Discussion on the Logical Coordination between Legal Theory and Legal Practice——from the Perspective of the Legal Basis of NPC5s Discussion and Decisiomaking Power on Major Issues

The decision of local people's congresses to discuss major issues is a basic right granted to local people's congresses by the Chinese Constitution and laws.However,in practice,the implementation of the power of deliberation of major issues by local people's congresses is worrying.By applying the theory of Chinese traditionalism and unity in the theory of law,the theory of"sovereignty in the people"in the social contract theory of Western natural law school,Austin's"legal command theory55 in Western positivist law and Hart's"recognition""Rules theory"to argue that the integrity of rights necessarily involves the dual factors of decision-making and execution.At the same time,the existence and operation of the law always reflects the development of the political system.The realistic political situation requires us to make more precise and meticulous refinement of the external form and specific technical links of the legal system,and to coordinate the rules to make up the legal theory and Conflicts and conflicts in legal practice help to reform social institutions.

The Legal Logic in the Practice of Poverty Reduction in Rural China in the One Hundred Years Since the Founding of the Communist Party of China

Three major poverty reduction models have successively been adopted in the poverty control led by the Communist Party of China(CPC),namely reliefbased poverty alleviation,which focused on adjusting the production factors of land,development-driven poverty alleviation,and targeted poverty alleviation.In the process,the target of finding a rational position for the principal function of poverty alleviation has been gradually realized:the approach of poverty alleviation has gradually adjusted from micro to macro,from direct to indirect;while the management has transformed from mobilization-based to rule-of-law based.Rules that link policies and laws,as well as a rule-of-law model of the poverty reduction of a developing country that is led by party committees and governments,has been formed,and an illustrative sample of poverty control has been created,which provides experience based knowledge to the anti-poverty practices in developing countries.In the future,it is necessary to further realize the protection of the rights of the people in comparative poverty and the proceduralization of poverty reduction administrative behaviors,as well as to formulate a unified "Poverty Reduction Law" when the time is ripe,to protect the rights of the people in comparative poverty in the post-poverty-alleviation era.

Impact of Institutional Quality on Multilateral Aid in Nigeria

The linkage between quality of institutions and economic performance of nations has generated a lot of interest among scholars,due to their influence on development of many countries and effective use of resources including foreign aid from multilateral organizations.Two strands of theories emerge on the institutions-multilateral aids nexus:those for benefits of aid to growth and development;and those for harms caused by aid.The research objective is to investigate the impact of institutional quality on multilateral aid in Nigeria.To do this,the study applied auto-regressive distributed lag(ARDL)bounds testing approach.Data for the study were sourced from the ICRG data,WGI data,QoG database,Transparency International,and World Development Indicators(WDI).The findings show that institutional quality variables do not have any influence on the multilateral aid in Nigeria,except the‘independence of judiciary’which appeared statistically significant.In the short-run analysis,the disequilibrium in the long-run equilibrium is corrected for in the next quarter period by about 25%;almost all the variables are statistically and significantly influencing multilateral aid.It is therefore recommended that donor agencies should consider other factors that negatively influence official development assistance(ODA)such as politics,location and colonial history.

法治是中国式现代化的重要保障

党的二十届三中全会审议通过的《中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革、推进中国式现代化的决定》明确提出“法治是中国式现代化的重要保障”,对法治与现代化之间的辩证关系从理论与实践相结合的角度作出系统阐述,对不断完善和健全法治在保障中国式现代化中的能力,推动法治与现代化同频共振、并肩前行发挥了政策引领作用。从法理层面准确认识法治对中国式现代化的保障机制和制度功能,要从历史维度、政治维度、理论维度、比较维度和实践维度“五个维度”有机统一的角度认识中国式现代化的具体特征和制度形态,针对不同层面的中国式现代化目标采取不同性质的法治应对和保障措施。法治在中国式现代化进程中,通过保障制度现代化推进中国式现代化。其中,法治自身也需要现代化。没有法治现代化就没有社会主义现代化。法治在推进中国式现代化过程中,通过不断提升自身效能和保障能力,逐步实现自身的现代化,成为中国式现代化事业的重要组成部分。

The Role of Consultative Democracy in a Constitutional System and the Rule of Law in China

The rule of law in China should be advanced under a systems framework. The systems framework on which the Chinese rule of law relies is shaped by the socialist democratic system. Socialist consultative democracy, which responds to the core themes of the determinant of socialism, Party leadership, the democratic tradition of New China and native resources for constructing the rule of law, is an important resource for constructing the rule of law in China. In a constitutional system of＂ruling Party--political power--the people＂ that takes the sovereignty of the people as the logic of its starting point, consultative democracy plays the role of functional coupling. Popular sovereignty gains political legitimacy on the basis of multi- party cooperation and political consultation under the leadership of the CPC, thus translating the will of the ruling Party into the will of the state. Consultative democracy constitutes an essential process in national decision-making, affording a basis for the construction of the inherent logical sequence of ＂ruling Party--Consultative Conference--People＇s Congress.＂ The democratic supervision exercised by the Consultative Conference is an extension of political consultation; from it unfolds the systems framework of the rule of law in China.

The Approach to Chinese Modernization of the Rule of Law

The essence of Chinese modernization of the rule of law is to promote a modern legal system in China.The approach to Chinese modernization of the rule of law refers to the Chinese approach to promoting a modern legal system.By comprehensively reviewing the history and reality,theory and practice,and actual and desirable aspects of Chinese modernization of the rule of law,we can summarize the Chinese approach to promoting a modern legal system.This approach containssvariouselements,including a leadership system for the rule of law with centralized and unified leadership by the Central Committee of Communist Party of China,a rule of law virtue principle of putting the people first,a functional orientation of the rule of law toward national governance,and a historical-legal consciousness that inherits fine traditional Chinese legal culture.These key elements play a prominent role and can effectively showcase the Chinese approach to promoting a modern legal system.Describing such a Chinese approach not only helps to summarize the fundamental experience of Chinese modernization of the rule of law but also showcases the Chinese logic and Chinese characteristics in this modernization process.

习近平法治思想融入高职思政课的意蕴、困境与对策

将习近平法治思想融入高职思政课教学,对于落实立德树人根本任务、坚定法治自信、培育高职学生法治素养和对标职业教育人才培养意义深远。在习近平法治思想融入高职思政课的教学具体过程中,存在内容、形式和效果等现实困境,应以习近平法治思想为引领培育法治思维,提升法治素养;以横纵两维度打破教学设计藩篱,整合教学内容;以“八个相统一”为指导推动各种教学方法创新,提升教学实效。

中国式现代化的党章基础

党章以一种从根本上体现中国共产党国家建设观念的方式,为中国式现代化构建逻辑完整的规范链条提供了充分有效的制度保障。党章通过实现人的全面发展与现代化道路的同构共进、表达党领导国家发展的价值理性、坚持系统均衡的发展理念,集中彰显中国式现代化的政治愿景。党章中的发展原则规范、社会主义文化建设规范、社会主义生态文明建设规范、外交规范等,与中国式现代化的基本特征、本质要求相呼应。以相关理念内容为基础,党章主要通过对规范体系的统领与指引、对治理体系的塑造与影响,确保中国式现代化在党的领导下扎实推进。

法治规范体系视域下党内法规保留的功能定位与规范建构

党内法规保留是将法律保留相关原理引入党内法规制度建设中形成的有关党内事务制定权配置的制度。在中国特色社会主义法治体系的法治背景下,党内法规保留应以法治规范体系作为制度建构的基本视角。基于与法律保留的功能比较,党内法规保留具有统制、区分、整合、保障等功能。在法治规范体系视域下,当前党内法规保留制度存在明显结构缺陷。可以从重塑党内法规保留的结构理念、重新阐释《中国共产党党内法规制定条例》第四条第一款的保留对象、建立相对保留制度、单列党章保留事项、对中央党内法规绝对保留事项进行内涵解读等方面进行结构重塑与完善。此外,在党内法规保留的保留标准上,应确立面向从严治党的重要事项保留标准。

中国式法治现代化理论在高校思政教育中的融入策略探析

在中国特色社会主义建设的伟大实践中,我国逐渐形成了具有中国特色的法治现代化理论。这一理论不仅为我国法治建设提供行动指南,也为高校思政教育提供了丰富的教学资源。高校作为培养社会主义建设者和接班人的重要阵地,应积极探索将中国式法治现代化理论融入思政教育的有效途径,以提升学生的法治素养,培养具备法治意识的新时代青年。为此,应对中国式法治现代化理论与高校思政教育现状以及中国式法治现代化理论融入高校思政教育的必要性展开研究,总结中国式法治现代化理论在高校思政教育中的融入策略,不断提高高校法治教育质量,努力培养具备高度法治素养的新时代大学生。

二十届三中全会《决定》中的“法”字及其语义价值分析

二十届三中全会《决定》中共出现130个“法”字,从语言学、语义学的角度来看,其分布状态、出现频次、组词形式等所表达的政策信息却不尽相同。结合十八届三中全会《决定》、十八届四中全会《决定》、党的十九大报告和二十大报告中“法”字出现的规律和特征可以看出,一些重要法律术语或法治熟语在二十届三中全会《决定》的缺失可能具有一定政策解读上的意义。从语言学现象的角度对二十届三中全会《决定》中关于全面依法治国的具体规定的深度解读,这种全新的解读方法对于准确把握《决定》起草目的,全面和系统地领悟《决定》精神实质具有很好的学术启发价值和实践引导作用。

中国共产党党内问责制度的发展脉络与变迁逻辑——基于历史制度主义的分析视角

作为中国共产党管党治党、全面从严治党的重要方式,党内问责制度先后经历了初步发展期、曲折发展期、恢复发展期、全面发展期的百年求索之路。从历史制度主义的视角来看,党内问责制度的变迁是宏观环境、政治变量、关键节点和路径依赖相互作用的结果。制度环境的变化引发了党内问责制度的变迁,从严治党的政策理念等政治变量推动着党内问责制度的完善,关键节点决定了党内问责制度的走向,路径依赖使得党内问责制度不断强化。总体而言,党内问责制度的演变呈现出体系化、法治化的鲜明特征,展现了以坚持党的领导为根本、以抓住“关键少数”为指引、以全覆盖监督为途径的历史经验,是中国共产党党内法规制度体系不断发展完善的缩影。

习近平法治思想融入高校思政课教学的路径探析

习近平法治思想是建党百年来提出的最全面、最系统、最科学的法治思想体系。习近平法治思想与高校思政课在教育目的、教学内容和教育规律上具有高度的耦合性,在教学实践中,应遵循学理性与政治性、知识性与价值性、灌输性与启发性相统一的原则,着力于扩大学生的学习内需、充盈教学内容的体系,选取新颖的教学方法、组建优质的教师团队、渲染浓厚的法治氛围等,充分发挥习近平法治思想融入高校思政课教学全过程的积极效用。

论习近平法治思想的党的领导观

习近平总书记关于坚持党对全面依法治国的领导的一系列论述构成了习近平法治思想的党的领导观。逻辑自洽性、历史必然性、自我革命性是党领导法治的三大理论和实践依据。逻辑自洽性反映为党的领导和依法治国的理论逻辑自洽、党的领导和依法治国的实践逻辑自洽、中国法治与西方法治相区别的制度逻辑自洽。历史必然性意味着历史选择党领导法治的必然性、人民选择党领导法治的必然性、党领导法治的历史规律性。自我革命性表现为通过依法治国践行初心使命、通过依法治国实现自我修复、通过依法治国实现与时俱进。

“建构中国自主法学知识体系”的命题阐释

“建构中国自主法学知识体系”,是一个由政治命题衍生而成的学术命题。对于这一命题的题旨情境,可从意蕴定位、概念融贯和理论示范渐次展开,由此理解“为何建构”的问题。以古典中国的政法传统、近代中国的知识革命、当代中国的法学体系为线索,勾勒中国法学知识由传统向现代的演化,可以深入理解“何以建构”之历史逻辑。在方法要义上,阐释“建构中国自主的法学知识体系”命题,可从政治家、思想家、法学家、法律家、社会治理精英以及更大范围“公众”的统合视角展开,以融贯一体为基本方法,以政法知识为核心支点,以法理均衡为推进主线,从整体上更新对“如何建构”的认知。

党的自我革命制度规范体系的政治逻辑与完善机制

党的自我革命制度规范体系为党的自我革命实践活动提供了坚实的法理依据与实践保障,其主旨在于促进党的自我革命向更高水平的制度化、规范化及体系化演进。党的二十大报告明确提出了“健全党的自我革命制度规范体系”这一重大使命,这要求我们既要从理论层面深挖其背后的政治动因,又需在实践层面探索有效的实施路径与保障框架。政治逻辑作为揭示政治现象深层规律的理论钥匙,其功能在于阐释并理解政治行为、决策及制度的基本属性及其互动。在党的自我革命制度规范体系中,政治逻辑体现为党通过不断推进自我革命制度建设,鲜明地展现以人民为中心的根本立场,这既是跳出“历史周期率”的客观要求,也是规范自我革命运行的内在需要,更是解决大党独有难题的制度安排。完善机制在系统或组织内部扮演着优化结构、提升效能及灵活应对外部环境变化的关键作用。具体而言,完善党的自我革命制度规范体系需健全党对重大工作的领导体制机制,以保障自我革命实践的有效实施;深化全面从严治党责任执行机制,强化自我革命的政治担当;完善一体推进“三不腐”工作机制,形成反腐倡廉的强大合力;构建系统集成、协同高效的监督机制,提升监督工作的精准度与效率;建立自我革命党内法规的动态调适机制,确保党内法规体系与时俱进,紧密契合自我革命的实际需求与发展动态。

中国式现代化进程中执政权的复合逻辑

在中国式现代化的语境下,立足于与传统执政权力视角有别的法理逻辑,执政权可视为认知和解释“党的领导与执政”的元概念,包含权利、权力和权威三重复合要素。作为法学概念的执政权,正当性基础来自事实性权威、规范性权力和价值性权利。以此为基础,执政权相应的义务要求,与“权利—权力”“权利—权威”“权力—权威”的复合逻辑一道,共同型构了执政权的复合性法治逻辑,并通过与“坚持党的领导”“依法执政”“党必须遵守宪法和法律”在理念、规范、实践层面的勾连,嵌入全面依法治国的制度化表达之中,最终得以建立起全新的执政权法治理论体系。

“依法治国和依规治党有机统一”突出优势的内涵、实践和效能

“依法治国和依规治党有机统一”充分彰显了中国特色社会主义法治体系的鲜明特点,是对人类政治文明发展的新贡献。从理论内涵而言,“依法治国和依规治党有机统一”是大国治理和大党治理更加协同高效的最佳途径,也是大国治理和大党治理在保障价值目标实现方面的最佳方式,开创了人类政治文明的新形态。从实践体现而言,“依法治国和依规治党有机统一”主要体现在坚持和加强党的领导、治国理政顶层设计、统筹党政机构等方面,并为在以中国式现代化全面推进中华民族伟大复兴新征程上更好发挥其突出优势提供了重要保障。充分发挥“依法治国和依规治党有机统一”突出优势的治理效能,必须把加强党对全面依法治国的集中统一领导作为根本政治保证,把注重党内法规同国家法律的衔接协调作为主要抓手,把统筹推进执法执规体系建设作为基础工程。

思想道德与法治课程精准教学探析

思想政治理论课实施精准教学是落实立德树人根本任务,帮助高职院校学生树立正确的世界观、人生观和价值观,培养德、智、体、美、劳全面发展的社会主义的建设者和接班人的客观现实需要。在遵循教育教学规律、学生成长规律和认知规律基础上从实施对象、教学内容、教学方法、教学评价和反馈等方面实施精准教学,提高教学的针对性、实效性、吸引力和感染力,能够有效达到预期教学目标,落实立德树人根本任务,为学生成人成才打下坚实的基础。

论实现中华民族伟大复兴的根本政治制度保障

今年是全国人民代表大会成立和人民代表大会制度建立70周年。实践证明,人民代表大会制度是党领导人民在人类政治制度史上的伟大创造,是坚持“两个结合”的重大制度成果,是有效保障和实现人民当家作主的根本政治制度。站在新的历史起点上,要按照新时代发展社会主义民主政治的新要求,通过强化政治属性、优化制度属性、强化理论支撑、提升民主属性、增强人民属性等举措,与时俱进推进人民代表大会制度不断完善发展,为以中国式现代化全面推进强国建设、民族复兴伟业提供强有力的根本政治制度保障。