The Loess Plateau, covered with thick loess, lies in the middle reaches of the YellowRiver to the west of the Taihangshan Mountains, east of the Wuqiao Mountains south ofYinshan Mountains and north of the Qinling Moun...The Loess Plateau, covered with thick loess, lies in the middle reaches of the YellowRiver to the west of the Taihangshan Mountains, east of the Wuqiao Mountains south ofYinshan Mountains and north of the Qinling Mountains with a total area of 56×10~4km^2.The plateau is 1000--2500m above sea level and has loess as thick as 100--200 metres, be-展开更多
为了更全面地评价WEPP模型在我国的适用性,该文通过建立模型数据库,利用WEPP分别模拟了坡长为10、20、30和40 m的径流量和土壤侵蚀量,并用实测径流和侵蚀资料进行对比分析。结果表明,在10、20、30和40 m 4个坡长条件下,WEPP模型对降雨...为了更全面地评价WEPP模型在我国的适用性,该文通过建立模型数据库,利用WEPP分别模拟了坡长为10、20、30和40 m的径流量和土壤侵蚀量,并用实测径流和侵蚀资料进行对比分析。结果表明,在10、20、30和40 m 4个坡长条件下,WEPP模型对降雨、每年和多年平均径流量模拟的Nash-Sutcliffe有效性(ME)分别为0.915、0.879和-0.056,对单场降雨、每年和多年平均土壤侵蚀量模拟的ME分别为0.853、0.758和-0.456,多年平均的ME为负值可能是由小样本计算造成的。WEPP模型对单场降雨和每年径流量和侵蚀量模拟效果较好。尽管WEPP模型对多年平均径流量和土壤侵蚀量模拟效果较差,但模型模拟的多年径流量和土壤侵蚀量与实测值的多年径流量和土壤侵蚀量的最大相对误差分别为7.90%和29.20%,表明WEPP模型对多年径流量和侵蚀量的模拟可满足要求。径流量模拟值随坡长增加的变化和实测值相比不够敏感;而土壤侵蚀量模拟值随坡长增加的变化和实测值相比过于敏感。展开更多
文摘The Loess Plateau, covered with thick loess, lies in the middle reaches of the YellowRiver to the west of the Taihangshan Mountains, east of the Wuqiao Mountains south ofYinshan Mountains and north of the Qinling Mountains with a total area of 56×10~4km^2.The plateau is 1000--2500m above sea level and has loess as thick as 100--200 metres, be-
文摘为了更全面地评价WEPP模型在我国的适用性,该文通过建立模型数据库,利用WEPP分别模拟了坡长为10、20、30和40 m的径流量和土壤侵蚀量,并用实测径流和侵蚀资料进行对比分析。结果表明,在10、20、30和40 m 4个坡长条件下,WEPP模型对降雨、每年和多年平均径流量模拟的Nash-Sutcliffe有效性(ME)分别为0.915、0.879和-0.056,对单场降雨、每年和多年平均土壤侵蚀量模拟的ME分别为0.853、0.758和-0.456,多年平均的ME为负值可能是由小样本计算造成的。WEPP模型对单场降雨和每年径流量和侵蚀量模拟效果较好。尽管WEPP模型对多年平均径流量和土壤侵蚀量模拟效果较差,但模型模拟的多年径流量和土壤侵蚀量与实测值的多年径流量和土壤侵蚀量的最大相对误差分别为7.90%和29.20%,表明WEPP模型对多年径流量和侵蚀量的模拟可满足要求。径流量模拟值随坡长增加的变化和实测值相比不够敏感;而土壤侵蚀量模拟值随坡长增加的变化和实测值相比过于敏感。
