The objective of this study is to summarize the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)enema in the treatment of ulcerative colitis(UC).The randomized controlled trials on TCM enema intervention in th...The objective of this study is to summarize the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)enema in the treatment of ulcerative colitis(UC).The randomized controlled trials on TCM enema intervention in the treatment of UC were searched in seven databases:PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,CBM,CNKI,Wanfang Database,and VIP Database from January 1,2013 to June 6,2022,and the data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.A total of 18 studies involving 1514 UC patients were included.Meta analysis results showed that compared with conventional Western medicine,Chinese medicine enema had a significant effect on UC,and the clinical effective rate of the experimental group using Chinese medicine enema was 4.45 times that of the control group using conventional Western medicine(odds ratio=4.45,95%confidence interval[3.27,6.06]).Therefore,Chinese medicine enema is effective in the treatment of UC,and can significantly reduce related symptoms.展开更多
Objective:To systematically and objectively evaluate clinical efficacy of retention enema with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine on radiation proctitis(RP).Methods:CNKI,WANFANG,VIP,CMB and foreign la...Objective:To systematically and objectively evaluate clinical efficacy of retention enema with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine on radiation proctitis(RP).Methods:CNKI,WANFANG,VIP,CMB and foreign language databases like Embase,Central and Medline were searched.Search dates were from establishment of the databases until May 2020.Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of retention enema with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine for RP were retrieved.Two system reviewers selected literature materials,extracted literature data,and evaluated the quality of the literatures.RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis.Results:A total of 12 studies were included,including 941 patients.Meta-analysis results showed:Clinical efficacy in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than that in the simple western medicine enema or blank enema group(OR=5.96,95%CI[5.50,14.29],P<0.00001).Improvement of abdominal pain in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than that in the control group(MD=-0.57,95%CI[-0.72,-0.42],P<0.00001).Treatment for hematochezia in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than that in the control group(MD=-0.55,95%CI[-0.69,-0.42],P<0.00001).Improvement of diarrhea in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than that in the control group(MD=-0.69,95%CI[-0.91,-0.48],P<0.00001).KPS scores in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine were better than those in the control group(MD=11.91,95%CI[3.81,20.01],P<0.00001).Conclusion:Clinical efficacy of retention enema with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine on RP is better than simple western medicine enema or blank enema.Due to the low quality of the included clinical literatures,it is necessary to carry out more deliberate,detailed,high-quality,randomized,double-blind,and multi-center RCTs in order to give more powerful demonstration on its clinical efficacy on RP.展开更多
Chinese Medicine Enema is one of the external therapies in Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM),which has been widely used clinically.The"International Standard of Traditional Chinese Medicine Techniques:The Operati...Chinese Medicine Enema is one of the external therapies in Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM),which has been widely used clinically.The"International Standard of Traditional Chinese Medicine Techniques:The Operating Specifications for Chinese Medicine Enema is drawn up by the Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital Medical University and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Xiamen Hospital in collaboration with domestic TCM universities and hospitals.The specification includes definition,operating process,points for attention and contraindications.It is targeted to provide reference for TCM providers at home and abroad with TCM background in clinical decision-making.展开更多
目的评价中药灌肠治疗溃疡性结肠炎(ulcerative colitis,UC)临床实践指南(clinical practice guidelines,CPGs)和专家共识的质量,并对推荐的中药灌肠方案进行内容一致性分析。方法检索主要中英文数据库和医脉通、SIGN、NICE、WHO等指南...目的评价中药灌肠治疗溃疡性结肠炎(ulcerative colitis,UC)临床实践指南(clinical practice guidelines,CPGs)和专家共识的质量,并对推荐的中药灌肠方案进行内容一致性分析。方法检索主要中英文数据库和医脉通、SIGN、NICE、WHO等指南网站及数据库,检索时限为建库至2023年11月1日。汇总分析中药灌肠相关推荐内容,并采用AGREE-China、RIGHT和JBI工具分别评价CPGs和专家共识的质量。结果最终纳入2部CPGs和5部专家共识。内容分析结果表明:各CPGs和专家共识中中药灌肠推荐意见存在不一致,未详细报告证据等级和推荐强度。结肠宁、锡类散和康复新液以及血竭、复方黄柏、青黛、乌梅和三七等是不同CPGs和共识中推荐频率相对较高的方剂和中药。AGREE-China 5个领域的总得分(报告率)分别为:(62.86±29.82)分、(76.07±23.29)分、(30.00±31.74)分、(85.24±17.53)分和(14.29±34.99)分。其中,4篇强推荐、2篇弱推荐和1篇不推荐。RIGHT评价结果显示:CPGs报告项目占45.71%、未报告占44.29%、部分报告(不适用)占10.00%。JBI评价结果显示:专家共识整体质量较高。结论我国中药灌肠治疗UC相关CPGs和共识整体方法学质量有待进一步加强,不同CPG和共识中药灌肠治疗UC相关推荐内容不全面且证据基础不足。期待后期国内研究者整合现有CPG和共识证据,制定全面规范的本土化中药灌肠治疗UC的循证指南,提高适用性,正确指导临床和护理合理选择灌肠中药,发挥中药灌肠疗护UC的特色优势。展开更多
文摘The objective of this study is to summarize the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)enema in the treatment of ulcerative colitis(UC).The randomized controlled trials on TCM enema intervention in the treatment of UC were searched in seven databases:PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,CBM,CNKI,Wanfang Database,and VIP Database from January 1,2013 to June 6,2022,and the data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.A total of 18 studies involving 1514 UC patients were included.Meta analysis results showed that compared with conventional Western medicine,Chinese medicine enema had a significant effect on UC,and the clinical effective rate of the experimental group using Chinese medicine enema was 4.45 times that of the control group using conventional Western medicine(odds ratio=4.45,95%confidence interval[3.27,6.06]).Therefore,Chinese medicine enema is effective in the treatment of UC,and can significantly reduce related symptoms.
基金Scientific Research Projects of Shanxi Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine(2019ZYY2006)Construction Projects of the Third National TCM Master Inheritance Studio and National Famous TCM Doctor Inheritance Studio(General Office and Department of Personnel and Education of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine[2018]No.119)。
文摘Objective:To systematically and objectively evaluate clinical efficacy of retention enema with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine on radiation proctitis(RP).Methods:CNKI,WANFANG,VIP,CMB and foreign language databases like Embase,Central and Medline were searched.Search dates were from establishment of the databases until May 2020.Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of retention enema with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine for RP were retrieved.Two system reviewers selected literature materials,extracted literature data,and evaluated the quality of the literatures.RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis.Results:A total of 12 studies were included,including 941 patients.Meta-analysis results showed:Clinical efficacy in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than that in the simple western medicine enema or blank enema group(OR=5.96,95%CI[5.50,14.29],P<0.00001).Improvement of abdominal pain in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than that in the control group(MD=-0.57,95%CI[-0.72,-0.42],P<0.00001).Treatment for hematochezia in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than that in the control group(MD=-0.55,95%CI[-0.69,-0.42],P<0.00001).Improvement of diarrhea in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than that in the control group(MD=-0.69,95%CI[-0.91,-0.48],P<0.00001).KPS scores in the retention enema group with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine were better than those in the control group(MD=11.91,95%CI[3.81,20.01],P<0.00001).Conclusion:Clinical efficacy of retention enema with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine on RP is better than simple western medicine enema or blank enema.Due to the low quality of the included clinical literatures,it is necessary to carry out more deliberate,detailed,high-quality,randomized,double-blind,and multi-center RCTs in order to give more powerful demonstration on its clinical efficacy on RP.
基金National Key R&D Plan:Development of International Standards for Traditional Chinese Medicine Technology(No.2019YFC1712003)。
文摘Chinese Medicine Enema is one of the external therapies in Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM),which has been widely used clinically.The"International Standard of Traditional Chinese Medicine Techniques:The Operating Specifications for Chinese Medicine Enema is drawn up by the Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital Medical University and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Xiamen Hospital in collaboration with domestic TCM universities and hospitals.The specification includes definition,operating process,points for attention and contraindications.It is targeted to provide reference for TCM providers at home and abroad with TCM background in clinical decision-making.
文摘目的评价中药灌肠治疗溃疡性结肠炎(ulcerative colitis,UC)临床实践指南(clinical practice guidelines,CPGs)和专家共识的质量,并对推荐的中药灌肠方案进行内容一致性分析。方法检索主要中英文数据库和医脉通、SIGN、NICE、WHO等指南网站及数据库,检索时限为建库至2023年11月1日。汇总分析中药灌肠相关推荐内容,并采用AGREE-China、RIGHT和JBI工具分别评价CPGs和专家共识的质量。结果最终纳入2部CPGs和5部专家共识。内容分析结果表明:各CPGs和专家共识中中药灌肠推荐意见存在不一致,未详细报告证据等级和推荐强度。结肠宁、锡类散和康复新液以及血竭、复方黄柏、青黛、乌梅和三七等是不同CPGs和共识中推荐频率相对较高的方剂和中药。AGREE-China 5个领域的总得分(报告率)分别为:(62.86±29.82)分、(76.07±23.29)分、(30.00±31.74)分、(85.24±17.53)分和(14.29±34.99)分。其中,4篇强推荐、2篇弱推荐和1篇不推荐。RIGHT评价结果显示:CPGs报告项目占45.71%、未报告占44.29%、部分报告(不适用)占10.00%。JBI评价结果显示:专家共识整体质量较高。结论我国中药灌肠治疗UC相关CPGs和共识整体方法学质量有待进一步加强,不同CPG和共识中药灌肠治疗UC相关推荐内容不全面且证据基础不足。期待后期国内研究者整合现有CPG和共识证据,制定全面规范的本土化中药灌肠治疗UC的循证指南,提高适用性,正确指导临床和护理合理选择灌肠中药,发挥中药灌肠疗护UC的特色优势。
