Objectives To investi gate the association of soluble Fas ligand( sFasL) and soluble Fas receptor( sFas) with human chronic con gestive heart failure( CHF) . Methods The serum level of sFasL and sFas in 33 patients wi...Objectives To investi gate the association of soluble Fas ligand( sFasL) and soluble Fas receptor( sFas) with human chronic con gestive heart failure( CHF) . Methods The serum level of sFasL and sFas in 33 patients with CHF (13 in cardiac function class Ⅱ, 17 in class Ⅲ, 3 in class Ⅳ, NYHA) was assessed with enzyme - linked immunosorbent assay, and was compared with that of 18 age - , blood pressure - matched patients with car diac function class Ⅰ (NYHA). Results There was no difference in the level of sFasL between the two groups [CHF group: 231. 50 + / - 84. 50 (cardiac function class Ⅱ216. 50 + / - 96. 00 , class Ⅲ 226. 80 + / - 85. 70, class Ⅳ 244. 00 + / - 73. 00) vs. cardiac function class I group: 217. 50 + /-89. 00 pg/mL, P>0. 05]. However, the level of sFas was significantly higher in the patients with CHF than those of cardiac function class I group [CHF group: 1353. 30 +/-507. 71 (cardiac function class Ⅱ 1154. 85 + /-371. 20 , class Ⅲ1412.88 + /-493. 62, classⅣ1875. 67 + / - 806. 10) vs. cardiac function class I group: 983. 11+/ -461. 26 pg/mL, P<0. 05 ] . Conclusions sFasL was not associated with human CHF. However, the elevation of serum level of sFas was proportion to the severity of human CHF. sFas may play an important role in the patho- genesis of human CHF.展开更多
文摘Objectives To investi gate the association of soluble Fas ligand( sFasL) and soluble Fas receptor( sFas) with human chronic con gestive heart failure( CHF) . Methods The serum level of sFasL and sFas in 33 patients with CHF (13 in cardiac function class Ⅱ, 17 in class Ⅲ, 3 in class Ⅳ, NYHA) was assessed with enzyme - linked immunosorbent assay, and was compared with that of 18 age - , blood pressure - matched patients with car diac function class Ⅰ (NYHA). Results There was no difference in the level of sFasL between the two groups [CHF group: 231. 50 + / - 84. 50 (cardiac function class Ⅱ216. 50 + / - 96. 00 , class Ⅲ 226. 80 + / - 85. 70, class Ⅳ 244. 00 + / - 73. 00) vs. cardiac function class I group: 217. 50 + /-89. 00 pg/mL, P>0. 05]. However, the level of sFas was significantly higher in the patients with CHF than those of cardiac function class I group [CHF group: 1353. 30 +/-507. 71 (cardiac function class Ⅱ 1154. 85 + /-371. 20 , class Ⅲ1412.88 + /-493. 62, classⅣ1875. 67 + / - 806. 10) vs. cardiac function class I group: 983. 11+/ -461. 26 pg/mL, P<0. 05 ] . Conclusions sFasL was not associated with human CHF. However, the elevation of serum level of sFas was proportion to the severity of human CHF. sFas may play an important role in the patho- genesis of human CHF.
