Hemodynamic analysis for endovascular treatment in small unruptured intracranial aneurysms:a matched comparison study of flow diverter versus LVIS

Background:We compared the treatment of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms(UIAs)with flow diverter and LVIS-assisted coiling to determine the effects of hemodynamic changes caused by different stent and coil packing in endovascular treatment.Methods:Fifty-one UIAs in 51 patients treated with pipeline embolization device(PED)were included in this study and defined as the PED group.We matched controls 1:1 and enrolled 51 UIAs who were treated with LVIS stent,which were defined as the LVIS group.Computational fluid dynamics were performed to assess hemodynamic alterations between PED and LVIS.Clinical analysis was also performed between these two groups after the match.Results:There was no difference in procedural complications between the two groups(P=0.558).At the first angiographic follow-up,the complete occlusion rate was significantly higher in the LVIS group compared with that in the PED group(98.0%vs.82.4%,P=0.027).However,during the further angiographic follow-up,the complete occlusion rate in the PED group achieved 100%,which was higher than that in the LVIS group(98.0%).Compared with the LVIS group after treatment,cases in the PED group showed a higher value of velocity in the aneurysm(0.03±0.09 vs.0.01±0.01,P=0.037)and WSS on the aneurysm(2.32±5.40 vs.0.33±0.47,P=0.011).Consequently,the reduction ratios of these two parameters also showed statistical differences.These parameters in the LVIS group showed much higher reduction ratios.However,the reduction ratio of the velocity on the neck plane was comparable between two groups.Conclusions:Both LVIS and PED were safe and effective for the treatment of small UIAs.However,LVIS-assisted coiling produced greater hemodynamic alterations in the aneurysm sac compared with PED.The hemodynamics in the aneurysm neck may be a key factor for aneurysm outcome.