Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage:risk factors, managements and outcomes

BACKGROUND： Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy（PD） hemorrhage（PPH） is an uncommon but serious complication. This retrospective study analyzed the risk factors, managements and outcomes of the patients with PPH.METHODS： A total of 840 patients with PD between 2000 and2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 73 patients had PPH： 19 patients had early PPH and 54 had late PPH.The assessment included the preoperative history of disease,pancreatic status and surgical techniques. Other postoperative complications were also evaluated.RESULTS： The incidence of PPH was 8.7%（73/840）. There were no independent risk factors for early PPH. Male gender（OR=4.40, P0.02）, diameter of pancreatic duct（OR=0.64,P0.01）, end-to-side invagination pancreaticojejunostomy（OR=5.65, P0.01）, pancreatic fistula（OR=2.33, P0.04）and intra-abdominal abscess（OR=12.19, P0.01） were the independent risk factors for late PPH. Four patients with early PPH received conservative treatment and 12 were treated surgically. As for patients with late PPH, the success rate of medical therapy was 27.8%（15/54）. Initial endoscopy was operated in 12 patients（22.2%）, initial angiography in 19（35.2%）,and relaparotomy in 15（27.8%）. Eventually, PPH resulted in 19 deaths. The main causes of death were multiple organ failure,hemorrhagic shock, sepsis and uncontrolled rebleeding.CONCLUSIONS： Careful and ongoing observation of hemorrhagic signs, especially within the first 24 hours after PD or within the course of pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess, is recommended for patients with PD and a prompt management is necessary. Although endoscopy and angiography are the standard procedures for the management of PPH,surgical approach is still irreplaceable. Aggressive prevention of hemorrhagic shock and re-hemorrhage is the key to treat PPH.

Analysis on Nutritional Risk Screening and Influencing Factors of Hospitalized Patients in Central Urban Area

Rational nutritional support shall be based on nutritional screening and nutritional assessment. This study is aimed to explore nutritional risk screening and its influencing factors of hospitalized patients in central urban area. It is helpful for the early detection of problems in nutritional supports, nutrition management and the implementation of intervention measures, which will contribute a lot to improving the patient＇s poor clinical outcome. A total of three tertiary medical institutions were enrolled in this study. From October 2015 to June 2016, 1202 hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years were enrolled in Nutrition Risk Screening 2002（NRS2002） for nutritional risk screening, including 8 cases who refused to participate, 5 cases of same-day surgery and 5 cases of coma. A single-factor chi-square test was performed on 312 patients with nutritional risk and 872 hospitalized patients without nutritional risk. Logistic regression analysis was performed with univariate analysis（P〈0.05）, to investigate the incidence of nutritional risk and influencing factors. The incidence of nutritional risk was 26.35% in the inpatients, 25.90% in male and 26.84% in female, respectively. The single-factor analysis showed that the age ≥60, sleeping disorder, fasting, intraoperative bleeding, the surgery in recent month, digestive diseases, metabolic diseases and endocrine system diseases had significant effects on nutritional risk（P〈0.05）. Having considered the above-mentioned factors as independent variables and nutritional risk（Y=1, N=0） as dependent variable, logistic regression analysis revealed that the age ≥60, fasting, sleeping disorders, the surgery in recent month and digestive diseases are hazardous factors for nutritional risk. Nutritional risk exists in hospitalized patients in central urban areas. Nutritional risk screening should be conducted for inpatients. Nutritional intervention programs should be formulated in consideration of those influencing factors, which enable to reduce the nutritional risk and to promote the rehabilitation of inpatients.

PERIOPERATIVE STROKE AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY ETIOLOGICAL RISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT

291 patients were subjected to carotid endarterectomy from January 1985 to June 1992 in two Australian medical institutions. Of the 291 patients, perioperative stroke occurred in 22 (6.3%) after 347 operations (moderate 17 and severe 5). The 22 patients were studied with Doppler scan, angiography, reexploration and CT. Reexploration showed that 12 of 14 patients had thrombosis in the internal carotid artery at operation. The etiological factors for perioperative strokes included thrombosis at the operative sites in 14 patients (64%), cerebral embolism after operation in 4, clamping ischemia in 2, intracerebral hemorrhage in 1 and unknown cause in 1. Six patients (27%) recovered completely in 4 weeks, 10 (45%) had mild residual neurological deficits, 5 (23%) had moderate neurological deficits and 1 died 3 days after operation. Only 6 patients had permanent neurological deficits (6 / 347, 17%).