Association between operative position and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery is one of the most effective ways to treat morbid obesity,and postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV)is one of the common complications after bariatric surgery.At present,the mechanism of the high incidence of PONV after weight-loss surgery has not been clearly explained,and this study aims to investigate the effect of surgical position on PONV in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.AIM To explore the effect of the operative position during bariatric surgery on PONV.METHODS Data from obese patients,who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG)in the authors’hospital between June 2020 and February 2022 were divided into 2 groups and retrospectively analyzed.Multivariable logistic regression analysis and the t-test were used to study the influence of operative position on PONV.RESULTS There were 15 cases of PONV in the supine split-leg group(incidence rate,50%)and 11 in the supine group(incidence rate,36.7%)(P=0.297).The mean operative duration in the supine split-leg group was 168.23±46.24 minutes and 140.60±32.256 minutes in the supine group(P<0.05).Multivariate analysis revealed that operative position was not an independent risk factor for PONV(odds ratio=1.192,95%confidence interval:0.376-3.778,P=0.766).CONCLUSION Operative position during LSG may affect PONV;however,the difference in the incidence of PONV was not statistically significant.Operative position should be carefully considered for obese patients before surgery.

State of art on the mechanisms of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus

Obesity and type-2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)are metabolic disorders.Obesity increases the risk of T2DM,and as obesity is becoming increasingly common,more individuals suffer from T2DM,which poses a considerable burden on health systems.Traditionally,pharmaceutical therapy together with lifestyle changes is used to treat obesity and T2DM to decrease the incidence of comorbidities and allcause mortality and to increase life expectancy.Bariatric surgery is increasingly replacing other forms of treatment of morbid obesity,especially in patients with refractory obesity,owing to its many benefits including good long-term outcomes and almost no weight regain.The bariatric surgery options have markedly changed recently,and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG)is gradually gaining popularity.LSG has become an effective and safe treatment for type-2 diabetes and morbid obesity,with a high cost-benefit ratio.Here,we review the mechanism associated with LSG treatment of T2DM,and we discuss clinical studies and animal experiments with regard to gastrointestinal hormones,gut microbiota,bile acids,and adipokines to clarify current treatment modalities for patients with obesity and T2DM.

Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on related variables of obesity complicated with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND Polycystic ovary syndrome(PCOS)is closely related to obesity,and weight loss can significantly improve the metabolic,endocrine and reproductive functions of obese individuals with PCOS.However,the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG)for obesity with PCOS are unclear.AIM The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of LSG on related variables in obese patients with PCOS.METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 32 obese patients with PCOS who received LSG treatment at the Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from 2013 to 2020.The changes in anthropometric indices,insulin,testosterone,estradiol,follicle stimulating hormone(FSH),luteinizing hormone(LH),menstrual cycle and LH/FSH ratio before and 1 mo,3 mo,6 mo and 12 mo after the operation were statistically analyzed.RESULTS At 1 mo,3 mo,6 mo and 12 mo after surgery,the anthropometric indices,such as body weight and body mass index,of all patients were lower than those before the operation.The percentage excess weight loss(EWL%)at 1 mo,3 mo,6 mo and 1 year of follow-up were 25,40,46 and 65,respectively.The PCOS-related indices,such as insulin,testosterone,estradiol,follicle stimulating hormone(FSH),luteinizing hormone(LH)and menstrual cycle,were improved to varying degrees.During the 1-year follow-up,the average serum testosterone decreased from preoperative 0.72 ng/mL to 0.43 ng/mL(P<0.05),average fasting insulin level(9.0 mIU/mL,preoperative 34.2 mil,LH level,4.4 mIU/mL,preoperative 6.1 mIU/mL).The level of FSH(3.8 U/L,4.8 U/p0.05)and the ratio of LH/FSH(0.7,1.3/p0.05)were more relieved than those before surgery.During the postoperative follow-up,it was found that the menstrual cycle of 27 patients(nasty 27)returned to normal,and 6 patients(18%)who intended to become pregnant became pregnant within 1 year after surgery.CONCLUSION The weight loss effect of LSG is obvious and affirmative,and the endocrine index of obese patients with PCOS is also improved to some extent,although the mechanism is not clear.Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is expected to become a backup choice for patients with polycystic ovaries in the future.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy following Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background: A 35-year-old married female (68 kg, 150 cm, BMI: 30.2) with pancreatic divisum complicated chronic pancreatitis and underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in 2010. After that, her condition was well. However, body weight gained progressively to 76 kg (BMI: 33.7) and hypertension developed. During these two years, tried exercise and medication control for hypertension, but in vain. She received a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in October 2013. The post-operative course was uneventful. Methods: We applied three ports for laparoscopic operation, including two 12 mm and one 5 mm trocars. The liver was not needed to be elevated due to adhesion. The operative time was 75 minutes. Results: The patient’s body weight was 10 kg reduced in the first two months and reduced to 59 kg 6 months later. Conclusions: We report a case that received laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy following pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy due to pancreatic divisum. This case encourages us to extend the indication of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Comparative study of outcomes following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients: A case control study

To compare the impact of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on weight loss and obesity related comorbidities over two year follow-up via case control study design. METHODSForty patients undergoing LRYGB, who completed their two year follow-up were matched with 40 patients undergoing LSG for age, gender, body mass index and presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Data of these patients was retrospectively reviewed to compare the outcome in terms of weight loss and improvement in comorbidities, i.e., T2DM, hypertension (HTN), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), hypothyroidism and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). RESULTSPercentage excess weight loss (EWL%) was similar in LRYGB and LSG groups at one year follow-up (70.5% vs 66.5%, P = 0.36) while it was significantly greater for LRYGB group after two years as compared to LSG group (76.5% vs 67.9%, P = 0.04). The complication rate after LRYGB and LSG was similar (10% vs 7.5%, P = 0.99). The median duration of T2DM and mean number of oral hypoglycemic agents were higher in LRYGB group than LSG group (7 years vs 5 years and 2.2 vs 1.8 respectively, P < 0.05). Both LRYGB and LSG had significant but similar improvement in T2DM, HTN, OSAS and hypothyroidism. However, GERD resolved in all patients undergoing LRYGB while it resolved in only 50% cases with LSG. Eight point three percent patients developed new-onset GERD after LSG. CONCLUSIONLRYGB has better outcomes in terms of weight loss two years after surgery as compared to LSG. The impact of LRYGB and LSG on T2DM, HTN, OSAS and hypothyroidism is similar. However, LRYGB has significant resolution of GERD as compared to LSG.

Surgical outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for resolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Bariatric procedures are considered superior to medical therapies in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(LRYGB)and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG)are the most commonly used procedures for weight loss and comorbidity resolution worldwide.However,it is not yet known whether the degree of T2DM is influenced by the choice of bariatric procedure.AIM To quantitatively compare T2DM resolution over 1-5 years follow-up by LRYGB and LSG in morbidly obese patients.METHODS We searched the selected databases for full-text English language clinical studies that compared the effectiveness of LRYGB and LSG for T2DM resolution.Review manager 5.3 was used for data analysis,and the overall effect summary was represented in a forest plot.RESULTS From 1,650 titles retrieved by an initial search,we selected nine studies for this research.We found insignificant differences for T2DM resolution by LRYGB and LSG,with an odds ratio of 0.93(95%CI:0.64-1.35,Z statistics=0.38,P=0.71).Additionally,subset analyses for T2DM resolution showed insignificant differences after 24 mo(χ^2=1.24,df=4,P=0.87,overall Z effect=0.23),36 mo(χ^2=0.41,df=2,P=0.81,overall Z effect=0.51),and 60 mo(χ^2=4.75,df=3,P=0.19,overall Z effect=1.20)by LRYGB and LSG.This study reports a T2DM remission rate of 82.3%by LRYGB and 80.7%by LSG.CONCLUSION This study reports similar T2DM resolution rates by both LRYGB and LSG during 1-5 years of follow-up.However,long-term follow-up of 10 years is needed to further substantiate these findings.

Bariatric surgery in old age:a comparative study of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in an Asia centre of excellence

Bariatric surgery has been proved to be the safest and efficient procedure in treating morbid obese patients,but data is still lacking in the elderly population.The aim of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass（LRYGB） and sleeve gastrectomy（LSG） in patients aged more than 55 years.We performed2 a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.All patients with body mass index（BMI） §32 kg/mand aged more than 55 years undergoing LRYGB or LSG in BMI Surgery Centre,E-Da Hospital between January 2008 and December 2011 with at least one year of follow up were included for the analysis.Demography,peri-operative data,weight loss and surgical complications were all recorded and analyzed.Mean age and BMI of these 68 patients22（22 males and 46 female） were 58.8 years（55-79 years） and 39.5 kg/m（32.00-60.40 kg/m）.LRYGB was performed in 44 patients and LSG in 24 patients.The two groups were comparable in their preoperative BMI,American Society of Anaesthesia（ASA） score and gender distribution.LSG patients were significantly older than patients receiving LRYGB.The proportion of type 2 diabetes preoperatively was significantly higher in LRYGB patients as compared to LSG patients（88.63% vs.50%; P,0.01）.The prevalence of other co-morbidities was similar and comparable2 between the groups.Mean BMI in the LRYGB and LSG groups at the end of 1 year were 28.8 kg/mand228.2 kg/m,respectively,and there was no statistically significant difference in mean percentage of excess weight loss（%EWL） at 1 year.The percentage of resolution of diabetes was significantly higher in LRYGB（69.2%） as compared to LSG（33.3%）.On the other hand,there was no statistical difference in the percentage of resolution of hypertension,hyperlipidemia and fatty liver hepatitis.The overall morbidity and re-operation rate was higher in LRYGB patients.In morbidly elderly patients,both surgeries achieved good weight loss and resolution of comorbidities.LRYGB is superior to LSG in terms of diabetes remission but carries higher complication rates even at high volume centres.

Palonosetron versus Ondansetron as Prophylaxis against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are prevalent symptoms after laparoscopic surgeries with an incidence rate of (54% - 79%) in bariatric procedures. Despite its popularity, limited studies assessed the effect of antiemetics for PONV prophylaxis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The aim of this trail is to compare the effectiveness of a single pre-induction intravenous dose of Palonosetron versus Ondansetron for prophylaxis of PONV, 24 hours after LSG. Subjects and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled double-blind parallel-group study was conducted from May till December 2019. Recruited patients were consented and randomized using a closed envelop method into two groups with fifty patients each. The total number of nausea and vomiting attacks in the 24 hours postoperatively was considered as a primary end point. The secondary end points were the frequency of nausea, retching and vomiting attacks in the 24 hours post-surgery. The severity of nausea was evaluated using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: This RCT included 100 patients divided into 2 groups of 50 patients each. Patients received either 75 mcg Palonosetron (Group I) or Ondansetron 4 mg (group II). Group I had statistically significant fewer episodes of nausea, retching and vomiting in the first 4 hours (P = 0.022) and from 4 to 12 hours (P = 0.024) but not after 12 hours post LSG. Total episodes of nausea, retching and vomiting in 24 hours postoperative were significantly less in group I (P = 0.021). Conclusion: A single dose of intravenous 75 mcg Palonosetron is superior to Ondansetron 4 mg in preventing PONV for patients after LSG.

Can Left Pleural Effusion Be an Indicator of Gastric Leaks after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy?

Background: Coincidental pleural effusion has been observed by computed tomography (CT) scans in individual patients with gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy;however, the frequency of this phenomenon has not been investigated in cohort studies. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of left pleural effusion as an indicator of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Setting: University hospital and bariatric surgery center of excellence. Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by CT scans to investigate suspected gastric leaks from September 2011 to September 2018. The sensitivity, specificity, Youden’s index, and predictive values were estimated using a 2 × 2 cross-tabulation. Results: The study involved assessing the CT scans of 148 patients;80 patients (44 men and 36 women, mean age: 34 years, mean body mass index {BMI}: 46 kg/m2) had positive findings of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, such as contrast leak, gas leak, and peri-gastric collection (either singly or in combination). The CT findings were negative for gastric leaks in 68 patients (38 men and 30 women, mean age: 33 years, mean BMI: 45 kg/m2). Pleural effusion manifested as a fluid density in the dependent portion of pleural cavity on CT. The sensitivity of left pleural effusion to predict gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was 73.8%, and the specificity was 91.2%. The positive and negative predictive values were 90.8% and 74.7%, respectively, and the Youden’s index was 64.9%. Conclusion: Left pleural effusion exhibits good diagnostic accuracy for gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Notably, the specificity (91.2%) was very high.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity

The incidence of obesity is steadily rising, and it has been estimated that 40% of the US population will be obese by the year 2025 if the current trend continues. In recent years there has been renewed interest in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity in concomitance with the epidemic of obesity. Bariatric surgery proved effective in providing weight loss of large magnitude, correction of comorbidities and excellent short-term and long-term outcomes, decreasing overall mortality and providing a marked survival advantage. The Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) has increased in popularity and is currently very "trendy" among laparoscopic surgeons involved in bariatric surgery. As LSG proved to be effective in achieving considerable weight loss in the short-term, it has been proposed by some as a sole bariatric procedure. This editorial focuses on the particular advantages of LSG in the treatment of morbid obesity.

Laparoscopic re-sleeve gastrectomy as a treatment of weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy

AIM: To evaluate laparoscopic re-sleeve gastrectomy as a treatment of weight regain after Sleeve.METHODS: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a com-mon bariatric procedure. Weight regain after long-term follow-up is reported. Patients were considered for laparoscopic re-sleeve gastrectomy when we observed progressive weight regain and persistence of comorbid-ities associated with evidence of dilated gastric fundus and/or antrum on upper gastro-intestinal series. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3, 6 and 12 mo after surgery and every 6 mo thereafter. Measures of change from baseline at different times were analyzed with the paired samples t test. RESULTS: We observed progressive weight regain after sleeve in 11 of the 201 patients(5.4%) who had a mean follow-up of 21.1 ± 9.7 mo(range 6-57 mo). Three patients started to regain weight after 6 mo fol-lowing Sleeve, 5 patients after 12 mo, 3 patients after 18 m. Re-sleeve gastrectomy was always performed by laparoscopy. The mean time of intervention was 55.8 ± 29.1 min. In all cases, neither intra-operative nor post-operative complications occurred. After 1 year follow-up we observed a significant(P < 0.05) mean body mass index reduction(-6.6 ± 2.7 kg/m2) and mean % ex-cess weight loss(%EWL) increase(+31.0% ± 15.8%). An important reduction of antihypertensive drugs and hypoglycemic agents was observed after re-sleeve in those patients affected by hypertension and diabetes. Joint problems and sleep apnea syndrome improved in all 11 patients.CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic re-sleeve gastrectomy is a feasible and effective intervention to correct weight regain after sleeve.

Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for morbid obesity:A prospective study

AIM To prospectively evaluate the postoperative morbimortality and weight loss evolution of patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG) as a primary bariatric procedure during 5 years of follow-up. METHODS Since 2006,data from patients undergoing a highly restrictive primary LSG have been prospectively registered in a database and analysed. Preoperative co-morbid conditions,operating time,hospital stay,early and late complications rate and evolution of weight loss after 5 years of follow-up were analysed.RESULTS A total of 156 patients were included,74.3% of whom were women. The mean age was 43.2 ± 13.1 years and the mean body mass index(BMI) was 41.5 ± 7.9 kg/m^2. Seventy patients(44.8%) presented a BMI under 40 kg/m^2. The mortality rate was 0%. The leakage rate was 1.2%,and the total 30-d morbidity rate was 5.1%(8/156). With a mean follow-up of 32.7 ± 28.5(range 6-112) mo,the mean percent of excess of weight loss(%EWL) was 82.0 ± 18.8 at 1 year,76.7 ± 21.3 at 3 years and 60.3 ± 28.9 at 5 years. The mean percent of excess of BMI loss(%EBMIL) was 94.9 ± 22.4 at 1 year,89.4 ± 27.4 at 3 years and 74.8 ± 29.4 at 5 years. Patients with preoperative BMI less than 40 kg/m^2 achieved greaterweight loss than did the overall study population. Diabetes remitted in 75% of the patients and HTA improved in 71.7%. CPAP masks were withdrawn in all patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.CONCLUSION LSG built with a narrow 34 F bougie and starting 3 cm from the pylorus proved to be safe and highly effective in terms of weight loss as a stand-alone procedure,particularly in patients with a preoperative BMI lower than 40 kg/m^2.

New results on the safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy bariatric procedure for type 2 diabetes patients

BACKGROUND It has been established that bariatric surgery,including laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG),has a positive impact on type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).However,less frequently T2DM is reported as a risk factor for complications with this type of surgery.AIM To evaluate the safety of LSG in T2DM.METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted over patients admitted for LSG from January 2008 to May 2015.Data was collected through digitized records.Any deviation from normal postoperative care within the first 60 d was defined as an early complication,and further categorized into mild or severe.RESULTS Nine hundred eighty-four patients underwent LSG,among these 143(14.5%)were diagnosed with T2DM.There were 19 complications in the T2DM group(13.3%)compared to 59 cases in the non-T2DM(7.0%).Out of 19 complications in the T2DM group,12 were mild(8.4%)and 7 were severe(4.9%).Compared to the non-T2DM group,patients had a higher risk for mild complications(Odds-ratio 2.316,CI:1.163-4.611,P=0.017),but not for severe ones(P=0.615).An increase of 1% in hemoglobin A1c levels was associated with a 40.7% increased risk for severe complications(P=0.013,CI:1.074-1.843)but not for mild ones.CONCLUSION Our data suggest that LSG is relatively safe for patients with T2DM.Whether preoperative control of hemoglobin A1c level will lower the complications rate has to be prospectively studied.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy was first defined in 1990 as a part of the duodenal switch procedure with the formation of a narrow stomach tube along the small curvature of the stomach. Later, researchers proposed that Laparoscopic leave gastrectomy (LSG) reduced the risk profile of the duodenal switch procedure in high risk patients. Additionally, LSG was accepted as a rapid single bariatric surgical procedure due to its simplicity and efficacy. The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of LSG at a single bariatric unit in King Salman North West Armed Forced Hospital (KSAFH), Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. Objective: To compare outcomes of primary LSG regarding pre and post operative sleep apnea, diabetes mellitus (DM), arterial hypertension (HTN), bronchial asthma, female urinary incontinence, infertility, and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). We will assess our complications according to the Clavein-Dindo classification. We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent LSG in King Salman Armed Forces Hospital from 1/1/2015 till 31/6/2017. Methods: This retrospective comparative study is performed in the Department of Surgery, KSAFH. All patients are instructed for follow-up at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months postoperatively. Laboratory tests are requested every 6 months post op. Improvement of Comorbidities assessed post-operatively. Surgical Complications reported according to the Clavein-Dindo classification. Our results were compared with international studies. Inclusion criteria (more than 14 years, morbid obese with BMI > 40 and obese class 11 with comorbidities). Exclusion criteria (less than 14 years, BMI < 35 and BMI < 40 with no medical illness, revisional cases). Results: A total of 127 patients underwent LSG at King Salman Armed Forces Hospital from 1/1/2015 till 31/5/2017. Of these, 40 were male (31.5%) and 87 were female (68.5%). The mean age was 35 years. Comorbidities included diabetes 31 (24.4%),

Machine learning identifies the risk of complications after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is widely used,and perioperative complications have become a highly concerned issue.AIM To develop a predictive model for complications in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer to better predict the likelihood of complications in gastric cancer patients within 30 days after surgery,guide perioperative treatment strategies for gastric cancer patients,and prevent serious complications.METHODS In total,998 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 16 Chinese medical centers were included in the training group for the complication model,and 398 patients were included in the validation group.The clinicopathological data and 30-d postoperative complications of gastric cancer patients were collected.Three machine learning methods,lasso regression,random forest,and artificial neural networks,were used to construct postoperative complication prediction models for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and laparoscopic total gastrectomy,and their prediction efficacy and accuracy were evaluated.RESULTS The constructed complication model,particularly the random forest model,could better predict serious complications in gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.It exhibited stable performance in external validation and is worthy of further promotion in more centers.CONCLUSION Using the risk factors identified in multicenter datasets,highly sensitive risk prediction models for complications following laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were established.We hope to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of preoperative and postoperative decision-making by using these models.

Comparison efficacy and safety of total laparoscopic gastrectomy and laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy in treatment of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND The development of laparoscopic technology has provided a new choice for surgery of gastric cancer(GC),but the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic total gastrectomy(LTG)and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy(LATG)in treatment effect and safety are still controversial.The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the two methods in the treatment of GC,and to provide a basis for clinical decision-making.AIM To compare the efficacy of totally LTG(TLTG)and LATG in the context of radical gastrectomy for GC.Additionally,we investigated the safety and feasibility of the total laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy technique.METHODS Literature on comparative studies of the above two surgical methods for GC(TLTG group and LATG group)published before September 2022 were searched in the PubMed,Web of Science,Wanfang Database,CNKI,and other Chinese and English databases.In addition,the following search keywords were used:Gastric cancer,total gastrectomy,total laparoscopy,laparoscopy-assisted,esophagojejunal anastomosis,gastric/stomach cancer,total gastrectomy,totally/completely laparoscopic,laparoscopic assisted/laparoscopy assisted/laparoscopically assisted,and esophagojejunostomy/esophagojejunal anastomosis.Review Manager 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis after two researchers independently screened the literature,extracted the data,and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies.RESULTS After layer-by-layer screening,258 pieces of literature were recovered,and 11 of those pieces were eventually included.This resulted in a sample size of 2421 instances,with 1115 cases falling into the TLTG group and 1306 cases into the LATG group.Age or sex differences between the two groups were not statistically significant,according to the meta-analysis,however the average body mass index of the TLTG group was considerably higher than that of the LATG group(P=0.01).Compared with those in the LATG group,the incision length in the TLTG group was significantly shorter(P<0.001),the amount of intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower(P=0.003),the number of lymph nodes removed was significantly greater(P=0.04),and the time of first postoperative feeding and postoperative hospitalization were also significantly shorter(P=0.03 and 0.02,respectively).There were no significant differences in tumor size,length of proximal incisal margin,total operation time,anastomotic time,postoperative pain score,postoperative anal exhaust time,postoperative anastomosis-related complications(including anastomotic fistula,anastomotic stenosis,and anastomotic hemorrhage),or overall postoperative complication rate(P>0.05).CONCLUSION TLTG and esophagojejunostomy are safe and feasible.Compared with LATG,TLTG has the advantages of less trauma,less bleeding,easier access to lymph nodes,and faster postoperative recovery,and TLTG is also suitable for obese patients.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux

Bariatric surgery is the only effective procedure that provides long-term sustained weight loss. Sleeve gastrectomy(SG) has emerged over the last few years to be an ideal bariatric procedure because it has several advantages compared to more complex bariatric procedures,including avoiding an intestinal bypass. However,several published follow-up studies report an increased rate of gastroesophageal reflux(GERD) after a SG. GERD is described as either de novo or as being caused by aggravation of preexisting symptoms. However,the literature on this topic is ambivalent despite the potentially increased rate of GERDs that may occur after this common bariatric procedure. This article reviews the mechanisms responsible for GERD in obese subjects as well as the results after a SG with respect to GERD. Future directions for clinical research are discussed along with the current surgical options for morbidly obese patients with GERD and undergoing bariatric surgery.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy:More than a restrictive bariatric surgery procedure?

Sleeve gastrectomy(SG) is a restrictive bariatric surgery technique that was first used as part of restrictive horizontal gastrectomy in the original Scopinaro type biliopancreatic diversion. Its good results as a single technique have led to a rise in its use, and it is currently the second most performed technique worldwide. SG achieves clearly better results than other restrictive techniques and is comparable in some aspects to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the current gold standard in bariatric surgery. These benefits have been associated with different pathophysiologic mechanisms unrelated to weight loss such as increased gastric emptying and intestinal transit, and activation of hormonal mechanisms such as increased GLP-1 hormone and decreased ghrelin. The aim of this review was to highlight the salient aspects of SG regarding its historical evolution, pathophysiologic mechanisms, main results, clinical applications and perioperative complications.

Gastric remnant twist in the immediate post-operative period following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Twist of stomach remnant post sleeve gastrectomy is a rare entity and difficult to diagnose pre-operatively. We are reporting a case of gastric volvulus post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, which was managed conservatively. A 38-year-old lady with a body mass index of 54 underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Sleeve gastrectomy was performed over a 32 French bougie using Endo-GIA tri-stapler. On post-operative day 1, patient had nausea and non-bilious vomiting. An upper gastrointestinal gastrografin study on postoperative days 1 and 2 revealed collection of contrast in the fundic area of stomach with poor flow distally, and she vomited gastrograffin immediately post procedure. With the suspicion of a stricture in the mid stomach as the cause, the patient was taken back for a exploratory laparoscopy and intra-operative endoscopy. We found a twist in the gastric tube which was too tight for the endoscope to pass through. This was managed conservatively with a long stent to keep the gastric tube straight and patent. The stent was discontinued in 7 d and the patient did well. In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy the stomach is converted into a tube and is devoid of its supports. If the staples fired are not aligned appropriately, it can predispose this stomach tube to undergo torsion along its long axis. Such a twist can be avoided by properly aligning the staples and by placing tacking sutures to the omentum and new stomach tube. This twist is a functional obstruction rather than a stricture; thus, it can be managed by endoscopy and stent placement.

Early Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Bariatric Surgery for Obese Patients: A Uni-center Report in China

Objective To report the experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric surgery in our center. Methods Twenty obese patients were followed up for i year after receiving laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric surgery in our center from January 2009 to October 2010, during which their general conditions, complications, and improvement of obesity-related diseases were assessed. Results Of the 20 patients, 19 underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and 1 underwent open sleeve gastrectomy with no death occurred. The average weight loss was 36.4＋10.0 kg, the average BMI decreased from 46.1＋11.5 to 33.6＋5.6 kg/m2, and the excess weight loss was 55.9%＋14.2% one year after the operation. The majority of obesity-related diseases were improved. In one year after the operation, excellent, good, fairly good and poor scores were achieved in 2 （10.0%）, 8 （40.0%）, 7 （35.0%）, and 3 patients （15.0%）, respectively. Conclusion Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric surgery is a safe and feasible procedure for obesity with excellent short-term effects. More studies with a long-term follow-up are needed to validate its benefits.