This study was designed to compare the impact of post and core systems on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated anterior teeth with flared root canals and to assess their fracture pattern. Sixty central inc...This study was designed to compare the impact of post and core systems on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated anterior teeth with flared root canals and to assess their fracture pattern. Sixty central incisors were cut horizontally 2 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction(CEJ). After root canal therapy, teeth were assigned into 6 groups(n = 10 each) based on a post system and used as follows: Group C, non-flared root received size #1 glass fiber posts(Control); Group AP, flared root restored with anatomical post; Group RC, flared root restored with size #1 fiber post and cemented with thick layer of resin cement; Group CR, flared root restored with size #1 and reinforced with composite resin; Group CM, cast post-core; Group CP, CAD/CAM polymer-infiltrated ceramic post and core.Following post cementation, core build-up and crown insertion, the specimens were thermo-cycled up to 10,000 cycles(5 C/55 C; 30 seconds dwell time, 6 seconds transition time) and then statically loaded at 1 mm/minute crosshead speed using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc test(α= 0.05) were used for data analysis. Group C recorded significantly higher resistance to fracture values [(826.9±39.1) N] followed by group CP [(793.8±55.6) N] while group RC yielded the lowest fracture resistance values [(586.7±51.4) N]. The resistance to fracture of wide root canals can be enhanced by using one-piece CAM/CAM post and core as an alternative to the use of either glass fiber post, relined with composite resin increasing the thickness of luting cement or the use of cast post and core system. However, this was an in vitro investigation and further in vivo studies are necessary.展开更多
目的研究根管预备、充填及纤维桩预备对根管壁微裂产生的影响。方法收集150颗离体前磨牙,并随机分为四个大组[1组(n=10)、2组(n=20)、3组(n=40)、4组(n=80)]及15个小组(1组,2组25#、2组40#,3组A25#、3组B25#、3组A40#、3组B40#,4组AX25#...目的研究根管预备、充填及纤维桩预备对根管壁微裂产生的影响。方法收集150颗离体前磨牙,并随机分为四个大组[1组(n=10)、2组(n=20)、3组(n=40)、4组(n=80)]及15个小组(1组,2组25#、2组40#,3组A25#、3组B25#、3组A40#、3组B40#,4组AX25#、4组AX40#、4组AT25#、4组AT40#、4组BX25#、4组BX40#、4组BT25#、4组BT40#,n=10)。1组:即对照组,不进行预备;2组:均分为两组,一组预备至WaveOne25#,另一组预备则预备至40#;3组:将样本与2组一样进行分组预备,之后进一步分为2个小组,进行冷牙胶侧压充填(A)及热牙胶连续波充填(B);4组:将样本与3组一样进行分组预备及充填,之后将不同方法充填后的样本进一步分为2小组进行RelyXTM(X)和RTD(T)纤维桩预备。将所有的样本从距离根尖3、5、7 mm处垂直于牙体长轴截断,在显微镜下观察微裂发生情况,并进行比较分析。结果1组及2组中均并未有裂纹存在。充填后,3组A与3组B的裂纹数目比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。置入纤维桩后,4组A的牙本质裂纹明显较4组B多,且差异具有统计学意义(22/120 VS 10/120,P<0.05)。在与根尖距离7 mm处,相较于RelyXTM纤维桩,RTD纤维桩预备后牙本质产生更多裂纹,差异具有统计学意义(9/120 VS 23/120,P<0.05)。4组的裂纹总发生率高于1组、2组、3组(P<0.05),说明纤维桩置入后,牙本质裂纹较仅进行牙体预备和充填明显增多。结论纤维桩的预备主要导致根管壁裂纹的产生,冷侧压充填后进行纤维桩预备比热牙胶充填后进行桩体预备更容易产生根管壁裂纹。展开更多
文摘This study was designed to compare the impact of post and core systems on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated anterior teeth with flared root canals and to assess their fracture pattern. Sixty central incisors were cut horizontally 2 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction(CEJ). After root canal therapy, teeth were assigned into 6 groups(n = 10 each) based on a post system and used as follows: Group C, non-flared root received size #1 glass fiber posts(Control); Group AP, flared root restored with anatomical post; Group RC, flared root restored with size #1 fiber post and cemented with thick layer of resin cement; Group CR, flared root restored with size #1 and reinforced with composite resin; Group CM, cast post-core; Group CP, CAD/CAM polymer-infiltrated ceramic post and core.Following post cementation, core build-up and crown insertion, the specimens were thermo-cycled up to 10,000 cycles(5 C/55 C; 30 seconds dwell time, 6 seconds transition time) and then statically loaded at 1 mm/minute crosshead speed using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc test(α= 0.05) were used for data analysis. Group C recorded significantly higher resistance to fracture values [(826.9±39.1) N] followed by group CP [(793.8±55.6) N] while group RC yielded the lowest fracture resistance values [(586.7±51.4) N]. The resistance to fracture of wide root canals can be enhanced by using one-piece CAM/CAM post and core as an alternative to the use of either glass fiber post, relined with composite resin increasing the thickness of luting cement or the use of cast post and core system. However, this was an in vitro investigation and further in vivo studies are necessary.
文摘目的研究根管预备、充填及纤维桩预备对根管壁微裂产生的影响。方法收集150颗离体前磨牙,并随机分为四个大组[1组(n=10)、2组(n=20)、3组(n=40)、4组(n=80)]及15个小组(1组,2组25#、2组40#,3组A25#、3组B25#、3组A40#、3组B40#,4组AX25#、4组AX40#、4组AT25#、4组AT40#、4组BX25#、4组BX40#、4组BT25#、4组BT40#,n=10)。1组:即对照组,不进行预备;2组:均分为两组,一组预备至WaveOne25#,另一组预备则预备至40#;3组:将样本与2组一样进行分组预备,之后进一步分为2个小组,进行冷牙胶侧压充填(A)及热牙胶连续波充填(B);4组:将样本与3组一样进行分组预备及充填,之后将不同方法充填后的样本进一步分为2小组进行RelyXTM(X)和RTD(T)纤维桩预备。将所有的样本从距离根尖3、5、7 mm处垂直于牙体长轴截断,在显微镜下观察微裂发生情况,并进行比较分析。结果1组及2组中均并未有裂纹存在。充填后,3组A与3组B的裂纹数目比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。置入纤维桩后,4组A的牙本质裂纹明显较4组B多,且差异具有统计学意义(22/120 VS 10/120,P<0.05)。在与根尖距离7 mm处,相较于RelyXTM纤维桩,RTD纤维桩预备后牙本质产生更多裂纹,差异具有统计学意义(9/120 VS 23/120,P<0.05)。4组的裂纹总发生率高于1组、2组、3组(P<0.05),说明纤维桩置入后,牙本质裂纹较仅进行牙体预备和充填明显增多。结论纤维桩的预备主要导致根管壁裂纹的产生,冷侧压充填后进行纤维桩预备比热牙胶充填后进行桩体预备更容易产生根管壁裂纹。
