Aims There is much evidence that plant competition below ground is size symmetric,i.e.that competing plants share contested resources in proportion to their sizes.Several researchers have hypothesized that a patchy di...Aims There is much evidence that plant competition below ground is size symmetric,i.e.that competing plants share contested resources in proportion to their sizes.Several researchers have hypothesized that a patchy distribution of soil nutrients could result in size-asymmetric root competition.We tested this hypothesis.Methods In a greenhouse experiment,Triticum aestivum(wheat)individ-uals of different initial sizes were grown alone or with below-ground competition from one neighbour,in 1 m tall,narrow containers in a nitrogen-poor field soil with(i)no added nitro-gen,(ii)nitrogen fertilizer mixed into the upper 50 cm,and(iii)the same amount of fertilizer mixed into a 20-30 cm deep layer.We measured total leaf length throughout the experiment,and above-ground biomass and nitrogen concentration at harvest.We also measured root depth and frequency over time in a subset of containers.Important Findings Competing plants were half the size of non-competing plants,meaning that root competition was very strong.Root competition was size-asym-metric to some degree in all soil treatments.Neighbours larger than the target plant showed a greater per-unit-size effect on target growth than neighbours smaller than the target.Size variation increased over time for competing individuals,but decreased for non-competing pairs.Contrary to expectations,the presence of a high-nutrient patch reduced the strength and size asymmetry of competition temporarily.Size asym-metry in poor,deep soils may result from directionality in resource interception as roots compete for limited nutrients by growing deeper into soil layers that have not yet been exploited.Root competition can be size asymmetric,but not to the same degree as competition for light.展开更多
文摘Aims There is much evidence that plant competition below ground is size symmetric,i.e.that competing plants share contested resources in proportion to their sizes.Several researchers have hypothesized that a patchy distribution of soil nutrients could result in size-asymmetric root competition.We tested this hypothesis.Methods In a greenhouse experiment,Triticum aestivum(wheat)individ-uals of different initial sizes were grown alone or with below-ground competition from one neighbour,in 1 m tall,narrow containers in a nitrogen-poor field soil with(i)no added nitro-gen,(ii)nitrogen fertilizer mixed into the upper 50 cm,and(iii)the same amount of fertilizer mixed into a 20-30 cm deep layer.We measured total leaf length throughout the experiment,and above-ground biomass and nitrogen concentration at harvest.We also measured root depth and frequency over time in a subset of containers.Important Findings Competing plants were half the size of non-competing plants,meaning that root competition was very strong.Root competition was size-asym-metric to some degree in all soil treatments.Neighbours larger than the target plant showed a greater per-unit-size effect on target growth than neighbours smaller than the target.Size variation increased over time for competing individuals,but decreased for non-competing pairs.Contrary to expectations,the presence of a high-nutrient patch reduced the strength and size asymmetry of competition temporarily.Size asym-metry in poor,deep soils may result from directionality in resource interception as roots compete for limited nutrients by growing deeper into soil layers that have not yet been exploited.Root competition can be size asymmetric,but not to the same degree as competition for light.
