A number of prominent solution-focused brief therapists have expressed the view that, to its detriment, this school of therapy tends to downplay emotion. Accordingly, we contend that, given that emotion is a primal bi...A number of prominent solution-focused brief therapists have expressed the view that, to its detriment, this school of therapy tends to downplay emotion. Accordingly, we contend that, given that emotion is a primal binding force, the bonding component of the crucially important therapeutic alliance risks being compromised in the current practice of this approach. We further argue that the prioritization of the depiction of actions that accompany the emotion expressed by the client over the actual participation in this emotion by the therapist tends to superficialize therapeutic communication. This is especially likely to happen when the therapist lapses into a formulaic, action-soliciting interrogatory mode in response to the emotion expressed by the client. In addition, we claim that the incorporation of emotion- and body-based approaches into the solution-focused canon could remedy the affective lacuna referred to above. We note, however, that such a modification would most likely face stiff resistance from some of the gatekeepers of solution-faced therapy, in particular those who subscribe to the “surface-only” descriptive approach advocated by the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. And yet, the effectiveness of depth-oriented therapies, such as sensorimotor psychotherapy and somatic experiencing, is supported by neurophysiological considerations. Finally, we suggest that these therapies, and even creativogenic elements of psychoanalysis, can actually synergize solution-focused brief therapy through the generation of affect-laden images, sensations and thoughts that lend themselves to the realization of outcomes desired by the client, which is the raison d’etre of solution-focused brief therapy. This paper pleads for the incorporation of the above-noted depth approaches into solution-focused brief therapy with a view to augmenting its effectiveness through a stronger therapeutic bond owing to an increased emotional engagement on the part of the therapist.展开更多
The present study aims to examine the effectiveness of the combination of solution-focused therapy and narrative therapy in marital adjustment of incompatible women. This research is a pretest-posttest quasi-experimen...The present study aims to examine the effectiveness of the combination of solution-focused therapy and narrative therapy in marital adjustment of incompatible women. This research is a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study design with a nonequivalent control group. The statistical population comprises all the incompatible women who referred to the counseling clinics of Neyshabour in May 2016 (1500 admission per month). The research sample consists of 24 incompatible women who were selected through Randomand available sampling method. For data collection, Marital Adjustment Scale by Spinner was applied. The data were analyzed using the analysis of covariance test and with the aid of SPSS-22 software. The findings demonstrated that the combination of solution-focused therapy and narrative therapy is significantly effective in marital adjustment of incompatible women (P < 0.05). Thus, it can be stated that the combination of solution-focused therapy and narrative therapy can help to promote adjustment among incompatible women.展开更多
目的探讨基于微信平台的焦点解决短期干预联合社会技能训练对出院精神分裂症患者康复的影响。方法选取2022年1月至2023年12月绍兴市第七人民医院出院的精神分裂症患者200例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组100例。...目的探讨基于微信平台的焦点解决短期干预联合社会技能训练对出院精神分裂症患者康复的影响。方法选取2022年1月至2023年12月绍兴市第七人民医院出院的精神分裂症患者200例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组100例。在研究过程中,研究组和对照组分别脱落11例和29例,最终研究组89例,对照组71例。对照组患者予以常规的出院随访,研究组患者实施为期6个月的基于微信平台的焦点解决短期干预联合社会技能训练。干预前后采用阳性和阴性症状量表(positive and negative syndrome scale,PANSS)、精神疾病患者病耻感量表中文版(stigma scale for mental illness-Chinese,SSMI-C)、康复状态量表(morning side rehabilitation stats scale,MRSS)和服药依从性进行效果评估。结果干预后,研究组患者的PANSS、SSMI-C、MRSS总分明显低于对照组,服药依从性高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论实施基于微信平台的焦点解决短期干预联合社会技可训练能降低出院精神分裂症患者的病耻感,提高其服药依从性,稳定其病情,对促进患者康复有积极作用。展开更多
文摘A number of prominent solution-focused brief therapists have expressed the view that, to its detriment, this school of therapy tends to downplay emotion. Accordingly, we contend that, given that emotion is a primal binding force, the bonding component of the crucially important therapeutic alliance risks being compromised in the current practice of this approach. We further argue that the prioritization of the depiction of actions that accompany the emotion expressed by the client over the actual participation in this emotion by the therapist tends to superficialize therapeutic communication. This is especially likely to happen when the therapist lapses into a formulaic, action-soliciting interrogatory mode in response to the emotion expressed by the client. In addition, we claim that the incorporation of emotion- and body-based approaches into the solution-focused canon could remedy the affective lacuna referred to above. We note, however, that such a modification would most likely face stiff resistance from some of the gatekeepers of solution-faced therapy, in particular those who subscribe to the “surface-only” descriptive approach advocated by the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. And yet, the effectiveness of depth-oriented therapies, such as sensorimotor psychotherapy and somatic experiencing, is supported by neurophysiological considerations. Finally, we suggest that these therapies, and even creativogenic elements of psychoanalysis, can actually synergize solution-focused brief therapy through the generation of affect-laden images, sensations and thoughts that lend themselves to the realization of outcomes desired by the client, which is the raison d’etre of solution-focused brief therapy. This paper pleads for the incorporation of the above-noted depth approaches into solution-focused brief therapy with a view to augmenting its effectiveness through a stronger therapeutic bond owing to an increased emotional engagement on the part of the therapist.
文摘The present study aims to examine the effectiveness of the combination of solution-focused therapy and narrative therapy in marital adjustment of incompatible women. This research is a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study design with a nonequivalent control group. The statistical population comprises all the incompatible women who referred to the counseling clinics of Neyshabour in May 2016 (1500 admission per month). The research sample consists of 24 incompatible women who were selected through Randomand available sampling method. For data collection, Marital Adjustment Scale by Spinner was applied. The data were analyzed using the analysis of covariance test and with the aid of SPSS-22 software. The findings demonstrated that the combination of solution-focused therapy and narrative therapy is significantly effective in marital adjustment of incompatible women (P < 0.05). Thus, it can be stated that the combination of solution-focused therapy and narrative therapy can help to promote adjustment among incompatible women.
文摘目的探讨焦点解决短期治疗(Solution-focused brief therapy,SFBT)联合叙事护理对实施安宁疗护晚期癌症患者焦虑抑郁及生活质量的影响。方法选取2022年8月至2023年5月晚期癌症安宁疗护患者作为研究对象,入院时采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(Hospital anxiety and de-pression scale,HADS)进行调查,筛选评分≥8分的患者纳入本研究(n=110),按照随机数字表法分为对照组(n=55)和试验组(n=55)。对照组采用安宁疗护常规护理,试验组在对照组的基础上采用焦点解决短期治疗联合叙事护理进行干预。比较两组干预前后焦虑自评量表(Self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)、抑郁自评量表(Self-rating depression scale,SDS)和癌症治疗功能评价量表(Functional assessment of cancer therapy,FACT-G)评分的差异,评价干预效果。结果因病情变化或死亡,试验组完成52例,对照组完成53例。干预前,试验组和对照组SAS、SDS、FACT-G评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,试验组SAS、SDS、FACT-G评分分别为(42.52±2.30)分、(57.63±3.80)分、(67.54±2.52)分,对照组SAS、SDS、FACT-G评分分别为(47.29±2.73)分、(62.25±2.87)分、(64.39±3.08)分,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论SFBT联合叙事护理干预,可降低晚期癌症患者的负面情绪,缓解抑郁焦虑,提高其生活质量。
文摘目的探讨基于微信平台的焦点解决短期干预联合社会技能训练对出院精神分裂症患者康复的影响。方法选取2022年1月至2023年12月绍兴市第七人民医院出院的精神分裂症患者200例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组100例。在研究过程中,研究组和对照组分别脱落11例和29例,最终研究组89例,对照组71例。对照组患者予以常规的出院随访,研究组患者实施为期6个月的基于微信平台的焦点解决短期干预联合社会技能训练。干预前后采用阳性和阴性症状量表(positive and negative syndrome scale,PANSS)、精神疾病患者病耻感量表中文版(stigma scale for mental illness-Chinese,SSMI-C)、康复状态量表(morning side rehabilitation stats scale,MRSS)和服药依从性进行效果评估。结果干预后,研究组患者的PANSS、SSMI-C、MRSS总分明显低于对照组,服药依从性高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论实施基于微信平台的焦点解决短期干预联合社会技可训练能降低出院精神分裂症患者的病耻感,提高其服药依从性,稳定其病情,对促进患者康复有积极作用。
