The objective of the study was to access the effect and the effectiveness of sit-up training on elderly bedridden patients with severe pneumonia.A total of 150 elderly bedridden patients diagnosed with severe pneumoni...The objective of the study was to access the effect and the effectiveness of sit-up training on elderly bedridden patients with severe pneumonia.A total of 150 elderly bedridden patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia were recruited for this study.They were divided equally into the observation group and control group,that is,75 cases in each group.All patients were selected from January 2016 to April 2018.On this basis,both groups were treated with the same routine nursing care except with the addition of 30–60 min situp trainings twice daily for the control group under supervision.The clinical hospitalization outcomes,length of hospital stay,and patient care satisfaction of the two groups were compared.The clinical hospitalization outcomes,length of hospital stay,and patient satisfaction of the observation group were found to be superior to the control group,and the difference was significant.In bedridden elderly patients with severe pneumonia,sit-up training had positive effects and beneficial in improving the clinical outcomes and recovery rate.展开更多
目的:比较三种功能性移动能力测试工具在预测老年人跌倒危险方面的有效性。方法:116名老年人受试者参与本研究并分为跌倒组和非跌倒组。对受试者进行5次坐到站测试(five times sit to stand test,FTSST)、3m计时起立行走测试(timed up a...目的:比较三种功能性移动能力测试工具在预测老年人跌倒危险方面的有效性。方法:116名老年人受试者参与本研究并分为跌倒组和非跌倒组。对受试者进行5次坐到站测试(five times sit to stand test,FTSST)、3m计时起立行走测试(timed up and go test,TUGT)和计时10m步行测试(timed 10-meter walk test,TWT)。结果:跌倒组和非跌倒组的受试者在FTSST、TUGT和TWT之间的比较有显著差异(P<0.001)。Spearman相关分析结果均显示FTSST、TUGT和TWT与跌倒史之间显著相关(P<0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示FTSST、TUGT和TWT的时间与跌倒危险显著关联(OR:1.1643—1.2503)。接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积比较FTSST、TUGT和TWT之间无显著性差异(P>0.05),并且三种测试工具可以显著预测跌倒危险(AUC:0.68—0.73,P<0.001)。结论:FTSST、TUGT和TWT作为简便、快捷的功能性测试工具可以有效预测老年人跌倒危险。展开更多
文摘The objective of the study was to access the effect and the effectiveness of sit-up training on elderly bedridden patients with severe pneumonia.A total of 150 elderly bedridden patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia were recruited for this study.They were divided equally into the observation group and control group,that is,75 cases in each group.All patients were selected from January 2016 to April 2018.On this basis,both groups were treated with the same routine nursing care except with the addition of 30–60 min situp trainings twice daily for the control group under supervision.The clinical hospitalization outcomes,length of hospital stay,and patient care satisfaction of the two groups were compared.The clinical hospitalization outcomes,length of hospital stay,and patient satisfaction of the observation group were found to be superior to the control group,and the difference was significant.In bedridden elderly patients with severe pneumonia,sit-up training had positive effects and beneficial in improving the clinical outcomes and recovery rate.
文摘目的:比较三种功能性移动能力测试工具在预测老年人跌倒危险方面的有效性。方法:116名老年人受试者参与本研究并分为跌倒组和非跌倒组。对受试者进行5次坐到站测试(five times sit to stand test,FTSST)、3m计时起立行走测试(timed up and go test,TUGT)和计时10m步行测试(timed 10-meter walk test,TWT)。结果:跌倒组和非跌倒组的受试者在FTSST、TUGT和TWT之间的比较有显著差异(P<0.001)。Spearman相关分析结果均显示FTSST、TUGT和TWT与跌倒史之间显著相关(P<0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示FTSST、TUGT和TWT的时间与跌倒危险显著关联(OR:1.1643—1.2503)。接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积比较FTSST、TUGT和TWT之间无显著性差异(P>0.05),并且三种测试工具可以显著预测跌倒危险(AUC:0.68—0.73,P<0.001)。结论:FTSST、TUGT和TWT作为简便、快捷的功能性测试工具可以有效预测老年人跌倒危险。
