Hepatocellular carcinoma effective stereotactic body radiotherapy using Gold Anchor and the Synchrony system:Two case reports and review of literature

BACKGROUND Radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is considered to have limited efficacy because of treatment intensity considering that the irradiated area includes the liver,which is highly radiosensitive.In this report,we present two cases in which tumor control by surgical resection,radiofrequency ablation,transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE),and lenvatinib administration was difficult,but stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)using the Synchrony system by Radixact?and Gold Anchor?(GA)was effective.CASE SUMMARY A 60-year-old man had a single 10-cm HCC in the right lobe.Viable lesions remained after TACE,and levels of alpha-fetoprotein and protein induced by vitamin K antagonists II(PIVKA-II)decreased and quickly re-elevated.We performed SBRT with GA.Three weeks after implantation,localized radiotherapy(SBRT;40 Gy/5 fractions)was performed using the Synchrony system by Radixact?.Four weeks later,the viable lesion had disappeared,and the PIVKA-II levels decreased.A 77-year-old man had a single 12-cm HCC in the right lobe.The patient experienced recurrence after hepatectomy.Further recurrence occurred after TACE,and we performed SBRT with GA.Because of the proximity of the HCC to the gastrointestinal tract,localized radiotherapy(SBRT;39 Gy/13 fractions)to the HCC was performed 3 wk after implantation using the Synchrony system by Radixact?.Four weeks later,the viable lesion had disappeared on computed tomography,and the PIVKA-Ⅱlevels decreased.CONCLUSION SBRT using the Synchrony system and GA can deliver a large dose accurately and safely,and could have a high therapeutic effect.

Whole-brain radiation therapy alone vs. combined therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of limited brain metastases: A systematic review

Objective The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of whole brain radiotherapy(WBRT) used alone and combined with stereotactic radiosurgery(SRS) in the treatment of limited(1–4)brain metastases. Methods We searched for randomized controlled and matched-pair analysis trials comparing WBRT plus SRS versus WBRT alone for brain metastases. The primary outcomes were the overall survival(OS), intracranial control(IC), and localcontrol(LC). The secondary outcome was radiation toxicity. The log hazard ratios(lnHRs) and their variances were extracted from published Kaplan-Meier curves and pooled using the generic inverse variance method in the RevMan 5.3 software. The non-pooled outcome measures were evaluated using descriptive analysis. Results Three randomized controlled trials and two matched-pair analysis studies were included. There was no difference in the OS for limited brain metastases between the two groups [lnHR 0.91(95% CI 0.76–1.09, P = 0.32) vs. 0.72(95% CI 0.44–1.19, P = 0.20)]. The LC and IC were significantly higher in the combined treatment group [lnHR 0.69(95% CI 0.55–0.86, P = 0.001) vs. 0.41(95% CI 0.29–0.58, P < 0.0001)]. For patients with a single lesion, one trial showed a higher survival in the combined treatment group(median OS: 6.5 months vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.04). The combined treatment was not associated with significantly higher incidence of radiation toxicity. Conclusion Combined treatment with WBRT plus SRS should be recommended for patients with limited brain metastases based on the better LC and IC without increased toxicity. It should also be considered a routine treatment option for patients with solitary brain metastases based on the prolonged OS.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background:Stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)in pancreatic cancer allows high delivery of radiation doses on tumors without affecting surrounding tissue.This review aimed at the SBRT application in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.Data sources:We retrieved articles published in MEDLINE/PubMed from January 2017 to December 2022.Keywords used in the search included:“pancreatic adenocarcinoma”OR“pancreatic cancer”AND“stereotactic ablative radiotherapy(SABR)”OR“stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)”OR“chemoradiotherapy(CRT)”.English language articles with information on technical characteristics,doses and fractionation,indications,recurrence patterns,local control and toxicities of SBRT in pancreatic tumors were included.All articles were assessed for validity and relevant content.Results:Optimal doses and fractionation have not yet been defined.However,SBRT could be the standard treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in addition to CRT.Furthermore,the combination of SBRT with chemotherapy may have additive or synergic effect on pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Conclusions:SBRT is an effective modality for patients with pancreatic cancer,supported by clinical practice guidelines as it has demonstrated good tolerance and good disease control.SBRT opens a possibility of improving outcomes for these patients,both in neoadjuvant treatment and with radical intent.

Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using an Abdominal Compression System, “Air-Bag System”

We investigated respiratory tumor motion in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with use of the “Air-Bag System”. 114 patients underwent four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) from October 2010 to April 2012. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was 8.1 ± 11.0 cc (range 0.3 - 77.5 cc). The tumor site was the upper and middle lobes in 62 cases, and lower lobe in 52 cases. The Air-Bag SystemTM consists of an inelastic air bag connected to a second smaller elastic air bag. The inelastic air bag is placed between the patient’s body surface and a HipFix and is secured by pressure adjustment via the elastic air bag. To assess respiratory tumor motion, the centroid of the tumor position is measured in the left-right, anterior-posterior, and caudal-cranial directions using the iPlan RT DoseTM treatment planning system. Respiratory tumor motion vector for patients with upper/middle and lower lobe tumors was 3.0 ± 2.2 mm (range, 0.4 - 11.7 mm) and 6.5 ± 4.6 mm (range, 0.4 - 22.0 mm) respectively, with this difference being significant (p < 0.05). Mean respiratory tumor motion for all patients was 0.9 ± 0.6 mm (range, 0.1 - 3.6 mm) in the left-right direction, 1.5 ± 1.1 mm (range, 0.1 - 5.7 mm) in the anterior-posterior direction, 4.1 ± 4.0 mm (range, 0.1 - 21.4 mm) in the caudal-cranial direction, and 4.7 ± 4.0 mm (range, 0.4 - 22.0 mm) overall. The Air-Bag System is expected to be provided an effective reduction in the motion of lung tumors.

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Residual Setup Errors and Intra-Fraction Motion Using the Stereotactic X-Ray Image Guidance Verification System

Purpose: To determine the precision of our institution’s current immobilization devices for spine SBRT, ultimately leading to recommendations for appropriate planning margins. Methods: We identified 12 patients (25 treatments) with spinal metastasis treated with spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). The Body-FIX system was used as immobilization device for thoracic (T) and lumbar (L) spine lesions. The head and shoulder mask system was used as immobilization device for cervical (C) spine lesions. Initial patient setup used the infrared positioning system with body markers. Stereotactic X-ray imaging was then performed and correction was made if the initial setup error exceeded predetermined institutional tolerances, 1.5 mm for translation and 2° for rotation. Three additional sets of verification X-rays were obtained pre-, mid-, and post-treatment for all treatments. Results: Intrafraction motion regardless of immobilization technique was found to be 1.28 ± 0.57 mm. The mean and standard deviation of the variances along each direction were as follows: Superior-inferior, 0.56 ± 0.39 mm and 0.77 ± 0.52 mm, (p = 0.25);Anterior-posterior, 0.57 ± 0.43 mm and 1.14 ± 0.61 mm, (p = 0.01);Left-right, 0.48 ± 0.34 mm and 0.74 ± 0.40 mm, (p = 0.09) respectively. There was a significantly greater difference in the average 3D variance of the BodyFIX as compared to the head and shoulder mask immobilization system, 1.04 ± 0.46 mm and 1.71 ± 0.52 mm;(p = 0.003) respectively. Conclusions: Overall, our institution’s image guidance system using stereotactic X-ray imaging verification provides acceptable localization accuracy as previously defined in the literature. We observed a greater intrafraction motion for the head and shoulder mask as compared with the BodyFIX immobilization system, which may be a result of greater C-spine mobility and/or the suboptimal mask immobilization. Thus, better immobilization techniques for C-spine SBRT are needed to reduce setup error and intrafraction motion. We are currently exploring alternative C-spine immobilization techniques to improve set up accuracy and decrease intrafraction motion during treatment.

Uninvolved liver dose prediction in stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver cancer based on the neural network method

BACKGROUND The quality of a radiotherapy plan often depends on the knowledge and expertise of the plan designers.AIM To predict the uninvolved liver dose in stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)for liver cancer using a neural network-based method.METHODS A total of 114 SBRT plans for liver cancer were used to test the neural network method.Sub-organs of the uninvolved liver were automatically generated.Correlations between the volume of each sub-organ,uninvolved liver dose,and neural network prediction model were established using MATLAB.Of the cases,70%were selected as the training set,15%as the validation set,and 15%as the test set.The regression R-value and mean square error(MSE)were used to evaluate the model.RESULTS The volume of the uninvolved liver was related to the volume of the corresponding sub-organs.For all sets of Rvalues of the prediction model,except for D_(n0)which was 0.7513,all R-values of D_(n10)-D_(n100)and D_(nmean)were>0.8.The MSE of the prediction model was also low.CONCLUSION We developed a neural network-based method to predict the uninvolved liver dose in SBRT for liver cancer.It is simple and easy to use and warrants further promotion and application.

Treatment for paraganglioma with stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND Paragangliomas(PG)are rare neoplasms of neuroendocrine origin that tend to be highly vascularized,slow-growing,and usually sporadic.To date,common treatment options are surgical resection(SR),with or without radiation therapy(RT),and a watch-and-wait approach.AIM To evaluate the local control and effectiveness of exclusive fractionated stereotactic RT(FSRT)treatment in unresectable PG(uPG).METHODS We retrospectively evaluated patients with uPG(medically inoperable or refused SR)treated with FSRT with a Cyberknife System(Accuray Incorporated,Sunnyvale,California).Toxicity and initial efficacy were evaluated.RESULTS From May 2009 to January 2023,6 patients with a median age of 68(range 20-84)were treated with FSRT.The median delivered dose was 21 Gy(range 20-30 Gy)at a median isodose line of 75.5%(range 70%-76%)in 4 fractions(range 3-5 fractions).The median volume was 13.6 mL(range 12.4-65.24 mL).The median cumulative biological effective dose and equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions were 70 Gy and 37.10 Gy respectively.Site of origin involved were the timpa-nojugular glomus(4/6),temporal bone,and cervical spine.In 1 of the 6 patients,the follow-up was insufficient;5 of 6 patients showed a 5-year overall survival and 5-year progression-free survival of 100%.We observed negligible toxicities during and after RT.The majority of patients showed stable symptoms during follow-up.Only 1 patient developed spine metastases.CONCLUSION Our preliminary results on this small cohort of patients suggest that FSRT could be an effective and safe alternative to SR.

Therapeutic Effects of Stereotactic Radiotherapy on 389 Cases of Brain Glioma

Objective： To investigate the treatment effectiveness and side effects of stereotactic radiotherapy for brain glioma. Methods： From Jun. 1995 to Dec. 1998, 389 cases of brain gliomas were treated by stereotactic radiotherapy, among which 151 cases were treated by stereotactic radiosurgery （SRS） and the other 238 cases, by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy （FSRT）. In the SRS group, the marginal tumor dose was 20 to 30 Gy （median, 2.6 Gy）. One to 6 isocenters （median, 2.48） and 5 to 21 irradiation arcs （median, 8.45） were applied. In the FSRT group, the per-fraction marginal tumor dose was 8 to 12 Gy with 1 to 6 isocenters （median, 2.53）, 6 to 20 irradiation arcs （median, 8.25） and 2-5 fractions delivered everyday or every other day. Results： Three months after treatment, the complete and partial response rates were 13.9% and 45.7% in SRS group respectively. The stable disease rate was 17.2%. The total effective rate was 76.8%. In FSRT group, the complete and partial remission rates were 19.7% and 47.9% respectively. The stable disease rate was 20.6%. The total effective rate was 88.2%. The total effective rate of FSRT group was higher than that in SRS group （X^2=9.874, P=0.020）. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate of all patients was 54.3%, 29.3%, 16.5% respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate in SRS group and FSRT group was 52.3% vs 26.5%, 11.9% vs 55.5%, and 31.1 vs 19.3% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups （X^2=2.16, P=0.1417）. The brain edema caused by the main radiation was more severe in the SRS group than in FSRT group （X^2=4.916, P=0.027）. Conclusion： It is effective for brain glioma to be treated by stereotactic radiotherapy. Compared with SRS, the FSRT has the advantage of good effect and less side response.

Radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic radiation therapy for lung cancer

Stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)has a locacontrol rate of 95%at 2 years for non-small cell lungcancer(NSCLC)and should improve the prognosis oinoperable patients,elderly patients,and patients withsignificant comorbidities who have early-stage NSCLCThe safety of SBRT is being confirmed in internationalmulti-institutional PhaseⅡtrials for peripheral lungcancer in both inoperable and operable patients,bureports so far have found that SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for early-stage NSCLC and early metastatic lung cancer.Radiation pneumonitis(RP)is oneof the most common toxicities of SBRT.Although mospost-treatment RP is Grade 1 or 2 and either asymptomatic or manageable,a few cases are severe,symptomatic,and there is a risk for mortality.The reportedrates of symptomatic RP after SBRT range from 9%to28%.Being able to predict the risk of RP after SBRT isextremely useful in treatment planning.A dose-effecrelationship has been demonstrated,but suggesteddose-volume factors like mean lung dose,lung V20and/or lung V2.5 differed among the reports.We foundthat patients who present with an interstitial pneumo-nitis shadow on computed tomography scan and high levels of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 and surfactant protein D have a high rate of severe radiation pneumo-nitis after SBRT.At our institution,lung cancer patients with these risk factors have not received SBRT since 2006,and our rate of severe RP after SBRT has de-creased significantly since then.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer:A review

Stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) is the treatment of choice for medically inoperable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). A literature search primarily based on PubMed electronic databases was completed in July 2018. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined prior to the search, and only prospective clinical trials were included. Nineteen trials from 2005 to 2018 met the inclusion criteria, reporting the outcomes of 1434 patients with central and peripheral early stage NSCLC. Patient eligibility,prescription dose and delivery, and follow up duration varied widely. Threeyears overall survival ranged from 43% to 95% with loco-regional control of up to 98% at 3 years. Up to 33% of patients failed distantly after SBRT at 3 years. SBRT was generally well tolerated with 10%-30% grade 3-4 toxicities and a few treatment-related deaths. No differences in outcomes were observed between conventionally fractionated radiation therapy and SBRT, central and peripheral lung tumors, or inoperable and operable patients. SBRT remains a reasonable treatment option for medically inoperable and select operable patients with early stage NSCLC. SBRT has shown excellent local and regional control with toxicity rates equivalent to surgery. Decreasing fractionation schedules have been consistently shown to be both safe and effective. Distant failure is common, and chemotherapy may be considered for select patients. However, the survival benefit of additional interventions, such as chemotherapy, for early stage NSCLC treated with SBRT remains unclear.

Role of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The integration of new technologies has raised an interest in liver tumor radiotherapy,with literature evolving to support its efficacy.These advances,particularly stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT),have been critical in improving local control or potential cure in liver lesions not amenable to first-line surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation.Active investigation of SBRT,particularly for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),has recently started,yielding promising local control rates.In addition,data suggest a possibility that SBRT can be an alternative option for HCC unfit for other local therapies.However,information on optimal treatment indications,doses,and methods remains limited.In HCC,significant differences in patient characteristics and treatment availability exist by country.In addition,the prognosis of HCC is greatly influenced by underlying liver dysfunction and treatment itself in addition to tumor stage.Since they are closely linked to treatment approach,it is important to understand these differences in interpreting outcomes from various reports.Further studies are required to validate and maximize the efficacy of SBRT by a large,multi-institutional setting.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with sintilimab in patients with recurrent or oligometastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase Ⅱ clinical trial

BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors have shown potential in treating hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)in retrospective studies.AIM To evaluate the efficacy of combining SBRT with sintilimab for patients with recurrent or oligometastatic HCC.METHODS This trial involved patients with recurrent or oligometastatic HCC intravenously treated with SBRT plus sintilimab every 3 wk for 12 mo or until disease progression.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS).RESULTS Twenty-five patients were enrolled from August 14,2019,to August 23,2021.The median treatment duration was 10.2(range,0.7-14.6)months.SBRT was delivered at a median dose of 54(range,48-60)Gy in 6(range,6-10)fractions.The median follow-up time was 21.9(range,10.3-39.7)mo,and 32 targeted lesions among 25 patients were evaluated for treatment response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.The median PFS was 19.7 mo[95%confidence interval(CI):16.9-NA],with PFS rates of 68%(95%CI:52-89)and 45.3%(95%CI:28-73.4)at 12 and 24 mo,respectively.The median overall survival(OS)was not reached,with OS rates of 91.5%(95%CI:80.8-100.0)and 83.2%(95%CI:66.5-100.0)at 12 and 24 mo,respectively.The 1-and 2-year local control rate were 100%and 90.9%(95%CI:75.4%-100.0%),respectively.The confirmed objective response rate and disease control rate was 96%,and 96%,respectively.Most adverse events were graded as 1 or 2,and grade 3 adverse events were observed in three patients.CONCLUSION SBRT plus sintilimab is an effective,well-tolerated treatment regimen for patients with recurrent or oligometastatic HCC.

Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis from colorectal cancer

Systemic chemotherapy has enabled prolongation of survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. This has subsequently increased the relative significance of local therapy for patients with oligometastases because they can be cured by removal of oligometastatic lesions. One of the most frequently reported tumor histologies for oligometastases is colorectal cancer. Resection is the standard therapy in most settings of oligometastases. Recently, studies have shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may become a treatment option that provides high local control with minimal morbidity. Two-year local control rates following SBRT for hepatic and pulmonary oligometastases are almost over 80% and are even higher for patients treated with high-dose regimens. The indications of SBRT for other metastatic sites or conditions include isolated lymph nodes, spinal and adrenal metastasis, and post-surgical pelvic recurrence. Many retrospective studies have indicated that SBRT for various lesions results in good outcomes with low morbidity, both in the curative and palliative setting. However, few reports with a high level of evidence have indicated the efficacy of SBRT compared to standard therapy. Hereafter, the optimal indication of SBRT needs to be prospectively investigated to obtain convincing evidence.

Initial experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy for intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND Graft hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)recurrence after liver transplant is more frequently encountered.Graft hepatectomy is technically challenging and is associated with high morbidity.Stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of primary HCC.However,its role in HCC recurrence in a liver graft remains unclear.AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT for the treatment of graft HCC recurrence after liver transplantation.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted.From 2012 to 2018,6 patients with intrahepatic HCC recurrence after liver transplant were treated with SBRT at Queen Mary Hospital,the University of Hong Kong.The primary outcome was time to overall disease progression and secondary outcomes were time to local progression and best local response,as assessed with the Modified response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours criteria.Patients were monitored for treatment related toxicities and graft dysfunction.RESULTS A total of 9 treatment courses were given for 13 tumours.The median tumour size was 2.3 cm(range 0.7-3.6 cm).Two(22%)patients had inferior vena cava tumour thrombus.The best local treatment response was:5(55%)complete response,1(11%)partial response and 3(33%)stable disease.After a median follow up duration of 15.5 mo,no local progression or mortality was yet observed.The median time to overall disease progression was 6.5 mo.There were 6 regional progression in the liver graft(67%)and 2 distant progression in the lung(22%).There was no grade 3 or above toxicity and there was no graft dysfunction after SBRT.CONCLUSION SBRT appears to be safe in this context.Regional progression is the mode of failure.

Stereotactic conformal radiotherapy of hepatic metastases:clinical analysis of 8 cases

ＩＮＴＲＯＤＵＣＴＩＯＮＩｔｉｓａｌｗａｙｓａｒｏｕｔｉｎｅｔｏｒｅｓｅｃｔｌｅｓｉｏｎｓｏｆｔｈｅｂｏｄｙｂｙｓｕｒｇｅｒｙ．Ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｓｔｓｈａｖｅｔｒｉｅｄｔｏｏｂｔａｉｎｔｈｅｓａｍｅｒｅｓｕｌｔｓｗｉｔｈｏｕｔｓｕｒｇｅｒｙ，ｂｕｔｆａ...

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for isolated paraaortic lymph node recurrence from colorectal cancer

AIM： To evaluate the efficacy and complications of stereotactic body radiotherapy in localized paraaortic lymph node recurrence from colorectal cancer. METHODS： From 2003 to 2009, 7 patients with paraaortic lymph node recurrence （1-3 lesions） from colorectal cancer were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Total gross tumor volumes ranged from 4 to 40 mL. The doses were escalated from 36 Gy/patient to 51 Gy/patient and were delivered in 3 fractions. RESULTS： One and 3 year overall survival rates were 100% and 71.4%, respectively, and median survival was 37 mo. Grade IV intestinal obstruction was reported in 1 of 7 patients. This patient received 48 Gy in 3 fractions with a maximum point dose to the intestine of 53 Gy and V45Gy = 3.6 mL. However, 6 patients received an intestinal maximum point dose of 〈 51 Gy and V45Gy of 〈 1 mL, and did not develop any severe complications. CONCLUSION： This pilot study suggests selected paraaortic lymph node recurrence （1-3 closed lesions） that failed to respond to chemotherapy can be potentially salvaged by stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Stereotactic radiotherapy and the potential role of magnetic resonance-guided adaptive techniques for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is a malignancy with one of the poorest prognoses amongst all cancers.Patients with unresectable tumours either receive palliative care or undergo various chemoradiotherapy regimens.Conventional techniques are often associated with acute gastrointestinal toxicities,as adjacent critical structures such as the duodenum ultimately limits delivered doses.Stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)is an advanced radiation technique that delivers highly ablative radiation split into several fractions,with a steep dose fall-off outside target volumes.AIM To discuss the latest data on SBRT and whether there is a role for magnetic resonance-guided techniques in multimodal management of locally advanced,unresectable pancreatic cancer.METHODS We conducted a search on multiple large databases to collate the latest records on radiotherapy techniques used to treat pancreatic cancer.Out of 1229 total records retrieved from our search,36 studies were included in this review.RESULTS Studies indicate that SBRT is associated with improved clinical efficacy and toxicity profiles compared to conventional radiotherapy techniques.Further dose escalation to the tumour with SBRT is limited by the poor soft-tissue visualisation of computed tomography imaging during radiation planning and treatment delivery.Magnetic resonance-guided techniques have been introduced to improve imaging quality,enabling treatment plan adaptation and re-optimisation before delivering each fraction.CONCLUSION Therefore,SBRT may lead to improved survival outcomes and safer toxicity profiles compared to conventional techniques,and the addition of magnetic resonance-guided techniques potentially allows dose escalation and conversion of unresectable tumours to operable cases.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A mini-review

Stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. This technique results in excellent local control rates with favorable toxicity profile despite being predominantly used in heavily pretreated patients or those unsuitable for other local therapies. SBRT may be used as a sole treatment or in combination with other local therapies as well as a bridging strategy for patient awaiting liver transplants. This brief review describes current practice of SBRT with respect to radiation technique, patient selection and treatment concepts. It summarizes available evidence from retroand prospective studies evaluating SBRT alone, SBRT in combination with other treatments and SBRT compared to other local treatment approaches.

Hepatocellular carcinoma with child Pugh-A Cirrhosis treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

AIM To evaluate the control, survival, and hepatic function for Child Pugh(CP)-A patients after Stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS From 2009 to 2016, 40 patients with Barcelona Liver Clinic(BCLC) stages 0-B HCC and CP-A cirrhosis completed liver SBRT. The mean prescription dose was 45 Gy(40 to 50 Gy in 4-5 fractions). Local relapse, defined as recurrence within the planning target volume was assessed with intravenous multiphase contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging every 4-6 mo after completion of SBRT. Progression of cirrhosis was evaluated by CP and Model for End Stage Liver Disease scores every 3-4 mo. Toxicities were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(v4.03). Median follow-up was 24 mo.RESULTS Forty-nine HCC lesions among 40 patients were analyzed in this IRB approved retrospective study. Median tumor diameter was 3.5 cm(1.5-8.9 cm). Six patients with tumors ≥ 5 cm completed planned selected transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) in combination with SBRT. Eight patients underwent orthotropic live transplant(OLT) with SBRT as a bridging treatment(median time to transplant was 12 mo, range 5 to 23 mo). The Pathologic complete response(PCR) rate in this group was 62.5%. The 2-year in-field local control was 98%(1 failure). Intrahepatic control was 82% and 62% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Overall survival(OS) was 92% and 60% at 1 and 2 years, with a median survival of 41 mo per Kaplan Meier analysis. At 1 and 2 years, 71% and 61% of patients retained CPA status. Of the patients with intrahepatic failures, 58% developed progressive cirrhosis, compared to 27% with controlled disease(P = 0.06). Survival specific to hepatic failure was 92%, 81%, and 69% at 12, 18, and 24 mo. There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity. On univariate analysis, gross tumor volume(GTV) < 23 cc was associated with freedom from CP progression(P = 0.05), hepatic failure-specific survival(P = 0.02), and trended with OS(P = 0.10).CONCLUSION SBRT is safe and effective in HCC with early cirrhosis and may extend waiting time for transplant in patients who may not otherwise be immediate candidates.

Treatment of metastatic liver tumors using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

The prognosis of patients with metastatic liver disease remains dismal with a median survival of only 6-12 mo. As 80%-90% of patients are not candidates for surgical therapy, there is a need for effective non-surgical therapies that would improve outcomes in these patients. The body of evidence related to the use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy(SABR) in metastatic liver disease has substantially grown and evolved over the past decade. This review summarizes the current evidence supporting liver SABR with particular attention given to patient selection, target delineation, organ at risk dose volume constraints, response evaluation imaging and the various SABR techniques for delivering ablative radiotherapy to the liver. Even though it is unclear what dose-fractionation scheme, delivery system, concomitant therapy or patient selection strategy yields the optimum liver SABR outcomes, clear and growing evidence is available that SABR is a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of oligometastatic liver disease.