Building State-owned Assets Supervision System and Conducting Mixed Ownership Reforms to Reinforce Each Other’s Collaboration

Improving the state-owned assets supervision system(SOASS)can effectively get over the defects of systems and mechanisms and further promote the reform of mixed ownership of state-owned enterprises(SOEs);and the deepening of the reform can advance the change of the SOASS to the supervision on capital.By analyzing the relationship between the SOASS and the reform of mixed ownership of state-owned enterprises,we have found that collaborative promotion of the change of the SOASS to the supervision on capital and promotion of the reform of mixed ownership can do good to ameliorating the corporate management mechanism,improving the market-oriented management mechanism of enterprises and completing the medium-and long-term incentive mechanisms,etc.to enhance business operation efficiency.Due to such prevailing problems as relative dispersion and vagueness of the policies relating to deepening the reform of SOEs,inconsistent progress of the reform of state-owned assets(SOAs)and SOEs,and corporate reform focusing on apprence,improving the SOASS and deepening collaborative development of the reform of mixed ownership of SOEs are hindered by some constraints.To construct and improve the SOASS and the reform of mixed ownership collaboratively,we should make efforts to promote the reform in the following five aspects,namely,placing importance to policy coordination,boosting synchronism of the reform of SOAs and SOEs at different levels and in different areas to coordinate the nationwide reform of SOAs and SOEs,facilitating reform of the mechanism of enterprises of mixed ownership through mixed capital,and promoting the SOASS and stimulating classified monitoring and reform of mixed ownership based on classified reform of SOEs.

国资民资布局结构对制造业绩效的影响机理——基于制造业微观数据的面板门限分析

在Solow-Barro模型扩展的基础上,构建了国资民资比例的增长模型,揭示了稳态增长路径下国资民资的比例关系。用面板门限回归模型,基于中国工业企业数据库构建出1998-2014年7308家企业的平衡面板数据进行实证分析,考察了不同国资民资比例在门限值前后对于经济(企业)产出总体指标的影响系数的大小,详细分析了影响系数差异的可能原因。实证表明:在经济后发地区,国有经济成分具有引领发展的功能,持续加强后发地区的国资引领和示范作用,就会产生累积效应。我国西部地区可以更加努力吸引东部地区优势不足的国有资本余量,以促进当地经济发展。