stored in the hemicellulose of the root CW. The ratios of Cd of CW-P-HC to CW generally followed the descending order of R1~R2〉R3〉R4〉R5~R6 for the cultivars, which implied that hemicellulose is probably the main subcellular pool for transferring Cd into rice grain, and it restrains the translocation of Cd from shoot to the grain, especially for the Cd-tolerance cultivars（R5 and R6）, the compartmentation of more Cd in hemicellulose in root CW is probably one of the main mechanisms for Cd tolerance of rice cultivars.

Bioaccumulation, subcellular distribution and chemical forms of yttrium in rice seedling

Yttrium（Y） accumulation in soil is a serious environment problem in China. To understand the mechanisms involved in Y tolerance and detoxification in rice seedling, the bioaccumulation, subcellular distribution, and chemical forms of Y was investigated in the present study. The results show that the content of Y both in roots and shoots increases with the increasing concentration of Y, and a large amount of Y is stored in roots. Subcellular distribution of Y in rice indicates that the majority of Y is bound to cell wall. Meanwhile, various chemical forms of Y is absorbed by rice. The greatest amount of Y is extracted by 2% hydrate acetic acid（HAc） and 0.6 mol/L HCl（particularly 2% HAc）, which indicates that most of Y is combined with un-dissolved phosphate and oxalate（particularly phosphate）. Cluster analysis, based on Y abundance levels, reveals the relationship between Y distribution patterns and chemical forms. Our results imply that Y forming of precipitates with phosphate（and/or oxalate） and depositing in the cell wall may be a key strategy for Y detoxicity and tolerance in rice.

Change analysis of rice area and production in China during the past three decades

Rice＇s spatial-temporal distributions, which are critical for agricultural, environ- mental and food security research, are affected by natural conditions as well as socio-eco- nomic developments. Based on multi-source data, an effective model named the Spatial Production Allocation Model （SPAM） which integrates arable land distribution, administrative unit statistics of crop data, agricultural irrigation data and crop suitability data, was used to get a series of spatial distributions of rice area and production with 10-km pixels at a national scale -it was applied from the early 1980s onwards and used to analyze the pattern of spatial and temporal changes. The results show that significant changes occurred in rice in China during 1980-2010. Overall, more than 50% of the rice area decreased, while nearly 70% of rice production increased in the change region during 1980-2010. Spatially, most of the increased area and production were in Northeast China, especially, in Jilin and Heilongjiang; most of the decreased area and production were located in Southeast China, especially, in regions of rapidly urbanization in Guangdong, Fujian and Zhejiang. Thus, the centroid of rice area was moved northeast approximately 230 km since 1980, and rice production about 320 km, which means rice production moved northeastward faster than rice area because of the significant rice yield increase in Northeast China. The results also show that rice area change had a decisive impact on rice production change. About 54.5% of the increase in rice pro- duction is due to the expansion of sown area, while around 83.2% of the decrease in rice production is due to contraction of rice area. This implies that rice production increase may be due to area expansion and other non-area factors, but reduced rice production could largely be attributed to rice area decrease.