Objective: Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and leukopenia is a common side effect. This study assesses whether chemotherapy-induced leukopenia is a predictor of efficacy and w...Objective: Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and leukopenia is a common side effect. This study assesses whether chemotherapy-induced leukopenia is a predictor of efficacy and whether it is associated with the survival of SCLC patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 445 patients with SCLC who received standard chemotherapy for 4 to 10 cycles. The World Health Organization grading system classifies leukopenia during chemotherapy as follows: absent (grade 0), mild (grades 1 and 2), or severe (grades 3 and 4). The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Results: The association between chemotherapy-induced leukopenia and OS was assessed. According to a multivariate Cox model with time-varying covariates, the hazard ratio of death was significantly lower among patients with mild leukopenia than among patients with severe leukopenia at 0.687 (0.506 to 0.943) and 1.414 (1.147 to 1.744), respectively. The median survival was 13 months (95% CI: 11 to 15 months) for patients who did not experience leukopenia, 17 months (95% CI: 14 to 18 months) for those with mild leukopenia, and 14 months (95% CI: 13 to 16 months) for those with severe leukopenia (absent vs. mild vs. severe leukopenia, P=0.047). Conclusion: Leukopenia during chemotherapy is associated with the survival of SCLC patients. Mild leukopenia is strongly associated with longer survival time.展开更多
Objective： Our group has previously observed that in patients with small-cell lung cancers （SCLCs）, the expression of a tumor antigen, glioma big potassium （gBK） ion channel, is higher at the time of death than w...Objective： Our group has previously observed that in patients with small-cell lung cancers （SCLCs）, the expression of a tumor antigen, glioma big potassium （gBK） ion channel, is higher at the time of death than when the cancer is first treated by surgical resection. This study aimed to determine whether this dichotomy was common in other potential lung tumor antigens by examining the same patient samples using our more extensive profile analysis of tumor-antigen precursor protein （TAPP）. We then tested the hypothesis that therapeutic intervention may inadvertently cause this increased gBK production. Methods： SCLC samples （eight surgical resections and three autopsy samples） and three control lungs were examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for 42 potential TAPPs that represent potential T-cell-mediated immunological targets. Results： Twenty-two TAPP mRNAs displayed the same profile as gBK, i.e., more mRNAs were expressed at autopsy than in their surgical counterparts. B-cyclin and mouse double minute 2, human homolog of PS3-binding protein were elevated in both autopsy and surgical specimens above the normal-lung controls. When HTB119 cells were incubated with doxorubicin, gBK was strongly induced, as confirmed by intracellular flow cytometry with a gBK-specific antibody. Conclusion： Our findings suggested that more immunological targets became available as the tumor responded to chemotherapy and proceeded toward its terminal stages.展开更多
Objective： To compare the efficacy and safety of Lobaplatin plus Etoposide （EL） and Cisplatin plus Etoposide （EP） regimens in chemonaive with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer （SCLC）. Methods： Between Jul...Objective： To compare the efficacy and safety of Lobaplatin plus Etoposide （EL） and Cisplatin plus Etoposide （EP） regimens in chemonaive with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer （SCLC）. Methods： Between July 2010 and July 2011, a total of 62 patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer who received initial treatment in our hospital and 309 hospital of PLA. 31 patients were randomly assigned to the EL Group： Lobaplatin was given intravenously at a dose of 30 mg/m2 on day 1 and Etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 of 21-day cycles for a maximum of six cycles. Another 31 patients were assigned to the EP Group： Cisplatin was given intravenously at a dose of 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and Etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 of 21-day cycles for a maximum of six cycles. We evaluated the efficacy, overall response rate （ORR）, disease control rate （DCR）, the progression-free survival （PFS） and toxicity between the patients of the two groups. Results： All 62 patients were eligible. In the EL group, 2 （6.5%） patients had complete response, 20 （64.5%） patients had partial response, 5 （16.1%） patients had stable disease and 4 （12.9%） patients had progress disease. In the EP group, 2 （6.5%） patients had complete response, 22 （70.9%） patients had partial response, 4 （12.9%） patients had stable disease and 3 （9.7%） patients had progress disease. The ORR of EL and EP group were 70.9% and 77.4%, respectively, showing no significant difference （P = 0.562）. The DCR of both groups were 87% and 90%, respectively, showing no significant difference （P = 0.688）. Median PFS of patients with EL and EP regimens were 5.5 months and 5 months, respectively, showing no significant difference （P = 0.637）. Adverse events were observed in all 62 patients. Grade 1 to 4 anemia was higher in the EP group than in EL group, showing significant difference （P = 0.02）. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 4 patients （12.9%） in EL group and 1 patient （3.2%） in EP group. Although one patient had platelet transfusion owing to Grade 4 thrombocytopenia in EL group, no significant difference （P = 0.637） were shown. The incidence of nausea/vomiting was higher in the EP group than in the EL group （96.7% vs 51.6%, P = 0.00）. Conclusien： The EL regimen is an effective and low-toxicity chemotherapy and no inferior to EP regimen in treatment response, therefore, EL regimen maybe is a good choice for patients with extensive-stage SCLC.展开更多
基金supported by the Key Problem Tackling Project for Cancer Therapy, China (Grant No. 12ZCDZSY15600)
文摘Objective: Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and leukopenia is a common side effect. This study assesses whether chemotherapy-induced leukopenia is a predictor of efficacy and whether it is associated with the survival of SCLC patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 445 patients with SCLC who received standard chemotherapy for 4 to 10 cycles. The World Health Organization grading system classifies leukopenia during chemotherapy as follows: absent (grade 0), mild (grades 1 and 2), or severe (grades 3 and 4). The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Results: The association between chemotherapy-induced leukopenia and OS was assessed. According to a multivariate Cox model with time-varying covariates, the hazard ratio of death was significantly lower among patients with mild leukopenia than among patients with severe leukopenia at 0.687 (0.506 to 0.943) and 1.414 (1.147 to 1.744), respectively. The median survival was 13 months (95% CI: 11 to 15 months) for patients who did not experience leukopenia, 17 months (95% CI: 14 to 18 months) for those with mild leukopenia, and 14 months (95% CI: 13 to 16 months) for those with severe leukopenia (absent vs. mild vs. severe leukopenia, P=0.047). Conclusion: Leukopenia during chemotherapy is associated with the survival of SCLC patients. Mild leukopenia is strongly associated with longer survival time.
文摘Objective： Our group has previously observed that in patients with small-cell lung cancers （SCLCs）, the expression of a tumor antigen, glioma big potassium （gBK） ion channel, is higher at the time of death than when the cancer is first treated by surgical resection. This study aimed to determine whether this dichotomy was common in other potential lung tumor antigens by examining the same patient samples using our more extensive profile analysis of tumor-antigen precursor protein （TAPP）. We then tested the hypothesis that therapeutic intervention may inadvertently cause this increased gBK production. Methods： SCLC samples （eight surgical resections and three autopsy samples） and three control lungs were examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for 42 potential TAPPs that represent potential T-cell-mediated immunological targets. Results： Twenty-two TAPP mRNAs displayed the same profile as gBK, i.e., more mRNAs were expressed at autopsy than in their surgical counterparts. B-cyclin and mouse double minute 2, human homolog of PS3-binding protein were elevated in both autopsy and surgical specimens above the normal-lung controls. When HTB119 cells were incubated with doxorubicin, gBK was strongly induced, as confirmed by intracellular flow cytometry with a gBK-specific antibody. Conclusion： Our findings suggested that more immunological targets became available as the tumor responded to chemotherapy and proceeded toward its terminal stages.
基金a grant of the Hainan Chang'an International Pharmaceutical Company Limited
文摘Objective： To compare the efficacy and safety of Lobaplatin plus Etoposide （EL） and Cisplatin plus Etoposide （EP） regimens in chemonaive with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer （SCLC）. Methods： Between July 2010 and July 2011, a total of 62 patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer who received initial treatment in our hospital and 309 hospital of PLA. 31 patients were randomly assigned to the EL Group： Lobaplatin was given intravenously at a dose of 30 mg/m2 on day 1 and Etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 of 21-day cycles for a maximum of six cycles. Another 31 patients were assigned to the EP Group： Cisplatin was given intravenously at a dose of 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and Etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 of 21-day cycles for a maximum of six cycles. We evaluated the efficacy, overall response rate （ORR）, disease control rate （DCR）, the progression-free survival （PFS） and toxicity between the patients of the two groups. Results： All 62 patients were eligible. In the EL group, 2 （6.5%） patients had complete response, 20 （64.5%） patients had partial response, 5 （16.1%） patients had stable disease and 4 （12.9%） patients had progress disease. In the EP group, 2 （6.5%） patients had complete response, 22 （70.9%） patients had partial response, 4 （12.9%） patients had stable disease and 3 （9.7%） patients had progress disease. The ORR of EL and EP group were 70.9% and 77.4%, respectively, showing no significant difference （P = 0.562）. The DCR of both groups were 87% and 90%, respectively, showing no significant difference （P = 0.688）. Median PFS of patients with EL and EP regimens were 5.5 months and 5 months, respectively, showing no significant difference （P = 0.637）. Adverse events were observed in all 62 patients. Grade 1 to 4 anemia was higher in the EP group than in EL group, showing significant difference （P = 0.02）. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 4 patients （12.9%） in EL group and 1 patient （3.2%） in EP group. Although one patient had platelet transfusion owing to Grade 4 thrombocytopenia in EL group, no significant difference （P = 0.637） were shown. The incidence of nausea/vomiting was higher in the EP group than in the EL group （96.7% vs 51.6%, P = 0.00）. Conclusien： The EL regimen is an effective and low-toxicity chemotherapy and no inferior to EP regimen in treatment response, therefore, EL regimen maybe is a good choice for patients with extensive-stage SCLC.
