Water environmental capacity of Lijiang River within Guilin city is researched. The relationship among concentration of pollutants and flow rate as well as water environmental capacity of Lijiang River is discussed. T...Water environmental capacity of Lijiang River within Guilin city is researched. The relationship among concentration of pollutants and flow rate as well as water environmental capacity of Lijiang River is discussed. The changes of pollutant concentration in past years is analyzed. The results show that there exists a certain value of flow rate corresponding to a certain average concentration of pollutants on the upper and lower sections of the research area. If flow rate is greater than that value, the concentration of pollutants will decrease with the increase of flow. While the result will be the contrary when river flow is smaller than that value, that is to say, the concentration will increase with the increase of flow. To be aware of this regularity is of vital significance in water resource protection and comprehensive utilization[1].展开更多
为加强河流生态流量阈值及保障率计算对天然水文情势变化的适应性,提出了基于水文集合分位数的生态流量计算方法。根据河流长序列实测径流数据,在年际和年内划分不同水文情景,基于生态流量水文集合的中位数和下四分位数确定年内汛期、...为加强河流生态流量阈值及保障率计算对天然水文情势变化的适应性,提出了基于水文集合分位数的生态流量计算方法。根据河流长序列实测径流数据,在年际和年内划分不同水文情景,基于生态流量水文集合的中位数和下四分位数确定年内汛期、非汛期生态流量阈值下限,以丰、平水年组的计算结果分别作为平、枯水年组的生态流量理想值,结合生态流量中长期和短期保障率,计算分析河流在不同时间尺度下的生态流量保障程度。抚河下游应用结果表明:综合水情变化的生态流量阈值和多时间尺度保障率分析方法能够更好地适应天然河流年际和年内水情变化,更准确识别河流水文健康状况;丰、平、枯水年组抚河下游年均生态流量阈值下限分别为156.49、90.43、29.54 m 3/s;不同时间尺度下抚河下游生态流量的保障程度均较低,中长期保障率大于短期保障率,中长期和短期保障率分别为63.64%~93.11%、42.50%~91.85%。展开更多
文摘Water environmental capacity of Lijiang River within Guilin city is researched. The relationship among concentration of pollutants and flow rate as well as water environmental capacity of Lijiang River is discussed. The changes of pollutant concentration in past years is analyzed. The results show that there exists a certain value of flow rate corresponding to a certain average concentration of pollutants on the upper and lower sections of the research area. If flow rate is greater than that value, the concentration of pollutants will decrease with the increase of flow. While the result will be the contrary when river flow is smaller than that value, that is to say, the concentration will increase with the increase of flow. To be aware of this regularity is of vital significance in water resource protection and comprehensive utilization[1].
文摘为加强河流生态流量阈值及保障率计算对天然水文情势变化的适应性,提出了基于水文集合分位数的生态流量计算方法。根据河流长序列实测径流数据,在年际和年内划分不同水文情景,基于生态流量水文集合的中位数和下四分位数确定年内汛期、非汛期生态流量阈值下限,以丰、平水年组的计算结果分别作为平、枯水年组的生态流量理想值,结合生态流量中长期和短期保障率,计算分析河流在不同时间尺度下的生态流量保障程度。抚河下游应用结果表明:综合水情变化的生态流量阈值和多时间尺度保障率分析方法能够更好地适应天然河流年际和年内水情变化,更准确识别河流水文健康状况;丰、平、枯水年组抚河下游年均生态流量阈值下限分别为156.49、90.43、29.54 m 3/s;不同时间尺度下抚河下游生态流量的保障程度均较低,中长期保障率大于短期保障率,中长期和短期保障率分别为63.64%~93.11%、42.50%~91.85%。